Imaging characteristics and safety of florbetapir (¹8F) in Japanese healthy volunteers, patients with mild cognitive impairment and patients with Alzheimer's disease.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the performance characteristics and safety of florbetapir ((I8)F) positron emission tomography (PET) in patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD) and mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and cognitively normal (CN) control patients from Japan. METHODS: Florbetapir ((I8)F) PET was obtained in 48 subjects (15 AD patients, 15 MCI patients, and 18 CNs) within a multicenter phase 2/3 study. Amyloid burden was assessed visually and classified as positive or negative for pathologic levels of amyloid aggregation, blind to diagnostic classification. Cerebral to cerebellar standardized uptake value ratios (SUVRs) were determined from the florbetapir ((I8)F) PET images. Safety was assessed by monitoring adverse events, vital signs, clinical laboratory assessments, and electrocardiograms. Demographic variables and cognitive scales were summarized by using descriptive statistics for each group. Fisher's exact test and one-way analysis of variance were used to compare amyloid positivity and mean SUVRs, respectively, between diagnostic groups. RESULTS: Florbetapir ((I8)F) PET was rated visually amyloid positive in 80.0% of AD patients, 33.3% of MCI patients, and 16.7% of CNs. Mean SUVRs were highest in the AD group and lowest in the CN group for each brain region (P < 0.01) and globally (P < 0.05). Kappa statistics showed strong inter-reader agreement (Fleiss' kappa = 0.82) and individual reader's agreement with the majority of readers (kappa ranged from 0.79 to 1.0). Seventeen of the 48 subjects (35.4%) were Apolipoprotein E genotype ε4 positive, which included 10 subjects in the AD group and 7 subjects in the MCI group. A total of 6 subjects (5 of whom were in the CN group) had at least 1 treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE). CONCLUSIONS: These data indicate that amyloid positivity increased with diagnostic category (CN < MCI < AD) and are consistent with expected rates of amyloid positivity among individuals with clinical diagnoses of AD and MCI. In addition, these results were similar to those obtained in United States studies. Florbetapir ((18)F) was safe and well tolerated. The reliability of both qualitative and quantitative assessments of florbetapir ((18)F) in this study population provides support for potential use in clinical settings in Japan.

Potential impact of amyloid imaging on diagnosis and intended management in patients with progressive cognitive decline.

Florbetapir F18 has been approved by the Food and Drug Administration for in vivo assessment of amyloid pathology in patients undergoing evaluation for Alzheimer disease (AD). The aim of this study was to determine the impact of amyloid imaging on the diagnoses and management of patients undergoing evaluation for cognitive decline. Patients were recruited to participate at 19 clinical sites. The site physician provided a provisional diagnosis, an estimate of their diagnostic confidence, and their plan for diagnostic evaluation and management both before and after receiving the results from amyloid imaging with florbetapir F18. Analyses compared the frequency of AD and non-AD diagnoses, plans for ancillary testing, and intended patient management before and after florbetapir imaging. A total of 229 patients participated in the trial (113 amyloid positive, 116 amyloid negative). After receiving the results of the florbetapir scan, diagnosis changed in 125/229, or 54.6% [95% confidence intervals (CI), 48.1%-60.9%], of cases, and diagnostic confidence increased by an average of 21.6% (95% CI, 18.3%-24.8%). A total of 199/229 or 86.9% (95% CI, 81.9%-90.7%) of cases had at least 1 change in their management plan. Intended cholinesterase inhibitor or memantine treatment increased by 17.7% (95% CI, 11.8%-25.8%) of all cases with positive scans and decreased by 23.3% (95% CI, 16.5%-31.8%) of all those with negative scans. Among subjects who had not yet undergone a completed work up, planned brain structural imaging (computed tomographic/magnetic resonance imaging) decreased by 24.4% (95% CI, 17.5%-32.8%) and planned neuropsychological testing decreased by 32.8% (95% CI, 25.0%-41.6%). In summary, amyloid imaging results altered physician's diagnostic thinking, intended testing, and management of patients undergoing evaluation for cognitive decline.

Male-to-male transmission of Costello syndrome: G12S HRAS germline mutation inherited from a father with somatic mosaicism.

Costello syndrome is a rare congenital anomaly syndrome associated with mental retardation and predisposition to benign and malignant tumors, caused by heterozygous missense mutations in the HRAS oncogene. Previously, all molecularly analyzed mutations appeared de novo, and most arose in the paternal germline. A single patient with somatic mosaicism for a Costello syndrome causing HRAS mutation has been reported. Here we describe the first documented transmission of an HRAS mutation from a parent with somatic mosaicism to a child with typical Costello syndrome. Prior to the identification of the underlying gene mutation in Costello syndrome, this family had been identified clinically. The proband was subsequently found to carry a G12S HRAS germline mutation. Testing of the parents for parental origin identified his father as mosaic for the same HRAS mutation. The mother was found not to carry an HRAS mutation. The causative familial mutation is identified as a c.34G > A, which is the most common mutation in the HRAS gene in patients with Costello syndrome. The father carries the mutation in 7-8% of his alleles. This is the second case of mosaicism observed in Costello syndrome and the first direct molecular evidence of father-to-son transmission of the disease-causing mutation. Our observation underlines the importance of parental evaluation, and may have implications for genetic counseling and clinical practice.