Arthroscopic management of avulsion fractures of the tibial attachment of the posterior cruciate ligament: A novel technique and mid-term outcomes.

Purpose: This study assessed the outcomes of arthroscopic management of avulsion fractures of the tibial attachment of the posterior cruciate ligament (PCL), with holding of the PCL with two ''cinch knots''. Methods: 15 patients with avulsion fractures of the tibial attachment of the PCL were treated with arthroscopic reduction and fixation with holding of the PCL with two ''cinch knots''. All patients were males with mean age of 28 (range, 15-44) years. Patients were assessed by the Lysholm Tegner knee scale and IKDC (International knee documentation committee) objective grade. Results: The mean follow-up period was 40 (range, 12-60) months. Mean postoperative flexion was 134.7° (range, 120-150). Mean Lysholm score was 90.27 (range, 67-99). Lysholm score was excellent in seven (46.7%) patients, good in six (40%) patients, fair in two (13.3%) patients, and none of the patients was poor. 11 (73.3%) patients had IKDC grade A, and four (26.7%) patients had IKDC grade B due to residual grade 1+ posterior drawer. Current Tegner activity level remained the same in nine (60%) patients, decreased one level in three (20%) patients, and decreased two levels in three (20%) patients as compared to the preinjury level. There wasn't any vascular or nerve complications. Conclusion: Arthroscopic treatment of PCL tibial avulsion fractures with the cinch knot technique has many advantages, and it proved to be safe and effective. The technique is simple and easy to be reproduced. Early results are promising to encourage surgeons to make this novel technique. Level of evidence: Therapeutic study, prospective case series with no comparison group, Level IV.

Does sequential examination under anaesthesia provide a reliable method to determine a management plan for unstable lateral compression pelvic ring injuries? a prospective study.

PURPOSE: To assess the reliability of sequential examination under anaesthesia (EUA) to determine pelvic instability and to evaluate radiological and functional outcomes in unstable lateral compression (LC) injuries. METHODS: A prospective case series study was conducted from 2020 to 2022 at a university hospital on 43 cases with LC injuries that met the inclusion criteria. Sequential EUA was carried out in three steps. Posterior-only fixation or anterior-posterior fixation was done according to the algorithm. Each patient was followed up for at least 12 months, both radiologically and functionally. RESULTS: Forty cases proved unstable and were fixed. None showed secondary displacement in the anterior-posterior fixation group. However, five cases (19.2%) of the posterior-only fixation group showed secondary displacement with a mean of 5.9 mm. Four cases of them had tetra-ramic injuries. There is a high tendency for secondary displacement at 14.5 mm or more preoperative displacement of the rami. Patients with secondary displacement showed comparable functional outcome scores to patients without secondary displacement. Posterior-only fixation showed shorter operative time, lesser radiological exposure, blood loss and iatrogenic nerve injury than anterior-posterior fixation. CONCLUSION: EUA is a reliable method to determine pelvic instability and management plan for LC fractures with unilateral anterior ring injury. Anterior-posterior fixation is needed if there is a tetra-ramic fracture or initial anterior ring displacement of 14.5 mm or more, irrespective of EUA.

Electronic health record based population health management to optimize care in CKD: Design of the Kidney Coordinated HeAlth Management Partnership (K-CHAMP) trial.

Primary care physicians (PCPs) provide the majority of medical care to patients with non-dialysis dependent CKD. However, PCPs report numerous limitations to providing expert CKD care, including poor patient education, inadequate diagnostic evaluation, suboptimal use of medications, and time limitations. The Kidney Coordinated HeAlth Management Partnership (Kidney CHAMP) trial is a cluster randomized controlled trial to evaluate the effectiveness of a novel centralized electronic health records (EHR)-delivered population health management (PHM) strategy for high-risk CKD patients on patient care, safety, and other outcomes of interest to patients, providers, and payors. Over a 42-month period, the trial will compare the effectiveness of a multifaceted intervention that combines early identification of high-risk patients, timely nephrology guidance, pharmacist-led medication management services, and CKD patient education to usual care and enroll 1650 high-risk CKD patients from 100 primary care practices. The primary outcome will be ≥40% decline in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) or end stage kidney disease. Key secondary outcomes will include blood pressure, renin-angiotensin aldosterone system inhibitors use, and exposure to potentially unsafe medications. If successful, our treatment approach could improve CKD care delivery and safety, resource allocation, and adoption of evidence-based CKD guideline-concordant care.

