Concordance between risk scales for venous thromboembolism in patients treated in emergency departments. / Concordancia entre las escalas de valoración del riesgo de tromboembolismo venoso en pacientes con patología médica en urgencias.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate agreement between risk-assessment models for venous thromboembolism (VTE) in patients hospitalized for medical conditions and to analyze variables associated with the decision to prescribe pharmacological thromboprophylaxis in hospital emergency departments (EDs). Conclusions. METHODS: Prospective observational multicenter cohort study. We included adults attended in 15 hospital EDs who were hospitalized for medical conditions, calculating VTE risk according to the International Medical Prevention Registry on Venous Thromboembolism (IMPROVE) score, the Padua Prediction Score (PPS), and the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) score. In addition to assessing interscore concordance, we analyzed variables associated with the prescription of thromboprophylaxis in the ED. RESULTS: A total of 1203 patients were included. The PADUA, IMPROVE, and NICE scales assigned high risk scores for 68.7%, 47.4%, and 69.5% of the patients, respectively. The κ statistic for agreement between the PADUA and NICE scores was 0.80 (95% CI, 0.76-0.84); 102 patients (8.5%) had discordant scores. The κ statistics for agreement between the IMPROVE score and the PADUA and NICE classifications were 0.47 (95% CI, 0.43-0.52) and 0.37 (95% CI, 0.33-0.42), respectively; 322 (26.8%) and 384 patients (31.9%), respectively, had discordant scores. Variables associated with starting thromboprophylaxis in the ED were a diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction or stroke (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 4.26), immobility in the last 2 months (aOR, 2.19), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (aOR, 1.97), ischemic heart disease (aOR, 1.51), reduced mobility of 3 days or longer (aOR, 1.14), body mass index (aOR, 1.04), age (aOR, 1.02), recent trauma or surgery (aOR, 0.40), and risk for bleeding (aOR, 0.56). CONCLUSIONS: There is disagreement among the recommended models for predicting risk for VTE in patients hospitalized for medical conditions. The basis for emergency physicians' clinical judgment regarding thromboprophylaxis extends beyond risk scales to include multiple risk factors for VTE and bleeding.

OBJETIVO: Evaluar la concordancia entre las escalas de riesgo de enfermedad tromboembólica venosa (ETV) de pacientes médicos hospitalizados y analizar las variables asociadas a la decisión de instaurar tromboprofilaxis farmacológica en los servicios de ur gencias(SUH). METODO: Se trata de un estudio de cohorte observacional prospectivo multicéntrico que incluyó pacientes adultos atendidos en 15 SUH españoles que requerían ingreso por patología médica. Se calculó la puntuación según las escalas IMPROVE, PADUA y NICE. Se evaluó la concordancia entre ellas, y las variables asociadas a la indicación de tromboprofilaxis en urgencias. RESULTADOS: Se incluyeron 1.203 pacientes. Las escalas PADUA, IMPROVE y NICE clasificaron de riesgo alto al 68,7%, 47,4% y 69,5% de los pacientes, respectivamente. PADUA y NICE mostraron un índice Kappa de 0,80 (IC 95%: 0,76-0,84) y discordancia del 8,5% (102 pacientes). IMPROVE con PADUA y NICE mostró un índice Kappa de 0,47 (IC 95%:0,43-0,52) y 0,37 (0,33-0,42), con una discordancia del 26,8% (322 pacientes) y 31,9% (384 pacientes), respectivamente. Las variables asociadas con la instauración de tromboprofilaxis fueron infarto agudo de miocardio o ictus (odss ratio ajustada ­ORa­ 4,26), inmovilidad 2 meses previos (ORa 2,19), enfermedad pulmonar obstructiva crónica (ORa 1,97), cardiopatía isquémica (ORa 1,51), movilidad reducida $ 3 días (ORa 1,14), índice masa corporal (ORa 1,04), edad (ORa 1,02), trauma o cirugía recientes (ORa 0,40) y factores de riesgo hemorrágicos (ORa 0,56). CONCLUSIONES: Existe disconcordancia entre las escalas recomendadas para valorar el riesgo de ETV en pacientes médicos hospitalizados. El juicio clínico del urgenciólogo para decidir la tromboprofilaxis se basa en la presencia de múltiples factores de riesgo de ETV y sangrado, más allá de las escalas.

