Factors affecting lower extremity venous insufficiency recurrence following radiofrequency ablation.

OBJECTIVE: To clarify possible factors for recurrence of venous insufficiency following radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for the treatment of lower extremity chronic venous insufficiency (CVI). METHODS: Patients with lower extremity CVI who underwent RFA therapy were reviewed for inclusion in the study. Patients' characteristics, operative parameters and follow-up outcomes were recorded. Patients were divided into two groups (patients with successful RFA and patients with recurrent venous insufficiency). Groups were compared according to patient demographic features, treated vein characteristics, operative data and follow-up duration. RESULTS: In total, 313 patients matched the study inclusion criteria and 48 patients encountered RFA failure during follow-up. Mean BMI and ratio of COPD were significantly higher in patients with RFA failure (p = .002 and p = .007). The CEAP classification was significantly different between the groups (p = .007). Mean follow-up time was significantly longer in patients with RFA failure (p = .011). Presence of COPD and BMI ≥30 kg/m2 increased RFA failure 4.187 times and 2.255 times, respectively (p = .002 and p = .022). Additionally, CEAP C4 significantly increased RFA failure (p = .001). Lastly, longer follow-up time was a predictive factor for RF failure (p = .024). CONCLUSION: Our study findings demonstrated for the first time that obesity, presence of COPD, presence of veins classified as CEAP C4 before RFA, and follow-up period longer than 48 months were predictive factors for venous insufficiency recurrence following RFA.

Comparison of Radiofrequency Ablation and Saphenous Vein Stripping for the Treatment of Recurrent Lower Extremity Venous Insufficiency.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficiency and safety of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and saphenous vein stripping (SVS) for the treatment of recurrent lower extremity chronic superficial venous insufficiency (CSVI). METHODS: Patients who underwent SVS and RFA for recurrent lower extremity CSVI following RFA and patients who had 2-year follow-up results were enrolled into the study. Total, 37 patients who underwent a second RFA session with 2-year follow-up results were available. Then 37 patients were selected from 88 patients who underwent SVS for recurrent lower extremity CSVI to achieve a 1:1 ratio for comparison. Groups were compared based on preoperative properties, operative parameters, postoperative outcomes, complications and follow-up results. RESULTS: Duration of the procedure was 20.7 minutes in the RFA group and 30.7 minutes in the SVS group (P = .001). Postoperative pain at first hour, sixth hour and 24th hour were significantly lower in patients who underwent RF (P = .001 for each parameter). Moreover, hospitalization time (18.1 hours vs 24.6 hours, P = .001) and time to return to normal daily activities (1.6 days and 2.5 days, P = .001) were significantly shorter in the RFA group. Success of the procedure did not statistically significant at first year follow-up (P = .304). However, success was significantly higher for the SVS group at second year follow-up (73% for RFA group and 91.9% for SVS group, P = .032). CONCLUSION: We achieved significantly shorter procedure time, less postoperative hospitalization time, and a shorter time to return to daily activities with RFA. In contrast, the success rate of SVS was significantly higher at the second year follow-up, but not the first year follow-up in comparison with RFA.

The Evaluation of YouTube™ English Videos' Quality About Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting.

Objectives: The aim of the study was to clarify the reliability and quality of English videos about Coronary artery bypass grafting on YouTubeTM. Methods: The study was performed between July 16 and July 30. A cardiovascular surgeon searched for terms including "coronary artery disease," "coronary artery treatment," "coronary artery bypass" and "coronary artery bypass surgery," in YouTubeTM. All videos were classified into two groups according to the source who uploaded the video as professional videos and non-professional videos. Video characteristics including duration of video on YouTube™, length of video, and view numbers for each video were recorded. Moreover, the numbers of "comments," "likes," and "dislikes" were noted. Furthermore, the target audience of the videos (professional health care worker and patients) was analyzed, DISCERN score and Global quality score (GQS) were calculated for each video. Results: Totally, 812 videos were divided into two groups according to upload sources; 448 videos were categorized as professional videos and 364 videos were categorized as non-professional videos. The mean number of views was 3220.5 for professional videos and 2216.5 for non-professional videos (p=0.001). In addition, the mean "like" numbers and mean comment numbers were significantly higher for professional videos (p=0.001 and p=0.001). The mean DISCERN score was 2.6 for professional videos and 1.5 for non-professional videos (p=0.001). Similarly, the mean GSQ was significantly higher for professional videos (3.5 vs. 2.5, p=0.001). Conclusion: YouTube™ videos which are shared by professional healthcare workers have better quality and reliability with significantly higher DISCERN score and GQS.

An interesting finding: What is the relation between aortic enlargement and COVID-19?

