ABSTRACT
ABSTRACT: Urachal adenocarcinoma is an unusual and aggressive form of bladder cancer that arises from urachus, a midline fibrous remnant of allantois. Experience with diagnosing them is limited and differentiating urachal adenocarcinoma from other urachal pathologies like infected urachal cysts may be difficult at times. Differentials of urachal anomalies can be narrowed down by proper assessment of patient demographics, clinical details, lesion morphology, and imaging findings. With this case series of five patients of urachal adenocarcinoma, we have tried describing their clinical manifestation and imaging appearances.
Subject(s)
Adenocarcinoma , Urinary Bladder Neoplasms , Humans , Urinary Bladder Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Urinary Bladder Neoplasms/pathology , Urinary Bladder Neoplasms/diagnosis , Adenocarcinoma/diagnostic imaging , Adenocarcinoma/pathology , Adenocarcinoma/diagnosis , Male , Female , Middle Aged , Aged , Adult , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , Urachus/abnormalities , Urachus/diagnostic imaging , Urachus/pathology , Urachus/surgery , Diagnosis, DifferentialSubject(s)
Diverticulum , Urachus , Humans , Diverticulum/diagnostic imaging , Urachus/abnormalities , Urachus/diagnostic imaging , Male , Female , Tomography, X-Ray ComputedABSTRACT
This study investigated the diagnostic and surgical management of urachal abscessation involving the urinary bladder in three cattle aged >18 months. While the abdominal floor or paralumbar fossa are typically considered for accessing the urachus and bladder in calves and heifers, the distance is too great to perform the procedure under direct vision in adult cows. Therefore, a novel preinguinal approach was used for access in cows with urachal abscesses after 18 months. Access was successfully achieved in all the three cows through a preinguinal incision to the urachal abscess at the apex of the bladder. However, in cases wherein the abscess and adhesions are severe, removal may be challenging or may necessitate a combined median or paramedian approach.
Subject(s)
Abscess , Cattle Diseases , Urachus , Animals , Cattle , Cattle Diseases/surgery , Abscess/veterinary , Abscess/surgery , Urachus/surgery , Female , Urinary Bladder Diseases/veterinary , Urinary Bladder Diseases/surgeryABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Persistence of embryonic urachal structures due to a failure of the urachus to involute into the median umbilical ligament is known as a urachal anomaly (UA). UAs may remain asymptomatic or lead to abdominal pain and recurrent infections. Management of UAs in pediatric patients has historically lacked a clear consensus between conservative and surgical management. While both urologists and general surgeons manage this pathology, a comparison of management style and outcomes between these specialties has not been published to our knowledge. OBJECTIVE: To (1) evaluate trends in management of UAs among pediatric urologists and general surgeons across three tertiary care children's hospitals and (2) identify factors that place patients at higher risk for requiring surgery. STUDY DESIGN: All patients diagnosed with a UA from 2016 to 2020 at our multi-site institution were identified by ICD-10 code Q64.4 "malformation of the urachus" and retrospectively reviewed. Patient demographics, treatment specialty, remnant subtype, and management strategy were recorded. Data was dichotomized between both urology and general surgery as well as between surgical and nonsurgical intervention to identify and compare management strategies. RESULTS: Overall, 143 patients diagnosed with UAs were identified. Of these patients, 74 were treated by urology and 69 were treated by general surgery. Patients who were treated by urology were significantly more likely to receive conservative treatment (66.2% treated conservatively vs. 33.8% treated surgically), while patients treated by general surgery were significantly more likely to undergo surgery (84.1% treated surgically vs. 15.9% treated conservatively, p < .0001). Though, urology was more likely to treat patients who presented incidentally (p < .01), and general surgery was more likely to treat patients who presented with an infected remnant (p < .01). Patients of male sex were more likely overall to receive surgery compared to female patients (p < .01). DISCUSSION: Management of UAs by urologists was more conservative than general surgeons. However, both specialties treat distinctly different patient presentations, with urology managing more incidental remnants and general surgery operating on more emergent, infected urachi. Limitations of the study included its retrospective nature and the insufficient reporting of urachal remnant subtypes and presence of infection among patients. CONCLUSIONS: Management strategies of UAs differ among urology and general surgery, but surgical and conservative treatments are necessary to appropriately treat their distinct patient populations. This study provides valuable insight into current practices of UA management and may help to inform future treatment.