[Environmental diagnostics for venous thromboembolism - thrombophilia and tumor screening]. / Umfelddiagnostik bei venöser Thromboembolie ­ Thrombophilie- und Tumor-Screening.

Inadequate treatment of venous thromboembolism can have fatal consequences that are often irreversible. If the indication is given, long-term therapeutic anticoagulation may be necessary to reduce the risk of recurrence for those affected. On the other hand, there is an increased risk of bleeding due to continued anticoagulation, so an individual risk/benefit assessment is necessary. A careful assessment of possible contributing factors is therefore essential. If uncertainty persists, comprehensive environmental diagnostics with regard to thrombophilia or cancer can be helpful.

Cancer-Associated Venous Thromboembolic Disease, Version 2.2024, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology.

The NCCN Guidelines for Cancer-Associated Venous Thromboembolic Disease provide strategies for the prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in adult patients with cancer. VTE is a common and life-threatening condition in patients with cancer, and its management often requires multidisciplinary efforts. The NCCN panel is comprised of specialists spanning various fields, including cardiology, hematology, medical oncology, internal medicine, interventional radiology, and pharmacology. The content featured in this issue specifically addresses the evaluation and recommended treatment options outlined in the NCCN Guidelines for the diverse subtypes of cancer-associated VTE.

Unresolved questions on venous thromboembolic disease. Therapeutic management of superficial vein thrombosis (SVT). Consensus statement of the French Society for Vascular Medicine (SFMV).

Superficial vein thrombosis (SVT), a manifestation of venous thromboembolism (VTE), is a common condition, yet of all the types of VTE, it has been the least well studied. Recent studies have challenged the conception that SVT is a benign disease, showing that its risk factors overlap with those of deep-vein thrombosis (DVT) and that it is frequently associated with DVT or pulmonary embolism (PE). In 2010, the CALISTO trial demonstrated the benefit of treatment with fondaparinux at the dose of 2.5mg (one injection per day) for 45days for lower limb SVT. Prior to CALISTO, the treatment of SVT was based on venous compression therapy, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAID) and anticoagulation using various therapeutic regimens. Surgery could also be envisaged in certain cases. In CALISTO, the inclusion criteria designed to obtain a homogeneous population meant that numerous questions remained unanswered with respect to SVT occurring in other locations and under other circumstances, notably in pregnant women, patients with renal insufficiency, and patients with recurrent SVT or superficial vein thrombosis less than 5cm long. The aim of this section is to review the current state of knowledge of SVT and to propose or recommend therapeutic strategies for the management of SVT according to the clinical context, the location of the thrombosis, and the presence of particular risk factors.

Unresolved questions on venous thromboembolic disease. Venous thromboembolism (VTE) management in obese patients. Consensus statement of the French Society of Vascular Medicine (SFMV).

Obesity is an alarming worldwide public health issue and is defined as a body mass index (BMI) of 30kg/m2 or more. It is considered as a risk factor for first thrombotic event and is associated with a significant risk of recurrence. Consequently, obese patients are often treated by anticoagulant therapy but data from randomised control trial are scarce. We will review in this narrative review the state of the art of the prescription of anticoagulant for the prevention and treatment of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in obese patients.

Comparing DOAC and warfarin outcomes in an obese population using the 'real-world' Michigan Anticoagulation Quality Improvement Initiative (MAQI2) registry.

INTRODUCTION: Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have overtaken warfarin in the treatment of nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (AF) and venous thromboembolism (VTE). Limited data explore the safety of DOACs in obesity. METHODS: This multicenter retrospective study between June 2015 and September 2019 uses the Michigan Anticoagulation Quality Improvement Initiative (MAQI2) registry to compare DOACs and warfarin across weight classes (not obese: body mass index (BMI) ⩾ 18.5 and < 30; obese: BMI ⩾ 30 and < 40; severely obese: BMI ⩾ 40). Primary outcomes include major, clinically relevant nonmajor (CRNM), and minor bleeding events per 100 patient-years. Secondary outcomes include stroke, recurrent VTE, and all-cause mortality. RESULTS: DOACs were prescribed to 49% of the 4089 patients with AF and 46% of the 3162 patients with VTE. Compared to patients treated with warfarin, those treated with DOACs had a higher estimated glomerular filtration rate across BMI categories regardless of indication. In the AF population, severely obese patients treated with DOACs had more major (3.4 vs 1.8, p = 0.004), CRNM (8.6 vs 5.9, p = 0.019), and minor bleeding (11.4 vs 9.9, p = 0.001). There was no difference in stroke or all-cause mortality. In the VTE population, both CRNM (7.5 vs 6.7, p = 0.042) and minor bleeding (19.3 vs 10.5, p < 0.001) events occurred at higher rates in patients treated with DOACs. There was no difference in recurrent pulmonary embolism, stroke, or all-cause mortality. CONCLUSION: There is a higher rate of bleeding in severely obese patients with VTE and AF treated with DOACs compared to warfarin, without a difference in secondary outcomes. Further studies to compare the anticoagulant classes and understand bleeding drivers in this population are needed.

