What you need to know about common skin problems in older adults.

Skin ageing is a multifaceted process impacted by both intrinsic and extrinsic factors. Drier and less elastic skin with declining sebum levels in older age makes ageing skin more vulnerable to various skin conditions, including infections, inflammatory dermatoses, and cancers. Skin problems are common among older adults due to the effects of ageing, polypharmacy and multimorbidity impacting not only physical health but wellbeing and quality of life. In the UK, older adults in geriatric medicine wards may present with various skin conditions. Hospitalised older individuals may have undiagnosed skin problems unrelated to their admission, making hospitalisation an opportunity to manage unmet needs. Asteatotic eczema, incontinence associated dermatitis, seborrhoeic dermatitis, chronic venous insufficiency, and cellulitis are common disorders clinicians encounter in the geriatric medicine wards. This article outlines the importance of performing comprehensive skin assessments to help diagnose and commence management for these common conditions.

Superficial Venous Disease-An Updated Review.

BACKGROUND: This review article provides an updated review of a relatively common pathology with various manifestations. Superficial venous diseases (SVDs) are a broad spectrum of venous vascular disease that predominantly affects the body's lower extremities. The most serious manifestation of this disease includes varicose veins, chronic venous insufficiency, stasis dermatitis, venous ulcers, superficial venous thrombosis, reticular veins, and spider telangiectasias. METHODS: The anatomy, pathophysiology, and risk factors of SVD were discussed during this review. The risk factors for developing SVD were related to race, age, sex, lifestyle, and certain genetic conditions as well as comorbid deep vein thrombosis. Various classification systems were listed, focusing on the most common one-the revised Clinical-Etiology-Anatomy-Pathophysiology classification. The clinical features including history and physical examination findings elicited in SVD were outlined. RESULTS: Imaging modalities utilized in SVD were highlighted. Duplex ultrasound is the first line in evaluating SVD but magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography venography, plethysmography, and conventional venography are feasible options in the event of an ambiguous venous duplex ultrasound study. Treatment options highlighted in this review ranged from conservative treatment with compression stockings, which could be primary or adjunctive to pharmacologic topical and systemic agents such as azelaic acid, diuretics, plant extracts, medical foods, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, anticoagulants and skin substitutes for different stages of SVD. Interventional treatment modalities include thermal ablative techniques like radiofrequency ablationss, endovenous laser ablation, endovenous steam ablation, and endovenous microwave ablation as well as nonthermal strategies such as the Varithena (polidocanol microfoam) sclerotherapy, VenaSeal (cyanoacrylate) ablation, and Endovenous mechanochemical ablation. Surgical treatments are also available and include debridement, vein ligation, stripping, and skin grafting. CONCLUSIONS: SVDs are prevalent and have varied manifestations predominantly in the lower extremities. Several studies highlight the growing clinical and financial burden of these diseases. This review provides an update on the pathophysiology, classification, clinical features, and imaging findings as well as the conservative, pharmacological, and interventional treatment options indicated for different SVD pathologies. It aims to expedite the timely deployment of therapies geared toward reducing the significant morbidity associated with SVD especially varicose veins, venous ulcers, and venous insufficiency, to improve the quality of life of these patients and prevent complications.

The anterior saphenous vein. Part 4. Clinical and technical considerations in treatment. Endorsed by the American Vein and Lymphatic Society, the American Venous Forum, and the International Union of Phlebology.

BACKGROUND: The decision to treat a refluxing anterior saphenous vein (ASV) should be a clinical decision based on the assessment on the ASV's contribution to patient's signs and symptoms. Once the decision to treat has been made, there are anatomic, clinical, and technical considerations in treatment planning. METHODS: Clinical scenarios were discussed by a panel of experts and common anatomic, clinical, and technical considerations were identified. RESULTS: There are unique clinical considerations such as whether both the great saphenous vein (GSV) and ASV should be concomitantly treated, if a normal ASV should be treated when treating a refluxing GSV and when and how to treat the associated tributary varicose tributaries. Being aware of the anatomic, clinical, and technical considerations allows development of a treatment plan that optimizes long-term outcomes in patients with ASV reflux. CONCLUSIONS: Ultimately the treatment plan should be tailored to address these types of variables in a patient-centered discussion.

The anterior saphenous vein. Part 2. Anatomic considerations in normal and refluxing patients. Endorsed by the American Vein and Lymphatic Society, the American Venous Forum, and the International Union of Phlebology.

