Does the abdominal ultrasonography reliable in the diagnosis of postoperative pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy in the first postoperative week?

PURPOSE: We evaluated the efficacy of ultrasonography (US) in the early postoperative period after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) to diagnose postoperative-pancreatic-fistula (POPF). Early diagnosis is important to prevent POPF-dependent mortality after PD. The value of radiological modalities for early diagnosing POPF is not clear. METHODS: Forty-five patients who underwent transabdominal-US in the first postoperative week after PD were retrospectively evaluated. Two types of grouping methods were performed. Firstly, peripancreatic or perianastomotic fluid collections at least 2 cm in diameter were considered to be a primary positive result on US. Patients then divided into 2 groups: group 1, US-positive and group 2, US-negative. Secondly, to increase the power of US, in addition to primary positive results, the presence of fever, leukocytosis or hyperamylasemia was considered to be a secondary positive result (group 1S). The remaining patients were considered to have secondary negative results (group 2S). The sensitivity and specificity for both grouping methods were calculated for the diagnosis of PF and clinically important PF (ciPF), according to the International Study Group on Pancreatic Fistula criteria. RESULTS: For the first grouping method, the sensitivity was 36% and 28% and the specificity was 80% and 85% for PF and ciPF, respectively. For the second grouping method, the sensitivity was 36% and 29% and the spesificity was 74% and 81% for PF and ciPF, respectively. The unloculated fluid collections were not related to a significant increase in the risk of POPF (P = 0.694). CONCLUSION: Abdominal-US has low sensitivity and high specificity for the early diagnosis of POPF after PD.

Intraoperative acidosis is a new predictor for postoperative pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy.

BACKGROUND: Early diagnosis of postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) is important for proper interventions. The preoperative, intraoperative and early postoperative biochemical markers have predictive value of POPF. The present study was to evaluate several simple biochemical parameters in the prediction of POPF. METHODS: Patients who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy in our center between 2006 and 2015 were reviewed retrospectively. Preoperative and early postoperative biochemical parameters were evaluated. Additionally, the relationship between POPF and pH and lactate level at the end of surgery were analyzed, and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), and red cell distribution width-to-platelet ratio (RPR) were calculated for postoperative days (PODs) 1 and 3. Diagnosis and grading of POPF were performed according to the standards of the International Study Group on Pancreatic Fistula. The patients were divided into two groups: Group 1 with no fistula or grade-A fistula; group 2 with grade-B or -C fistula. These simple biochemical markers were then compared between the two groups. RESULTS: Serum amylase level was significantly higher at POD3, and pH level was significantly lower at the end of operation in group 2 compared with those in group 1. However, the serum amylase was below the upper limit of normal serum level and therefore, the difference was not significant in clinical practice. Receiver operating charecteristic curve analysis showed that pH level was a reliable predictor of POPF (area under the curve: 0.713; 95% CI: 0.573-0.853). CONCLUSIONS: A low pH level at the end of pancreaticoduodenectomy was a risk factor of POPF. NLR, PLR, and RPR had no predictive value of POPF after pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Diagnostic value of basic laboratory parameters for simple and perforated acute appendicitis: an analysis of 3392 cases.

