Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 8 de 8
Filter
1.
Wilderness Environ Med ; 31(1): 63-70, 2020 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32044209

ABSTRACT

The UK General Medical Councils' approved curricula share only 3 topics with the Fellowship in the Academy of Wilderness Medicine core curriculum, suggesting an underrepresentation of wilderness medicine (WM) in medical education. We developed a 5-mo course to address the gaps between these curricula to run in parallel with the conventional curriculum. Our 71-h course is composed of lectures and practical exercises. We set out to evaluate the effectiveness of this concept and assess its suitability for use by other institutions. The course was undertaken by 18 medicine and healthcare undergraduates. Semiquantitative evaluation of the course was done using participants' self-reported WM knowledge and interest before and after the course using a Likert scale. Participants were further assessed with a WM objective structured clinical examination. Before the course, students had a lower understanding of WM (2.8/5.0) and were not confident in prehospital medicine (2.5/5.0). After the course, knowledge and confidence increased in all teaching categories, with a mean gain of 1.4/5.0 (P<0.05). Students demonstrated competence in a range of WM categories by completing the WM objective structured clinical examination, with a pass rate of 82%. Providing students with a WM course is effective in introducing components of the Fellowship in the Academy of Wilderness Medicine curriculum and inspiring future engagement in the field. We have developed a framework for successful implementation of WM teaching and shown that the concept may be used in other undergraduate settings.


Subject(s)
Education, Medical/statistics & numerical data , Emergency Medicine/education , Students, Medical/statistics & numerical data , Wilderness Medicine/education , Education, Medical/organization & administration , Emergency Medicine/statistics & numerical data , United Kingdom , Wilderness Medicine/statistics & numerical data
2.
Wilderness Environ Med ; 30(2): 155-162, 2019 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30987868

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Helicopter emergency medical services (HEMS) contribute to and complement other specialized search and rescue (SAR) services. Conversely, traditional SAR services perform medical evacuation (medevac), depending on crew, training, medical equipment, and procedures for interdisciplinary cooperation. We aim to describe and compare SAR and remote medevac mission characteristics in a military SAR helicopter system to a civilian HEMS operating in the same region. METHODS: Retrospective, observational study of SAR and remote medevac missions performed at a Norwegian military SAR helicopter and civilian HEMS base in the 5-y period from January 1, 2013 to December 31, 2017. Descriptive statistics and median values with interquartile range (IQR) were applied where appropriate. Comparisons were performed with the Mann-Whitney U test. RESULTS: We included 721 missions. The SAR service performed 359 (50%) missions, of which 237 (33%) were SAR and 122 (17%) were remote medevac missions. The HEMS service performed 85 (12%) SAR and 277 (38%) remote medevac missions. Median mission time for SAR missions was 152 (IQR 100-235) min for the SAR service and 57 (IQR 34-89) min for the HEMS service. Trauma was the dominating mechanism in 48% of patients, followed by medical conditions (21%) and psychiatric disorders (9%). Medevac patients in both services had a higher median National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics score of 3 (IQR 2-4) compared to 1 (IQR 0-3) in SAR missions (P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Both SAR and HEMS services perform SAR and remote medevac missions extensively and mission profiles vary.


Subject(s)
Air Ambulances/statistics & numerical data , Emergency Medical Services/statistics & numerical data , Rescue Work/statistics & numerical data , Aircraft/statistics & numerical data , Female , Humans , Male , Mental Disorders/epidemiology , Norway/epidemiology , Retrospective Studies , Wilderness Medicine/statistics & numerical data , Wounds and Injuries/epidemiology
3.
Wilderness Environ Med ; 29(3): 315-324, 2018 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29908723