BACKGROUND: The term Anterior Accessory of the Great Saphenous Vein suggests this is a branch tributary vein despite this vessel's anatomic features of a truncal vein. A multisocietal group suggested to designate this the anterior saphenous vein (ASV). This study was aimed to evaluate its ultrasound anatomy in normal and varicose limbs. METHODS: The clinical anatomy of the ASV was evaluated by narrative review of the literature. Additionally, the course of the ASV was evaluated in 62 limbs with no evidence of venous disease and 62 limbs with varicosities. RESULTS: The ASV length, patterns of origin and termination are reported in both normal and patients with varicose veins. Discussion of the patterns is supported by the narrative review of the literature. CONCLUSIONS: The ASV must be considered a truncal vein and its treatment modalities should be the same that for the great and small saphenous veins rather than a tributary vein.

Risk factors for recanalization of truncal veins following endoluminal ablation.

BACKGROUND: Recanalization of target veins after treatment of superficial venous incompetence has clinical implications and may depend on the type of intervention. The aim of this study was to evaluate patient and procedural factors associated with truncal vein recanalization in a large study cohort using the Vascular Quality Initiative (VQI) Varicose Vein Registry. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review using the VQI Varicose Vein Registry from 2014 to 2018. We evaluated all procedures performed for truncal venous insufficiency. Demographic data and information about treatment modality were collected. Patients were separated into recanalization and nonrecanalization groups based on the status of the treated vein at follow-up ultrasound examination. The vein was only considered recanalized if the VQI noted complete recanalization of the target vein. Univariate and multivariate comparisons were performed as appropriate. RESULTS: A total of 10,604 procedures were performed in 7403 patients. The average age was 55.9 years and 70.3% of the patients were female. Patients with recanalization were more likely to have a history of phlebitis (P < .001) and had a higher mean body mass index (30.5 vs 32., kg/m2 ; P = .006) compared with those without recanalization. There was no difference in the use of compression therapy, anticoagulation, deep venous reflux, number of pregnancies, prior deep vein thrombosis, Venous Clinical Severity Score, and clinical-etiology-anatomy-pathophysiology between patients with and without recanalization. The number of truncal veins treated per procedure was higher in the recanalization group compared with the nonrecanalization group (2.36 vs 1.88; P = .001). After multivariate logistic regression, laser ablation was associated with higher rate of recanalization compared with radiofrequency ablation (P = .017). CONCLUSIONS: This study is the first to use VQI based data to describe risk factors for recanalization following treatment of truncal venous reflux. The use of laser ablation for truncal veins is associated with a higher risk for recanalization compared with radiofrequency ablation. Obesity, prior phlebitis, and number of veins treated were independently associated with increased rate of recanalization.

Disparities in access to endovenous treatment options in chronic lower extremity superficial venous insufficiency: A national 7-year analysis.

OBJECTIVE: The goal of this study was to analyze trends in treatment access for chronic superficial venous disease and to identify disparities in care. METHODS: This retrospective study was exempt from institutional review board approval. The American College of Surgeon National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database was used to identify patients who underwent vein stripping (VS) and endovenous procedures for treatment of chronic superficial venous disease. Endovenous options included radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and laser ablation. Data was available from 2011 to 2018 and demographic information was extracted for each patient identified by Current Procedural Terminology codes. For all racial and ethnic groups, trend lines were plotted, and the relative rate of change was determined within each specified demographic. RESULTS: There were 21,025 patients included in the analysis. The overall mean age was 54.2 years, and the majority of patients were female (64.8%). In total, 27.9%, 55.2%, and 16.9% patients underwent VS, RFA, and laser ablation, respectively. Patients who received laser ablation were older (P < .001). Hispanic ethnicity was associated with significantly lower odds of receiving endovascular thermal ablation (EVTA) over VS (odds ratio [OR], 0.71; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.64-0.78; P < .001). American Indian/Alaska Native patients were more likely to receive EVTA over VS (OR, 4.02; 95% CI, 2.48-6.86); similarly, Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander patients were more likely to receive EVTA over VS, although this difference was not statistically significant (OR, 1.44; 95% CI, 0.93-2.27). On multinomial regression, Hispanic patients were less likely to receive RFA over VS, whereas American Indian/Alaskan Native patients were more likely to receive RFA over VS. In all racial and ethnic groups, the percentage of endovenous procedures increased, whereas vein stripping decreased. CONCLUSIONS: Based on a hospital-based dataset, demographic indicators, including age, sex, race, and ethnicity, are associated with differences in endovenous treatments for chronic superficial venous insufficiency suggesting disparities in obtaining minimally invasive treatment options among certain patient groups.

