Pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and safety assessment of multiple doses of soticlestat in healthy volunteers.

AIMS: Soticlestat, a first-in-class inhibitor of cholesterol 24-hydroxylase (also known as cytochrome P450 46A1), is currently in development for the treatment of developmental and epileptic encephalopathies. Here, we report safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic outcomes from a phase I, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multiple-rising-dose study of soticlestat in healthy adults. METHODS: Five cohorts of healthy subjects (n = 8 each, randomized 6:2 soticlestat:placebo) received oral soticlestat 100-600 mg once daily (QD) or 300 mg twice daily (BID) for 10-14 days. Serial blood and urine samples were obtained on days 1, 7 (blood only) and 14. RESULTS: Soticlestat in the dose range 100-400 mg/day for up to 14 days was generally well tolerated. In total, 45 treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported; most (91%) were transient and mild in intensity. Two subjects experienced TEAEs leading to discontinuation: one receiving soticlestat 600 mg QD reported a severe event of acute psychosis; another receiving 300 mg BID reported a mild event of confusional state. Steady-state exposure to soticlestat increased in a slightly greater than dose-proportional manner across the dose range 100-400 mg QD. Peak plasma concentrations were reached within 0.33-0.5 hour, and soticlestat elimination half-life was approximately 4 hours. Renal excretion of soticlestat was negligible. Soticlestat 100-400 mg QD reduced 24S-hydroxycholesterol levels by 46.8 (coefficient of variation [CV%] -9.2) to -62.7% (CV% -7.3) at steady state; values of enzymatic inhibition were compatible with antiepileptic effects observed in preclinical models. CONCLUSION: The pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profiles of soticlestat characterized here provided a data-driven rationale for clinical trial dose selection.

Safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, bioavailability and food effect of single doses of soticlestat in healthy subjects.

AIMS: Soticlestat is a first-in-class selective inhibitor of cholesterol 24-hydroxylase, the enzyme that converts brain cholesterol to 24S-hydroxycholesterol (24HC), a positive allosteric modulator of N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors. Soticlestat is under development as treatment for rare developmental and epileptic encephalopathies. METHODS: In this first-in-human study, 48 healthy men and women received single ascending doses of soticlestat oral solution or placebo. Subsequently, nine healthy subjects received soticlestat tablets under fed and fasting conditions to assess the relative oral bioavailability and effects of food. Serial blood and urine samples were collected for pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic assessments. RESULTS: Soticlestat appeared to be well tolerated up to a single dose of 1350 mg. Adverse events (AEs) were mild in intensity, and dose-dependent increase in AE prevalence was not apparent. Soticlestat administered via oral solution was rapidly absorbed (median time to maximum plasma concentration [Cmax ] 0.250-0.520 h). Mean Cmax and area under plasma concentration-time curve from zero to infinity increased by 183- and 581-fold, respectively, over a 90-fold dose increase. Mean terminal elimination half-life was 0.820-7.16 hours across doses. Renal excretion was negligible. Administration of soticlestat tablets, and with food, lowered Cmax but did not affect overall exposure. Plasma 24HC concentrations generally decreased with increasing dose. CONCLUSIONS: Soticlestat appeared to be well tolerated after a single oral administration of up to 1350 mg and dose-dependently reduced plasma 24HC concentrations. Systemic exposure increased in a greater than dose-proportional manner over the dose range evaluated but was not affected by formulation or administration with food.

Suicidal ideation and behavior in adults with major depressive disorder treated with vortioxetine: post hoc pooled analyses of randomized, placebo-controlled, short-term and open-label, long-term extension trials.

