RESUMO
Rickettsia africae is a tick-borne bacteria known to cause African tick bite fever (ATBF). While the disease was first described more than 100 years ago, knowledge of transmission risk factors and disease burden remain poorly described. To better understand the burden of R. africae, this article reviewed and summarized the published literature related to ATBF epidemiology and clinical management. Using a systematic approach, consistent with the PRISMA guidelines, we identified more than 100 eligible articles, including 65 epidemiological studies and 41 case reports. Most reports described R. africae in ticks and livestock, while human studies were less common. Human disease case reports were exclusively among returning travellers from non-endemic areas, which limits our disease knowledge among at-risk populations: people living in endemic regions. Substantial efforts to elucidate the ATBF risk factors and clinical manifestations among local populations are needed to develop effective preventative strategies and facilitate appropriate and timely diagnosis.
RESUMO
We obtained samples from the Department of Defense Serum Repository from soldiers who were stationed at Fort Liberty, North Carolina, between 1991 and 2019 to assess temporal trends in tick-borne rickettsiosis and ehrlichiosis. Serological evidence of infection was common, with nearly 1 in 5 (18.9%) demonstrating antibodies. We observed significant decreases in Rickettsia seroprevalence (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.42 [95% CI, .27-.65], P = .0001) while over the same period Ehrlichia seroprevalence, albeit less common, nearly doubled (aOR, 3.61 [95% CI, 1.10-13.99], P = .048). The increase in Ehrlichia seroprevalence likely reflects increased transmission resulting from the expanding geographic range of the lone star tick.
RESUMO
Investigating new avenues of mosquito control is an important area of entomological research. Examining the effects of various compounds on mosquito biology contributes to the foundation of knowledge from which novel control methods can be built. Caffeine, in particular, is a commonly consumed compound that has not been thoroughly studied for its potential in disrupting the natural life cycle of mosquitoes. In this exploratory study, we analyzed caffeine's effect on the blood-feeding behavior, survival, and fecundity of Aedes albopictus Skuse (Diptera: Culicidae) mosquitoes. Two outcomes, blood-feeding behavior and fecundity, were analyzed in the first experiment in which mosquitoes were exposed to caffeine doses ranging from 0.2 to 2.4 mg/ml. We found a negative linear relationship between dose and fecundity, but no significant impact on blood-feeding behavior. Adjustments were made to the experimental design in which mosquitoes were exposed to doses ranging from 2.5 to 20 mg/ml. From this experiment, we found that caffeine negatively affected blood-feeding behavior, survival, and fecundity especially at higher concentrations. These results suggest that caffeine could be a potential target for future mosquito control research.
Assuntos
Aedes , Animais , Cafeína/farmacologia , Fertilidade , Estágios do Ciclo de Vida , Comportamento AlimentarRESUMO
Knock-down resistance (kdr) mutations in the voltage-gated sodium channel gene of Aedes species mosquitoes are biomarkers for resistance to pyrethroid insecticides. In the United States, few studies have reported kdr mutations among Aedes albopictus (Skuse) (Diptera: Culicidae) populations. In this study, we sought to compare the presence of kdr alleles among Ae. albopictus mosquitoes collected from Fort Bragg and Wake County, North Carolina. We collected 538 Ae. albopictus mosquitoes, including 156 from 4 sites at Fort Bragg, North Carolina and 382 from 15 sites in Wake County, North Carolina to compare the prevalence of kdr mutations. Of those successfully sequenced, we identified 12 (3.0%) mosquitoes with kdr mutations, all of which were attributed to variants at position 1534 within domain 3. All mutations were found in mosquitoes collected at Wake County sites; no mutations were identified in collections from Fort Bragg. There was a focus of mutations observed at the Wake County sites with approximately 92% (11 of 12) of the mosquitoes with the mutation coming from one site, where kdr mutations represented 24.4% (11 of 45) of all mosquitoes collected. We observed highly focal resistance in a suburban area of Raleigh, which may be attributable to peri-domestic mosquito control activities that involve area dispersal of pyrethroid insecticides. More robust surveillance is needed to monitor the emergence and spread of resistance.