Minimally invasive stabilization of posterior pelvic ring injuries through transiliac internal fixator versus Iliosacral screw: A prospective comparative cohort study.

INTRODUCTION: Longitudinal sacral fractures are usually a matter of controversy regarding decision-making for reduction, fixation, and approach. Percutaneous and minimally invasive techniques present perioperative difficulties, but with fewer postoperative complications compared to open techniques. The objective of this study was to compare the functional as well as radiological outcomes of the Transiliac Internal fixator (TIFI) versus Iliosacral screw (ISS) fixation of sacral fractures applied percutaneously in a minimally invasive technique. METHODS: A Prospective comparative cohort study was conducted in a level 1 trauma center in a university hospital. The study included 42 patients with complete sacral fractures, 21 patients have been allocated to each group (TIFI group & ISS group). The clinical, functional, as well as radiological data, were collected and analyzed for the 2 groups. RESULTS: The mean age was 32 (18 -54 years), and the mean follow-up was 14 (12 -20 months). There was a statistically significant difference in favor of the TIFI group regarding a shorter operative time (P = 0.04) as well as less fluoroscopy time (P = 0.01) whereas there was less blood loss in the ISS group (P = 0.01). Both the mean Matta's radiological score, the mean Majeed score as well as the pelvic outcome score were comparable between the 2 groups with no statistically significant difference. CONCLUSION: This study suggests that both TIFI and ISS through a minimally invasive technique represent valid methods for sacral fracture fixation with a shorter operative time, less radiation exposure in TIFI and less blood loss in the ISS. However, the functional, as well as radiological outcomes, were comparable between the 2 groups.

Minimally invasive sacroiliac fusion, a case series, and a literature review.

INTRODUCTION: Non-autoimmune sacroiliac joint pain contributes to nearly a quarter of low back pain patients. Non-surgical management fails to satisfy patients. A new minimally invasive technique for sacroiliac stabilization has been introduced, defying the traditional rules of fusion. The results outside explanatory trials and in day-to-day practice have not been reported. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This case series includes 20 patients diagnosed with chronic sacroiliac pain resistant to conservative management for at least 6 months. The diagnosis was confirmed with a positive sacroiliac injection. Patients underwent stabilization using the iFuse® implant. Patients were followed up for a minimum of one year. The primary outcome was the functional outcomes, assessed using VAS, ODI, and SF36. Secondary procedure rates, complication rates, and radiological assessments of fusion were collected as secondary outcomes. RESULTS: At one year, the mean VAS score improved from 81.25 ± 10.7 SD preoperatively to 52.5 ± 26.8, p-value 0.0013. The mean ODI improved from 54.8 ± 11.21 SD preoperatively to 41.315 ± 15.34, P value = 0.0079. The mean PCS and MCS of SF36 improved by 17 and 20 points, respectively. Only 55% of patients achieved the MCID for the VAS score. 35% of the cohort had secondary procedures. DISCUSSION: Minimally invasive sacroiliac fusion resulted in an improvement in mean functional scores with a wide dispersion. Patients not achieving MCID are patients with either a malpositioned implant, an associated lumbar pathology, or an inaccurate diagnosis. Our results are underwhelming compared to similar work but are still better than conservative cohorts in comparative studies. CONCLUSION: Minimally invasive sacroiliac fusion can be used successfully in select patients. Attention to diagnosis and surgical technique can improve the reproducibility of results.

