Physical Medicine Applications in Hand Burns: Treatment or Rehabilitation.

The aim of this study is to investigate the contribution of concurrent physical therapy to the preservation of hand function in patients with hand burns. This retrospective cohort study included the records of adult patients who presented with hand burns between July 1, 2020, and December 1, 2021. A total of 67 of 1578 burn patients who attended the clinic were included in this study. The patients' age, sex, total BSA with burns, causative agent, depth of burn on the hand, right or left hand, location of the burned area on the hand, treatment applied, healing time of the burn on the hand, limitation of movement, the joint restrictions, contractures, and compliance with physical therapy were assessed and recorded. Among the 67 patients included, 82.1% (n = 55) had no limitation in terms of their joint range of motion, whereas 17.9% (n = 12) had a limitation of movement in their finger joints. When the prevalence of movement limitation was examined by gender, such limitation was found to be more common in females (P = .041). Moreover, contractures were found to occur more frequently in patients with full-thickness burns (P = .032). It was also found that the limitation of movement was more severe in patients with skin grafts (P = .044). In addition, it was observed that the recovery time of the burn area was longer in those patients who had movement limitations (P = .004). In this study, we found that applying early physical therapy to patients after burn injuries facilitated the recovery of hand functions.

Outcomes of Wide-Awake Flexor Tendon Repairs in 58 Fingers and 9 Thumbs.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to present the outcomes of wide-awake flexor tendon repairs in zones 1 and 2 in a major hand trauma referral center. METHODS: Zone 1 and zone 2 wide-awake flexor tendon repairs performed between August 2018 and March 2020 were analyzed retrospectively. Outcomes were assessed by the original Strickland-Glogovac criteria for fingers and Buck-Gramcko scoring system for thumbs. Further descriptive analysis of the groups according to potential negative factors, such as injury mechanism, concomitant neurovascular injury, and the extent of injury in zone 2, were performed. RESULTS: A total of 94 tendons were repaired in 67 digits (58 fingers, 9 thumbs) of the 61 patients included in the study. Satisfactory results were achieved in 89.6% of the fingers and 77.8% of the thumbs. Intraoperative gapping was corrected after active digital extension-flexion test in 1 patient. Rupture was seen in 1 patient for a rate of 1.5%. The tenolysis indication rate was 5.1% for fingers and 11.1% for thumbs. CONCLUSIONS: In our series, functional outcome scores, tenolysis, and rupture rates remained similar with findings in the literature. The outcome of a flexor tendon repair is influenced by many factors that cannot be controlled intraoperatively. To assess the effect of performing the repair in a wide-awake setting on the outcome, clinical trials with large patient groups are needed. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic IV.