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Physician-staffed helicopter emergency medical services (HEMS) in Norway are an adjunct to existing search and rescue services. Our aims were to study the epidemiological, operational, and medical aspects of HEMS daylight static rope operations performed in the southeastern part of the country and to examine several quality dimensions that are characteristic of this service. METHODS: We reviewed the static rope operations performed at 3 HEMS bases during a 3-y period and applied a set of quality indicators designed for physician-staffed emergency medical services to evaluate the quality of care. Data are presented as medians with quartiles, except National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics (NACA) scores, which are presented as mean (SD). RESULTS: Fifty-nine static rope operations were identified, involving 60 patients. Median (quartiles) age was 43 (27-55) y. Median (quartiles) take-off time was 9 (5-13) min. Trauma-related injuries were found in 48 patients. The main conditions were lower limb injuries, found in 32 patients. Ten patients experienced medical conditions. Mean (SD) NACA score was 3.3 (1.3). A potential or actual life-threatening diagnosis (NACA score: 4-6) was reported among 15 patients. The main interventions were intravenous lines (19 patients), analgesics (17), and oxygen treatment (14). Four patients were intubated, and 1 thoracostomy was performed. CONCLUSIONS: Static rope operations are rarely performed. The quality indicators suggest that the service is safe, available, and equitable. Its main benefit seems to be evacuation and the maintenance of readiness before rapid transport of the physician to the scene or the patient to the hospital.


Subject(s)
Air Ambulances/statistics & numerical data , Wilderness Medicine/methods , Wilderness Medicine/statistics & numerical data , Wounds and Injuries/epidemiology , Wounds and Injuries/therapy , Adult , Aircraft , Databases, Factual , Emergency Medical Services , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Norway/epidemiology , Physicians , Quality of Health Care , Severity of Illness Index
4.
Wilderness Environ Med ; 29(2): 211-214, 2018 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29576403

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: In 2014, the Wilderness Medical Society (WMS) published guidelines for the treatment of acute pain in remote settings. We surveyed wilderness medicine providers on self-reported analgesia prescribing practices. METHODS: We conducted a prospective, anonymous survey. Respondents were recruited from the WMS annual symposium in 2016. All willing attendees were included. RESULTS: During the symposium, we collected a total of 124 surveys (68% response rate). Respondent age was 42±12 (24-79) years (mean±SD with range), 58% were male, and 69% reported physician-level training. All respondents had medical training of varying levels. Of the physicians reporting a specialty, emergency medicine (59%, n=51), family medicine (13%, n=11), and internal medicine (8%, n=7) were reported most frequently. Eighty-one (65%) respondents indicated they prefer a standardized pain assessment tool, with the 10-point numerical rating scale being the most common (54%, n=67). Most participants reported preferring oral acetaminophen (81%, n=101) or nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAID) (91%, n=113). Of those preferring NSAID, most reported administering acetaminophen as an adjunct (82%, n=101). Ibuprofen was the most frequently cited NSAID (71%, n=88). Of respondents who preferred opioids, the most frequently preferred opioid was oxycodone (26%, n=32); a lower proportion of respondents reported preferring oral transmucosal fentanyl citrate (9%, n=11). Twenty-five (20%, n=25) respondents preferred ketamine. CONCLUSIONS: Wilderness medicine practitioners prefer analgesic agents recommended by the WMS for the treatment of acute pain. Respondents most frequently preferred acetaminophen and NSAIDs.


Subject(s)
Analgesia/methods , Pain Management/methods , Wilderness Medicine/methods , Adult , Aged , Analgesia/statistics & numerical data , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Pain Management/statistics & numerical data , Prospective Studies , Self Report , Wilderness Medicine/statistics & numerical data
5.
Wilderness Environ Med ; 29(1): 5-10, 2018 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29331295