Predicting Mortality Using Machine Learning Algorithms in Patients Who Require Renal Replacement Therapy in the Critical Care Unit.

Background: General severity of illness scores are not well calibrated to predict mortality among patients receiving renal replacement therapy (RRT) for acute kidney injury (AKI). We developed machine learning models to make mortality prediction and compared their performance to that of the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) and HEpatic failure, LactatE, NorepInephrine, medical Condition, and Creatinine (HELENICC) scores. Methods: We extracted routinely collected clinical data for AKI patients requiring RRT in the MIMIC and eICU databases. The development models were trained in 80% of the pooled dataset and tested in the rest of the pooled dataset. We compared the area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUCs) of four machine learning models (multilayer perceptron [MLP], logistic regression, XGBoost, and random forest [RF]) to that of the SOFA, nonrenal SOFA, and HELENICC scores and assessed calibration, sensitivity, specificity, positive (PPV) and negative (NPV) predicted values, and accuracy. Results: The mortality AUC of machine learning models was highest for XGBoost (0.823; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.791−0.854) in the testing dataset, and it had the highest accuracy (0.758). The XGBoost model showed no evidence of lack of fit with the Hosmer−Lemeshow test (p > 0.05). Conclusion: XGBoost provided the highest performance of mortality prediction for patients with AKI requiring RRT compared with previous scoring systems.

Anterior Approach for Fixation of Acetabular Fractures Using Anatomically Designed Plates: Accuracy of Reduction and Early Functional Outcomes With a Minimum of 1-Year Follow-Up.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the results of a new plate system using anterior approaches in the management of acetabular fractures. DESIGN: Retrospective case-note review. SETTING: Pelvic and acetabular tertiary center. PATIENTS AND INTERVENTION: A consecutive series of acetabular fractures treated using only anterior approach and anatomical plates, at one tertiary specialist unit, were reviewed. The fracture patterns, incisions used, intraoperative and postoperative complications, reduction achieved (measured on postoperative radiographs and computed tomography scans), and early postoperative results (minimum 1-year follow-up) were recorded. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENT: Postoperative reduction (measured by postoperative plain radiographs and computed tomography). RESULTS: Thirty-three patients (mean age, 57 years) underwent reconstruction with the anatomical plates using anterior approaches. Associated both columns and anterior column posterior hemitransverse represented most of the patients (85%). The fracture pattern was complex with quadrilateral plate involvement in 79% of cases. Overall, anatomic reduction was seen in 82% on plain radiographs and CT scan evaluation. Increasing age was a statistically significant variable in obtaining anatomical reduction with an age cutoff value of 70 years ( P 0.012). Associated both column fractures were associated with a lower incidence of anatomical reduction ( P = 0.038). Complication rates were comparable with the literature. 22 patients (71%) were symptom free, with 20 patients (62.5%) having excellent radiographic outcomes at the latest follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: The results suggested that using approach-specific instruments and anatomical plates through anterior approaches in a specialized unit led to anatomical reconstruction in 82% with patients demonstrating satisfactory early radiological and functional outcomes at 1 year. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level I. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Challenges to Shared Decision Making About Treatment of Advanced CKD: A Qualitative Study of Patients and Clinicians.

RATIONALE & OBJECTIVE: Greater understanding of the challenges to shared decision making about treatment of advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD) is needed to support implementation of shared decision making in clinical practice. STUDY DESIGN: Qualitative study. SETTING & PARTICIPANTS: Patients aged≥65 years with advanced CKD and their clinicians recruited from 3 medical centers participated in semi-structured interviews. In-depth review of patients' electronic medical records was also performed. ANALYTICAL APPROACH: Interview transcripts and medical record notes were analyzed using inductive thematic analysis. RESULTS: Twenty-nine patients (age 73±6 years, 66% male, 59% White) and 10 of their clinicians (age 52±12 years, 30% male, 70% White) participated in interviews. Four themes emerged from qualitative analysis: (1) competing priorities-patients and their clinicians tended to differ on when to prioritize CKD and dialysis planning above other personal or medical problems; (2) focusing on present or future-patients were more focused on living well now while clinicians were more focused on preparing for dialysis and future adverse events; (3) standardized versus individualized approach to CKD-although clinicians tried to personalize care recommendations to their patients, the patients perceived their clinicians as taking a monolithic approach to CKD that was predicated on clinical practice guidelines and medical literature rather than the patients' lived experiences with CKD and personal values and goals; and (4) power dynamics-patients described cautiously navigating a power differential in their therapeutic relationship with their clinicians whereas clinicians seemed less attuned to these power dynamics. LIMITATIONS: Thematic saturation was based on patient interviews. Themes presented might incompletely reflect clinicians' perspectives. CONCLUSIONS: Efforts to improve shared decision making for treatment of advanced CKD will likely need to explicitly address differences between patients and their clinicians in approaches to decision making about treatment of advanced CKD and perceived power imbalances in the therapeutic relationship.

Association of Self-Rated Health With Functional Limitations in Patients With CKD.

RATIONALE & OBJECTIVE: In patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD), self-rated health ("In general, how do you rate your health?") is associated with mortality. The association of self-rated health with functional status is unknown. We evaluated the association of limitations in activities of daily living (ADLs) with self-rated health and clinical correlates in a cohort of patients with CKD stages 1-5. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. SETTING & PARTICIPANTS: Patients with CKD at a nephrology outpatient clinic in western Pennsylvania. OUTCOME: Patients participated in a survey assessing their self-rated health (5-point Likert scale) and physical (ambulation, dressing, shopping) and cognitive (executive and memory) ADLs. Adjusted analysis was performed using logistic regression models. ANALYTICAL APPROACH: Logistic regression was conducted to examine the adjusted association of 3 dependent variables (sum of total, physical, and cognitive ADL limitations) with self-rated health (independent variable of interest). RESULTS: The survey was completed by 1,268 participants (mean age, 60 years; 49% females, and 74% CKD stages 3-5), of which 41% reported poor-to-fair health. Overall, 35.9% had at least 1 physical ADL limitation, 22.1% had at least 1 cognitive ADL limitation, and 12.5% had at least 3 ADL limitations. Ambulation was the most frequently reported limitation and was more common in patients reporting poor-to-fair self-rated health compared with those with good-to-excellent self-rated health (58.1% vs 17.4%, P < 0.001). In our fully adjusted model, poor-to-fair self-rated health was strongly associated with limitations in at least 3 ADLs (total ADL) [OR 8.29 (95% CI, 5.23-13.12)]. There was no significant association of eGFR with ADL limitations. LIMITATIONS: Selection bias due to optional survey completion, residual confounding, and use of abbreviated (as opposed to full) ADL questionnaires. CONCLUSIONS: Poor-to-fair self-rated health is strongly associated with physical ADL limitations in patients with CKD. Future studies should evaluate whether self-rated health questions may be useful for identifying patients who can benefit from additional evaluation and treatment of functional limitations to improve patient-centered outcomes.

Improving Primary Care Delivery for Patients Receiving Maintenance Hemodialysis.

The beneficial impact of primary care, focused on all aspects of a patient's health (rather than a disease-specific focus) is well established. Recognized benefits include greater receipt of preventive care and counseling, lower use of emergency care and hospitalization for ambulatory care-sensitive conditions, and decreased early mortality. Although the importance of primary care and care coordination at the primary care/specialty interface is well recognized, the role of primary care within traditional and emerging care models for patients receiving in-center maintenance hemodialysis remains ill-defined. In this perspective article, we will describe: (1) the role of primary care for patients receiving maintenance hemodialysis and the current evidence regarding the receipt of primary care among these patients; (2) the key challenges to delivery of primary care in these complex cases, including suboptimal care coordination between nephrology and primary care providers, the intensity of dialysis care, and the limited capacity of nephrologists and primary care providers to meet the broad health needs of hemodialysis patients; (3) potential strategies for improving the delivery of primary care for patients receiving hemodialysis; and (4) future research requirements to improve primary care delivery for this high-risk population.

