Correlation between cephalometric nasal changes and patients' perception after orthognathic surgery.

INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the correlation between cephalometric measurements and patients' perception of nasal changes in those with Class III malocclusion who had undergone orthognathic surgery. METHODS: Eighty-five patients (36 men and 49 women) who received maxillary advancement with (group 1) or without (group 2) maxillary impaction were included in this study. Lateral cephalometric radiographs taken before and at the end of the treatment were analyzed. The patients were given an esthetic evaluation form and asked to evaluate their own noses on the Likert scale (subjective perception), while at the same time, they were asked to evaluate profile silhouettes without knowing that it was their own profile (objective perception). The changes and correlations between the cephalometric measurements and the scores obtained from the esthetic perception questionnaire were evaluated statistically. RESULTS: Postoperative nasal tip inclination and rotation, nasofacial angle, and sagittal position of pronasale had increased significantly (P <0.05), whereas nasal tip protrusion, nasofrontal angle, and vertical position of pronasale had decreased (P <0.05). The change in the nasolabial angle and vertical position of pronasale was statistically different between the 2 surgical groups (P <0.05). In the end, a significant increase was observed in the patients' objective nasal esthetic scores (P <0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Soft tissues are affected by the vertical and sagittal surgical movements of the maxilla. There was a moderate correlation between patients' perception of nasal changes and cephalometric measurements. The subjective evaluation of the nose was similar among patients after surgery, but in the objective assessment, patients found their noses more esthetic.

Biomechanical evaluation between orthodontic attachment and three different materials after various surface treatments: A three-dimensional optical profilometry analysis.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the best bonding method of orthodontic attachment among monolithic zirconia, feldspathic porcelain, hybrid porcelain, and the impact of surface-conditioning methods using a three-dimensional optical profilometer after debonding. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 56 feldspathic porcelain, 56 monolithic zirconia, and 56 hybrid porcelain samples were divided into four surface treatment subgroups: (1) hydrofluoric (HF) acid etch + silane, (2) Al2O3 sandblasting + silane, (3) silicoating (SiO2), and (4) diamond bur + silane. The specimens were tested to evaluate shear bond strength (SBS). Residual composite was removed after debonding. Three-dimensional white-light interferometry was used to obtain quantitative measurements on surface roughness. RESULTS: The highest SBS value was found for the HF acid-etched feldspathic porcelain group. The average surface roughness values were significantly higher in all material groups in which diamond bur was applied, while roughening with Cojet provided average surface roughness values closer to the original material surface. CONCLUSIONS: Variations in structures of the materials and roughening techniques affected the SBS and surface roughness findings.

Sagittal skeletal correction using symphyseal miniplate anchorage systems : Success rates and complications.

OBJECTIVES: Aim of this study is to evaluate success rates and complications related with symphyseal miniplate anchorage systems used for treatment of Class 2 and Class 3 deformities. METHODS: A total of 58 miniplates applied to 29 growing patients were evaluated. The first group comprised 24 symphyseal miniplates applied to 12 patients and Forsus Fatigue Resistant Devices were attached to the head of the miniplates for mandibular advancement. The second group consisted of 34 symphyseal miniplates applied to 17 patients and intermaxillary elastics were applied between acrylic appliances placed on the maxillary dental arch and the symphyseal miniplates for maxillary protraction. Success rate and complications of the symphyseal plate-screw anchorage system were evaluated. RESULTS: The overall success rate of symphseal miniplates was 87.9%. Six miniplates showed severe mobility and 2 miniplates broke during orthodontic treatment. Infection, miniplate mobility and mucosal hypertrophy were statistically different between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Symphyseal miniplates were generally used as successful anchorage units in most patients. Infection, mobility, and mucosal hypertrophy occurred more frequently in Class 2 deformity correction. However, the success rates regarding the two treatment modalities were comparable.

Modified Haas Expander for the Treatment of Anterior Openbite and Posterior Crossbite Associated with Thumb Sucking-A Case Report: 3-Years Follow-Up.

Thumb sucking is an abnormal habit that occurs in childhood and can cause several malocclusions if it persists for a long time. Malocclusions caused by oral habits require proper treatment timing to maintain a normal growth and should be treated at an early age. This case report shows the management of thumb sucking and early correction of anterior open bite and posterior crossbite by a modified Haas expander. Three-year follow-up results showed the effectiveness of this special designed appliance.

Treatment of Class II, Division 2 Malocclusion with Miniscrew Supported En-Masse Retraction: Is Deepbite Really an Obstacle for Extraction Treatment?