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: The popularity of adventure recreation in wilderness areas across the world continues to increase. Nevertheless, the risk of injury and illness remains significant. The purpose of this study is to analyze the mountain rescue operations performed in Slovenia between 2011 and 2015. METHODS: This retrospective study reports mountain rescue operations documented by the Slovenian National Mountain Rescue Association. The annual number of ground-based and helicopter-based rescues were identified and compared. For 2015, the indication for rescue and the severity of injury were also analyzed, specifically for interventions requiring the use of a helicopter. RESULTS: From 2011 through 2015, the number of rescues remained consistent with an annual average of 413 (SD ±15; range, 393-434) rescues. However, the percentage of ground-based rescues varied significantly year by year (P=0.016), with highest rate in 2014 (68%) and the lowest in 2015 (56%). In 2015, 434 mountain rescue operations were reported in Slovenia. Injury accounted for 44%, illness for 10%, and fatality for 9% of the rescues. In 37%, no illness or injury was reported. Helicopter rescue was used in 190 (44%) of all interventions. Among the 190 helicopter rescues, 49% of patients had nonfatal injuries, 29% required no medical treatment, 15% had illness, and 7% had fatal injuries. CONCLUSIONS: A significant number of mountain rescue operations were conducted in Slovenia from 2011 through 2015. Most of these were needed for injured, ill, or deceased persons. A notable number of rescues in 2015 required a helicopter.


Subject(s)
Air Ambulances/statistics & numerical data , Rescue Work/statistics & numerical data , Wilderness Medicine/statistics & numerical data , Mountaineering/statistics & numerical data , Retrospective Studies , Slovenia
6.
Wilderness Environ Med ; 27(4): 468-475, 2016 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27789165

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To describe the resources for medical condition management in mountain huts and the epidemiology of such events. METHODS: We conducted a 3-step study from April 2013 to August 2014 in French mountain huts. The first step consisted of collecting data regarding the first aid equipment available in mountain huts. The second step consisted of a qualitative evaluation of the mountain hut guardian's role in medical situations through semistructured interviews. Finally, a prospective observational study was conducted in the summer season to collect all medical events (MEs) that occurred during that period. RESULTS: Out of 164 hut guardians, 141 (86%) had a basic life support diploma. An automatic external defibrillator was available in 41 (26%) huts, and 148 huts (98%) were equipped with a first aid kit. According to semistructured interviews, hut guardians played a valuable role in first aid assistance. Regarding the observational study, 306 people requested the hut guardian's help for medical reasons in 87 of the 126 huts included. A total of 501 MEs for approximately 56,000 hikers (0.85%) were reported, with 280 MEs (56%) involving medical pathologies and 221 (44%) MEs involving trauma-related injuries. CONCLUSIONS: MEs had low prevalence, but the hut guardian played a valuable role as a first aid responder.


Subject(s)
Emergency Treatment/statistics & numerical data , First Aid/instrumentation , First Aid/statistics & numerical data , Mountaineering , Adult , Aged , Female , France , Housing , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , Surveys and Questionnaires , Wilderness Medicine/statistics & numerical data , Young Adult
8.
Wilderness Environ Med ; 20(1): 39-42, 2009.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19364185

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To introduce and describe the US Border Patrol (USBP) Tucson Sector Border Patrol Search, Trauma and Rescue Unit (BORSTAR) and to analyze whether the frequency of its activities were associated with the amount of total border patrol law enforcement activities in the area. METHODS: Descriptive and nonparametric analysis was conducted on data that were obtained on total USBP apprehensions of undocumented immigrants and BORSTAR activities for a consecutive 3-year period. RESULTS: From October 2004 to September 2007 over 1 million apprehensions occurred within the Tucson Sector. During this time, a large number of search, rescue, and medical intervention events occurred. However, only a weak association was found between the frequency of apprehensions and BORSTAR activities. CONCLUSIONS: The BORSTAR unit of the Tucson Sector commonly encounters harsh conditions and provides search, rescue, and medical interventions to undocumented immigrants. The frequency of BORSTAR activities is not strongly associated with the volume of USBP law enforcement activities.


Subject(s)
Emergency Medical Services/statistics & numerical data , Emigration and Immigration , Rescue Work , Wilderness Medicine/statistics & numerical data , Arizona , Humans , Mexico , Seasons , Transients and Migrants
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL