Active nerve management for above the knee amputation: A comparison of through the wound versus posterior approach.

Targeted muscle reinnervation (TMR) and regenerative peripheral nerve interface (RPNI) are used to prevent or treat neuromas in amputees. TMR for above-the-knee amputation (AKA) is most commonly performed through a posterior incision rather than the stump wound because recipient motor nerves are primarily located in the proximal third of the thigh. When preventative TMR is performed with concurrent AKA, a posterior approach requires intraoperative repositioning and an additional incision. The purpose of this study was to evaluate feasibility of TMR and operative times for nerve management performed through the wound compared to a posterior approach in AKA patients to guide surgical decision-making. Patients who underwent AKA with TMR between 2018-2023 were reviewed. Patients were divided into two groups: TMR performed through the wound (Group I) and TMR performed through a posterior approach (Group II). If a nerve was unable to undergo coaptation for TMR due to the lack of suitable donor motor nerves, RPNI was performed. Eighteen patients underwent AKA with nerve management were included from Group I (8 patients) and Group II (10 patients). TMR coaptations performed on distinct nerves was 1.5 ± 0.5 in Group I compared to 2.6 ± 0.5 in Group II (p = 0.001). Operative time for Group I was 200.7 ± 33.4 min compared to 326.5 ± 37.1 min in Group II (p = 0.001). TMR performed through the wound following AKA requires less operative time than a posterior approach. However, since recipient motor nerves are not consistently found near the stump, RPNI may be required with TMR whereas the posterior approach allows for more TMR coaptations.

Contralateral C7 nerve transfer for severe pediatric brachial plexus injuries: donor site morbidity.

BACKGROUND: Pediatric brachial plexus injuries (BPI) can have a devastating impact on upper extremity function. With localized lesions, nerve grafting and transfers are well-described. However, reconstruction of pan-plexus (C5-T1) injuries (PPI) requires donor nerves outside of the brachial plexus. The cross C7 (CC7) nerve transfer extended with sural nerve grafts to the contralateral recipient nerve offers the advantage of supplying robust donor axons. Though controversial in the West, CC7 transfer is routine in many Asian centers. We present a case series of pediatric patients who underwent CC7 transfer for BPI. Our objective was to catalog donor site morbidity incurred by transferring the C7 nerve root. METHODS: This retrospective study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of our university. INCLUSION CRITERIA: patients under 18 years old that underwent CC7 nerve transfer for BPI at our health system between 2021 and 2022. A chart review was completed to collect demographic and outcomes data. RESULTS: Three patients underwent a complete CC7 transfer between 2021 and 2022 for BPI reconstruction. All patients underwent concomitant additional nerve transfers. Post-operative donor site sensory deficits were minimal and transient in all but one patient, who reported mild but persistent paresthesia of the donor side hand with movement of recipient side digits; however, no patients suffered donor site motor deficits (Table 1). CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that CC7 nerve transfer is a safe surgical option to provide additional donor motor axons for PPI in pediatric patients.

Outcomes after Anterior Interosseous Nerve to Ulnar Motor Nerve Transfer.

Background Ulnar nerve lesions proximal to the elbow can result in loss of intrinsic muscle function of the hand. The anterior interosseous nerve (AIN) to deep motor branch of the ulnar nerve (DBUN) transfer has been demonstrated to provide intrinsic muscle reinnervation, thereby preventing clawing and improving pinch and grip strength. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of the AIN to DBUN transfer in restoring intrinsic muscle function for patients with traumatic ulnar nerve lesions. Methods We performed a prospective, multi-institutional study of outcomes following AIN to DBUN transfer for high ulnar nerve injuries. Twelve patients were identified, nine of which were enrolled in the study. The mean time from injury to surgery was 15 weeks. Results At final follow-up (mean postoperative follow-up 18 months + 15.5), clawing was observed in all nine patients with metacarpophalangeal joint hyperextension of the ring finger averaging 8.9 degrees (+ 10.8) and small finger averaging 14.6 degrees (+ 12.5). Grip strength of the affected hand was 27% of the unaffected extremity. Pinch strength of the affected hand was 29% of the unaffected extremity. None of our patients experienced claw prevention after either end-to-end ( n = 4) or end-to-side ( n = 5) AIN to DBUN transfer. Conclusion We conclude that, in traumatic high ulnar nerve injuries, the AIN to DBUN transfer does not provide adequate intrinsic muscle reinnervation to prevent clawing and normalize grip and pinch strength.

