Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
1.
Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs ; 20(4): 348-357, 2021 05 22.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33709117

RESUMO

AIMS: Medical procedures and hospitalizations can be experienced as traumatic and can lead to post-traumatic stress reactions. Eye movement desensitization and reprocessing (EMDR) shows promising results but very few long-term studies have been published. Therefore, our aim was to test the long-term (8 months post-treatment) effectiveness of EMDR in children and adolescents with medically related subthreshold post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). METHODS AND RESULTS: Seventy-four children (including 39 with congenital or acquired heart disease) aged 4-15 (M = 9.6 years) with subthreshold PTSD after previous hospitalization were included into a parallel group randomized controlled trial. Participants were randomized to EMDR (n = 37) or care-as-usual (CAU) (n = 37; medical care only). The primary outcome was PTSD symptoms of the child. Secondary outcomes were symptoms of depression and blood-injection-injury (BII) phobia, sleep problems, and health-related quality of life (HrQoL) of the child. Assessments of all outcomes were planned at baseline and 8 weeks and 8 months after the start of EMDR/CAU. We hypothesized that the EMDR group would show significantly more improvements on all outcomes over time. Both groups showed improvements over time on child's symptoms of PTSD (only parent report), depression, BII phobia, sleep problems, and most HrQoL subscales. GEE analyses showed no significant differences between the EMDR group (nT2 = 33, nT3 = 30) and the CAU group (nT2 = 35, nT3 = 32) on the primary outcome. One superior effect of EMDR over time was found for reducing parent-reported BII phobia of the child. CONCLUSION: EMDR did not perform better than CAU in reducing subthreshold PTSD up to 8 months post-treatment in previously hospitalized children. Possible explanations and clinical implications are discussed.


Assuntos
Dessensibilização e Reprocessamento através dos Movimentos Oculares , Transtornos de Estresse Pós-Traumáticos , Adolescente , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Dessensibilização e Reprocessamento através dos Movimentos Oculares/métodos , Movimentos Oculares , Humanos , Qualidade de Vida , Transtornos de Estresse Pós-Traumáticos/diagnóstico , Transtornos de Estresse Pós-Traumáticos/terapia , Resultado do Tratamento
2.
Eur J Psychotraumatol ; 11(1): 1705598, 2020.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32002140

RESUMO

Background: Paediatric illness, injury and medical procedures are potentially traumatic experiences with a range of possible negative psychosocial consequences. To prevent psychosocial impairment and improve medical adherence, evidence-based psychotherapy should be offered if indicated. Eye movement desensitization and reprocessing (EMDR) has been found to reduce symptoms of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) in adults. The evidence for the use with children is promising. Furthermore, recent studies indicate its effectiveness for the treatment of other psychological symptomatology. However, the effectiveness of EMDR in children with subthreshold PTSD after medically related trauma has not yet been investigated. Objective: Investigating the short-term effectiveness of EMDR on posttraumatic stress, anxiety, depression and sleep problems in children with subthreshold PTSD after hospitalization through a randomized controlled trial (RCT). Method: Following baseline screening of 420 children from various Dutch hospitals, 74 children (4-15 years old) with medically related subthreshold PTSD were randomized to EMDR (n = 37) or care-as-usual (CAU; n = 37). Follow-up assessment took place after M = 9.7 weeks. Generalized Estimating Equation (GEE) analyses were performed to examine the effectiveness of EMDR compared to CAU. Results: Children in both groups improved significantly over time on all outcomes. However, the EMDR group improved significantly more as to child-reported symptoms of blood-injection-injury (BII) phobia and depression, and child-, and parent-reported sleep problems of the child. There was no superior effect of EMDR compared to CAU on subthreshold PTSD symptom reduction. Conclusions: EMDR did not perform better than CAU in reducing PTSD symptoms in a paediatric sample of children with subthreshold PTSD after hospitalization. However, the study results indicate that EMDR might be superior in reducing symptoms of blood-injection-injury phobia, depression and sleep problems.


