Cartilage-Sparing Otoplasty: An Overview of the Mustardé and Furnas Suture Techniques.

Otoplasty is commonly used to treat prominauris. Cartilage-sparing techniques for otoplasty are well popularized. The most common cartilage-sparing otoplasty techniques include the Mustardé and Furnas techniques. This article discusses the preparation, surgical steps, postoperative care, and associated complications for Mustardé and Furnas otoplasty in detail.

Once Upon a Rhinoplasty: The History of the "Queen" of Facial Plastic Surgery.

The history of rhinoplasty is absolutely fascinating. It is replete with mysterious practices, intrigue, and imaginative thoughts. If necessity is the mother of invention, then sex, crimes, and punishment lay a legitimate claim to being the mother of rhinoplasty. The history of rhinoplasty is a global saga spanning the millennia. Practitioners of the art and science have included those demonstrating the most admirable traits espoused in the Hippocratic Oath, as well as those to whom the word "charlatan" might more aptly be applied. The truth of a story is illustrated in its telling, and we have attempted to be true historians. We recognize that observers and narrators, now well past (sic), have determined many of today's truths, and therefore their stories become our truths whether they were so or not. We have attempted to reference many who have contributed to the advance of this amazing surgical procedure, recognizing that we may have included some who have demonstrated marginal merit to be so. Assuredly, we have also unintentionally omitted some whom we should have included. From them we ask forbearance. Let the story begin, "Once upon a time…".

Surgical Tips for the Management of the Wide Nasal Base.

Alar base reduction (ABR) was first described by Weir in 1892, but continues to be a controversial topic in rhinoplasty in terms of optimal techniques. The authors describe the techniques for ABR including internal, external and combined ABR, flare excisions, and alar hooding reductions. The techniques described have resulted in consistent outcomes with acceptable scarring and high patient satisfaction.

Newly Designed Upper Lateral Cartilage Flap for Preventing Depression of the Keystone Area in Large-Nose Septorhinoplasty.

IMPORTANCE: Because large dorsal reduction may weaken the keystone area, later notching of this area should be prevented while reducing large humps during septorhinoplasty. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether a triangular-shaped flap of upper lateral cartilages (ULCs) that we designed can prevent secondary deformity of the nasal dorsum in the keystone area following large hump reduction. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: In this retrospective study, medical records as well as preoperative and postoperative photographs of septorhinoplasty cases in which triangular flaps had been used between April 1, 2012, and March 3, 2013, were reviewed. Data analysis was conducted from March 3 to May 10, 2014. Demographic data, amount of hump reduction, and any irregularity of the dorsum in the keystone area mentioned in the medical record or identified in postoperative profile view photographs were assessed. The study was conducted in a research center, and the operations were performed in a private setting. Patients had been scheduled for septorhinoplasty with flap reconstruction if more than 3 mm of dorsal hump reduction was planned and their skin was not thin. Of 41 identified patients, 3 could not be monitored for 1 year; 38 patients were included in the analysis. EXPOSURES: Open septorhinoplasty had been performed, and more than 3 mm of dorsum had been removed in all patients whose data were analyzed. During stepwise resection of the nasal dorsum, a triangular-shaped remnant of the most cephalomedial part of the ULC was maintained intact on each side over the keystone area. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Irregularity of the nasal dorsum over the keystone area in postoperative profile view photographs. RESULTS: More than 3 mm of hump reduction had been made in all 38 patients. No irregularities were observed in the postoperative photographs or had been found on digital examination of the keystone area after at least 12 months of follow-up. CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE: Maintaining a remnant of the ULC over the keystone area in the form of a triangular-shaped flap on each side is a simple, reliable, and durable way to prevent notching of the keystone area during lowering of the nasal dorsum in large noses with sufficient skin thickness. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4.

Nasal tip deprojection with crural cartilage overlap: the M-arch model.

Vertical arch division is a mainstay of tip surgery, and its applications are expanding. It allows deprojection of the overprojected tip, and modifies rotation, length, and lobule definition. These parameters can be altered in a controlled, predictable fashion when the alar cartilage is preserved and overlapped, maintaining its strength. Cartilage overlay techniques aim to preserve normal anatomy and establish support for the nasal framework. We discuss the uses of vertical arch division when applied to the M-arch model, an expansion of the nasal tip tripod concept, which provides for a utilitarian approach to surgical techniques for the nasal tip.