The Anterior Saphenous Vein. Part 2. Anatomic considerations in normal and refluxing patients. Endorsed by the American Vein and Lymphatic Society, the American Venous Forum and the International Union of Phlebology.

BACKGROUND: The term Anterior Accessory of the Great Saphenous Vein suggest this is a branch tributary vein despite this vessel's anatomic features of a truncal vein. A multisocietal group suggested to designate this the Anterior Saphenous Vein (ASV). This study was aimed to evaluate its ultrasound anatomy in normal and varicose limbs. METHODS: The clinical anatomy of the ASV was evaluated by narrative review of the literature. Additionally, the course of the ASV was evaluated in 62 limbs with no evidence of venous disease and 62 limbs with varicosities. RESULTS: The ASV length, patterns of origin and termination are reported in both normal and patients with varicose veins. Discussion of the patterns is supported by the narrative review of the literature. CONCLUSIONS: The ASV must be considered a truncal vein and its treatment modalities should be the same that for the great and small saphenous veins rather than a tributary vein.

The anterior saphenous vein. Part 3. Systematic review of the literature and payor coverage policies. Endorsed by the American Vein and Lymphatic Society, the American Venous Forum and the International Union of Phlebology.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study is to systemically review the literature on Anterior Saphenous Vein (ASV) reflux treatment and insurance impediments to treatment coverage. METHODS: A literature search was performed using a PRISMA framework. In addition, a cross-sectional analysis of insurance policies for ASV treatment was evaluated. RESULTS: Published evidence and treatment considerations in the literature for ASV treatment are discussed. In 155 of 226 (68.6%) insurance policies reviewed coverage of ASV ablation was allowed while 62/226 (27.4%) did not specify coverage and 9/226 (4.0%) specified ASV treatment was not covered. Of the 155 that provide ASV coverage, 98 (62.2%) provide coverage with criteria such as requiring prior treatment of the great saphenous vein. CONCLUSIONS: Vein treatment experts should continue to advocate to insurance carriers to update their varicose vein treatment policies to reflect the substantial clinical evidence so that patients with ASV reflux can be appropriately treated.

Investigating low rates of compliance to graduated compression therapy for chronic venous insufficiency: A systematic review.

Chronic venous insufficiency (CVI) is a chronic lower limb progressive disorder with significant burden. Graduated compression therapy is the gold-standard treatment, but its underutilisation, as indicated in recent literature, may be contributing to the growing burden of CVI. The aim of this systematic review is to determine the reasons for poor compliance in patients who are prescribed graduated compression therapy in the management of chronic venous insufficiency. A systematic review of the literature was conducted to identify the reasons for non-compliance in wearing graduated compression therapy in the management of chronic venous insufficiency. The keyword search was conducted through Medline, PubMed, CINAHL, Cochrane library, AMED, and Embase databases from 2000 to April 2023. Qualitative and quantitative studies were included with no study design or language limits imposed on the search. The study populations were restricted to adults aged over 18 years, diagnosed with chronic venous insufficiency. Of the 856 studies found, 80 full-text articles were reviewed, with 14 being eligible for the review. Due to the variability in study designs, the results were summarised rather than subjected to meta-analysis. There are five main overarching themes for non-compliance, which are physical limitations, health literacy, discomfort, financial issues, and psychosocial issues with emerging sub-themes. Graduated compression therapy has the potential to reduce the burden of chronic venous insufficiency if patients are more compliant with their prescription.

The anterior saphenous vein. Part 3. Systematic review of the literature and payor coverage policies. Endorsed by the American Vein and Lymphatic Society, the American Venous Forum, and the International Union of Phlebology.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study is to systemically review the literature on Anterior Saphenous Vein (ASV) reflux treatment and insurance impediments to treatment coverage. METHODS: A literature search was performed using a PRISMA framework. In addition, a cross-sectional analysis of insurance policies for ASV treatment was evaluated. RESULTS: Published evidence and treatment considerations in the literature for ASV treatment are discussed. In 155 of 226 (68.6%) insurance policies reviewed coverage of ASV ablation was allowed while 62/226 (27.4%) did not specify coverage and 9/226 (4.0%) specified ASV treatment was not covered. Of the 155 that provide ASV coverage, 98 (62.2%) provide coverage with criteria such as requiring prior treatment of the great saphenous vein. CONCLUSIONS: Vein treatment experts should continue to advocate to insurance carriers to update their varicose vein treatment policies to reflect the substantial clinical evidence so that patients with ASV reflux can be appropriately treated.