Venous thromboembolism in the era of machine learning and artificial intelligence in medicine.

In this review, we embark on a comprehensive exploration of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in the context of medical history and its current practice within medicine. We delve into the landscape of artificial intelligence (AI), exploring its present utility and envisioning its transformative roles within VTE management, from prevention to screening and beyond. Central to our discourse is a forward-looking perspective on the integration of AI within VTE in medicine, advocating for rigorous study design, robust validation processes, and meticulous statistical analysis to gauge the efficacy of AI applications. We further illuminate the potential of large language models and generative AI in revolutionizing VTE care, while acknowledging their inherent limitations and proposing innovative solutions to overcome challenges related to data availability and integrity, including the strategic use of synthetic data. The critical importance of navigating ethical, legal, and privacy concerns associated with AI is underscored, alongside the imperative for comprehensive governance and policy frameworks to regulate its deployment in VTE treatment. We conclude on a note of cautious optimism, where we highlight the significance of proactively addressing the myriad challenges that accompany the advent of AI in healthcare. Through diligent design, stringent validation, extensive education, and prudent regulation, we can harness AI's potential to significantly enhance our understanding and management of VTE. As we stand on the cusp of a new era, our commitment to these principles will be instrumental in ensuring that the promise of AI is fully realized within the realm of VTE care.

Venous thromboembolism: exploring incidence and utility of screening in individuals with dual diagnosis.

OBJECTIVES: The development of venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a common complication following spinal cord injury (SCI) and brain injury (BI), leading to significant morbidity and mortality. The purpose of this study was to explore the incidence of VTE in patients with the dual diagnosis (DD) of SCI and concomitant BI using ultrasonography. DESIGN: Retrospective study. SETTING: Acute rehabilitation hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Thirty-one individuals admitted for DD rehabilitation who were routinely screened for VTE with ultrasound on admission. INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Retrospective chart review was performed to identify whether patients were found to have DVT or PE at the following three time points: in acute care prior to admission to rehabilitation, at time of admission diagnosed via screening examination, and after admission to rehabilitation during the inpatient stay via post screening examinations. Retrospective chart review was also performed to identify incidence of bleeding. RESULTS: 67.7% of individuals were found to have DVTs at any timepoint. Of these DVTs, 22.6% were identified in acute care, 48.4% on admission to rehabilitation, and 16.1% during the course of rehabilitation stay. Of those who were placed on therapeutic anticoagulation due to admission diagnosis of VTE, 25% developed recurrent DVT and 12.5% had bleeding complications. No cases of PE were observed in this study population. CONCLUSIONS: This study found a high incidence of DVT for the DD population at all three timepoints with a high proportion identified via screening ultrasonography on admission to rehabilitation. Further research is needed to investigate the incidence of VTE and utility of screening ultrasonography in this population.

Development and validation of a multi-parameter nomogram for venous thromboembolism in gastric cancer patients: a retrospective analysis.

