RESUMO
In this editorial, we talk about a compelling case focusing on posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome (PRES) as a complication in patients undergoing liver transplantation and treated with Tacrolimus. Tacrolimus (FK 506), derived from Streptomyces tsukubaensis, is a potent immunosuppressive macrolide. It inhibits T-cell transcription by binding to FK-binding protein, and is able to amplify glucocorticoid and progesterone effects. Tacrolimus effectively prevents allograft rejection in transplant patients but has adverse effects such as Tacrolimus-related PRES. PRES presents with various neurological symptoms alongside elevated blood pressure, and is primarily characterized by vasogenic edema on neuroimaging. While computed tomography detects initial lesions, magnetic resonance imaging, especially the Fluid-Attenuated Inversion Recovery sequence, is superior for diagnosing cortical and subcortical edema. Our discussion centers on the incidence of PRES in solid organ transplant recipients, which ranges between 0.5 to 5 +ACU-, with varying presentations, from seizures to visual disturbances. The case of a 66-year-old male status post liver transplantation highlights the diagnostic and management challenges associated with Tacrolimus-related PRES. Radiographically evident in the parietal and occipital lobes, PRES underlines the need for heightened vigilance among healthcare providers. This editorial emphasizes the importance of early recognition, accurate diagnosis, and effective management of PRES to optimize outcomes in liver transplant patients. The case further explores the balance between the efficacy of immunosuppression with Tacrolimus and its potential neurological risks, underlining the necessity for careful monitoring and intervention strategies in this patient population.
RESUMO
Ankylosing spondylitis (AS) is a chronic inflammatory arthritis affecting the spine, presenting a considerable morbidity risk. Although evidence consistently indicates an elevated risk of ischemic heart disease among AS patients, debates persist regarding the likelihood of these patients developing left ventricular dysfunction (LVD). Our investigation aimed to determine whether individuals with AS face a greater risk of LVD compared to the general population. To accomplish this, we identified studies exploring LVD in AS patients across five major databases and Google Scholar. Initially, 431 studies were identified, of which 30 met the inclusion criteria, collectively involving 2933 participants. Results show that AS patients had: (1) poorer Ejection Fraction (EF) [mean difference (MD): -0.92% (95% CI: -1.25 to -0.59)], (2) impaired Early (E) and Late (atrial-A) ventricular filling velocity (E/A) ratio [MD: -0.10 m/s (95% CI: -0.13 to -0.08)], (3) prolonged deceleration time (DT) [MD: 12.30 ms (95% CI: 9.23-15.36)] and, (4) a longer mean isovolumetric relaxation time (IVRT) [MD: 8.14 ms (95% CI: 6.58-9.70)] compared to controls. Though AS patients show increased risks of both systolic and diastolic LVD, we found no significant differences were observed in systolic blood pressure [MD: 0.32 mmHg (95% Confidence Interval (CI): -2.09 to 2.73)] or diastolic blood pressure [MD: 0.30 mmHg (95% CI: -0.40 to 1.01)] compared to the general population. This study reinforces AS patients' susceptibility to LVD without a notable difference in HTN risk.