Pediatric esthetic otoplasty.

Pediatric otoplasty is generally considered to be a "simple" procedure, but an astute surgeon recognizes the challenges of this operation and is mindful of the degree of detail involved in its planning and execution. The vast number of described otoplasty methods, which are ever evolving, is a testament to the complexity of this procedure. In this article, the authors' methodology with respect to preoperative analysis and planning, surgical technique, and postoperative care, including management of complications and potential pitfalls, are highlighted.

Global facial beauty: approaching a unified aesthetic ideal.

Recognition of facial beauty is both inborn and learned through social discourses and exposures. Demographic shifts across the globe, in addition to cross-cultural interactions that typify 21st century globalization in virtually all industries, comprise major active evolutionary forces that reshape our individual notions of facial beauty. This article highlights the changing perceptions of beauty, while defining and distinguishing natural beauty and artificial beauty.

Rhinoplasty: panel discussion.

Should one use an open or closed rhinoplasty approach? How appropriate is the endonasal approach in modern-day rhinoplasty? Should the tip lobule be divided or preserved? Are alloplastic implants inferior to autologous implants? Does release and reduction of the upper lateral cartilages from the nasal dorsal septum always require spreader graft placement to prevent mid one-third nasal pinching in reduction rhinoplasty? Over past 5 years, how have rhinoplasty techniques and approaches evolved?

Revision rhinoplasty: panel discussion, controversies, and techniques.

UNLABELLED: What is the single most difficult challenge in revision rhinoplasty and how do you address it? During revision rhinoplasty, when dorsal augmentation is necessary and septal and ear cartilage is not available, what is the best substance for correcting the problem? If rib cartilage is used for dorsal augmentation during revision rhinoplasty, what is the technique to prevent warping of the graft? Alloplast in the nose--when, where, and for what purpose? Does the release and reduction of the upper lateral cartilages from the nasal dorsal septum always require spreader graft placement to prevent mid-one-third nasal pinching in reductive rhinoplasty?' ANALYSIS: Over the past 5 years, how has your technique evolved or what have you observed and learned in performing revision rhinoplasty?

Objective assessment of perceived age reversal and improvement in attractiveness after aging face surgery.

IMPORTANCE: Primary reasons why patients pursue aesthetic facial surgery are to look younger and more attractive; however, there is minimal literature about the effect of aesthetic facial surgery on perceived age and attractiveness. OBJECTIVES: To objectively and quantitatively evaluate the degree of perceived age change and improvement in attractiveness following aesthetic facial surgical procedures. DESIGN: Prospective evaluation by independent raters of preoperative and postoperative photographs of 49 consecutive patients who underwent aesthetic facial surgery between July 4, 2006, and July 22, 2010. The photographs of these patients were presented to 50 blinded raters, each of whom was randomly assigned to 4 rater groups. Raters were asked to estimate the age of each patient in the photographs presented and to rate the patient's attractiveness on a scale of 1 to 10. SETTING: Facial plastic surgery private practice in Toronto, Ontario, Canada. PARTICIPANTS: Patient inclusion criteria consisted of primary facial surgical procedures with a minimum 6-month follow-up period, use of standardized photographs, and no cosmetic procedures in the intervening period. Raters were chosen from the province of Ontario, randomly assigned to 1 of 4 rater groups, and blinded to the objectives of the study. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The mean "years saved" (true age minus guessed age) and change in attractiveness scores after facial aesthetic surgery. RESULTS: The mean overall years saved following aesthetic facial surgery was 3.1 years (range, -4.0 to 9.4 years). There was a small but insignificant increase in attractiveness scores in postprocedural photographs relative to preprocedural photographs (P > .54). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: In this study, aesthetic facial surgery was effective in reducing the apparent age of patients but did not consistently improve their attractiveness. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4.

Ethical considerations in aesthetic rhinoplasty: a survey, critical analysis, and review.

