Self-rated executive dysfunction in adults with epilepsy and effects of a cognitive-behavioral intervention (HOBSCOTCH).

RATIONALE: Cognitive problems are common in adults with epilepsy and significantly affect their quality of life. HOBSCOTCH (HOme Based Self-management and COgnitive Training CHanges lives) was developed to teach problem-solving and compensatory memory strategies to these individuals. This study examined whether HOBSCOTCH is associated with improvement in specific aspects of subjective executive functions. METHODS: Fifty-one adults, age 18-65, with epilepsy and subjective cognitive concerns were randomized to receive HOBSCOTCH (n = 31) or a care-as-usual control sample (n = 20). Participants completed the Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function-Adult version (BRIEF-A), as well as the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) to assess depression. Rates of elevated (i.e., T ≥ 65, impaired) BRIEF-A scores at baseline, as well as pre-post score changes for the BRIEF-A clinical scales were evaluated. Significance was set at α = 0.05, one-tailed, given our directional hypothesis. RESULTS: At baseline, a considerable percentage of patients in the overall sample endorsed executive dysfunction on BRIEF-A scales: Inhibit = 28%, Shift = 51%, Emotional Control = 45%, Self-Monitor = 33%, Initiate = 35%, Working Memory = 88%, Plan/Organize = 45%, Task Monitor = 47%, Organization of Materials = 28%. Significant improvement was seen in mean T-scores for Inhibit, Shift, Initiate, and Working Memory in the treatment group, but only Working Memory improved in the control group. The control group endorsed worse task monitoring and organization of materials at baseline and follow-up. Change in depression was not observed for either group, and there was no association between changes in depression and BRIEF-A scores. CONCLUSIONS: A sizeable subset of adults with epilepsy reported experiencing executive dysfunction in their everyday lives, especially for working memory. HOBSCOTCH resulted in amelioration of subjective executive functioning independent of changes in mood.

[Formula: see text]Parent rating of executive function in fetal alcohol spectrum disorder: A review of the literature and new data on Aboriginal Canadian children.

Aboriginal children in Canada are at high risk of fetal alcohol spectrum disorder (FASD) but there is little research on the cognitive impact of prenatal alcohol exposure (PAE) in this population. This paper reviews the literature on parent report of executive functioning in children with FASD that used the Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function (BRIEF). New data on the BRIEF is then reported in a sample of 52 Aboriginal Canadian children with FASD for whom a primary caregiver completed the BRIEF. The children also completed a battery of neuropsychological tests. The results reveal mean scores in the impaired range for all three BRIEF index scores and seven of the eight scales, with the greatest difficulties found on the Working Memory, Inhibit and Shift scales. The majority of the children were reported as impaired on the index scores and scales, with Working Memory being most commonly impaired scale. On the performance-based tests, Trails B and Letter Fluency are most often reported as impaired, though the prevalence of impairment is greater for parent ratings than test performance. No gender difference is noted for the parent report, but the boys had slightly slower intellectual functioning and were more perseverative than the girls on testing. The presence of psychiatric comorbidity is unrelated to either BRIEF or test scores. These findings are generally consistent with prior studies indicating that parents observe considerable executive dysfunction in children with FASD, and that children with FASD may have more difficulty with executive functions in everyday life than is detected by laboratory-based tests alone.

Mutual antipathies and their significance in middle childhood and adolescence.

Mutual antipathies (when two children or adolescents dislike one another) were studied among 2,348 school-age children and 2,768 adolescents to determine incidence, gender and age differences, and implications for social adjustment. The children were more frequently involved than were the adolescents in same-sex antipathies but not mixed-sex ones. Boys were involved more frequently than were girls in same-sex antipathies, but involvement in mixed-sex antipathies was comparable for the two genders. With peer rejection scores used as a covariate, same-sex antipathies were associated with antisocial behavior and social withdrawal among children and adolescents of both genders and, in addition, to emotionality and lack of friendship support among adolescents. Mixed-sex antipathies were related to social adjustment depending on gender: these antipathies were related to antisocial and bullying behavior in boys but not girls; and to nonaggressiveness, victimization, lesser cooperation, shyness, and depression in girls but not boys. Mutual antipathies thus appear to be concomitants of adaptational risk in both childhood and adolescence.