The use of nutritional supplements in dressage and eventing horses.

The aim of the study was to determine which types of nutritional supplements were used in dressage and eventing horses, and the reasons that owners used supplements. An online questionnaire was distributed through British Eventing and Dressage websites, to collect data on demographics of owners and their horses, supplements used and their opinion on health and performance problems. Data were evaluated using descriptive analysis, Sign and Fisher's exact tests for quantitative data, and categorisation of qualitative data. In total, 599 responses met the inclusion criteria (441 dressage and 158 eventing horse owners). Participants had 26.4 (3-60) (mean (range)) years of riding experience, owned 1.2 (0-10) horses and used 2 (0-12) supplements in their highest performing horse. The main health and performance issues identified for dressage were 'energy/behaviour', 'lameness' and 'back and muscle problems'. The main issues for eventing were 'stamina and fitness levels',' lameness' and 'energy/behaviour'. The main reasons for using supplements in their highest performing horse were 'joints and mobility', and 'behaviour' for dressage, and 'electrolytes', and 'joints and mobility' for eventing. Lameness and behavioural problems were significant concerns within both disciplines. There was incongruence between owners' opinions of problems within their discipline and their reasons for using supplements.

Induction of anti-ß2 -glycoprotein I autoantibodies in mice by protein H of Streptococcus pyogenes.

BACKGROUND: The antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is characterized by the persistent presence of anti-ß(2) -glycoprotein I (ß(2) -GPI) autoantibodies. ß(2) -GPI can exist in two conformations. In plasma it is a circular protein, whereas it adopts a fish-hook conformation after binding to phospholipids. Only the latter conformation is recognized by patient antibodies. ß(2) -GPI has been shown to interact with Streptococcus pyogenes. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the potential of S. pyogenes-derived proteins to induce anti-ß(2) -GPI autoantibodies. METHODS AND RESULTS: Four S. pyogenes surface proteins (M1 protein, protein H, streptococcal collagen-like protein A [SclA], and streptococcal collagen-like protein B [SclB]) were found to interact with ß(2) -GPI. Only binding to protein H induces a conformational change in ß(2) -GPI, thereby exposing a cryptic epitope for APS-related autoantibodies. Mice were injected with the four proteins. Only mice injected with protein H developed antibodies against the patient antibody-related epitope in domain I of ß(2) -GPI. Patients with pharyngotonsillitis caused by S. pyogenes who developed anti-protein H antibodies also generated anti-ß(2) -GPI antibodies. CONCLUSIONS: Our study has demonstrated that a bacterial protein can induce a conformational change in ß(2) -GPI, resulting in the formation of antiß(2) -GPI autoantibodies. This constitutes a novel mechanism for the formation of anti-ß(2) -GPI autoantibodies.

Antiphospholipid syndrome. Current insights into laboratory diagnosis and pathophysiology.

The antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is a non-inflammatory autoimmune disease characterized by the presence of antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) in the plasma of patients with vascular thrombosis, recurrent complications of pregnancy, or both (1, 2). The presence of aPL in plasma of patients can be detected with either a prolongation of phospholipid dependent coagulation tests (lupus anticoagulant, LAC), or with solid phase immune assays against the protein beta2-glycoprotein I (beta2-GPI) or the phospholipid cardiolipin (anti-beta2-GPI antibody ELISA and anti-cardiolipin antibody ELISA, respectively) (3). For a long time there was a lot of confusion on who had the syndrome and who not. To solve this dispute, an international consensus meeting was organized in Sapporo in 1999 to formulate classification criteria for patients with the antiphospholipid syndrome (4). These criteria have been updated in 2004 at another international consensus meeting in Sydney (5). The classification criteria were defined for scientific purposes and were aimed to be used as inclusion criteria in patient related studies. They were specifically not defined for diagnostic purposes. However, current practice is that these criteria are used as a diagnostic tool. This is very unfortunate because the specificity of the different aPL assays to detect the clinical manifestations that characterize APS are disputable. One of the aims of defining the criteria was to initiate studies to determine the value of the different anti-phospholipid antibody assays to serve as biomarker for the risk of thrombosis and pregnancy morbidity. The recent progress made on this important topic will be discussed.

The Tough Guy prehospital experience: patterns of injury at a major UK endurance event.

BACKGROUND: Data from mass gathering events help when planning allocation of resources and in setting standards of care. There is currently a lack of data from the UK. AIM: To determine the frequency of injuries and hospital transfer rates at a large outdoor endurance event. METHODS: 251 patient attendances from four consecutive events over 2 years (two summers two winters; 2006-2007) were analysed. RESULTS: 1%-2% of contenders required medical help. Hypothermia (n = 84), soft tissue problems (n = 71) and musculoskeletal problems (n = 51) were the most common conditions encountered. 4% of patients required immediate transfer to the hospital. The medical team was able to prevent 31 hospital transfers, which represents a reduction of 78%. 13% of cases specifically required a doctor who was able to prevent more immediate hospital transfers than other care givers. The majority of injuries were classified as minor (n = 228), with the remaining as intermediate (n = 23); there were no life-threatening injuries or deaths. No patient required intravenous fluid. Overall, in winter, more patients were treated when compared with summer (157 vs 94). There were significantly more retirements in winter (69 vs 22, p<0.001), although hospital transfer rates were similar. CONCLUSIONS: Medical teams should plan for casualty rates of 1%-2% of competitors and hospital transfer rates of approximately 5% of patients treated. Outdoor events in winter create more casualties than in summer and require greater resources. Trauma and exposure injuries are common; critical illness is uncommon. An adequately equipped and skilled medical team reduces hospital admissions.