Subject(s)
Urachal Cyst , Urachus , Urology , Child , Humans , Male , Female , Retrospective Studies , Urachus/surgery , Urachus/abnormalities , Conservative Treatment , Urologists , Urachal Cyst/diagnosis , Urachal Cyst/surgerySubject(s)
Adenocarcinoma, Mucinous , Appendiceal Neoplasms , Neoplasms, Cystic, Mucinous, and Serous , Peritoneal Neoplasms , Pseudomyxoma Peritonei , Urachus , Humans , Pseudomyxoma Peritonei/diagnosis , Pseudomyxoma Peritonei/surgery , Urachus/diagnostic imaging , Peritoneal Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Peritoneal Neoplasms/surgery , Adenocarcinoma, Mucinous/diagnosis , Adenocarcinoma, Mucinous/surgeryABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Urachal remnants (URs) represent uncommon and underdiagnosed entities that are usually detected incidentally at imaging or present clinically different manifestations. METHODS: Here we presented a boy with UR infection. Ultrasonography and bacterial culture and identification were performed. He received antibiotic treatment and underwent surgical excision of the cyst. RESULTS: The patient presented with both a urachal cyst and umbilical-urachal sinus. UR infection was caused by Actinomyces turicensis. He recovered well from the operation without complications. CONCLUSIONS: The present case reminds clinicians to be familiar with imaging features of different types of URs and their potential complications and indicates the necessity of pathogenic microorganism analysis to tailor antibiotic treatment and post-operative follow-up to prevent complications.
Subject(s)
Laparoscopy , Urachal Cyst , Urachus , Male , Humans , Laparoscopy/methods , Urachus/surgery , Urachal Cyst/diagnosis , Urachal Cyst/surgery , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic useABSTRACT
A 52 year old woman presented to the emergency department of Affiliated Hospital of Zunyi Medical University, Zunyi, China in May 2022, complaining of a palpable lower abdominal mass since two days. She denied haematuria, umbilical drainage, or any other urinary symptoms. Previous health record indicated that the patient was diagnosed with urachal inflammatory pseudotumour. Inflammatory pseudotumourous masses of the urachal canal are rare chronic inflammatory disorders with only a few case reports. Ultrasonography is the preferred method for diagnosing urachal lesions. Contrast- enhanced ultrasonography (CEUS) allows real-time visualization of the microvascular blood flow within the solid lesion, reducing the probability of misdiagnosis of the disease. We have reported a case of urachal inflammatory pseudotumour and analyzed its ultrasonographic findings from two-dimensional conventional ultrasonography and CEUS to provide support for the diagnosis of urachal inflammatory pseudotumour in the clinic and to assist clinical selection of effective treatment modalities.
Subject(s)
Granuloma, Plasma Cell , Urachus , Female , Humans , Middle Aged , Urachus/diagnostic imaging , Urachus/pathology , Granuloma, Plasma Cell/diagnostic imaging , Treatment Outcome , Diagnosis, Differential , UltrasonographyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: A urachal mass is a relatively rare presentation to the urologists' practice, often requiring radical surgical excision for a definitive diagnosis. Xanthogranulomatous inflammation of the urachus is an extremely rare entity with few cases reported worldwide, and to the best of our knowledge, no cases reported in the western world. CASE PRESENTATION: In this case, a 55-year-old male patient presented with bothersome lower urinary tract symptoms and computed tomography findings demonstrating a urachal mass that was worrisome for urachal carcinoma. Following surgical intervention, histopathology revealed urachal xanthogranuloma. Post-operatively, the patient recovered well, and eventually, he had symptomatic and radiologic improvement. CONCLUSION: This case brings awareness to a rare presentation of a urachal mass-urachal xanthogranuloma. While operative intervention was both diagnostic and therapeutic, we highlight the challenge in differentiating between benign and malignant processes for urachal masses. Herein, we show the importance of including urachal xanthogranuloma in the differential diagnosis of a urachal mass to prevent further morbidity associated with the treatment of this disease.
Subject(s)
Urachus , Urinary Bladder Neoplasms , Xanthomatosis , Male , Humans , Middle Aged , Urachus/diagnostic imaging , Urachus/pathology , Urinary Bladder Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Urinary Bladder Neoplasms/surgery , Xanthomatosis/diagnosis , Xanthomatosis/surgery , Xanthomatosis/pathology , Diagnosis, Differential , Tomography, X-Ray ComputedABSTRACT
Accessory spleen (AS) refers to single or multiple splenic tissues which appear outside the relative normal spleen position results from embryonic dysplasia similar in structure and function to the spleen. AS is frequently observed in the splenic hilus and or adjacent to the tail of pancreas, and only a few cases occurred in the pelvic cavity. We present an extremely rare AS case in urachus, which was initially considered as an urachal neoplasm revealed on CT images with big mass. However, the postoperative pathology confirmed it was an AS that had not been reported at urachal before. Urachal AS can be misdiagnosed as a tumor, so it is vital to make an accurate imaging preoperative diagnosis to avoid unnecessary biopsy and surgery.