Antecedentes: La enfermedad pediátrica, injuria y procedimientos médicos son experiencias potencialmente traumáticas con un rango de posibles consecuencias psicosociales negativas. Para prevenir el deterioro psicosocial y mejorar la adherencia médica, se debe ofrecer psicoterapia basada en evidencia si está indicada. Se ha observado que la Desensibilización y Reprocesamiento por Movimientos Oculares (EMDR) reduce los síntomas del Trastorno de Estrés Postraumático (TEPT) en adultos. La evidencia para su uso en niños es promisoria. Asimismo, estudios recientes indican su efectividad para el tratamiento de otra sintomatología psicológica. No obstante, la efectividad de la EMDR en niños con TEPT subumbral posterior a trauma médicamente relacionado aún no ha sido estudiada.Objetivo: Investigar la efectividad a corto plazo de la EMDR en estrés postraumático, ansiedad, depresión y alteraciones del sueño en niños con TEPT subumbral posterior a hospitalización, a través de un ensayo controlado aleatorizado (ECA).Método: Seguimiento de una muestra de 420 niños provenientes de varios hospitales holandeses, 74 niños (4­15 años de edad) con TEPT subumbral médicamente relacionado fueron aleatorizados a EMDR (n=37) o tratamiento habitual (TH, n=37). La evaluación posterior tuvo lugar tras M=9,7 semanas. Se realizó un análisis de ecuaciones de estimación generalizadas (EEG) para examinar la efectividad de EMDR comparado con TH.Resultados: Los niños en ambos grupos mejoraron significativamente a lo largo del tiempo en todas las variables. No obstante, el grupo EMDR mejoró significativamente más en los síntomas reportados por los niños respecto a belonefobia y depresión, y en alteraciones del sueño de los niños reportadas tanto por ellos como por sus padres. No hubo efecto superior de EMDR comparado con TH en la reducción de síntomas de TEPT subumbral.Conclusiones: EMDR no actuó mejor que TH en la reducción de síntomas de TEPT en niños en una muestra pediátrica de niños con TEPT subumbral posterior a hospitalización. Sin embargo, los resultados del estudio indican que EMDR podría ser superior en la reducción de síntomas de belonefobia, depresión y alteraciones del sueño.

3.
Cardiol Young ; 29(9): 1172-1182, 2019 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31378215

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Children with congenital heart disease and their families are at risk of psychosocial problems. Emotional and behavioural problems, impaired school functioning, and reduced exercise capacity often occur. To prevent and decrease these problems, we modified and extended the previously established Congenital Heart Disease Intervention Program (CHIP)-School, thereby creating CHIP-Family. CHIP-Family is the first psychosocial intervention with a module for children with congenital heart disease. Through a randomised controlled trial, we examined the effectiveness of CHIP-Family. METHODS: Ninety-three children with congenital heart disease (age M = 5.34 years, SD = 1.27) were randomised to CHIP-Family (n = 49) or care as usual (no psychosocial care; n = 44). CHIP-Family consisted of a 1-day group workshop for parents, children, and siblings and an individual follow-up session for parents. CHIP-Family was delivered by psychologists, paediatric cardiologists, and physiotherapists. At baseline and 6-month follow-up, mothers, fathers, teachers, and the child completed questionnaires to assess psychosocial problems, school functioning, and sports enjoyment. Moreover, at 6-month follow-up, parents completed program satisfaction assessments. RESULTS: Although small improvements in child outcomes were observed in the CHIP-Family group, no statistically significant differences were found between outcomes of the CHIP-Family and care-as-usual group. Mean parent satisfaction ratings ranged from 7.4 to 8.1 (range 0-10). CONCLUSIONS: CHIP-Family yielded high program acceptability ratings. However, compared to care as usual, CHIP-Family did not find the same extent of statistically significant outcomes as CHIP-School. Replication of promising psychological interventions, and examination of when different outcomes are found, is recommended for refining interventions in the future. TRIAL REGISTRY: Dutch Trial Registry number NTR6063, https://www.trialregister.nl/trial/5780.