Objective: Gastric cancer (GC), one of the highest venous thromboembolism (VTE) incidence rates in cancer, contributes to considerable morbidity, mortality, and, prominently, extra cost. However, up to now, there is not a high-quality VTE model to steadily predict the risk for VTE in China. Consequently, setting up a prediction model to predict the VTE risk is imperative. Methods: Data from 3,092 patients from December 15, 2017, to December 31, 2022, were retrospectively analyzed. Multiple logistic regression analysis was performed to assess risk factors for GC, and a nomogram was constructed based on screened risk factors. A receiver operating curve (ROC) and calibration plot was created to evaluate the accuracy of the nomogram. Results: The risk factors of suffering from VTE were older age (OR = 1.02, 95% CI [1.00-1.04]), Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) ≥ 70 (OR = 0.45, 95% CI [0.25-0.83]), Blood transfusion (OR = 2.37, 95% CI [1.47-3.84]), advanced clinical stage (OR = 3.98, 95% CI [1.59-9.99]), central venous catheterization (CVC) (OR = 4.27, 95% CI [2.03-8.99]), operation (OR = 2.72, 95% CI [1.55-4.77]), fibrinogen degradation product (FDP) >5 µg/mL (OR = 1.92, 95% CI [1.13-3.25]), and D-dimer > 0.5 mg/L (OR = 2.50, 95% CI [1.19-5.28]). The area under the ROC curve (AUC) was 0.82 in the training set and 0.85 in the validation set. Conclusion: Our prediction model can accurately predict the risk of the appearance of VTE in gastric cancer patients and can be used as a robust and efficient tool for evaluating the possibility of VTE.

Deep Learning-Based Dynamic Risk Prediction of Venous Thromboembolism for Patients With Ovarian Cancer in Real-World Settings From Electronic Health Records.

PURPOSE: Patients with epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) have an elevated risk for venous thromboembolism (VTE). To assess the risk of VTE, models were developed by statistical or machine learning algorithms. However, few models have accommodated deep learning (DL) algorithms in realistic clinical settings. We aimed to develop a predictive DL model, exploiting rich information from electronic health records (EHRs), including dynamic clinical features and the presence of competing risks. METHODS: We extracted EHRs of 1,268 patients diagnosed with EOC from January 2007 through December 2017 at the National Cancer Center, Korea. DL survival networks using fully connected layers, temporal attention, and recurrent neural networks were adopted and compared with multi-perceptron-based classification models. Prediction accuracy was independently validated in the data set of 423 patients newly diagnosed with EOC from January 2018 to December 2019. Personalized risk plots displaying the individual interval risk were developed. RESULTS: DL-based survival networks achieved a superior area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) between 0.95 and 0.98 while the AUROC of classification models was between 0.85 and 0.90. As clinical information benefits the prediction accuracy, the proposed dynamic survival network outperformed other survival networks for the test and validation data set with the highest time-dependent concordance index (0.974, 0.975) and lowest Brier score (0.051, 0.049) at 6 months after a cancer diagnosis. Our visualization showed that the interval risk fluctuating along with the changes in longitudinal clinical features. CONCLUSION: Adaption of dynamic patient clinical features and accounting for competing risks from EHRs into the DL algorithms demonstrated VTE risk prediction with high accuracy. Our results show that this novel dynamic survival network can provide personalized risk prediction with the potential to assist risk-based clinical intervention to prevent VTE among patients with EOC.

The genetic effects of hormones modulated by the Pituitary-Thyroid/Adrenal/Gonadal axis on the risk of developing venous thromboembolism: a mendelian randomization study.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to explore the genetic effects of hormones modulated through the pituitary-thyroid/adrenal/gonadal axis on the risk of developing venous thromboembolism (VTE) and to investigate the potentially causal relationships between them. METHODS: A two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) design was used. The single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) used as instrumental variables for various hormones and hormone-mediated diseases were derived from published genome-wide association studies (GWASs). Summary statistics for the risk of developing VTE (including deep venous thrombosis [DVT] and pulmonary embolism [PE]) were obtained from the UK Biobank and the FinnGen consortium. Inverse-variance weighting (IVW) was applied as the primary method to analyse causal associations. Other MR methods were used for supplementary estimates and sensitivity analysis. RESULTS: A genetic predisposition to greater free thyroxine (FT4) concentrations was associated with a greater risk of developing DVT (OR = 1.0007, 95%CI [1.0001-1.0013], p = 0.0174) and VTE (OR = 1.0008, 95%CI [1.0002-1.0013], p = 0.0123). Genetically predicted hyperthyroidism was significantly associated with an increased risk of developing DVT (OR = 1.0685, 95%CI [1.0139-1.1261], p = 0.0134) and VTE (OR = 1.0740, 95%CI [1.0165-1.1348], p = 0.0110). According to the initial MR analysis, testosterone concentrations were positively associated with the risk of developing VTE (OR = 1.0038, 95%CI [1.004-1.0072], p = 0.0285). After sex stratification, estradiol concentrations were positively associated with the risk of developing DVT (OR = 1.0143, 95%CI [1.0020-1.0267], p = 0.0226) and VTE (OR = 1.0156, 95%CI [1.0029-1.0285], p = 0.0158) in females, while the significant relationship between testosterone and VTE did not persist. SHBG rs858518 was identified as the only SNP that was associated with an increased risk of developing VTE, mediated by estradiol, in females. CONCLUSIONS: Genetically predicted hyperthyroidism and increased FT4 concentrations were positively associated with the risk of developing VTE. The effects of genetically predicted sex hormones on the risk of developing VTE differed between males and females. Greater genetically predicted estradiol concentrations were associated with an increased risk of developing VTE in females, while the SHBG rs858518 variant may become a potential prevention and treatment target for female VTE.