Supraclavicular Approach to the Brachial Plexus.

The brachial plexus consists of an intricate array of nerves originating from the C5-T1 ventral rami of the spinal cord. Their course is complex and can be substantially distorted after injury. Thus, dissection of the brachial plexus can be difficult. Here, we present a practical approach to the supraclavicular dissection of the brachial plexus, with emphasis on relevant anatomy and surgical landmarks. Methods: This anatomical review was prepared using intraoperative surgical imaging. In addition, illustrations are used to display the images in schematic form. We present a stepwise surgical approach to the supraclavicular dissection of the brachial plexus. We highlight the differences between pre- and postganglionic nerve root injuries, and also relevant anatomical variants of the brachial plexus. Results: Eleven steps are recommended to facilitate the supraclavicular approach to the brachial plexus. Conclusion: The supraclavicular dissection of the brachial plexus is reliable with consistent landmarks and can be carried out in a stepwise fashion.

The Association of Insurance Status and Complications After Carpal Tunnel Release.

BACKGROUND: Carpal tunnel release (CTR) is one of the most commonly performed procedures in hand surgery. Complications from surgery are a rare but significant patient dissatisfier. The purpose of this study was to determine whether insurance status is independently associated with complications after CTR. METHODS: We retrospectively identified all patients undergoing CTR between 2008 and 2018 using the Indiana Network for Patient Care, a state-wide health information exchange, and built a database that included patient demographics and comorbidities. Patients were followed for 90 days to determine whether a postoperative complication occurred. To minimize dropout, only patients with 1 year of encounters after surgery were included. RESULTS: Of the 26 151 patients who met inclusion criteria, 2662 (10.2%) had Medicare, 7027 (26.9%) had Medicaid, and 16 462 (62.9%) had commercial insurance. Compared with Medicare, Medicaid status (P < .001) and commercial insurance status (P < .001) were independently associated with postoperative CTR complications. The overall complication rate was 2.23%, with infection, wound breakdown, and complex regional pain syndrome being the most common complications. Younger age, alcohol use, diabetes mellitus, hypertension, and depression were also independently associated with complications. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of complications after CTR is low. Insurance status, patient demographics, and medical comorbidities, however, should be evaluated preoperatively to appropriately risk stratify patients. Furthermore, surgeons can use these data to initiate preventive measures such as working to manage current comorbidities and lifestyle choices, and to optimize insurance coverage.

Parent Perspectives for Type B Ulnar Polydactyly Management.

BACKGROUND: Type B ulnar polydactyly is one of the most commonly encountered congenital hand differences and can be treated with ligation or excision. The purpose of this study was to determine what factors families consider in selecting treatment for their child with type B ulnar polydactyly. METHODS: We reviewed treatment outcomes and administered a survey by telephone to parents of children with type B ulnar polydactyly treated at a pediatric hospital between 2015 and 2020. We assessed satisfaction, reasons for choosing treatment, and post-management complications. RESULTS: The families of 70 of the 156 consecutive treated patients were successfully contacted and agreed to participate (45% response rate). The mean follow-up was 27 months. Twenty-eight chose in-office suture ligation and 42 chose excision. Rapid treatment was prioritized by those who opted for in-office ligation (P = .044). The complication rate for suture ligation was significantly higher than excision (P < .0001), with the most common complication being a residual remnant (nubbin or neuroma stump) (64%). Respondents with residual remnant reported significantly less satisfaction with the appearance of their child's hand (P < .001) and with treatment outcomes (P = .028) compared to those without residual remnants. CONCLUSIONS: Factors considered by parents in choosing type of treatment for type B ulnar polydactyly vary and may be significantly influenced by the surgeon. Although the majority of parents remain extremely satisfied with their child's outcome regardless of management type, time to treatment plays a determinative role in parents opting for ligation rather than excision in the operating room.

Emergency Department Utilization After Administration of Peripheral Nerve Blocks for Upper Extremity Surgery.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to determine the impact of upper extremity peripheral nerve blocks on emergency department (ED) utilization after hand and upper extremity surgery. METHODS: We reviewed all outpatient upper extremity surgeries performed in a single Midwestern state between January 2009 and June 2019 using the Indiana Network for Patient Care. These encounters were used to develop a database of patient demographics, comorbidities, concurrent procedures, and postoperative ED visit utilization data. We performed univariate, bivariate, and multivariate logistic regression analyses. RESULTS: Among 108 451 outpatient surgical patients, 9079 (8.4%) received blocks. Within 1 week of surgery, a greater proportion of patients who received peripheral nerve blocks (1.4%) presented to the ED than patients who did not (0.9%) (P < .001). The greatest risk was in the first 2 postoperative days (relative risk, 1.78; P < .001). Pain was the principal reason for ED utilization in the block cohort (53.6%) compared with those who did not undergo a block (35.1%) (P < .001). When controlling for comorbidities and demographics, only peripheral nerve blocks (adjusted odds ratio [OR], 1.71; P = 0.007) and preprocedural opioid use (adjusted OR, 1.43; P = .020) conferred an independently increased risk of ED utilization within the first 2 postoperative days. CONCLUSIONS: Peripheral nerve blocks used for upper extremity surgery are associated with a higher risk of unplanned ED utilization, most likely related to rebound pain. Through proper patient education and pain management, we can minimize this unnecessary resource utilization.

Long-Term Outcomes After Treatment for Type B Ulnar Polydactyly.

BACKGROUND: Type B ulnar polydactyly is a common congenital hand difference and can be treated with either ligation or surgical excision. There is a paucity of literature, however, evaluating long-term patient reported outcomes of these treatments. The purpose of this study was to compare the long-term outcomes after ligation and excision for the management of type B ulnar polydactyly. METHODS: We created a database of patients who underwent treatment for type B ulnar polydactyly at a single pediatric health system from 2005 to 2014. We administered the Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Pediatric Upper Extremity survey to patients through telephone and assessed for their satisfaction. RESULTS: We successfully collected outcomes from 69 of 173 eligible patients treated in infancy (40% response rate). The mean follow-up was 11.1±2.5 years, and the average age of the participant at the time of the survey was 11.7±2.6 years of age. Twenty-four patients were treated with in-office ligation and 45 underwent formal surgical excision. Ten patients who were initially treated with ligation required future treatment with surgery because of symptomatic neuroma stump or persistent polydactyly (42%). Patients who were treated with surgical excision rated significantly higher satisfaction with their treatment than those who underwent ligation (P=0.003). Patients in both cohorts rated similar satisfaction with the esthetic appearance of their hand (P=0.07). There was no significant difference in PROMIS-rated hand function between the ligation and surgical cohort (P=0.765) and treated adolescents PROMIS scores were not statistically different than age-matched controls without polydactyly. CONCLUSION: While ligation and surgical excision result in similar function and esthetics, patient satisfaction is higher after surgery. Furthermore, a significant number of patients fail ligation and ultimately undergo surgery for symptomatic neuroma or persistent polydactyly. Counseling parents of patients with type B ulnar polydactyly should include these considerations to assist them in selecting the best treatment for their child. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Utilization of Techniques for Upper Extremity Amputation Neuroma Treatment and Prevention.

This study aimed to understand the current utilization of surgical approaches for nerve ending management in upper extremity amputation to prevent and treat nerve-related pain. We administered a survey to 190 of 1270 surgeons contacted by email (15% response rate) and analyzed their demographics, practice patterns, and perceptions regarding techniques for nerve ending management in upper extremity amputees. Although many surgical techniques were employed, most surgeons (54%) performed traction neurectomy during amputation and, alternatively, bury nerve into muscle if a neuroma subsequently develops (52%). Surgeons in practice less than 10 years were more likely to perform targeted muscle reinnervation (TMR) and regenerative peripheral nerve interfaces (RPNI) than surgeons in practice greater than 10 years (p<0.001). TMR and RPNI were performed more frequently for proximal amputations than distal amputations, but there is no consensus regarding the optimal timing to utilize these techniques. Surgeons commonly cited improved prosthetic control, pain, and phantom limb symptoms as reasons for performing TMR and RPNI. Increased physician compensation as a consideration was more commonly cited among TMR non-adopter than adopters (31% vs 14%, p=0.008). There is no consensus regarding techniques for the prevention or treatment of nerve ending pain in upper extremity amputees. TMR and RPNI are being utilized with increasing frequency and both patient and surgeon factors affect implementation in clinical practice.

