A Low-Cost Perfusate Alternative for Ex Vivo Lung Perfusion.

BACKGROUND: Normothermic ex vivo lung perfusion (EVLP) has been used successfully to evaluate and recondition marginal donor lungs; however, multiple barriers continue to prevent its widespread adoption. We sought to develop a common hospital ingredient-derived perfusate (CHIP) with equivalent functional and inflammatory characteristics to a standard Krebs-Henseleit buffer with 8% serum albumin-derived perfusate (KHB-Alb) to improve access and reduce costs of ex vivo organ perfusion. METHODS: Sixteen porcine lungs were perfused using negative pressure ventilation (NPV) EVLP for 12 hours in a normothermic state and were allocated equally to 2 groups: KHB-Alb vs CHIP. Physiological parameters, cytokine profiles, and edema formation were compared between treatment groups. RESULTS: Perfused lungs in both groups demonstrated equivalent oxygenation (partial pressure of arterial oxygen/fraction of inspired oxygen ratio >350 mm Hg) and physiological parameters. There was equivalent generation of tumor necrosis factor-α and IL-6, irrespective of perfusate solution used, when comparing CHIP vs KHB-Alb. Pig lungs developed equivalent edema formation between groups (CHIP: 15.8 ± 4.8%, KHB-Alb 19.5 ± 4.4%, P > .05). CONCLUSION: A perfusate derived of common hospital ingredients provides equivalent results to a standard Krebs-Henseleit buffer with 8% serum albumin-based perfusate in NPV-EVLP.

Ex vivo perfusion induces a time- and perfusate-dependent molecular repair response in explanted porcine lungs.

Ex vivo lung perfusion (EVLP) shows promise in ameliorating pretransplant acute lung injury (ALI) and expanding the donor organ pool, but the mechanisms of ex vivo repair remain poorly understood. We aimed to assess the utility of gene expression for characterizing ALI during EVLP. One hundred sixty-nine porcine lung samples were collected in vivo (n = 25), after 0 (n = 11) and 12 (n = 11) hours of cold static preservation (CSP), and after 0 (n = 57), 6 (n = 8), and 12 (n = 57) hours of EVLP, utilizing various ventilation and perfusate strategies. The expression of 53 previously described ALI-related genes was measured and correlated with function and histology. Twenty-eight genes were significantly upregulated and 6 genes downregulated after 12 hours of EVLP. Aggregate gene sets demonstrated differential expression with EVLP (P < .001) but not CSP. Upregulated 28-gene set expression peaked after 6 hours of EVLP, whereas downregulated 6-gene set expression continued to decline after 12 hours. Cellular perfusates demonstrated a greater reduction in downregulated 6-gene set expression vs acellular perfusate (P < .038). Gene set expression correlated with relevant functional and histologic parameters, including P/F ratio (P < .001) and interstitial inflammation (P < .005). Further studies with posttransplant results are warranted to evaluate the clinical significance of this novel molecular approach for assessing organ quality during EVLP.

Negative pressure ventilation decreases inflammation and lung edema during normothermic ex-vivo lung perfusion.

BACKGROUND: Normothermic ex-vivo lung perfusion (EVLP) using positive pressure ventilation (PPV) and both acellular and red blood cell (RBC)-based perfusate solutions have increased the rate of donor organ utilization. We sought to determine whether a negative pressure ventilation (NPV) strategy would improve donor lung assessment during EVLP. METHODS: Thirty-two pig lungs were perfused ex vivo for 12 hours in a normothermic state, and were allocated equally to 4 groups according to the mode of ventilation (positive pressure ventilation [PPV] vs NPV) and perfusate composition (acellular vs RBC). The impact of ventilation strategy on the preservation of 6 unutilized human donor lungs was also evaluated. Physiologic parameters, cytokine profiles, lung injury, bullae and edema formation were compared between treatment groups. RESULTS: Perfused lungs demonstrated acceptable oxygenation (partial pressure of arterial oxygen/fraction of inspired oxygen ratio >350 mm Hg) and physiologic parameters. However, there was less generation of pro-inflammatory cytokines (tumor necrosis factor-α, interleukin-6 and interleukin-8) in human and pig lungs perfused, irrespective of perfusate solution used, when comparing NPV with PPV (p < 0.05), and a reduction in bullae formation with an NPV modality (p = 0.02). Pig lungs developed less edema with NPV (p < 0.01), and EVLP using an acellular perfusate solution had greater edema formation, irrespective of ventilation strategy (p = 0.01). Interestingly, human lungs perfused with NPV developed negative edema, or "drying" (p < 0.01), and lower composite acute lung injury (p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Utilization of an NPV strategy during extended EVLP is associated with significantly less inflammation, and lung injury, irrespective of perfusate solution composition.

A Leukocyte Filter Does Not Provide Further Benefit During Ex Vivo Lung Perfusion.

Normothermic ex vivo lung perfusion (EVLP) allows for assessment and reconditioning of donor lungs. Although a leukocyte filter (LF) is routinely incorporated into the EVLP circuit; its efficacy remains to be determined. Twelve pig lungs were perfused and ventilated ex vivo in a normothermic state for 12 hours. Lungs (n = 3) were allocated to four groups according to perfusate composition and the presence or absence of a LF in the circuit (acellular ± LF, cellular ± LF). Acceptable physiologic lung parameters were achieved during EVLP; however, increased amounts of pro-inflammatory cytokines (TNF-α and IL-6) and leukocytes in the perfusate were observed despite the presence or absence of a LF. Analysis of cells washed off the LF demonstrates that it trapped leukocytes although being ineffective throughout perfusion as it became saturated over 12 hours of EVLP. We conclude that there is no objective evidence to support the routine incorporation of a LF during EVLP as it does not provide further benefit and its removal does not appear to cause harm. The lack of hypothesized benefit to a LF may be because of the saturation of the LF with donor leukocytes, leading to similar amounts of circulating leukocytes still present in the perfusate with and without a LF.