Various Therapies for Lymphedema and Chronic Venous Insufficiency, Including a Multimodal At-Home Nonpneumatic Compression Treatment.

ABSTRACT: Lymphedema and chronic venous insufficiency (CVI) affect millions of people and require lifelong management. Many compression options exist for the long-term management of these conditions; however, limitations in patient mobility and adherence are common. Current options for care often present challenges with adherence because they are time-intensive and cumbersome. Innovation is needed to improve compression options for patients with chronic edematous conditions, particularly because lymphedema and CVI benefit from combination interventions. In this narrative review, the authors focus on long-term management strategies for lymphedema and CVI and highlight a nonpneumatic compression device designed for ease of use in the management of lymphedema and CVI. Using a nonpneumatic compression device that combines multiple treatment modalities demonstrates improved efficacy, quality of life, and patient adherence.

A comprehensive ultrasound approach to lower limb varicose veins and abdominal-pelvic connections.

OBJECTIVE: Pelvic venous reflux may be responsible for pelvic venous disorders and/or lower-limb (LL) varicose veins. Ultrasound investigation with Doppler allows a complete study of the entire infra-diaphragmatic venous reservoir. The aim of this study was to guide and standardize the investigation of the pelvic origin of venous reflux in female patients with LL varicose veins. METHODS: In this case-control study, we applied a comprehensive ultrasound investigation protocol, which involved four steps: (1) venous mapping of the lower limbs; (2) transperineal and vulvar approach; (3) transabdominal approach; and (4) transvaginal approach. RESULTS: Forty-four patients in group 1 (patients with LL varicose veins and pelvic escape points [PEPs]) and 35 patients in group 2 (patients with LL varicose veins without PEPs [control group]) were studied, matched by age. The median age was 43 years in both groups. The calculated body mass index was lower in group 1 (23.4 kg/m2) compared with the control group (25.4 kg/m2), and this difference reached statistical significance (P < .001). The presence of pelvic varicose veins (PVs) by transvaginal ultrasound was 86% in group 1 and 31% in group 2. Perineal PEPs were the most prevalent, being found in 35 patients (79.5%), more frequent on the right (57.14%) than on the left (42.85%) and associated with bilateral PVs 65.7% of the time. In group 1, 23 patients (52%) reported recurrent varicose veins vs eight patients (23%) in the control group (P = .008). Regarding the complaint of dyspareunia, a significant difference was identified between the groups (P = .019), being reported in 10 (23%) patients in group 1 vs one patient (2.9%) in the control group. The median diameters in the transabdominal approach of the left gonadal veins were 6.70 mm for group 1 and 4.60 mm for group 2 (P < .001). In patients with PVs in group 1, the median diameter of PEPs at the trans-perineal window was 4.05 mm. In the transvaginal examination, the mean diameter of the veins in the peri uterine region was 8.71 mm on the left and 7.04 mm on the right. CONCLUSIONS: The identification of PEPs by venous mapping demonstrates the pelvic origin of the reflux and its connections with the LL varicose veins. For a more adequate treatment plan, we suggest a complete investigation protocol based on the transabdominal and transvaginal study to rule out venous obstructions, thrombotic or not, and confirm the presence of varicose veins in the pelvic adnexal region.

The clinical and economic impact of chronic venous insufficiency-associated lymphedema and the prevalence of persistent edema after venous intervention.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the demographics, outcomes, and healthcare utilization of patients with chronic venous insufficiency-associated lymphedema (CVI-LED) and the prevalence of lymphedema-specific therapy use after venous intervention. METHODS: The IBM MarketScan Commercial and Medicare Claims Databases were examined for patients with CVI-LED. Patient demographics and the use of lymphedema-specific therapy before and after venous intervention were collected. RESULTS: Of 85,601 LED patients identified, 8,406 also had a diagnosis of CVI. In the CVI-LED group, 1051 underwent endovenous ablation or venous stent placement. The use of lymphedema-specific therapy before and after venous intervention was 52% and 39%, respectively (p < .05). The mean time of initiation of LED-specific therapy following venous intervention was 265 days after ablation and 347 days after stent placement. CONCLUSION: Treating venous hypertension improves certain venous-related signs and symptoms of CVI. However, a significant proportion of patients have persistent edema which may reflect underlying, sub-optimally treated LED.