BACKGROUND: We aim to compare the diameters of ascending aorta in COVID-19 patients and COVID-19-free individuals referred to our pandemic hospital. METHODS: The medical records and thorax tomographies of patients admitted to the "pandemic central" state hospital with symptoms of COVID-19 were observed between April 2020 and May 2020 in this case-control study. The first group consisted of patients diagnosed with COVID-19, and the second group consisted of patients without the disease. The diameter of the ascending aorta is measured via tomography and compared to each other. The most causative risk factors for aortic enlargements underwent a multivariate regression analysis. RESULTS: Charts of 156 patients (104 COVID-19 positives, 52 COVID-19 negatives) were reviewed. There was a statistical difference (p: .01) between the mean aortic diameter of COVID-19 patients (39 mm) and COVID-free patients (32.5 mm) even though comorbid factors and patient characteristics were similar in the two groups at the time of hospital admission. The regression analysis result demonstrates that COVID-19 (leading factor), age, and coronary artery disease were the most significant factors associated with increasing aortic dimensions. (p: .001, B: 5.3/, p: .02, B: 3.36/, p: .002, B: 0.13/, R square: 40.2%). CONCLUSION: This study shows that the mean aortic diameter of COVID-19 patients is larger than non-COVID-19 patients with similar comorbidities referred to a pandemic hospital. COVID-19, age, and coronary artery disease are the most influential factors that affect the aortic diameter, and the COVID-19 was the leading factor.

The Evaluation of Cardiovascular Surgery-Associated Google Search Trends During COVID-19 Waves.

Objectives: The aim of the study was to clarify public interest about cardiovascular disease during the COVID-19 pandemic using Google Trends (GT). Methods: The study was performed between November 20 and December 1, 2021. A total of 21 keywords related to cardiovascular surgery were selected. Public attention to all selected keywords was analyzed by GT with using the filters "web search," "all categories," and "Turkey." In Turkey, three COVID-19 waves (between March 12, 2020, and May 8, 2020, November 24, 2020, and January 20, 2021, and March 20, 2021, and May 16, 2021) were experienced since the beginning of the pandemic. To analyze public attention to cardiovascular surgery during the COVID-19 waves, 8-week periods during the COVID-19 waves were compared with the same times in the past 4 years (2016-2019). Results: Comparisons of March 12-May 8 2020 and the same period between 2016 and 2019 showed that total public interest about cardiovascular surgery was significantly decreased (-28.7%, p=0.001). The comparison of the second COVID-19 wave (November 24, 2020-January 20, 2021 versus November 24-January 20, 2016-2019) revealed that public interest about cardiovascular surgery was significantly lower in the COVID-19 era (-22.2%, p=0.001). Comparison of the third COVID-19 wave and the same periods in the previous 4 years demonstrated that public interest about cardiovascular disease was significantly lower in the COVID-19 era (-8.5%, p=0.001). In contrast, the term coronary angiography was searched significantly more during the third wave of COVID-19 in comparison to the same periods between 2016 and 2019 (17.9%, p=0.015). Conclusion: Our study demonstrated that public interest in cardiovascular diseases was significantly decreased in all waves of the COVID-19 pandemic. However, interest in only the term coronary angiography was significantly increased in the third wave of pandemic.

Percutaneous Thrombectomy for the Treatment of Lower Extremity Deep Vein Thrombosis: Medium-Term Follow-up Results and Analysis of 112 Cases.

Introduction The aim of this study was to analyze percutaneous thrombectomy (PT) outcomes for the management of lower extremity deep vein thrombosis (DVT) with medium-term follow-up. Methods The study included charts of patients who underwent PT due to lower extremity DVT between August 2017 and March 2021. Patient characteristics and procedure outcomes were recorded in the electronic information system on the same day as the procedure. The procedures with complete removal of thrombus following PT without requiring additional procedure or additional thrombectomy apparatus were considered successful. Also, duration of follow-up was noted. Results In total, 112 patients were enrolled in the study. The femoropopliteal (40.2%) and iliofemoral (25.0%) veins were the most common sites with thrombus detected. The duration of PT procedure and fluoroscopy were 123.1 minutes and 21.9 minutes, respectively. Estimated blood loss was 255.1 milliliters. The hospital stay and intensive care unit stay following PT were 3.7 and 1.4 days, respectively. Major hemorrhage did not occur in any patient, but we encountered bradycardia in six (5.4%) patients, acute renal failure in one (0.9%) patient, hemoglobinuria in 11 (9.8%) patients, leg pain in 15 (13.4%) patients, and pulmonary embolism in 2 (1.8) patients, respectively. Success of the present study was 94.6% in the first month, and re-operation was required only in one patient. The mean follow-up period was 21.1 months with 90.2% venous patency rates. Conclusion The present study demonstrated that PT was an effective and reliable treatment modality with acceptable complication rates for the treatment of lower extremity DVT. Additionally, the efficacy of PT was proven by mid-term follow-up results.