Subject(s)
Urachus , Humans , Urachus/diagnostic imaging , Urachus/surgery , Spleen/diagnostic imaging , Spleen/surgery , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , BiopsySubject(s)
Urachal Cyst , Urachus , Urinary Tract , Humans , Child , Urachus/surgery , Urachal Cyst/diagnostic imaging , Urachal Cyst/surgeryABSTRACT
A five-month-old alpaca cria presented with a history of abdominal pain, dysuria, and a recurring rectal prolapse. An ultrasonographic examination indicated a urachal abscess attached to the urinary bladder. The abscess was removed surgically, and the patient had an adequate recovery after the procedure and ancillary treatment. This case report highlights secondary complications that could arise following an infection of the urachus in new-world camelids. Key clinical message: Urachal abscess should be considered as a differential diagnosis in juvenile new-world camelids with rectal prolapse, tenesmus, or dysuria.
Prolapsus rectal secondaire à un abcès de l'ouraque chez un cria d'alpaga. Un cria d'alpaga âgé de cinq mois est présenté avec des antécédents de douleurs abdominales, de dysurie et de prolapsus rectal récurrent. Un examen échographique a révélé un abcès de l'ouraque attaché à la vessie. L'abcès a été enlevé chirurgicalement, et le patient a eu une récupération adéquate après la procédure et le traitement auxiliaire. Ce rapport de cas met en évidence les complications secondaires qui pourraient survenir à la suite d'une infection de l'ouraque chez les camélidés du nouveau monde.Message clinique clé :L'abcès de l'ouraque doit être considéré comme un diagnostic différentiel chez les camélidés juvéniles du nouveau monde présentant un prolapsus rectal, un ténesme ou une dysurie.(Traduit par Dr Serge Messier).
Subject(s)
Camelids, New World , Rectal Prolapse , Urachus , Urinary Tract Infections , Animals , Abscess/surgery , Abscess/veterinary , Abscess/diagnosis , Rectal Prolapse/diagnosis , Rectal Prolapse/surgery , Rectal Prolapse/veterinary , Dysuria/veterinary , Urinary Tract Infections/veterinaryABSTRACT
Introducción. Durante el desarrollo embrionario normal, se espera que el denominado uraco o ligamento umbilical mediano se oblitere a las 32 semanas de gestación. Ante una obliteración incompleta surgen las diferentes anomalías, siendo las más frecuentes el quiste y la fístula urinaria umbilical. El objetivo de este artículo fue presentar el caso de una paciente joven, sin comorbilidades, con quiste de uraco. Caso clínico. Mujer indígena de 19 años que consultó por dolor leve en hipogastrio, asociado a síntomas urinarios y distensión abdominal. Se sospechó en primera instancia cólico renal, pero ante hallazgos ecográficos de masa infraumbilical y reactantes de fase aguda elevados, la impresión diagnóstica cambió a sepsis secundaria a absceso intraabdominal. Posterior a tomografía y cistoscopía con calibración uretral se identificó pequeño divertículo en cúpula vesical, que sugirió el diagnóstico de uraco persistente, por lo que la paciente fue llevada a intervención quirúrgica para su resección, con evolución favorable. Discusión. El quiste de uraco es una anormalidad infrecuente, en su mayoría asintomática y generalmente de hallazgo incidental en la población anciana, por lo que se requiere de imágenes y manejo multidisciplinar para su correcto diagnóstico y abordaje. Conclusión. Son pocos los casos de uraco persistente reportados, y mucho menos en el sexo femenino. Dada la posibilidad de complicaciones tardías es importante el seguimiento para su manejo. Este caso se ha controlado de manera ambulatoria por 2 años
Introduction. During normal embryonic development, it is expected that the so-called urachus or median umbilical ligament will be obliterated at 32 weeks of gestation. In the face of incomplete obliteration, the different anomalies of the urachus arise. The most frequent anomaly of the urachus is the cyst followed by the umbilical urinary fistula. The objective of this article was to present the case of a young patient without comorbidities with urachal cyst. Clinical case. A 19-year-old indigenous woman consulted for mild hypogastric pain associated with urinary symptoms and abdominal distension. Renal colic was suspected at first, but due to ultrasound findings of an infraumbilical mass and high acute phase reactants, the diagnostic impression changed to sepsis secondary to an intra-abdominal abscess. After tomography and cystoscopy with urethral calibration, a small diverticulum was identified in the bladder dome, suggesting a diagnosis of persistent urachus, for which the patient was taken to surgery for its resection, with favorable evolution. Discussion. The urachal cyst is a rare abnormality, mostly asymptomatic and usually incidental finding in the elderly population. Imaging and multidisciplinary management are required for its correct diagnosis and approach. Conclusion. There are few reported cases of persistent urachus and much less in females. Given the possibility of late complications, follow-up is important for its management, in this case we have carried out control for 2 years