Patient Electronic Health Record Portal Use and Patient-Centered Outcomes in CKD.

RATIONALE & OBJECTIVE: Electronic health record portals are increasingly emphasized in chronic kidney disease (CKD). However, associations of portal use with clinical and patient-centered outcomes remain unknown. STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey (April 2015 to March 2018). SETTING & PARTICIPANTS: Nondialysis patients with CKD from nephrology clinics within 1 academic medical center. EXPOSURES: Patient demographics (age, sex, race, ethnicity, education, and income), kidney function. OUTCOMES: Association between portal use as an outcome and exposures. Additionally, associations of portal use and patient demographics with 4 patient-centered outcomes (CKD-specific knowledge, stress, and 2 self-ratings of health). ANALYTIC APPROACH: Logistic regression to examine associations between patient portal use, demographics, and kidney function. Linear regression to examine associations between portal use and patient-centered outcomes. RESULTS: Of 245 participants, mean age was 60 ± 17 (SD) years, 182 (77%) were White, 121 (49%) were women, 230 (96%) had a high school education or higher, and 96 (45%) had <$50,000 annual income. Examining portal use, 159 (65%) used the portal as follows: checking laboratory test results, 157 (99%); managing appointments, 133 (84%); messaging providers, 131 (82%); viewing medical history, 127 (80%); reviewing educational resources, 113 (71%); and renewing prescriptions, 98 (62%). African Americans (OR, 0.34; 95% CI, 0.16-0.72 vs White patients), patients with less formal education (OR, 0.06; 95% CI, 0.01-0.36), and those with lower income (OR, 0.28; 95% CI, 0.13-0.60; and OR, 0.26; 95% CI, 0.12-0.54 comparing income < $25,000 and $25,000-$50,000, respectively, with ≥$50,000) had lower odds of using the portal. In adjusted analysis, only lower income predicted lower portal use. Examining patient-centered outcomes in univariable analysis, portal users had higher knowledge (ß = 4.89; P = 0.02), higher ratings of current health (ß = 0.28; P = 0.03), and lower CKD-related stress (ß = -0.18; P = 0.05). In adjusted analysis, only patient demographics and/or kidney function remained independent predictors of patient-centered outcomes. LIMITATIONS: Cross-sectional study design, cannot determine causality. CONCLUSIONS: Interventions are needed to ensure that all patients have access to portals to mitigate disparities in care.

Renin-angiotensin aldosterone inhibitor use at hospital discharge among patients with moderate to severe acute kidney injury and its association with recurrent acute kidney injury and mortality.

Recurrent episodes of acute kidney injury (AKI) are common among AKI survivors. Renin-angiotensin aldosterone inhibitors (RAASi) are often indicated for these patients but may increase the risk for recurrent AKI. Here, we examined whether RAASi associates with a higher risk for recurrent AKI and mortality among survivors of moderate to severe AKI in a retrospective cohort of Veterans who survived Stage II or III AKI. The primary exposure was RAASi at hospital discharge and the primary endpoint was recurrent AKI within 12 months. Cox proportional hazards models were fit on a propensity score-weighted cohort to compare time to recurrent AKI and mortality by RAASi exposure. Among 96,983 patients, 40% were on RAASi at discharge. Compared to patients who continued RAASi use, those discontinuing use experienced no difference in risk for recurrent AKI but had a significantly higher risk of mortality [hazard ratio 1.33 (95% confidence interval1.26-1.41)]. No differences in recurrent AKI risk was observed for non-users started or not on RAASi compared to prevalent users who continued RAASi. Subgroup analyses among those with diabetes, chronic kidney disease, heart failure, and malignancy were similar with exception of a modest reduction in recurrent AKI risk among RAASi discontinuers with chronic kidney disease. Thus, RAASi use among survivors of moderate to severe AKI was associated with little to no difference in risk for recurrent AKI but was associated with improved survival. Reinitiating or starting RAASi among patients with strong indications is warranted but should be balanced with individual overall risk for recurrent AKI and with adequate monitoring.

