RESUMO
Objective: Atrophic rhinitis (AR) is a rare clinical condition affecting the nasal mucosa. It is characterized by progressive nasal congestion and thick, bothersome nasal secretions. In this narrative review, pathogenesis, differences between the 2 types of AR, new management modalities, and the impact of management on lifestyle have been highlighted. Materials and Methods: An extensive literature search was conducted using PubMed, Web of Science, Google Scholar, and Saudi Digital Library databases. The articles were investigated to extract information on the pathogenesis, types, new treatment modalities, and the impact of management on lifestyle. Results: AR has primary and secondary types that affect different populations and have specific clinical presentations. Primary AR is common in women and countries with long, warm seasons. Secondary AR is the most common disease in the industrialized world. It is more common among adults who have systemic disease, have undergone extensive nasal surgery, and have experienced nasal trauma. Certain infections, autoimmune disorders, chronic sinusitis, hormonal imbalance, poor nutritional condition, and iron deficiency anemia have been suggested as etiological factors. Conservative treatment is safe, inexpensive, and effective. Hygiene, a well-balanced diet, smoking cessation, and early detection and treatment of nasal pathology can help prevent AR. Some interventions shown to improve quality of life was explained in detail. Conclusions: This paper reviewed published relevant literature on AR related to pathogenesis, types, new treatment modalities, and the impact of treatment on lifestyle, thus, providing a comprehensive view of the management and prevention of AR.
RESUMO
Purpose: The COVID-19 pandemic dramatically affected every aspect of life worldwide. Contact restrictions and social distancing during the epidemic has led to the suspension of bedside teaching (BST) and shifting to online didactic teaching and other methods of active learning. We implemented peer role-play simulation (PRPS) during the pandemic to compensate for the suspended BST. This study aims to explore the effectiveness of PRPS in developing the students' verbal communication, empathy and clinical reasoning skills compared to BST. Methods: This is a cross-sectional observational study conducted in Jazan University faculty of medicine with the study sample including all medical students enrolled in 5th and 6th year during the academic year 2020-21. Data collection involved using a web-based validated questionnaire. Results: Most of the students (84.1%) rated bedside teaching (BST) as extremely beneficial or beneficial in developing verbal communication skills compared to 73.3% for peer role-play simulation (PRPS). A similar pattern was found in empathy skills development with 84.1% for bedside compared to 72.2% for PRPS. The pattern is reversed with the development of clinical reasoning skills with 77.7% rating BST as beneficial or extremely beneficial compared to 81.2% for PRPS. Conclusion: Overall, peer role-play is generally a valuable and trustworthy method in the absence of bedside teaching for enhancing clinical reasoning skills of medical students during the COVID-19 pandemic from students' perspective. It is less efficient than bedside teaching in enhancing communication skills. It cannot wholly replace bedside teaching, although it can be used reliably for that purpose in exceptional circumstances when bedside teaching cannot be implemented.