Although the practice of medicine is built on a foundation of ethics, science, and common sense, the increasing complexity of medical interventions, social interactions, and societal norms of behavior challenges the ethical practice of aesthetic surgeons. We report a survey of the opinions, practices, and attitudes of experienced and novice facial plastic surgeons. The survey consisted of 15 clinical vignettes addressing ethical quandaries in aesthetic rhinoplasty. The vignettes are based on the experience and observations of the senior author (P.A.A.) over nearly 30 years of practice and teaching. Fellowship directors and facial plastic surgery fellows of the American Academy of Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery were surveyed anonymously. Five of the 15 vignettes demonstrated significant differences between the responses of the fellowship directors and the fellows. No single vignette had a unanimous consensus in either group. Aesthetic rhinoplasty surgeons encounter ethical issues that should be reflected on by both experienced and inexperienced facial plastic surgeons, preferably before being faced with them in practice. We present a practical approach to ethical issues in clinical practice. Our survey can also be used as a stimulus for further discussion and teaching.

Perceived age change after aesthetic facial surgical procedures quantifying outcomes of aging face surgery.

OBJECTIVE: To quantify the degree of perceived age change after aesthetic facial surgical procedures to provide an objective measure of surgical success. METHODS: Sixty patients undergoing various aging face surgical procedures were randomly chosen for analysis. Preoperative and postoperative photographs were evaluated. Raters were presented with photographs in a random assortment and were asked to estimate the age of the patient. Perceived age difference was defined as the difference between the chronological age and the estimated age, and the change in this value after surgery was the chief outcome of interest. Statistical models were designed to account for any effects of interrater differences, preoperative chronological age, rater group, photograph order, or surgical procedure performed. RESULTS: Our patient population was divided into the following 3 groups based on the surgical procedure performed: group 1 (face- and neck-lift [22 patients]), group 2 (face- and neck-lift and upper and lower blepharoplasty [17 patients]), and group 3 (face- and neck-lift, upper and lower blepharoplasty, and forehead-lift [21 patients]). Adjusted means demonstrated that patient ages were estimated to be 1.7 years younger than their chronological age before surgery and 8.9 years younger than their chronological age after surgery. The effect was less substantial for group 1 patients and was most dramatic for group 3 patients, who had undergone all 3 aging face surgical procedures. CONCLUSIONS: Our study is novel in that it quantifies the degree of perceived age change after aging face surgical procedures and demonstrates a significant and consistent reduction in perceived age after aesthetic facial surgery. This effect is more substantial when the number of surgical procedures is increased, an effect unrelated to the preoperative age of a patient and unaffected by other variables that we investigated. The ability to perceive age correctly is accurate and consistent.

Patient complaints with primary versus revision rhinoplasty: analysis and practice implications.

BACKGROUND: Rhinoplasty patients often present with specific concerns and are frequently exacting in their demands and expectations of the surgical experience. OBJECTIVES: The authors assess the presenting complaints expressed during the rhinoplasty consultation process and compare the presentations of primary versus revision rhinoplasty patients. METHODS: A retrospective review of 400 consecutive rhinoplasty patients was performed. Demographic information and patient concerns regarding nasal appearance and function were recorded. Complaint frequencies (as well as rank order) were compared between primary and revision patients. Statistically significant associations were compared in more detail through logistic regression models. RESULTS: Primary rhinoplasty patients were significantly more likely to cite "too large" and "dorsal hump" as motivating concerns. Conversely, revision rhinoplasty patients were far more likely to cite concern regarding a "crooked nose," "tip asymmetry," "wide or large nostrils," "dorsal sloop," and "columellar show." Revision rhinoplasty patients also complained of issues such as "alar retraction," "pointy tip," and "nasal scarring," which were almost negligible in frequency in the primary rhinoplasty group. CONCLUSIONS: Patients presenting for primary rhinoplasty commonly seek a smaller, more refined nasal appearance. Patients with prior rhinoplasty operations are far more likely to raise concern regarding crookedness or asymmetries. By comparing the presentations of primary and revision rhinoplasty patients-and delineating the common indications for revision operations-novice rhinoplasty surgeons may be able to avoid certain pitfalls at the outset, thereby reducing their revision rates. The data may also assist surgeons in developing a more targeted approach to the consultation process in the revision setting.