A 17-year-old female patient, whose chief complaint was her unpleasing smile, had skeletal and dental class II malocclusion, hypodivergent facial type with a severely increased overbite. Among the treatment options, upper-first-premolar extractions followed by miniscrew-supported en-masse retraction was the treatment of choice. After the initial levelling and alignment, miniscrews with 1.5- to 1.4-mm diameter and 7-mm lenght, were installed between the roots of the second premolars and the first molars, bilaterally. En-masse retraction was achieved on a 0.016×0.022-inch stainless steel archwire with 7-mm long power hooks placed distal to the lateral incisors, and with nickel-titanium (NiTi) closed coil springs exerting 250-gr of force per side. At the end of the treatment, deepbite, incisor inclinations and interincisal angle were corrected, and Class II molar relationship with good intercuspation was achieved. Upper 2-2, lower 3-3 retainers were bonded for retention. As a result, deepbite and Class II canine relationship was successfully corrected with simultaneous incisor intrusion and retraction using miniscrew-supported en-masse retraction.

Dentofacial effects of skeletal anchored treatment modalities for the correction of maxillary retrognathia.

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this clinical study was to investigate the skeletal, dentoalveolar, and soft-tissue effects of 2 skeletal anchorage rationales for Class III treatment compared with an untreated Class III control group. METHODS: Fifty-one subjects who were in the prepubertal or pubertal growth period were included in the study. In group 1 (n = 17), facemasks were applied from miniplates placed in the lateral nasal walls of the maxilla, and intermaxillary Class III elastics were applied from symphyseal miniplates to a bonded appliance on the maxilla in group 2 (n = 17). These skeletal anchored groups were compared with an untreated control group (n = 17). Lateral cephalometric radiographs were obtained at the beginning and the end of the observation periods in all groups and analyzed according to the structural superimposition method. Differences between the groups were assessed with the Wilcoxon signed rank test or the paired-samples t test. RESULTS: The treatment periods were 7.4 and 7.6 months in groups 1 and 2, respectively, and the untreated control group was observed for 7.5 months. The maxilla moved forward by 3.11 mm in group 1 and by 3.82 mm in group 2. The counterclockwise rotation of the maxilla was significantly less in group 1 compared with group 2 (P <0.01). The mandible showed clockwise rotation and was positioned downward and backward in the treatment groups, and it was significantly greater in group 2 compared with group 1 (P <0.01). Changes in the maxillary incisor measurements were negligible in group 1 compared with group 2. A significant amount of mandibular incisor retroclination was seen in group 1, and a significant proclination was seen in group 2. The maxillomandibular relationships and the soft-tissue profiles were improved remarkably in both treatment groups. CONCLUSIONS: The protocols of miniplates with facemasks and miniplates with Class III elastics offer valid alternatives to conventional methods in severe skeletal Class III patients. However, the 2 maxillary protraction protocols demonstrated significant skeletal and dentoalveolar effects. The miniplate with facemask protocol is preferred for patients with severe maxillary retrusion and a high-angle vertical pattern, whereas in patients with a decreased or normal vertical pattern and retroclined mandibular incisors, miniplates with Class III elastics can be the intraoral treatment option. Therefore, the exact indication of the procedure should be considered carefully.

Comparison of two implant-supported molar distalization systems.

OBJECTIVE: To examine skeletal, dental, and soft tissue effects of the Miniscrew Implant Supported Distalization System (MISDS) and the Bone-Anchored Pendulum Appliance (BAPA). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Among 28 patients displaying Angle Class II malocclusion, 14 patients with a mean age of 14.8 ± 3.6 years treated with MISDS were included in the first group, and 14 patients with a mean age of 14.5 ± 1.5 years treated with BAPA were included in the second group. The pretreatment and posttreatment lateral cephalograms were analyzed. Statistical evaluation was carried out using the paired Shapiro-Wilk test, the paired-sample t-test, and the unpaired t-test. RESULTS: Upper posterior teeth were distalized successfully in both groups. Nearly bodily distalization was seen in the MISDS group, whereas significant distal tipping of the upper first molars was observed in the BAPA group (P < .001). There were no statistically significant changes in the sagittal position of the maxilla and mandible and in the position of the upper incisors as a result of treatment in either group. CONCLUSIONS: Both methods provided absolute anchorage for distalization of posterior teeth; however, almost translatory distal movement was encountered in the MISDS group, and substantial distal tipping of the maxillary molars accompanied distalization in the BAPA group.

Tilted orthodontic micro implants: a photoelastic stress analysis.

The aim of this study was to examine peri-implant stresses around orthodontic micro implants upon torque-tightening and static load application by quasi-three-dimensional photoelastic stress analysis. Self-tapping orthodontic micro implants were progressively inserted into photoelastic models at 30, 45, 70, and 90 degrees and insertion torques were measured. Stress patterns (isochromatic fringe orders) were recorded by the quasi-three-dimensional photoelastic method using a circular polariscope after insertion and 250 g static force application. Torque-tightening of implants generated peri-implant stresses. Upon insertion, 90 degree placed implants displayed the lowest and homogeneous stress distribution followed by 30, 70, and 45 degree tilted implants. Static loading did not dramatically alter stress fields around the implants tested. The highest alteration in stress distribution was observed for the 90 degree placed implant, while 70 degree tilted implant had the lowest stresses among tilted implants. Torque-tightening of orthodontic micro implants creates a stress field that is not dramatically altered after application of static lateral moderate orthodontic loads, particularly at the cervical region of tilted implants.