Indications, contraindications, side effects, general assessment, and outlook for the future: An International Compression Club survey.

BACKGROUND: The effectiveness of compression therapy (CT) and the best compression modality choice are questioned in many clinical stages of chronic venous disease (CVD). This work aims to obtain information on indications, contraindications, and the best treatment option for CT in different clinical scenarios of CVD. METHOD: An online survey was made among members of the International Compression Club, experts in CT. RESULTS: The experts apply CT in all clinical stages of CVD, even when evidence is missing. Regarding compression materials, experts use inelastic materials in the advanced stages of CVD and compression stockings in the early or chronic stages of CVD. CONCLUSION: The authors highlight the gap between experts' practical use of CT and evidence-based medicine results. They also suggested that, given the cost of randomized clinical trials aimed at specifying specific indications for different devices, artificial intelligence could be used for large-scale practice surveys in the future.

Comparison of Radiofrequency Ablation and Cyanoacrylate Closure for Large-Diameter Great Saphenous Vein Insufficiency.

BACKGROUND: To compare radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and cyanoacrylate closure (CAC) for large-diameter great saphenous vein (GSV) insufficiency between diameters of 12 and 16 mm. METHODS: This study is a single-center retrospective study. Subjects who underwent endovenous treatment with RFA (Group A) or CAC (Group B) for GSV insufficiency between June 2015 and June 2021 who were followed up for at least 2 years were included in the study. Subjects who had a 12-mm to 16-mm target vessel diameter and subjects with grade 3 and grade 4 reflux were included. Subjects' demographic data (age, sex), body mass indices, clinical, etiological, anatomic, pathophysiologic classification, GSV diameter, reflux grade, target vessel length, preoperative venous clinical severity score (VCSS), procedural time, postoperative first-day pain scores, postoperative 14th-day patient satisfaction scale, and postoperative complications were noted. In follow-up, subjects were evaluated with duplex ultrasonography and VCSS at 1, 6, 12, and 24 months. RESULTS: In total, 142 subjects were included (n = 71 for both groups). The mean GSV diameter was 13.21 ± 1.00 for Group A and 13.51 ± 0.97 for Group B. The groups did not differ in terms of age, sex, body mass index, clinical, etiological, anatomic, pathophysiologic classification, GSV diameter, reflux grade, target GSV length, preoperative VCSS, complications, postoperative 24-hr pain status or postoperative 14-day patient satisfaction scale (P > 0.05 for all comparisons). The procedure time was significantly shorter in Group B (34.68 ± 4.22 min for Group A vs. 22.59 ± 4.5 min for Group B, P = 0.001). In the 1-month and 6-month Duplex ultrasonography of the subjects, partial closure and patency rates in Group B were significantly higher than those in Group A (P = 0.003 and P = 0.025, respectively). At the 12-month and 24-month evaluation, closure rates did not show a statistically significant difference between the groups (P = 0.056 and P = 0.090, respectively). Preoperative and 1-month VCSS measurements did not show a statistically significant difference between groups (P > 0.05 for all comparisons). The 6-month, 12-month, and 24-month VCSS measurements of Group A were significantly higher than those in Group B. (P = 0.043, P = 0.009 and P = 0.002, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Both RFA and CAC were found to be effective in the treatment of large-diameter GSV incompetency. The complication rates were similar between the 2 techniques. CAC had a shorter procedure time. Although the closure rates in the early postoperative period were better in the RFA group, long-term follow-up demonstrated similar patency rates. The functional results in the long-term follow-up were better in the RFA group.

Improvement of Chronic Venous Insufficiency Related Leg Xerosis and Dermatitis With Ceramide-Containing Cleansers and Moisturizers: An Expert-Based Consensus.