Donor site morbidity after sural nerve grafting: A systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Understanding the morbidity of sural nerve harvest is important when counselling patients regarding nerve grafts. Existing data consist of small studies with varying degrees of follow-up and a wide range of reported donor site outcomes. The objective of this study was to systematically review the literature and pool the current data for postoperative outcomes after sural nerve graft harvest. METHODS: A systematic review of literature was conducted to identify studies that examined donor site outcomes of sural nerve graft harvests. RESULTS: Five-hundred and fourteen studies were identified through a literature search, and nine studies met inclusion criteria. There were 240 patients who underwent sural nerve grafts. The most common methods for sensory evaluation were patient survey (44.4%) and Semmes-Weinstein evaluation (33.3%). Five studies reported surface areas of sensory loss, and this generally decreased over time after sural nerve grafting. Overall, 87.2% of patients (n = 190) reported sensory loss, 25.6% (n = 42) of patients reported pain, 22.2% (n = 28) of patients reported cold sensitivity, and 10% (n = 20) of patients reported functional impairment at follow-up. When the proximal sural nerve was spared during harvest, the extent of sensory loss and pain were less than harvest at the popliteal fossa (87.4% vs 95.7%, p = 0.0407 and 9.1% vs 35.5%, p = 0.0004, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: In this study, we present the extent of sensory loss and rates of pain, cold sensitivity, and functional impairment after sural nerve harvest. These data should be discussed prior to surgery in order for patients and surgeons to make an informed decision.

Side-to-Side Metacarpal Fusion for Reconstruction of Bone Loss in the Radial Carpometacarpal Joints.

We present a unique case of side-to-side metacarpal fusion for reconstruction after an isolated gunshot wound to the right hand of a 19-year-old woman. There was a traumatic segmental loss of the proximal right second metacarpal base with considerable comminution of the trapezium and trapezoid. Reconstructive options were limited because of the destruction of the distal carpus and carpometacarpal (CMC) joint. Digital ray amputation was offered but deferred because of patient preference. The reconstruction was performed via metacarpal fusion of the second metacarpal remnant to the third metacarpal base, bypassing the previously destroyed second CMC joint. The fusion of the second and third metacarpals offers acceptable results when the radial CMC joints are traumatized with extensive bone loss.

Pediatric Fingertip Injuries.

Pediatric fingertip injuries are common and peak at 2 years of age. These injuries most frequently result from a crush mechanism and half sustain an associated fracture. The presence of a physis results in unique injury patterns and management considerations in the growing child. Due to a substantial healing potential in children, an initial conservative approach to management for many soft tissue and nail bed injuries is recommended. This article reviews the evidence and approach for treating pediatric fingertip injuries and amputations.

Patient-Reported Outcomes after Syndactyly Reconstruction.

BACKGROUND: There is scant literature regarding patient-reported outcomes after reconstruction for congenital hand syndactyly. Understanding patient perceptions of the postoperative outcome may facilitate a more evidence-based discussion of expectations after reconstruction. METHODS: All patients undergoing congenital syndactyly reconstruction at Ann and Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago between January of 2007 and December of 2015 were identified. Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System questionnaires were completed by patients; parent-proxy questionnaires were completed for patients 10 years of age and younger and those unable to complete the questionnaire independently. A retrospective chart review was also performed to capture demographic and clinical information. RESULTS: The authors identified 124 patients meeting inclusion criteria; 51 completed the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System surveys (response rate, 41.1 percent). The survey score for upper extremity function was 41.8 ± 11. Upper extremity function was further impaired in patients with a documented history of developmental delay (23.8 ± 6.2 versus 44.2 ± 10.2). Parents completing surveys on behalf of their children reported higher pain interference scores than self-responders. CONCLUSIONS: The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System is a valuable tool for measuring patient-reported outcomes in patients with syndactyly. Patients who have undergone reconstruction for syndactyly experience minor impairments in upper extremity function, but other aspects of their health-related quality of life are comparable to those of the general population. Developmental delay may be associated with additional impairments in upper extremity function and should be discussed when considering surgical reconstruction.