Assuntos
Espondilite Anquilosante , Volume Sistólico , Disfunção Ventricular Esquerda , Espondilite Anquilosante/fisiopatologia , Espondilite Anquilosante/complicações , Espondilite Anquilosante/epidemiologia , Humanos , Disfunção Ventricular Esquerda/fisiopatologia , Disfunção Ventricular Esquerda/epidemiologia , Masculino , Volume Sistólico/fisiologia , Feminino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Adulto , Fatores de Risco , Ecocardiografia/métodos , IdosoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: This review article provides an updated review of a relatively common pathology with various manifestations. Superficial venous diseases (SVDs) are a broad spectrum of venous vascular disease that predominantly affects the body's lower extremities. The most serious manifestation of this disease includes varicose veins, chronic venous insufficiency, stasis dermatitis, venous ulcers, superficial venous thrombosis, reticular veins, and spider telangiectasias. METHODS: The anatomy, pathophysiology, and risk factors of SVD were discussed during this review. The risk factors for developing SVD were related to race, age, sex, lifestyle, and certain genetic conditions as well as comorbid deep vein thrombosis. Various classification systems were listed, focusing on the most common one-the revised Clinical-Etiology-Anatomy-Pathophysiology classification. The clinical features including history and physical examination findings elicited in SVD were outlined. RESULTS: Imaging modalities utilized in SVD were highlighted. Duplex ultrasound is the first line in evaluating SVD but magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography venography, plethysmography, and conventional venography are feasible options in the event of an ambiguous venous duplex ultrasound study. Treatment options highlighted in this review ranged from conservative treatment with compression stockings, which could be primary or adjunctive to pharmacologic topical and systemic agents such as azelaic acid, diuretics, plant extracts, medical foods, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, anticoagulants and skin substitutes for different stages of SVD. Interventional treatment modalities include thermal ablative techniques like radiofrequency ablationss, endovenous laser ablation, endovenous steam ablation, and endovenous microwave ablation as well as nonthermal strategies such as the Varithena (polidocanol microfoam) sclerotherapy, VenaSeal (cyanoacrylate) ablation, and Endovenous mechanochemical ablation. Surgical treatments are also available and include debridement, vein ligation, stripping, and skin grafting. CONCLUSIONS: SVDs are prevalent and have varied manifestations predominantly in the lower extremities. Several studies highlight the growing clinical and financial burden of these diseases. This review provides an update on the pathophysiology, classification, clinical features, and imaging findings as well as the conservative, pharmacological, and interventional treatment options indicated for different SVD pathologies. It aims to expedite the timely deployment of therapies geared toward reducing the significant morbidity associated with SVD especially varicose veins, venous ulcers, and venous insufficiency, to improve the quality of life of these patients and prevent complications.
Assuntos
Varizes , Humanos , Fatores de Risco , Resultado do Tratamento , Varizes/terapia , Varizes/fisiopatologia , Varizes/epidemiologia , Insuficiência Venosa/terapia , Insuficiência Venosa/fisiopatologia , Insuficiência Venosa/epidemiologia , Insuficiência Venosa/diagnóstico por imagem , Veias/fisiopatologia , Veias/diagnóstico por imagem , Valor Preditivo dos TestesRESUMO
BACKGROUND Obesity is a global epidemic often managed through surgical interventions, such as intragastric balloons. Despite the minimally invasive appeal of intragastric balloons, severe complications, such as gastric outlet obstruction, can occur with their use. The most recent guidelines recommend metabolic and bariatric surgery for specific body mass index categories but rarely discuss the potential complications and required postoperative monitoring. Guidelines encourage metabolic and bariatric surgery for patients with a body mass index of 30-34.9 kg/m² and presence of metabolic disease, or body mass index ≥35 kg/m², regardless of co-morbidities. CASE REPORT We report a case of a 35-year-old woman with severe nausea, vomiting, electrolyte imbalance, and chest pain, leading to ICU admission just 2 weeks after intragastric balloon placement in Mexico. Testing and diagnostics were concerning for metabolic imbalance and heart rhythm changes. Imaging and endoscopic investigations confirmed gastric outlet obstruction, necessitating emergent endoscopic balloon deflation and removal. Following the procedure, her symptoms resolved, and she was discharged with appropriate medication and scheduled follow-up. CONCLUSIONS Given the increasing prevalence of obesity and a corresponding surge in surgical interventions, this case serves as a cautionary tale. Selection of a type of metabolic and bariatric surgery should be patient specific, with the patient involved in the decision making. Rigorous preoperative assessments and sustained postoperative monitoring are imperative. This study aims to guide future research toward enhanced patient selection and prevention of severe complications, thus influencing practice and policy in obesity management.