Subject(s)
Humans , Congenital Abnormalities , Urachus , Urachal Cyst , Abdominal Pain , Abdominal Abscess , CystoscopyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: To date, there is no standard established laparoscopic surgical method for managing urachal remnants because of their rarity, and several questions remain unanswered. Are there any problems for considering the operative indications about patients' factors for example, body mass index and so on? This study aimed to determine the feasible surgical method for managing urachal remnants and presents the operative outcomes of our cases in relation to the findings from the existing literature. METHODS: We analyzed the data of 16 patients (7 women and 9 men; age range, 19-48 years) who underwent surgery for urachal remnants between January 2013 and March 2019 at our institution. RESULTS: In our cases, all urachal remnants were urachal sinuses, and the primary complaints were umbilical pain and pus discharge. Most of these symptoms were controlled using umbilical drainage and oral antibiotic intake; however, incisional drainage was required in two cases. In all cases, we performed a laparoscopic resection of the urachal remnants; one patient underwent an open conversion due to a very thick abdominal wall. Therefore, "peri-umbilical distanse" was proposed as an index to verify the periumbilical abdominal wall thickness. This index may clear the difficulties of the laparoscopic resection of the urachal remnunts. A postoperative complication-local infection that was treated using re-suturing-was observed in one patient. No adverse events occurred in the other cases. Our method was appropriate because it allowed for complete urachal resection with good cosmetic results, i.e., a small and natural scar appearance. Additionally, if bladder injury occurred, bladder re-suturing was easily possible because of the laparoscopic port's position. CONCLUSIONS: We present an feasible method for laparoscopic urachal resection. This method may be recommended for young patients with an peri-umbilical distanse of < 2 cm.
Subject(s)
Laparoscopy , Urachus , Male , Humans , Female , Young Adult , Adult , Middle Aged , Urachus/surgery , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Drainage , Laparoscopy/methods , Urinary BladderABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Urachal remnants are a rare congenital defect resulting from failure of obliteration of a fibrous tube that connects the umbilicus to the bladder dome during embryological development. Oftentimes a urachal remnant will go undiagnosed, but occasionally a patient may present with a variety of symptoms, ultimately leading to the identification of the remnant. Given its rarity, there is very limited literature available on the management of symptomatic urachal remnants, especially in adults. Surgical resection has been the first-line management of urachal remnants for years, especially given the risk of the development of urachal adenocarcinoma secondary to recurrent infection, persistent irritation, and urinary stasis associated with some urachal remnants. AIM: We present our experience in the management of symptomatic urachal remnants in adults at our institute and perform a brief literature review of the same. METHODS: A retrospective review of all cases who underwent surgical management of symptomatic urachal remnants between December 2015 and January 2022 was performed. Seven cases of urachal remnant excision in total were identified over the time period. Patient characteristics and perioperative parameters were analysed. Post-operative complications were measured in accordance with the Clavien-Dindo grading system. RESULT: In total, 7 cases of urachal remnants were treated at our institute over the study period. Four patients were treated with a TURBT and 3 patients were treated with a laparoscopic partial cystectomy. There were no intraoperative complications and one post-operative complication requiring readmission for intravenous antibiotics. There was one mortality but this was not as a direct result of the operative procedure. Mean length of stay was 1.71 days. Two of patients had histologically confirmed urachal adenocarcinoma and the remaining five patients had benign histology. Each patient was seen in the outpatients department 6 weeks post-operatively for clinical review and review of histology. No further follow-up was required for the patients with benign histology given resolution of symptoms and follow-up for the malignant histology was arranged appropriately following MDM. CONCLUSION: There is a paucity of data available on the management of urachal remnants in the adult population; however, an endoscopic or laparoscopic approach is a safe and effective method of excising symptomatic urachal remnants.