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to evaluate the risk of suicidal ideation and behavior associated with vortioxetine treatment in adults with major depressive disorder (MDD). METHODS: Suicide-related events were evaluated post hoc using 2 study pools: one short-term pool of 10 randomized, placebo-controlled studies (6-8 weeks) and another long-term pool that included 3 open-label extension studies (52 weeks). Evaluation of suicide-related events was performed using Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) scores and treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) data. RESULTS: At baseline, the percentage of patients reporting any C-SSRS ideation or behavior events in short-term studies was similar between placebo (14.7%), vortioxetine (19.8%, 13.0%, 11.2%, and 13.7% for 5-, 10-, 15-, and 20-mg groups, respectively), and duloxetine active reference (13.2%) and did not change throughout the 6- to 8-week treatment period for placebo (17.0%), vortioxetine (19.3%, 13.5%, 12.6%, and 15% for 5-, 10-, 15-, and 20-mg groups, respectively), or duloxetine (11.3%). The incidence of suicide-related events for TEAEs in the short-term pool was 0.4% for placebo, 0.2% or 1.0% for vortioxetine 5 mg or 10 mg, and 0.7% each for vortioxetine 15 mg and 20 mg, as well as duloxetine. After 52-week treatment with vortioxetine, suicidal ideation based on C-SSRS was 9.8%, C-SSRS suicidal behavior was 0.2%, and the incidence of suicide-related events based on TEAEs was <1%. There were no completed suicides in any study. CONCLUSIONS: Vortioxetine is not associated with increased risk of suicidal ideation or behavior in MDD patients.

Clinical implications of directly switching antidepressants in well-treated depressed patients with treatment-emergent sexual dysfunction: a comparison between vortioxetine and escitalopram.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this work was to describe treatment-emergent sexual dysfunction (TESD) and tolerability following a switch from selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI: citalopram, paroxetine, or sertraline) monotherapy to vortioxetine or escitalopram monotherapy in adults with well-treated major depressive disorder (MDD) and SSRI-induced sexual dysfunction. METHODS: Data were analyzed from the primary study, an 8-week, randomized, double-blind, head-to-head study in which participants with well-treated depressive symptoms but experiencing TESD with SSRIs were directly switched to flexible doses (10/20 mg) of vortioxetine or escitalopram. Sexual functioning was assessed by the Changes in Sexual Functioning Questionnaire-14 (CSFQ-14), efficacy by the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale scores (MADRS) and Clinicians Global Impression of Severity/Improvement (CGI-S/CGI-I), and tolerability by adverse events. Efficacy and tolerability were assessed by pre-switch SSRI therapy where possible, and by participant characteristics. RESULTS: Greater improvements in TESD were seen in the vortioxetine compared with escitalopram groups based on: participant demographics (≤45 years, women; P = 0.045), prior SSRI treatment (P = 0.044), number of prior major depressive episodes (MDEs) (1-3; P = 0.001), and duration of prior SSRI therapy (>1 year; P = 0.001). Prior SSRI treatment did not appear to influence the incidence or severity of TEAEs, except for nausea. Regardless of prior SSRI, both treatments maintained antidepressant efficacy after 8 weeks. CONCLUSION: Results suggest that vortioxetine is a safe and effective switch therapy for treating SSRI-induced sexual dysfunction in adults with well-treated MDD. Also, improvement in sexual dysfunction with vortioxetine or escitalopram may be influenced by prior SSRI usage, sex, age, and history of MDEs.

A phase 2, randomized, placebo-controlled study of the efficacy and safety of TAK-063 in subjects with an acute exacerbation of schizophrenia.