Assuntos
Terapia Cognitivo-Comportamental/métodos , Família/psicologia , Cardiopatias Congênitas/terapia , Poder Familiar/psicologia , Modalidades de Fisioterapia , Qualidade de Vida , Estresse Psicológico/reabilitação , Pré-Escolar , Aconselhamento , Feminino , Seguimentos , Cardiopatias Congênitas/complicações , Cardiopatias Congênitas/psicologia , Humanos , Masculino , Estudos Retrospectivos , Método Simples-Cego , Estresse Psicológico/etiologia , Estresse Psicológico/psicologia
4.
Eur J Psychotraumatol ; 9(1): 1536287, 2018.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30510642

RESUMO

Background: Three in every 10 children and adolescents admitted to a hospital or undergoing medical treatment develop subthreshold symptoms of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). When untreated, subthreshold PTSD can have a serious impact on psychosocial functioning, quality of life and long-term psychopathology. However, research investigating subthreshold PTSD and its treatment following paediatric medical interventions and/or hospitalization is scarce. Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing (EMDR) is a fast and non-invasive psychosocial treatment for posttraumatic stress complaints. However, the effectiveness of EMDR in paediatric patients with subthreshold PTSD has not previously been systematically investigated. Objective: Describing the design of a randomized controlled trial (RCT) set up to evaluate the effectiveness of EMDR in children with subthreshold PTSD after hospitalization. Method: Children aged 4-15 years who have undergone a one-time (trauma type I) or repeated (trauma type II) hospitalization up to five years ago will be included. Participating children will be first screened with a standardized questionnaire for PTSD-symptoms. Subsequently, children with subthreshold PTSD will be randomly assigned to (1) approximately six sessions of standardized EMDR or (2) care as usual (CAU). Children with full diagnostic PTSD do not participate in the RCT, but are referred for direct treatment. Follow-up measurements will take place after eight weeks and eight months. Discussion: Considering the scarce evidence for the effectiveness of EMDR in children with medically related trauma, clinicans, researchers and children treated in hospitals can benefit from this study. Potential strengths and limitations of this study are discussed. Trial Registration: Netherlands Trial Register NTR5801.


Antecedentes: Alrededor de 3 de cada 10 niños y adolescentes ingresados en un hospital o sometidos a tratamiento médico desarrollan síntomas subumbrales de trastorno de estrés postraumático (TEPT). Cuando no se trata, el TEPT subumbral puede tener un impacto grave en el funcionamiento psicosocial, la calidad de vida, y la psicopatología a largo plazo. Sin embargo, la investigación sobre el TEPT subumbral y su tratamiento después de las intervenciones médicas pediátricas y/o la hospitalización es escasa. La desensibilización y reprocesamiento por movimientos oculares (EMDR) es un tratamiento psicosocial rápido y no invasivo para las quejas de estrés postraumático. Sin embargo, la efectividad del EMDR en pacientes pediátricos con TEPT subumbral no ha sido previamente investigada de manera sistemática.Objetivo: Describir el diseño de un ensayo controlado aleatorizado (RCT, en sus siglas en inglés) establecido para evaluar la efectividad de EMDR en niños con TEPT subumbral después de una hospitalización.Método: Se incluirán niños de 4 a 15 años que hayan sido sometidos a una hospitalización única (trauma tipo I) o repetida (trauma tipo II) hasta en los 5 años previos. Los niños participantes serán evaluados inicialmente con un cuestionario estandarizado para síntomas de TEPT. Posteriormente, los niños con TEPT subumbral serán asignados aleatoriamente a (1) seis sesiones de EMDR estandarizado o (2) cuidados usuales (CAU, por sus siglas en inglés). Los niños con diagnóstico completo de TEPT no participan en el RCT, pero serán derivados para tratamiento directo. Las mediciones de seguimiento se llevarán a cabo después de ocho semanas y ocho meses.Discusión: Teniendo en cuenta la escasa evidencia de la efectividad de EMDR en niños con trauma médico, los clínicos, los investigadores y los niños tratados en hospitales pueden beneficiarse de este estudio. Se discuten las fortalezas y limitaciones potenciales de este estudio.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA