Impact of ABCC8 and TRPM4 genetic variation in central nervous system dysfunction associated with pediatric sepsis.

BACKGROUND: Sepsis-associated brain injury is associated with deterioration of mental status, persistent cognitive impairment, and morbidity. The SUR1/TRPM4 channel is a non-selective cation channel that is transcriptionally upregulated in the central nervous system with injury, allowing sodium influx, depolarization, cellular swelling, and secondary injury. We hypothesized that genetic variation in ABCC8 (SUR1 gene) and TRPM4 would associate with central nervous system dysfunction in severe pediatric sepsis. METHODS: 326 children with severe sepsis underwent whole exome sequencing in an observational cohort. We compared children with and without central nervous system dysfunction (Glasgow Coma Scale <12) to assess for associations with clinical characteristics and pooled rare variants in ABCC8 and TRPM4. Sites of variation were mapped onto protein structure and assessed for phenotypic impact. RESULTS: Pooled rare variants in either ABCC8 or TRPM4 associated with decreased odds of central nervous system dysfunction in severe pediatric sepsis (OR 0.14, 95% CI 0.003-0.87), p-value = 0.025). This association persisted following adjustment for race, organ failure, viral infection, and continuous renal replacement therapy (aOR 0.11, 95% CI 0.01-0.59, p-value = 0.038). Structural mapping showed that rare variants concentrated in the nucleotide-binding domains of ABCC8 and N-terminal melastatin homology region of TRPM4. CONCLUSION: This study suggests a role for the ABCC8/TRPM4 channel in central nervous system dysfunction in severe pediatric sepsis. While exploratory, the lack of therapies to prevent or mitigate central nervous system dysfunction in pediatric sepsis warrants further studies to clarify the mechanism and confirm the potential protective effect of these rare ABCC8/TRPM4 variants.

Are dietitian recommendations followed? A descriptive study of paediatric hospitalised and ambulatory patients.

BACKGROUND: The primary objective of this cross-sectional retrospective study was to describe the implementation of dietitian prescribed nutrition recommendations in malnourished paediatric patients in the hospital and ambulatory settings. We also aimed to investigate other characteristics that could be associated with differences in implementation. METHODS: Data were collected from 186 hospitalised and 565 ambulatory patients between February 2020 and January 2021. Data included age, hospital or ambulatory specialty departments, primary diagnosis, malnutrition status, hospital length of stay (LOS), and medical nutrition therapy recommendations. Implementation by the medical team in the hospital setting and adherence by the family in the outpatient setting were categorised as "Full", "Partial" or "None". "Partial" and "None" were combined for analysis. RESULTS: Dietitian prescribed recommendations were implemented in 79.6% of hospitalised patients. In the ambulatory population, 46.4% of patients were adherent with nutrition recommendations. Within the hospital, there was a significant difference in implementation of nutrition recommendations based on age (p = 0.047), hospital department (p = 0.002) and LOS (p = 0.04), whereas, in the ambulatory population, there were no significant differences in the rate of adherence among any of the studied characteristics. CONCLUSIONS: Dietitian recommendations are frequently implemented in the hospital, whereas adherence to such recommendations is poor in the outpatient population. Interventions to improve adherence to nutrition recommendations in the ambulatory setting are needed.

Dietitian Involvement Improves Consumption of Oral Nutrition Supplements in Hospitalized Patients.

Hospitalized patients are at an increased risk of malnutrition due to multiple factors including, but not limited to, acute and chronic diseases especially those affecting gastrointestinal tract, surgery, appetite, and frequent nil per os while undergoing diagnostic workup. Because of this, guidelines suggest the use of oral nutritional supplements (ONS) in hospitalized patients to reduce the risk of malnutrition and its complications. The current report aims to highlights key findings from a cross-sectional survey of 99 hospitalized patients who were at risk for or diagnosed with malnutrition and prescribed ONS. Data regarding ONS prescriber information as well as number ordered and consumed were collected. Of the 2.4 ± 1.5 supplements ordered per person each day, only 1.3 ± 1.1 were consumed, and there was 48% wastage of prescribed ONS. However, dietitian involvement was associated with significant reduction in wastage. Given the need and benefit, it is imperative for the nutrition community to further explore best practices to improve ONS consumption.