Long-term drug survival of biological agents in patients with rheumatoid arthritis in clinical practice.

OBJECTIVES: To assess and compare the long-term drug survival (time to drug discontinuation) of biological agents (BA) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in clinical practice. Factors associated with discontinuation of BAs were also investigated. METHOD: We conducted an observational longitudinal study of RA patients taking BAs from 1999 to 2013. The primary endpoint was BA discontinuation due to: adverse drug reactions (ADRs), inefficacy, and other causes. Incidence rates of discontinuation (IRs) per 100 patient-years were estimated using survival techniques. Comparisons between BA discontinuation rates and other associated factors were made using Cox regression models. RESULTS: We included 851 courses of BA therapy (1869 patient-years). Adalimumab (33%) was the BA most frequently used, followed by etanercept (24.4%), infliximab, and rituximab. Treatment was suspended in 558 cases [IR 29.8, 95% confidence interval (CI) 27-32]. In the first year of therapy 68% continued on BAs, and after 10 years the retention rate did not exceed 10%. The IR due to inefficacy was 12.1 (95% CI 10.6-13.8) and the IR of ADRs was 13.6 (95% CI 12-15). The unadjusted IR was higher for rituximab than for tumour necrosis factor (TNF) antagonists. In multivariate analysis, infliximab was the BA with the highest risk of discontinuation, compared to adalimumab. Calendar period, taking subsequent courses of BAs, concomitant therapy, and specific comorbidities were also independent factors associated with discontinuation. CONCLUSIONS: After several years of BA treatment in clinical practice, the survival rate was low, mainly as a result of ADRs and inefficacy. We also found differences between the discontinuation rates of BAs and other clinical factors that modify their survival.

Leflunomide discontinuation in rheumatoid arthritis and influence of associated disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs: a survival analysis.

OBJECTIVES: The aims of this study were to describe the rate of leflunomide discontinuation in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients, in standard clinical practice, and to analyse which factors could influence this rate, paying particular attention to the concomitant treatment with other disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs). METHOD: We selected RA patients, diagnosed according to the 1987 American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria, attending the rheumatology outpatient clinic of the San Carlos Clinical Hospital (Madrid, Spain), who had started treatment with leflunomide between 1 January 2006 and 1 January 2011. Clinical records were examined until withdrawal of the drug, loss of follow-up, or 1 October 2011. Kaplan-Meier curves were set to account for leflunomide withdrawal. Cox bivariate and multivariate regression models were conducted to examine risk factors for leflunomide discontinuation. RESULTS: The incident rate (IR) for leflunomide discontinuation, regardless of the cause, was 27 per 100 patient-years [95% confidence interval (CI) 22-31]. We observed, in both the bivariate and multivariate regression analysis, that those aged > 75 years at the start of the leflunomide treatment and undergoing concurrent treatment with methotrexate (MTX) and/or hydroxychloroquine (HC) had a significantly higher risk of leflunomide discontinuation. CONCLUSIONS: An older age at the start of the treatment with leflunomide, or concomitant treatment with MTX and/or HC, could be associated with a higher risk of leflunomide discontinuation, regardless of the cause. Therefore, when taking MTX or HC, patients receiving leflunomide should be closely monitored early to detect the occurrence of adverse reactions, and hence prevent their aggravation.

Long-term use of antimalarial drugs in rheumatic diseases.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate long-term use of antimalarial drugs and to analyse all causes of discontinuation. METHODS: This is a retrospective study of a cohort of rheumatic diseases patients on antimalarials, during a maximum period of 17.5 years. Case was defined as antimalarial treatment discontinuation due to: a) lack of efficacy, b) adverse events, and c) other causes. Survival techniques were used to estimate the incidence rate (IR) per 1,000 patient-years with the 95% Confidence Interval (95% CI) of antimalarial treatment discontinuation. Cox regression models were conducted to evaluate possible associated factors to antimalarial discontinuation. RESULTS: One thousand, two hundred and ninety-one medical records were reviewed, and 778 patients were included. Patients started 869 different courses of treatment, with a total follow-up of 2,263 person-years. The IR of global discontinuation was 204 (95% CI 186-224). Fifty-two per cent of the treatments stopped were related to adverse events, 14% to lack of efficacy; and 34% to other reasons (refusal to take medication, ocular comorbidity, remission, or pregnancy). Adverse events discontinuations were related to non-ophthalmologic reasons in 54.5% (gastrointestinal, neuro-psychiatric, skin problems), and to ophthalmologic adverse events in 45.5%. Nine patients suffered definite presence of antimalarial retinopathy (IR: 3.97 [IC 95%: 2.06-7.62]) and one of them irreversible loss of vision (IR: 0.44 [IC 95%: 0.06-3.12]). Women, increasing age, and chloroquine vs. hydroxychloroquine use, increased the risk of discontinuation due to ophthalmologic adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: Results suggest that antimalarials have a good balance between benefit and risk. However, we noted a number of discontinuations due to both inefficacy and adverse events. The potential for an unusual but serious ophthalmologic toxicity emphasises the importance of close ophthalmologic monitoring.