A systematic review and meta-analysis of the association between the D-dimer and rheumatic diseases.

INTRODUCTION: There is good evidence that specific autoimmune rheumatic diseases (RDs), for example, rheumatoid arthritis and systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), are associated with a state of hypercoagulability and an increased risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE). However, limited information regarding this association is available for other autoimmune or autoinflammatory RDs. We sought to address this issue by conducting a systematic review and meta-analysis of the association between the d-dimer, an established marker of hypercoagulability and VTE, and RDs and the possible clinical and demographic factors mediating this association. METHODS: We searched the electronic databases PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus from inception to January 31, 2024. The risk of bias and the certainty of evidence were assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Checklist and GRADE, respectively. RESULTS: In 31 studies selected for analysis (2724 RD patients and 3437 healthy controls), RD patients had overall significantly higher d-dimer concentrations when compared to controls (standard mean difference = 0.93, 95% CI 0.76-1.10, p < .001; I2 = 86.1%, p < .001; moderate certainty of evidence). The results were stable in a sensitivity analysis. Significant associations were observed between the effect size of the between-group differences in d-dimer concentration and age, specific RD and RD category, RD duration, fibrinogen, plasminogen activator inhibitor, C-reactive protein, and erythrocyte sedimentation rate. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, patients with RDs have significantly higher d-dimer concentrations when compared with healthy controls, indicating a state of hypercoagulability. The alterations in d-dimer concentrations are mediated by age, specific RD and RD category, RD duration, and markers of anticoagulation and inflammation. Further research is warranted to investigate d-dimer concentrations across the spectrum of RDs and their utility in predicting and managing VTE in these patients (PROSPERO registration number: CRD42024517712).

[The prevention, diagnosis and management of pregnancy-associated pulmonary embolism].

Pregnancy-associated pulmonary embolism (PE) is a type of venous thromboembolism (VTE) that seriously threatens the lives of pregnant women and has gained more attention in clinical practice. Due to physiological and anatomical characteristics, the incidence of VTE during pregnancy and postpartum is significantly higher than that during non-pregnancy periods. Currently, guidelines widely acknowledge the exploration of appropriate risk assessment models to evaluate the risk of pregnancy-associated VTE and to take corresponding preventive measures from mechanical to medication methods according to different risk levels. For patients suspected of PE, initial assessments can be made based on whether they exhibit clinical manifestations of deep vein thrombosis, with options including vascular compression ultrasonography or chest X-ray examination. Confirmation relies on CT pulmonary angiography or V/Q imaging. For patients with shock, echocardiography can be quickly used for the diagnosis and differential diagnosis of PE. The management of pregnancy-associated pulmonary embolism PE depends on the patient's hemodynamic status, with options including reperfusion therapy or anticoagulation therapy. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation may also be beneficial in high risk patients. The overall evidence level for the prevention and management of pregnancy-associated PE is low, and further exploration in clinical practice is still needed to promote the safety of pregnant women.

Integrative Metabolomics Differentiate Coronary Artery Disease, Peripheral Artery Disease, and Venous Thromboembolism Risks.