Tendon Transfers for Peripheral Nerve Palsies.

Recovery after an upper extremity peripheral nerve injury varies depending on multiple factors. In patients with poor functional recovery, tendon transfers may be indicated. The decision to perform an early tendon transfer at the time of nerve repair or before expected reinnervation is considered on a case-by-case basis. There are a multitude of potential tendon transfer options, the choices of which depend on remaining function, specific deficits, and surgeon experience and preferences. A thoughtful approach to reconstruction can lead to a substantial functional improvement with minimal donor site morbidity.

Common Etiologies of Upper Extremity Spasticity.

Spasticity is a motor disorder that manifests as a component of the upper motor neuron syndrome. It is associated with paralysis and can cause significant disability. The most common causes leading to spasticity include stroke, traumatic brain injury, multiple sclerosis, spinal cord injury, and cerebral palsy. This article discusses the pathophysiology and clinical findings associated with each of the most common etiologies of upper extremity spasticity.

Considerations in the Management of Upper Extremity Spasticity.

Spasticity is a movement disorder characterized by a velocity-dependent increase in muscle tone and a hyperexcitable stretch reflex. Common causes of spasticity include cerebral palsy, spinal cord injury, and stroke. Surgical treatment plans for spasticity must be highly individualized and based on the characteristics of patients and the spasticity in order to maximize functional gains. Candidates for surgery must be carefully selected. In this article, the authors review the pathophysiology of spasticity and discuss general considerations for surgical management with an emphasis on patient factors and spasticity characteristics. Specific considerations for the common causes of spasticity are presented.

Surgical Management of Spasticity of the Forearm and Wrist.

Upper extremity spasticity may result from a variety of types of brain injury, including cerebral palsy, stroke, or traumatic brain injury. These conditions lead to a predictable pattern of forearm and wrist deformities caused by opposing spasticity and flaccid paralysis. Upper extremity spasticity affects all ages and sociodemographics and is a complex clinical problem with a variety of treatment options depending on the patient, the underlying disease process, and postoperative expectations. This article discusses the cause, diagnosis, operative planning, operative techniques, postoperative outcomes, and rehabilitation protocols for the spastic wrist and forearm.

Combined Carpal Tunnel Release and Palmar Fasciectomy for Dupuytren's Contracture Does Not Increase the Risk for Complex Regional Pain Syndrome.

BACKGROUND: Hand surgery dogma suggests that simultaneous surgical treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome and Dupuytren's contracture results in an increased incidence of complex regional pain syndrome. As a result, many surgeons do not perform surgery for the two conditions concurrently. The authors' goal was to determine the extent of this association. METHODS: The authors identified all patients undergoing surgical treatment for carpal tunnel syndrome, Dupuytren's contracture, or both between April of 1982 and March of 2017 using the Indiana Network for Patient Care, a large, multi-institutional, statewide information exchange. Demographics, comorbidities, and 1-year postoperative incidence of complex regional pain syndrome were recorded. RESULTS: A total of 51,739 patients (95.6 percent) underwent carpal tunnel release only, 2103 (3.9 percent) underwent palmar fasciectomy only, and 305 (0.6 percent) underwent concurrent carpal tunnel release and palmar fasciectomy. There was no difference in the likelihood of developing complex regional pain syndrome (p = 0.163) between groups. Independent risk factors for developing complex regional pain syndrome were younger age; anxiety; depression; epilepsy; gout; and history of fracture of the radius, ulna, or carpus. CONCLUSIONS: Concurrent carpal tunnel release and palmar fasciectomy is not associated with an increased risk for developing complex regional pain syndrome. Patient demographics, medical comorbidities, and a history of upper extremity trauma are associated with the development of complex regional pain syndrome after surgery and should be discussed preoperatively as potential risk factors. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, III.