Subject(s)
Adenocarcinoma , Laparoscopy , Urachus , Urinary Bladder Neoplasms , Humans , Adult , Urachus/surgery , Urachus/abnormalities , Urachus/pathology , Laparoscopy/methods , Urinary Bladder Neoplasms/surgery , Urinary Bladder Neoplasms/pathology , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Retrospective StudiesABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Port placement in laparoscopic urachal resection has not yet been standardized. We herein report an approach for transumbilical reduced-port laparoscopic urachal resection for pediatric and adolescent patients. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the outcomes of pediatric and adolescent patients for urachal remnant treated with reduced-port laparoscopic urachal resection from 2016 to 2020 in our department. Regarding our surgical procedure, a skin incision was made around the umbilicus, and the urachus was dissected partially under direct vision. Two transumbilical 5 mm ports and a 3.5 mm port in the right lateral abdomen were placed. In the laparoscopic view, the urachus was dissected from the abdominal wall and resected at the bladder dome. The defect of the peritoneum was closed by suturing. RESULTS: Sixteen patients underwent the procedure. The median patient age was 12.5 years old. Surgery was performed by trainee surgeons in all patients without intraoperative complications or conversion to open surgery. The median postoperative hospital stay was 2 days. CONCLUSIONS: Our transumbilical reduced-port laparoscopic urachal resection technique has advantages in terms of safety, operability, and cosmetic appearance.
Subject(s)
Laparoscopy , Urachus , Humans , Child , Adolescent , Urachus/surgery , Retrospective Studies , Laparoscopy/methods , Umbilicus/surgery , PeritoneumABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: To explore the extraperitoneal laparoscopic urachal mass excision technique and its safety and efficacy in treating urachal mass. METHODS: Baseline characteristics were collected from patients who underwent surgery to diagnose a urachal cyst or abscess in our hospital between January 2020 and August 2021. The full-length of the urachus and part of the top bladder wall were completely removed through the extraperitoneal approach. Patient outcomes were collected to evaluate surgical safety and efficacy, including operation time, intraoperative blood loss, drainage tube removal time, length of stay (LOS), and postoperative complications. RESULTS: All 20 surgeries were successfully performed laparoscopically, and no case was converted to open surgery. The mean body mass index of the patients was 24.6 ± 2.2. The mean patient age was 49.3 ± 8.7 years. The mean size of the cysts was 3.0 ± 0.4 cm. The mean operation time was 56.3 ± 12.0 min. The mean intraoperative blood loss was 28.0 ± 6.4 mL. The mean drainage tube removal time was 3.0 ± 0.5 days. The mean LOS was 5.2 ± 0.4 days. The mean follow-up was 13.4 ± 2.1 months. No postoperative complications were observed during the follow-up period. The short-term follow-up and small patient cohort limited our outcome evaluation. CONCLUSION: Our results indicated that the extraperitoneal laparoscopic approach was a safe and effective method to treat urachal mass. Given the limitations of the study, further multiple and larger sample-sized trials are required to confirm our findings.
Subject(s)
Laparoscopy , Urachal Cyst , Urachus , Humans , Adult , Middle Aged , Urachus/surgery , Blood Loss, Surgical , Retrospective Studies , Urachal Cyst/surgery , Laparoscopy/methods , Postoperative Complications/surgeryABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Giant umbilical cord, defined as a cord diameter of more than 5 cm, is an extremely rare malformation. There are few case reports of giant umbilical cord often associated with patent urachus duct or cystic malformation. These cases are usually managed by surgical excision and repair of patent urachus or cyst resection. CASE PRESENTATION: We report the case of a 1-day-old Iranian boy with giant umbilical cord detected postnatally. The pregnancy course was uneventful, except for preterm premature rupture of the membrane and preterm delivery. There was no relevant family history. The patient was delivered by vaginal delivery with a good Apgar score. On clinical examination, the umbilical cord was very thick (about 6 cm in diameter), and huge fluctuating Wharton's jelly was observed. Other organs were normal. During the hospital stay, the patient did not develop any complications except borderline hyperbilirubinemia, which improved with conventional phototherapy. Since the umbilical cord had no discharge and was dried, the newborn was discharged with advice for cord drying care. CONCLUSION: The newborn was well, and the dried umbilical stump was detached after 32 days, leaving a granulomatous structure without discharge. The patient was followed up for 4.5 months and had no problems except delayed separation of the umbilical cord.