BACKGROUND: Arterial and venous cardiovascular conditions, such as coronary artery disease (CAD), peripheral artery disease (PAD), and venous thromboembolism (VTE), are genetically correlated. Interrogating underlying mechanisms may shed light on disease mechanisms. In this study, we aimed to identify (1) epidemiological and (2) causal, genetic relationships between metabolites and CAD, PAD, and VTE. METHODS: We used metabolomic data from 95 402 individuals in the UK Biobank, excluding individuals with prevalent cardiovascular disease. Cox proportional-hazards models estimated the associations of 249 metabolites with incident disease. Bidirectional 2-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) estimated the causal effects between metabolites and outcomes using genome-wide association summary statistics for metabolites (n=118 466 from the UK Biobank), CAD (n=184 305 from CARDIoGRAMplusC4D 2015), PAD (n=243 060 from the Million Veterans Project), and VTE (n=650 119 from the Million Veterans Project). Multivariable MR was performed in subsequent analyses. RESULTS: We found that 196, 115, and 74 metabolites were associated (P<0.001) with CAD, PAD, and VTE, respectively. Further interrogation of these metabolites with MR revealed 94, 34, and 9 metabolites with potentially causal effects on CAD, PAD, and VTE, respectively. There were 21 metabolites common to CAD and PAD and 4 common to PAD and VTE. Many putatively causal metabolites included lipoprotein traits with heterogeneity across different sizes and lipid subfractions. Small VLDL (very-low-density lipoprotein) particles increased the risk for CAD while large VLDL particles decreased the risk for VTE. We identified opposing directions of CAD and PAD effects for cholesterol and triglyceride concentrations within HDLs (high-density lipoproteins). Subsequent sensitivity analyses including multivariable MR revealed several metabolites with robust, potentially causal effects of VLDL particles on CAD. CONCLUSIONS: While common vascular conditions are associated with overlapping metabolomic profiles, MR prioritized the role of specific lipoprotein species for potential pharmacological targets to maximize benefits in both arterial and venous beds.

Risk factors related to venous thromboembolism in pregnant women: a meta-analysis.

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this paper was to make a preliminary analysis of the risk factors related to venous thromboembolism (VTE) in pregnant women by Meta-analysis. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: Three databases including PubMed, Web of Science, and The National Library of Medicine (NLM) were systematically searched from their establishment to January 1, 2023, and the obtained data were statistically analyzed using RevMan5.3 software. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: A total of 10 studies were included, involving 22 risk factors, of which 16 were included for further analysis. Meta analysis showed that cesarean section (OR=2.05, 95%CI: 1.71, 2.47, P=0.007), gestational diabetes (OR=1.17, 95%CI: 1.09, 1.27, P<0.001), eclampsia or preeclampsia (OR=1.88, 95%CI: 1.42, 2.49, P< 0.001), obesity (OR=1.19, 95%CI: 1.04, 1.86, P=0.028), twin or multiple pregnancy (OR=2.34, 95%CI: 1.46, 3.76, P<0.001), chronic heart disease (OR=3.59, 95%CI: 3.28, 3.92, P<0.001), and blood transfusion history (OR=3.20, 95%CI: 2.78, 3.68, P<0.001) were risk factors for VTE in pregnant women. CONCLUSIONS: Existing evidence suggests that cesarean section, gestational diabetes, eclampsia or preeclampsia, obesity (body mass index ≥30 kg/m2), twin or multiple pregnancy, chronic heart disease, and blood transfusion history may be risk factors for VTE in pregnant women. In clinical practice, the evaluation and management of VTE should be strengthened, and a model for clinical prediction of VTE can be established to provide a reference for the prevention of VTE.

Risk of venous thromboembolism and arterial events in patients with hypoalbuminemia: a comprehensive meta-analysis of more than 2 million patients.

BACKGROUND: Albumin has antiplatelet and anticoagulant functions. Hypoalbuminemia, as defined by serum values of <3.5 g/dL, is associated with arterial thrombosis; its impact on venous thromboembolism (VTE) is unclear. OBJECTIVES: The objective of this meta-analysis is to assess the VTE risk in patients with hypoalbuminemia. METHODS: MEDLINE and EMBASE were searched up to January 2024 for observational studies and randomized trials reporting data of interest. Primary outcome was the risk of VTE, while secondary outcomes were myocardial infarction and stroke risk in patients with hypoalbuminemia versus those without hypoalbuminemia. The risk of bias was evaluated using Newcastle-Ottawa scale and Cochrane tool. Risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated in a random-effects model. RESULTS: Forty-three studies for a total of 2 531 091 patients (39 738 medical and 2 491 353 surgical) were included in primary analysis; 79.1% of the studies used 3.5 g/dL cut-off value for hypoalbuminemia definition. Follow-up duration was 30 days in 60.5% of studies. Patients with hypoalbuminemia had a higher risk of VTE (RR, 1.88; 95% CI, 1.66-2.13). RRs were similar in both medical (RR, 1.87; 95% CI, 1.53-2.27) and surgical patients (RR, 1.87; 95% CI, 1.61-2.16) and in patients with (RR, 1.86; 95% CI, 1.66-2.10) and without cancer (RR, 1.89; 95% CI, 1.47-2.44). Risk of myocardial infarction (RR, 1.88; 95% CI, 1.54-2.31) and stroke (RR, 1.77; 95% CI, 1.26-2.48) was higher in patients with hypoalbuminemia. CONCLUSION: Hypoalbuminemia is a risk factor for VTE in both medical and surgical patients irrespective of cancer coexistence. Serum albumin analysis may represent a simple and cheap tool to identify patients at VTE risk.