INTRODUCTION: Chronic venous insufficiency (CVI) may lead to sustained elevated pressure (aka venous hypertension) in the dermal venous microcirculation. Risk factors include advanced age, obesity, female gender, pregnancy, and prolonged standing. CVI in the lower extremities may lead to cutaneous changes such as xerosis and venous leg dermatitis (VLD). This review explores skin barrier restoration using skincare for xerosis and VLD.    Methods: Prior to the meeting, a structured literature search yielded information on fourteen draft statements. During the meeting, a multi-disciplinary group of experts adopted five statements on xerosis and VLD supported by the literature and the authors’ clinical expertise.   Results: VLD and associated xerosis is a common condition requiring more attention from healthcare providers. Compression therapy is the standard CVI and should be combined with good-quality skincare to enhance adherence to treatment. Maintaining an intact skin barrier by preventing and treating xerosis using gentle cleansers and ceramide-containing moisturizers may improve the skin sequelae of CVI. Skincare is frequently lacking or overlooked as part of the treatment of patients with CVI and VLD. This skin treatment is an unmet need that can be addressed with ceramides-containing pH balanced cleansers and moisturizers. CONCLUSION: Compression therapy is the mainstay of treatment for CVI and VLD. Quality skincare can improve treatment adherence and the efficacy of compression therapy. Using a skincare agent may reduce friction and help patients avoid skin trauma while putting on compression garments. A ceramide-containing moisturizer sustained significant improvements in skin moisturization for 24 hours and may offer synergistic benefits together with compression treatment.  J Drugs Dermatol. 2024;23(2):61-66.     doi:10.36849/JDD.7588.

Hypersensitivity reactions following vein closure therapy with venasealTM (n-butyl- 2-cyanoacrylate).

VenaSealTM is composed of a cyanoacrylate adhesive compound often utilized for chronic venous stasis treatment. Rare case reports of hypersensitivity reactions to this compound exist. We present the first case of dermatographism and angioedema after utilization of VenaSealTM successfully treated via high dose antihistamines. We also present a case of type IV hypersensitivity to VenaSealTM, a cyanoacrylate, occurring in a patient with known meth(acrylate) allergy indicating a possible cross reactivity between these acrylate groups.

Microcirculation disorders of the skin.

Changes in the microcirculation of the skin are a frequently observed accompanying phenomenon of many diseases, far beyond the spectrum of dermatological diseases. Not all of these changes are pathological, many are transient and have no serious consequences. This is true for many inflammatory diseases such as psoriasis vulgaris or atopic eczema. However, there are also diseases in which functionally and morphologically recognizable microangiopathies lead to severe disease consequences. One of the most important diseases in this context is systemic sclerosis, an autoimmune systemic disease with multiple organ manifestations. Investigations of the cutaneous microcirculation are of great importance for the initial diagnosis as well as for prognosis and assessment of disease progression. In peripheral hemodynamic disorders such as peripheral arterial disease (PAD) and chronic venous insufficiency (CVI), understanding microcirculatory disturbances also plays an important role in therapy and in monitoring the success of therapeutic interventions.

Risk factors for low back pain after iliac vein stenting for non-thrombotic iliac vein lesions.

OBJECTIVE: Iliac vein stenting is an option being explored to treat chronic venous insufficiency. We have noted that our most common postoperative complication is low back pain after stent placement, which is occasionally quite severe. We wanted to investigate risk factors that are involved in this phenomenon and identify potentially modifiable factors. METHODS: Patients who failed 3 months of conservative therapy had iliac vein interrogation performed. We limited the scope of this database to non-thrombotic iliac vein lesions treated in the office in which Wallstents were placed. Data were collected from September 2012 to August 2020 for 2308 consecutive outpatients who underwent 3747 procedures. Before August 2016, patients received pre-procedure oral valium (n = 2679) and thereafter, patients received intravenous (IV) sedation (n = 1068). A pain score, on a Likert scale ranging from 0 to 10, was assessed within 1 hour postoperatively. We analyzed the medications administered and correlated them with pain scores. RESULTS: The average of all the pain scores was 0.86 (range, 0-10; standard deviation [SD], 2.00). Age had a slight inverse effect on pain scores (r = -0.12; P < .00001). Presenting signs (based upon CEAP) (P = .11) and body mass index (P = .88) did not have a significant effect on pain scores. Average pain score for females (0.96) was slightly higher than for males (0.70), with P < .0001. Average pain score for procedures on the right side (0.67) was lower than for procedures on the left side (1.01), with P < .0001. Average pain score for patients who received IV sedation (mean, 0.68; SD, 1.58) was lower than that for those who did not (mean, 0.93; SD, 2.15), with P = .0004. When using a single agent, propofol was associated with the lowest pain scores (P < .0001). Toradol displayed a dose-dependent effect on pain score (P < .0001). The best combination of agents for pain control was propofol and toradol together. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, the vast majority of pain scores were low. Factors that were associated with lower pain scores were older age, male sex, procedures on the right side, and IV sedation, in particular with the use of propofol. These data may help us better target patients anticipated to have high pain scores and suggest the preferential use of propofol and toradol.