Mosaic translation hypothesis: chimeric polypeptides produced via multiple ribosomal frameshifting as a basis for adaptability.

How many different proteins can be produced from a single spliced transcript? Genome annotation projects overlook the coding potential of reading frames other than that of the reference open reading frames (refORFs). Recently, alternative open reading frames (altORFs) and their translational products, alternative proteins, have been shown to carry out important functions in various organisms. AltORFs overlapping refORFs or other altORFs in a different reading frame may be involved in one fundamental mechanism so far overlooked. A few years ago, it was proposed that altORFs may act as building blocks for chimeric (mosaic) polypeptides, which are produced via multiple ribosomal frameshifting events from a single mature transcript. We adopt terminology from that earlier discussion and call this mechanism mosaic translation. This way of extracting and combining genetic information may significantly increase proteome diversity. Thus, we hypothesize that this mechanism may have contributed to the flexibility and adaptability of organisms to a variety of environmental conditions. Specialized ribosomes acting as sensors probably played a central role in this process. Importantly, mosaic translation may be the main source of protein diversity in genomes that lack alternative splicing. The idea of mosaic translation is a testable hypothesis, although its direct demonstration is challenging. Should mosaic translation occur, we would currently highly underestimate the complexity of translation mechanisms and thus the proteome.

Do Clothing Labels Play a Role for Weight Estimation in Pediatric Emergencies? A Prospective, Cross-Sectional Study.

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to investigate the usability of the age value listed on the labels on children's clothes in the age-based weight estimation method recommended by the Pediatric Advanced Life Support (PALS) guidelines. MATERIAL-METHOD: This prospective, cross-sectional study was organized in Antalya Training and Research Hospital Emergency Department. Children aged between 1-12 years were included in the study. The weight measurements of the children were obtained based on the age-related criteria on the labels of their clothes. The estimated values were compared with the real values of the cases measured on the scale. RESULTS: One-thousand ninety-four cases were included, the mean age of cases in age-based measurements was 6.25 years, which was 6.5 years in label-based measurements. Average weights measured 25.75kg according to age-based measurements, 26.5kg according to label-based measurements, and 26.0kg on the scales, and showed no statistical difference (P <.0001). It was estimated that 741 (67.7%) of age-based measurements and 775 (70.8%) of label-based measurements were within (±)10% values within the normal measurement limits and no significant difference was measured. CONCLUSION: In the emergency department and prehospital setting, children with an unknown age and that need resuscitation and interventional procedures for stabilization, and have no time for weight estimation, checking the age on clothing label (ACL) instead of the actual age (AA) can be safely used for the age-dependent weight calculation formula recommended by the PALS guide.

Concomitant Substance Use Increases the Toxic Effect of synthetic cannabinoid (Bonsai): A Prospective Study.

OBJECTIVE: In this study, we aimed to contribute to the literature by evaluating bonsai and additional drugs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This prospective study was conducted on 217 patients who admitted to the emergency department (ED) with bonsai intake between December 20, 2014 and January 1, 2016, according to the patient history obtained from the patients. While 168 patients with negative urinary metabolites results were excluded from the study, 49 patients with positive urinary metabolites were included in the study. Patients were divided into two groups. The first group consisted of patients with only bonsai intake and the second group consisted of patients with bonsai and concomitant drug intake. The groups were compared in terms of symptoms, findings, blood gas values, duration of the symptoms, discharge time, hospitalization, and mortality rate. Data were analyzed using the Chi-square, the Fisher's exacttest, the Student t-test, and the Mann-Whitney U test. Data were evaluated at the 95% confidence interval. P<0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: The mean age of 49 patients included in the study was 26.7±8.9 years and 91.8% (n=45) of the patients were male. Concomittant drug intake was identified in 69.4% of patients. Concomitant drug use was as follows: cocaine (20.4%, n=10), amphetamines (14.3%, n=7), methamphetamines (8,2%, n=4,) tetrahydrocannabinol (32.7%, n=16), opiates (18.4%, n=9) and alcohol (30.6%, n=15). On admission, Glasgow Coma Score (GCS) of the bonsai with additional substance group was significantly higher (p=0,003). The most common symptom was palpitations (tachycardia) (75.5%, n=37). There were no patients hospitalized in Only Bonsai group (p=0,020). The median time to remission of symptoms and median follow-up time of the patients in the emergency room were 3 hours and 6 hours, respectively. Remission time of the symptoms and hospitalization rates were higher in patients with concomittant drug intake (p <0.05) Conclusion: While the bonsai intake alone is not considered mortal to the patients and most of them can be discharged from the ED after signs and symptoms disappear, concomitant drug use can increase the toxic effects of bonsai intake. That is why follow-up of patients taking concomitant drug and the treatment process should be carried out more carefully.