Positive predictive value and sensitivity of cancer-associated venous thromboembolism diagnoses in the Danish National Patient Register.

INTRODUCTION: Hospital discharge diagnoses from administrative registries are frequently used in studies of cancer-associated venous thromboembolism, but the validity of International Classification of Diseases (ICD) codes for identifying such events is unknown. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using patient samples from the Danish National Patient Register, we calculated positive predictive values (PPV), i.e., the proportion of registered ICD codes, which could be confirmed after manual search of the electronic health record. Sensitivity was estimated in a sample of patients with imaging-verified venous thromboembolism but without prior knowledge about their ICD coding status. Sensitivity was calculated as the proportion of these patients, who were discharged with an ICD code for venous thromboembolism. RESULTS: The overall PPV of an ICD-10 diagnosis of cancer-associated venous thromboembolism was 75.9 % (95 % confidence interval 71.3-80.0). In subgroups, the PPV was particularly low for recurrent venous thromboembolism (44.2 %), diagnoses in a secondary position (55.7 %), outpatient diagnoses (65.3 %), and diagnoses given at surgical (66.7 %), emergency wards (48.4 %), or via hospices/palliative teams (0 %). The overall sensitivity was 68 %, meaning 32 % of patients with cancer diagnosed in hospital with venous thromboembolism were discharged without any registered ICD code for venous thromboembolism. CONCLUSIONS: The positive predictive value of an ICD diagnosis of cancer-associated venous thromboembolism in the Danish Patient Register was overall adequate for research purposes, but with notable variation across subgroups. Sensitivity was limited, as 1/3 of patients with venous thromboembolism were discharged without any relevant ICD code. Cautious interpretation of incidence of cancer-associated venous thromboembolism based on administrative register-based data is warranted.

Temporal Changes in Long-Term Outcomes of Venous Thromboembolism From the Warfarin Era to the Direct Oral Anticoagulant Era.

BACKGROUND: There have been limited data on the changes in clinical outcomes after the introduction of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) for venous thromboembolism (VTE) in real clinical practice. We evaluated the changes in management strategies and long-term outcomes from the warfarin era to the DOAC era. METHODS AND RESULTS: We compared the 2 series of multicenter COMMAND VTE (Contemporary Management and Outcomes in Patients With Venous Thromboembolism) registries in Japan enrolling consecutive patients with acute symptomatic VTE: Registry 1: 3027 patients in the warfarin era (2010-2014) and Registry 2: 5197 patients in the DOAC era (2015-2020). The prevalence of DOAC use increased more in Registry 2 than in the Registry 1 (Registry 1: 2.6% versus Registry 2: 79%, P<0.001). The cumulative 5-year incidence of recurrent VTE was significantly lower in Registry 2 than in Registry 1 (10.5% versus 9.5%, P=0.02), and the risk reduction of recurrent VTE in Registry 2 remained significant even after adjusting the confounders (hazard ratio [HR], 0.78 [95% CI, 0.65-0.93]; P=0.005). The cumulative 5-year incidence of major bleeding was not significantly different between the 2 registries (12.1% versus 13.7%, P=0.26), and the risk of major bleeding between the 2 registries was not significantly different even after adjusting the confounders (HR, 1.04 [95% CI, 0.89-1.21]; P=0.63). CONCLUSIONS: Along with the shift from warfarin to DOACs, there was a lower risk of recurrent VTE in the DOAC era than in the warfarin era, whereas there was no apparent change in the risk of major bleeding, which might still be an unmet need even in the DOAC era.