INTRODUCTION: TAK-063 is a potent, selective inhibitor of phosphodiesterase 10A, an enzyme selectively expressed in medium spiny neurons of the striatum. This randomized, parallel-group study evaluated the efficacy and safety of 20-mg daily TAK-063 versus placebo in subjects with acutely exacerbated symptoms of schizophrenia (NCT02477020). METHODS: Adults aged 18 to 65 with diagnosed schizophrenia and psychotic symptoms that exacerbated within 60 days before screening were included. Subjects who discontinued psychotropic medications before screening were randomized 1:1 to 6 weeks of placebo (n = 81) or 20-mg TAK-063 (n = 83). Weekly efficacy visits were conducted during the treatment period, and dose de-escalation was allowed (blinded) to 10-mg TAK-063 for intolerability. RESULTS: The primary endpoint, change from baseline in the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale total score at week 6, was not achieved (least-squares mean difference vs placebo [standard error] = -5.46 [3.44]; p = 0.115). Secondary endpoints were generally supportive of antipsychotic efficacy. Consistent with previous phase 1 studies, TAK-063 was safe and well tolerated, and most adverse events were mild or moderate in severity and did not result in discontinuation. No deaths occurred, and the incidence of akathisia and dystonia, categories of extrapyramidal syndromes, was more frequent in the TAK-063 group than placebo. CONCLUSIONS: Although the study did not meet the primary endpoint (effect size = 0.308), the effects of TAK-063 on the primary and secondary endpoints may be suggestive of antipsychotic activity. Interpretation of these results is confounded by a relatively high placebo effect and a lack of dose-ranging or active reference.

Effects of Intrinsic Factors on the Clinical Pharmacokinetics of Vortioxetine.

Vortioxetine is an antidepressant agent with multimodal activity that is approved for the treatment of major depressive disorder at doses of 5 to 20 mg once daily. Vortioxetine is a medium-clearance drug that undergoes extensive metabolism via several cytochrome P450 isozymes. A series of single- and multiple-dose pharmacokinetic studies were performed to evaluate the impact of intrinsic (ie, subject-related) factors, such as age, sex, race, and renal and hepatic function, on the pharmacokinetics of vortioxetine. The point estimates on the ratios and their 90% confidence intervals (CIs) for the central values of AUC (area under the concentration-time curve) and Cmax (maximum plasma concentration) were obtained by taking the antilog of the differences and 90%CIs in the log-transformed least-squares means. The results demonstrate that there were no clinically meaningful differences (defined as exposure difference between 50% and 2-fold change) in the exposure to vortioxetine (as assessed by AUC and Cmax ) between elderly and younger subjects, men and women, and blacks and whites and among subjects with varying degrees of renal or hepatic impairment. These results suggest that no dosing adjustments of vortioxetine are required for the intrinsic factors investigated in these studies.

A Randomized Multiple Dose Pharmacokinetic Study of a Novel PDE10A Inhibitor TAK-063 in Subjects with Stable Schizophrenia and Japanese Subjects and Modeling of Exposure Relationships to Adverse Events.

BACKGROUND: Phosphodiesterase 10A (PDE10A) is selectively expressed in medium spiny neurons of the striatum. TAK-063 is a selective inhibitor of PDE10A in clinical development for the treatment of schizophrenia. OBJECTIVES: Safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics (PK) of TAK-063 were evaluated following multiple rising oral doses, and PK/adverse event (AE) models were developed to characterize the relationship between TAK-063 exposure and incidence of specific AEs. METHODS: Healthy Japanese subjects (HJS) aged 20-55 years and subjects with stable schizophrenia (SSS) aged 18-55 years were enrolled and randomized to either TAK-063 or placebo. Study medication was administered as a tablet once daily (at night) with food over a 7-day period. RESULTS: TAK-063 and placebo groups consisted of 62 and 15 subjects, respectively. A majority of subjects (71 of 77) completed the study. AEs were mostly of mild or moderate severity, and no deaths were reported. The most common AE was somnolence. For equivalent doses, the rate of extrapyramidal syndromes (EPS) was higher in SSS than in HJS. PK parameters were comparable between HJS and SSS at equivalent doses. The incidence of somnolence and EPS symptoms increased with exposure, and this was described with the PK/AE model. A maximum tolerated dose was not determined. CONCLUSIONS: Multiple doses of TAK-063 were safe and well tolerated. PK/AE models characterized the incidence of somnolence and EPS with increasing TAK-063 exposure, and simulations suggested that a once-daily dose range of up to 30 mg would be suitable for future studies. CLINICALTRIALS. GOV IDENTIFIER: NCT01879722.