Differences between rheumatology attending physicians and training residents in the management of rheumatoid arthritis in Spain.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the variability in the characteristics and management of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients between rheumatology attending physicians and training residents in Spain. METHODS: A retrospective medical record (MR) review was performed in a probabilistic sample of 1379 RA patients from 46 centres distributed in 16 of the 19 autonomous communities (AC) of Spain. RA patients' sociodemographic and clinical characteristics, healthcare resources use, and their single responsible physician's (defined as an identifiable single physician who attended the patient in more than 75% of visits) characteristics were recorded following a standardized protocol. Multivariate analyses were performed to assess differences in the characteristics and management of RA patients between attending physicians and training residents. RESULTS: A total of 1205 RA patients had a single responsible physician and were analysed (nearly 75% women with rheumatoid factor positive and more than 25% with persistent active disease), 49 of whom were followed by training residents and 1156 by attending physicians. In the multivariate analyses, irrespective of patient and disease characteristics, training residents' patients reported more hospital admissions, laboratory tests, and imaging techniques compared to attending physicians. Training residents also less frequently used combined therapy with disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs). CONCLUSION: Training residents and attending physicians differ in RA patients' care. More efforts in training programmes are necessary to guarantee proper RA management and to improve the profile of the future rheumatologists.

[Incidence and characteristics of tuberculosis in patients with autoimmune rheumatic diseases]. / Incidencia y características de la tuberculosis en pacientes con enfermedades reumáticas autoinmunes.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the incidence and characteristics of the infection caused by Mycobacterium tuberculosis in patients with autoimmune diseases. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Searching in the database of the department at our institution, all new cases of tuberculosis from 1991 to 2000 were identified in patients with autoimmune diseases; the total follow-up time was calculated as the difference between first and last visits. Time with immunosuppressive drug therapy was obtained for patients with rheumatoid arthritis from a database oriented to the longitudinal follow-up of these patients. The incidence density was calculated as the quotient between the absolute frequency of cases and the sum of individual periods at risk for each subgroup. RESULTS: Fifteen cases of tuberculosis were identified from 3,634 risk patients followed for an accumulated period of 9,795 years (overall incidence 153 per 100,000 patients-year). Fourteen patients were receiving disease-modifying drugs and eleven were receiving corticosteroids at diagnosis. The location of tuberculosis infection was the lung for 33.3% of cases. The incidence by drugs in patients with rheumatoid arthritis was 143 per 100,000 patients-year with methotrexate, 2,703 per 100,000 patients-year with azathioprin, 7,692 per 1,000 patients-year with cyclophosphamide, and 4,878 per 100,000 patients-year for anti-TNFalpha. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with the general population, the incidence density of tuberculosis is increasing in our population, with a higher frequency of extrapulmonary involvement. The incidence density is variable among patients with rheumatoid arthritis depending upon the used drugs.

Lag time between onset of symptoms and access to rheumatology care and DMARD therapy in a cohort of patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

OBJECTIVE: To study demographic and clinical variables associated with a longer delay in disease modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD) therapy initiation in a cohort of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: We studied 527 new RA patients (74.3% female, median age at symptom onset 55 yrs) in a hospital setting who fulfilled the ACR criteria for the diagnosis of RA. Demographic, clinical, laboratory, and treatment variables were collected longitudinally into a computerized research database. Risk factors for delay in use of DMARD therapy and first evaluation by a rheumatologist were analyzed using a Cox regression model. RESULTS: The median lag time between symptom onset and first rheumatologist encounter was 17 months and between onset of symptoms and first DMARD therapy 19 months. Variables associated with longer delay to DMARD therapy were the lag time between symptom onset and first rheumatologist visit (RR 0.73, 95% CI 0.71-0.76) and years of education. Variables associated with longer delay in first visit with rheumatologist were swollen/tender joint count, age at symptom onset, home support, labor force status, marital status, and years of education. CONCLUSION: Awareness of factors associated with a longer delay in access to rheumatology care and DMARD therapy may help break down barriers that prevent their early access, irrespective of patient age, socioeconomic status, initial symptoms, or need for treatment.