Implementation of Surprise Question Assessments using the Electronic Health Record in Older Adults with Advanced CKD.

Background: The Surprise Question (SQ; "Would you be surprised if this patient died in the next 12 months?") is a validated prognostication tool for mortality and hospitalization among patients with advanced CKD. Barriers in clinical workflows have slowed SQ implementation in practice. Objectives: The aims of this study were: (1) to evaluate implementation outcomes after the use of electronic health record (EHR) decision support to automate the collection of the SQ; and (2) to assess the prognostic utility of the SQ for mortality and hospitalization/emergency room (ER) visits. Methods: We developed and implemented a best practice alert (BPA) in the EHR to identify nephrology outpatients ≥60 years of age with an eGFR <30 ml/min per 1.73 m2. At appointment, the BPA prompted the physician to answer the SQ. We assessed the rate and timeliness of provider responses. We conducted a post-hoc open-ended survey to assess physician perceptions of SQ implementation. We assessed the SQ's prognostic utility in survival and time-to-hospital encounter (hospitalization/ER visit) analyses. Results: Among 510 patients for whom the BPA triggered, 95 (19%) had the SQ completed by 16 physicians. Among those completed, nearly all (98%) were on appointment day, and 61 (64%) the first time the BPA fired. Providers answered "no" for 27 (28%) and "yes" for 68 (72%) patients. By 12 months, six (22%) "no" patients died; three (4%) "yes" patients died (hazard ratio [HR] 2.86, ref: yes, 95% CI, 1.06 to 7.69). About 35% of "no" patients and 32% of "yes" patients had a hospital encounter by 12 months (HR, 1.85, ref: yes, 95% CI, 0.93 to 3.69). Physicians noted (1) they had goals-of-care conversations unprompted; (2) EHR-based interventions alone for goals-of-care are ineffective; and (3) more robust engagement is necessary. Conclusions: We successfully integrated the SQ into the EHR to aid in clinical practice. Additional implementation efforts are needed to encourage further integration of the SQ in clinical practice.

Nephrology Provider Surprise Question Response and Hospitalizations in Older Adults with Advanced CKD.

BACKGROUND: Older adults with advanced non-dialysis-dependent chronic kidney disease (NDD-CKD) face a high risk of hospitalization and related adverse events. METHODS: This prospective cohort study followed nephrology clinic patients ≥60 years old with NDD-CKD stages 4-5. After an eligible patient's office visit, study staff asked the patient's provider to rate the patient's risk of death within the next year using the surprise question ("Would you be surprised if this patient died in the next 12 months?") with a 5-point Likert scale response (1, "definitely not surprised" to 5, "very surprised"). We used a statewide database to ascertain hospitalization during follow-up. RESULTS: There were 488 patients (median age 72 years, 51% female, 17% black) with median estimated glomerular filtration rate 22 mL/min/1.73 m2. Over a median follow-up of 2.1 years, the rates of hospitalization per 100 person-years in the respective response groups were 41 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 34-50), "very surprised"; 65 (95% CI: 55-76), "surprised"; 98 (95% CI: 85-113), "neutral"; 125 (95% CI: 107-144), "not surprised"; and 120 (95% CI: 94-151), "definitely not surprised." In a fully adjusted cumulative probability ordinal regression model for proportion of follow-up time spent hospitalized, patients whose providers indicated that they would be "definitely not surprised" if they died spent a greater proportion of follow-up time hospitalized compared with those whose providers indicated that they would be "very surprised" (odds ratio 2.4, 95% CI: 1.0-5.7). There was a similar association for time to first hospitalization. CONCLUSION: Nephrology providers' responses to the surprise question for older patients with advanced NDD-CKD were independently associated with proportion of future time spent hospitalized and time to first hospitalization. Additional studies should examine how to use this information to provide patients with anticipatory guidance on their possible clinical trajectory and to target potentially preventable hospitalizations.

Burnout and Emotional Well-Being among Nephrology Fellows: A National Online Survey.

BACKGROUND: Physician burnout and emotional distress are associated with work dissatisfaction and provision of suboptimal patient care. Little is known about burnout among nephrology fellows. METHODS: Validated items on burnout, depressive symptoms, and well being were included in the American Society of Nephrology annual survey emailed to US nephrology fellows in May to June 2018. Burnout was defined as an affirmative response to two single-item questions of experiencing emotional exhaustion or depersonalization. RESULTS: Responses from 347 of 808 eligible first- and second-year adult nephrology fellows were examined (response rate=42.9%). Most fellows were aged 30-34 years (56.8%), male (62.0%), married or partnered (72.6%), international medical graduates (62.5%), and pursuing a clinical nephrology fellowship (87.0%). Emotional exhaustion and depersonalization were reported by 28.0% and 14.4% of the fellows, respectively, with an overall burnout prevalence of 30.0%. Most fellows indicated having strong program leadership (75.2%), positive work-life balance (69.2%), presence of social support (89.3%), and career satisfaction (73.2%); 44.7% reported a disruptive work environment and 35.4% reported depressive symptoms. Multivariable logistic regression revealed a statistically significant association between female gender (odds ratio [OR], 1.90; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 1.09 to 3.32), poor work-life balance (OR, 3.97; 95% CI, 2.22 to 7.07), or a disruptive work environment (OR, 2.63; 95% CI, 1.48 to 4.66) and burnout. CONCLUSIONS: About one third of US nephrology fellows surveyed reported experiencing burnout and depressive symptoms. Further exploration of burnout-especially that reported by female physicians, as well as burnout associated with poor work-life balance or a disruptive work environment-is warranted to develop targeted efforts that may enhance the educational experience and emotional well being of nephrology fellows.

Timing of Recovery From Moderate to Severe AKI and the Risk for Future Loss of Kidney Function.

RATIONALE & OBJECTIVE: The extent of recovery of kidney function following acute kidney injury (AKI) is known to be associated with future chronic kidney disease. Less is known about how the timing of recovery affects the rate of future loss of kidney function. STUDY DESIGN: We performed a retrospective cohort study examining the independent association between the timing of recovery from moderate to severe AKI and future loss of kidney function. SETTING & PARTICIPANTS: 47,903 adult US veterans with stage 2 or 3 AKI who recovered to within 120% of baseline creatinine level within 90 days of peak injury. EXPOSURE: The timing of recovery of kidney function from peak inpatient serum creatinine level grouped into 1 to 4, 5 to 10, 11 to 30, and 31 to 90 days. OUTCOME: A sustained 40% decline in estimated glomerular filtration rate below that calculated from the last serum creatinine level available during the 90-day recovery period or kidney failure (2 outpatient estimated glomerular filtration rates<15mL/min/1.73m2, dialysis procedures > 90 days apart, kidney transplantation, or registry within the US Renal Data System). ANALYTICAL APPROACH: Time to the primary outcome was examined using multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression. RESULTS: Among 47,903 patients, 29,316 (61%), 10,360 (22%), 4,520 (9%), and 3,707 (8%) recovered within 1 to 4, 5 to 10, 11 to 30, and 31 to 90 days, respectively. With a median follow-up of 42 months, unadjusted incidence rates for the kidney outcome were 2.01, 3.55, 3.86, and 3.68 events/100 person-years, respectively. Compared with 1 to 4 days, recovery within 5 to 10, 11 to 30, and 31 to 90 days was associated with increased rates of the primary outcome: adjusted HRs were 1.33 (95% CI, 1.24-1.43), 1.41 (95% CI, 1.28-1.54), and 1.58 (95% CI, 1.43-1.75), respectively. LIMITATIONS: Predominately male population, residual confounding, and inability to make causal inferences because of the retrospective observational study design. CONCLUSIONS: The timing of recovery provides an added dimension to AKI phenotyping and prognostic information regarding the future occurrence of loss of kidney function. Studies to identify effective interventions on the timing of recovery from AKI are warranted.

Association of medication non-adherence with short-term allograft loss after the treatment of severe acute kidney transplant rejection.

BACKGROUND: Medication non-adherence is a risk factor for acute kidney transplant rejection. The association of non-adherence with short-term allograft loss in patients who develop acute rejection and are subsequently treated with maximal therapy is unknown. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective single center cohort study of adult patients who developed acute rejection from January 2003 to December 2017 and were treated with lymphocyte depletion. Clinicopathologic characteristics including adherence status were collected and descriptive statistics utilized to compare groups. The primary outcome was all-cause graft loss at 6 months after acute rejection treatment. A multivariable logistic regression quantified the association of non-adherence with the outcome. RESULTS: A total of 182 patients were included in the cohort, of whom 71 (39%) were non-adherent. Compared to adherent patients, non-adherent patients were younger (mean age 37y vs 42y), more likely to be female (51% vs 35%) and developed acute rejection later (median 2.3y vs 0.5y from transplant). There were no differences in estimated glomerular filtration rate or need for dialysis on presentation, Banff grade, or presence of antibody mediated rejection between the 2 groups. Overall, 48 (26%) patients lost their grafts at 6 months after acute rejection treatment. In adjusted analysis, non-adherence was associated with all-cause graft loss at 6 months after acute rejection treatment [OR 2.64 (95% CI 1.23-5.65, p = 0.012]. CONCLUSIONS: After adjusting for common confounders, non-adherent patients were at increased risk for short-term allograft loss after a severe acute rejection despite lymphocyte depletion. This finding may aid clinicians in risk stratifying patients for poor short-term outcomes and treatment futility.

The association of exercise and sedentary behaviours with incident end-stage renal disease: the Southern Community Cohort Study.

OBJECTIVE: To examine whether lifestyle factors, including sedentary time and physical activity, could independently contribute to risk of end-stage renal disease (ESRD). STUDY DESIGN: Case-cohort study. SETTING: South-eastern USA. PARTICIPANTS: The Southern Community Cohort Study recruited ~86 000 black and white participants from 2002 to 2009. We assembled a case cohort of 692 incident ESRD cases and a probability sample of 4113 participants. PREDICTORS: Sedentary time was calculated as hours/day from daily sitting activities. Physical activity was calculated as metabolic equivalent (MET)-hours/day from engagement in light, moderate and vigorous activities. OUTCOMES: Incident ESRD. RESULTS: At baseline, among the subcohort, mean (SD) age was 52 (8.6) years, and median (25th, 75th centile) estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was 102.8 (85.9-117.9) mL/min/1.73 m2. Medians (25th-75th centile) for sedentary time and physical activity were 8.0 (5.5-12.0) hours/day and 17.2 (8.7-31.9) MET-hours/day, respectively. Median follow-up was 9.4 years. We observed significant interactions between eGFR and both physical activity and sedentary behaviour (p<0.001). The partial effect plot of the association between physical activity and log relative hazard of ESRD suggests that ESRD risk decreases as physical activity increases when eGFR is 90 mL/min/1.73 m2. The inverse association is most pronounced at physical activity levels >27 MET-hours/day. High levels of sitting time were associated with increased ESRD risk only among those with reduced kidney function (eGFR ≤30 mL/min/1.73 m2); this association was attenuated after excluding the first 2 years of follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: In a population with a high prevalence of chronic kidney disease risk factors such as hypertension and diabetes, physical activity appears to be associated with reduced risk of ESRD among those with preserved kidney function. A positive association between sitting time and ESRD observed among those with advanced kidney disease is likely due to reverse causation.