Efficacy, safety, and tolerability of vortioxetine for the treatment of major depressive disorder in patients aged 55 years or older.

OBJECTIVE: These post hoc analyses evaluate the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of vortioxetine versus placebo in patients aged ≥55 years with major depressive disorder (MDD). METHODS: Study-level efficacy data from 12 short-term, fixed-dose, randomized, placebo-controlled trials of vortioxetine 5-20 mg/day were assessed using a random-effects meta-analysis. Adverse events (AEs), vital signs, ECG values, liver enzymes, and body weight were pooled from the same studies. Patients had baseline Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) total scores ranging from 22-30. RESULTS: 1508 patients (mean age=62.4 years; range, 55-88 years) were included. Mean differences from placebo in change from baseline to study end (6/8 weeks) in MADRS were -2.56 (5 mg, n=324, P=0.035), -2.87 (10 mg, n=222, P=0.007), -1.32 (15 mg, n=90, P=NS), and -4.65 (20 mg, n=165, P=0.012). Odds ratios for response versus placebo were 1.6 (5 mg, P=NS), 1.8 (10 mg, P=0.002), 1.2 (15 mg, P=NS), and 2.5 (20 mg, P<0.001), and for remission versus placebo were 1.5 (5 mg, P=NS), 1.5 (10 mg, P=NS), 1.4 (15 mg, P=NS), and 2.7 (20 mg, P=0.001). The proportion of patients with AEs for placebo and vortioxetine 5-20 mg was 61.5% and 62.3%, respectively, with no increase at increased doses. Vortioxetine demonstrated a placebo-level incidence of serious AEs (1.2%). AEs occurring in ≥5% of any treatment group were nausea, headache, diarrhea, dizziness, dry mouth, constipation, fatigue, vomiting, and anxiety. No clinically significant mean changes in vital signs, ECG values, liver enzymes, or body weight emerged during treatment. CONCLUSION: Vortioxetine 5-20 mg/day is efficacious and well tolerated in MDD patients aged ≥55 years, a group that is often comorbid with other conditions and treated with other medications.

Lack of Effect of Vortioxetine on the Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Ethanol, Diazepam, and Lithium.

INTRODUCTION: Because the multimodal antidepressant vortioxetine is likely to be coadministered with other central nervous system (CNS)-active drugs, potential drug-drug interactions warrant examination. OBJECTIVE: These studies evaluated whether there are pharmacokinetic and/or pharmacodynamic interactions between vortioxetine and ethanol, diazepam, or lithium. METHODS: This series of phase I studies included healthy men and women (only men in the lithium study) aged 18-45 years. The ethanol study was a randomized, double-blind, two-parallel group, four-period crossover study in which subjects received a single dose of vortioxetine (20 or 40 mg) or placebo with or without ethanol, and the diazepam study was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, two-sequence, two-period crossover study in which subjects received a single dose of diazepam following multiple doses of vortioxetine 10 mg/day or placebo. These two studies evaluated the effect of coadministration on standardized psychomotor parameters and on selected pharmacokinetic parameters of each drug. The lithium study was a single-blind, single-sequence study evaluating the effect of multiple doses of vortioxetine 10 mg/day on the steady-state pharmacokinetics of lithium. RESULTS: Concomitant administration of vortioxetine and single doses of either ethanol or diazepam had no significant effect on the psychomotor performance of subjects compared with administration of ethanol or diazepam alone. Vortioxetine had no significant effect on the pharmacokinetics of ethanol, diazepam, or lithium, and ethanol had no significant effect on the pharmacokinetics of vortioxetine. CONCLUSIONS: Concomitant administration of these agents with vortioxetine was generally well tolerated, with no clinically relevant drug-drug pharmacokinetic or pharmacodynamic interactions identified.