BACKGROUND: The aim of the present study was to examine the efficacy of simple laboratory parameters including neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet count (PLT), mean platelet volume (MPV), and serum bilirubin level in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis and recognition of perforated appendicitis. METHODS: Records of 3392 patients who underwent appendectomy in a 10-year period were reviewed retrospectively. Patients were divided into 2 groups according to histopathological examination results: Group 1 had normal appendix, Group 2 had acute appendicitis. Patients with acute appendicitis were divided into subgroups: Group 2A had simple acute appendicitis, while Group 2B had perforated appendicitis. Efficacy of the aforementioned laboratory parameters was evaluated in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis and recognition of perforated appendicitis. Independent variables were determined by univariate analysis and multivariate analysis was performed. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to identify significant parameters in multivariate analysis. Cut-off values, sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy calculations performed for parameters with area under curve (AUC) >0.600 were accepted as "significant parameters." RESULTS: White cell count (WCC), bilirubin, and NLR were significant parameters for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis. Cut-off values were 11900/mm3 for WCC (sensitivity: 71.2%; specificity: 67.2%; OR: 5.13), 1.0 mg/dl for bilirubin (sensitivity: 19.1%; specificity: 92.4%; OR: 2.96), and 3.0 for NLR (sensitivity: 81.2%; specificity: 53.1%; OR: 4.27). Serum bilirubin and NLR were independent variables for the diagnosis of perforated appendicitis. Cut-off values were 1.0 mg/dl for bilirubin (sensitivity: 78.4%; specificity: 41.7%; OR: 2.6) and 4.8 for NLR (sensitivity: 81.2%; specificity: 53.1%; OR: 2.6). CONCLUSION: Presence of at least 1 of the following findings in a patient suspected of having acute appendicitis was significantly associated with a definite diagnosis: WCC >11.900 mm3, serum bilirubin >1.0 mg/dl, NLR >3.0. In patients with acute appendicitis, serum bilirubin >1.0 mg/dl or NLR >4.8 were significantly associated with the presence of perforation. While WCC is a significant parameter for diagnosis of acute appendicitis, no significant association with perforated appendicitis was found. PLT and MPV were not useful parameters when diagnosing acute appendicitis.

Is the classification of intraoperative complications (CLASSIC) related to postoperative course?

INTRODUCTION: The Classification of Intraoperative Complications (CLASSIC) is one of two recent classification systems for intraoperative adverse events (iAEs), featuring simple but inclusive definitions. No data have been reported regarding the relation between CLASSIC and postoperative course. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the relation between the grade of iAEs and the grade of postoperative complications in patients who underwent hepatopancreaticobiliary (HPB) surgery. METHODS: Demography, preoperative laboratory parameters, iAEs, postoperative complications, and intraoperative pH and lactate levels of patients who underwent HPB surgery between December 2014 and December 2015 were evaluated retrospectively. The recorded parameters were compared according to the grade of iAEs and the grade of postoperative complications described in the Accordion Severity Classification of Postoperative Complications. RESULTS: Fifty-eight patients were considered. Mean age was 56 ± 15, 21 female vs. 37 male, 47 malign vs. 11 benign. Demographic features and preoperative status of the patients, and the presence of intraoperative acidosis were not significantly related to the grade of iAEs or postoperative complications. The grade of iAEs was directly proportional to the grade of postoperative complications (p = 0.031). Although it is not statistically significant, lactate level at the end of operation had a potential to predict the postoperative course (p = 0.057). CONCLUSIONS: The grade of iAEs has a predictive value for the grade of postoperative complications in HPB surgery patients; hence, high grade of iAEs is significantly related to high grade of postoperative complications. Lactate level at the end of operation has the potential to predict the postoperative course.

Preoperative localization of distal colorectal tumours.

BACKGROUND: The detection of true localization of the tumour are crucial to driving the proper treatment algorithm in distally-located colorectal cancers (CRCs). The performance of four methods; colonoscopy, computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and fluoro-deoxy-glucose-positron emission tomography scan (FDG/PET-CT), were evaluated to identify the localizations of distal colorectal malignancies according to the rectum, sigmoid colon and recto- sigmoid junction (RSJ). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Medical records of patients who underwent colorectal surgery for tumours located on the sigmoid colon, RSJ, or rectum were reviewed retrospectively. METHODS: In total, 156 patients were included in the study. In terms of overall accuracy, colonoscopy, CT, MRI and FDG/PET-CT had similar accuracy rates, with 74%, 67%, 75%, and 74%, respectively. Colonoscopy was relatively less sensitive for rectosigmoid tumours (33%), while CT was less sensitive for rectal tumours (26%). MRI was less specific for tumours located on the rectum (33%). CONCLUSIONS: It is crucial to correctly identify the location of distal colorectal tumours in order to plan accurate treatment strategies. Preoperative modalities, including colonoscopy, CT, MRI, and FDG/PET-CT, do not provide excellent accuracy for tumours of the distal colorectal tumours. To increase the success of these modalities; combined use could be more successful. KEY WORDS: Colonoscopy, Computed tomography Distal colorectal cancer, Magnetic resonance imaging.