Participation in medical decision-making across Europe: An international longitudinal multicenter study.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this paper was to examine national differences in the desire to participate in decision-making of people with severe mental illness in six European countries. METHODS: The data was taken from a European longitudinal observational study (CEDAR; ISRCTN75841675). A sample of 514 patients with severe mental illness from the study centers in Ulm, Germany, London, England, Naples, Italy, Debrecen, Hungary, Aalborg, Denmark and Zurich, Switzerland were assessed as to desire to participate in medical decision-making. Associations between desire for participation in decision-making and center location were analyzed with generalized estimating equations. RESULTS: We found large cross-national differences in patients' desire to participate in decision-making, with the center explaining 47.2% of total variance in the desire for participation (P<0.001). Averaged over time and independent of patient characteristics, London (mean=2.27), Ulm (mean=2.13) and Zurich (mean=2.14) showed significantly higher scores in desire for participation, followed by Aalborg (mean=1.97), where scores were in turn significantly higher than in Debrecen (mean=1.56). The lowest scores were reported in Naples (mean=1.14). Over time, the desire for participation in decision-making increased significantly in Zurich (b=0.23) and decreased in Naples (b=-0.14). In all other centers, values remained stable. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that patients' desire for participation in decision-making varies by location. We suggest that more research attention be focused on identifying specific cultural and social factors in each country to further explain observed differences across Europe.

Clinical decision making and outcome in the routine care of people with severe mental illness across Europe (CEDAR).

AIMS: Shared decision making has been advocated as a means to improve patient-orientation and quality of health care. There is a lack of knowledge on clinical decision making and its relation to outcome in the routine treatment of people with severe mental illness. This study examined preferred and experienced clinical decision making from the perspectives of patients and staff, and how these affect treatment outcome. METHODS: "Clinical Decision Making and Outcome in Routine Care for People with Severe Mental Illness" (CEDAR; ISRCTN75841675) is a naturalistic prospective observational study with bimonthly assessments during a 12-month observation period. Between November 2009 and December 2010, adults with severe mental illness were consecutively recruited from caseloads of community mental health services at the six study sites (Ulm, Germany; London, UK; Naples, Italy; Debrecen, Hungary; Aalborg, Denmark; and Zurich, Switzerland). Clinical decision making was assessed using two instruments which both have parallel patient and staff versions: (a) The Clinical Decision Making Style Scale (CDMS) measured preferences for decision making at baseline; and (b) the Clinical Decision Making Involvement and Satisfaction Scale (CDIS) measured involvement and satisfaction with a specific decision at all time points. Primary outcome was patient-rated unmet needs measured with the Camberwell Assessment of Need Short Appraisal Schedule (CANSAS). Mixed-effects multinomial regression was used to examine differences and course over time in involvement in and satisfaction with actual decision making. The effect of clinical decision making on the primary outcome was examined using hierarchical linear modelling controlling for covariates (study centre, patient age, duration of illness, and diagnosis). Analysis were also controlled for nesting of patients within staff. RESULTS: Of 708 individuals approached, 588 adults with severe mental illness (52% female, mean age = 41.7) gave informed consent. Paired staff participants (N = 213) were 61.8% female and 46.0 years old on average. Shared decision making was preferred by patients (χ 2 = 135.08; p < 0.001) and staff (χ 2 = 368.17; p < 0.001). Decision making style of staff significantly affected unmet needs over time, with unmet needs decreasing more in patients whose clinicians preferred active to passive (-0.406 unmet needs per two months, p = 0.007) or shared (-0.303 unmet needs per two months, p = 0.015) decision making. CONCLUSIONS: Decision making style of staff is a prime candidate for the development of targeted intervention. If proven effective in future trials, this would pave the ground for a shift from shared to active involvement of patients including changes to professional socialization through training in principles of active decision making.

N(epsilon)(gamma-glutamyl)lysine in cerebrospinal fluid marks Alzheimer type and vascular dementia.

N(epsilon)(gamma-glutamyl)lysine isodipeptide is released from the breakdown of proteins cross-linked by transglutaminase enzymes. Transglutaminase activation is a marker of apoptosis and elevated isodipeptide concentrations in body fluids might correlate with the intensity of apoptotic cell turnover. The concentration of N(epsilon)(gamma-glutamyl)lysine was measured in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) of patients with probable Alzheimer's disease (n = 14) and vascular type dementia (n = 11) and compared with not demented surgical controls (n = 17). Baseline levels of 26-62 nM/l (mean 37.9 +/- 8.7 SD) free isodipeptide were detected in control patients. CSF isodipeptide levels showed significant elevation in vascular (mean 95.6 +/- 45.1 SD) as well as Alzheimer patients (176.6 +/- 77.1 SD). Isodipeptide concentrations above 120 nM/l were 72% specific and 77% sensitive to Alzheimer's dementia, although the difference between the two dementias was statistically insignificant (p > 0.05). Determination of CSF N(epsilon)(gamma-glutamyl)lysine isodipeptide concentration offers a novel method for measurement of neurodegeneration in primary and mixed dementias.

Turn-amplitude analysis in neuromuscular diseases.

The first attempts in computer aided EMG analysis were performed for the automatic evaluation of interference pattern. In the routine work the turn-amplitude analysis (T/A), introduced by Stålberg and Antoni (1981), proved to be an accurate and easily performed procedure, with the advantage of being relatively independent of force. The aim of our study was to determine the diagnostic significance of T/A analysis in various neuromuscular diseases. The recordings were performed with Madaus Amplaid EMG 15, and concentric needles were used. fifty subjects had been investigated. The diagnoses were based on clinical, biochemical and histological findings. Tibialis anterior, quadriceps femoris, extensor digitorum communis and biceps brachii muscles were regularly sampled. In myogenic conditions a distinct correlation was found between the severity of muscle damage and T/A values. The more pronounced abnormalities were observed in Duchenne boys. Except the ALS in neurogenic processes correlation was found between the severity of muscle damage and T/A analysis, too. The central lesions did not have any effect on the T/A results. Examples of the possible sources of technical errors were presented and comparisons to the traditional concentric needle EMG were done.