Improvement in physician pain perception with using pain scales.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Acute pain is the most common reason for visits to the emergency department (ED). The underuse of analgesics occurs in a large proportion of ED patients. The physician's accurate assessment of patients' pain is a key element to improved pain management. The purpose of this study was to assess if physicians' perception of pain can improve with looking at the pain score of the patient marked on VAS. STUDY DESIGN: This was a single-center, cross-sectional prospective observational study, that took place in an academic ED. METHODS: All adult ED patients presenting with a painful condition were enrolled to the study. In the first phase of the study, the physician rated his/her opinion about the patient's pain on a 100 mm VAS, in a blinded fashion to the patient's pain score. In the second phase, the physician rated his/her opinion after looking at the pain scale marked by patient. RESULTS: 587 patients (295, in first and 292, in second phase) were enrolled. The groups were not statistically different for demographic data. The physician's perception of pain was lower than the patient's pain score at both phases of the study. Insight of the patient's pain score on VAS increased the physician's pain perception significantly (p = 0.03). During the second phase, physicians ordered significantly more analgesic medications to the patients (p = 0.03). CONCLUSION: The physicians' perception of the patients' pain differs significantly from the pain that the patient is experiencing. VAS helps to bring the physicians impression of pain perception to the level of pain that the patient is actually experiencing and resulted in ordering more analgesics to the patients. Implementation of a pain assessment tool can raise the physician's perception of the pain and may improve pain management practices and patient satisfaction.

Diagnostic Value and Effect of Bedside Ultrasound in Acute Appendicitis in the Emergency Department.

OBJECTIVE: Early and accurate diagnosis of acute appendicitis (AA) with ultrasound (US) can minimize the morbidity and mortality of the patients. In this regard, US can help emergency physicians (EPs) in the diagnosing process and clinical decision making for AA. Therefore, we primarily aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of point-of-care US (POCUS) in clinical decision making of EPs for the diagnostic evaluation for AA in the emergency department (ED). METHODS: The study sample consisted of patients aged > 18 years who presented to the ED with abdominal pain and underwent diagnostic evaluation for AA. All patients were examined initially with POCUS by EPs and then with radiology-performed US (RADUS) by radiologists. Pre- and post-POCUS median diagnostic certainty values (MDCVs) for AA were determined with visual analog scale (VAS) scores (0 = not present, 100 = certainly present) by POCUS performers. Definitive diagnoses were determined by surgery, pathologic evaluation of appendectomy specimens, or clinical follow-up results. The sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio (PLR), and negative likelihood ratio (NLR) for POCUS and RADUS together with pre- and post-POCUS VAS scores for MDCVs were compared. RESULTS: A total of 264 patients were included into the final analysis and 169 (64%) had a diagnosis of AA. The sensitivity, specificity, PLR, and NLR of US examinations were 92.3% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 87.2%-95.8%), 95.8% (89.5%-98.8%), 21.9 (8.4-57.2), and 0.08 (0.05-0.1) for POCUS and 76.9% (69.8-83%), 97.8% (84.9-99.7%), 36.4 (9.25-144.3), and 0.24 (0.18-0.31) for RADUS, respectively. Pre-POCUS and post-POCUS VAS scores for MDCVs were 60 (interquartile range [IQR] = 50-65) and 95 (IQR = 20-98), respectively (p = 0.000). CONCLUSION: Point-of-care ultrasonography, when performed in ED for the diagnosis of AA, has high sensitivity and specificity and had a positive impact on the clinical decision making of EPs.