Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
1.
J Nucl Cardiol ; 30(6): 2464-2476, 2023 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37226006

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Bone scintigraphy imaging is frequently used to investigate patients with suspected transthyretin cardiac amyloidosis (ATTR-CM). However, the reported accuracy for interpretation approaches has changed over time. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine the diagnostic accuracy of visual planar grading, heart-to-contralateral (HCL) ratio, and quantitative analysis of SPECT imaging and evaluate reasons for shifts in reported accuracy. METHODS: We performed a systematic review to identify studies of the diagnostic accuracy of bone scintigraphy for ATTR-CM from 1990 until February 2023 using PUBMED and EMBASE. Studies were reviewed separately by two authors for inclusion and for risk of bias assessment. Summary receiver operating characteristic curves and operating points were determined with hierarchical modeling. RESULTS: Out of a total of 428 identified studies, 119 were reviewed in detail and 23 were included in the final analysis. The studies included a total of 3954 patients, with ATTR-CM diagnosed in 1337 (39.6%) patients and prevalence ranging from 21 to 73%. Visual planar grading and quantitative analysis had higher diagnostic accuracy (.99) than HCL ratio (.96). Quantitative analysis of SPECT imaging had the highest specificity (97%) followed by planar visual grade (96%) and HCL ratio (93%). ATTR-CM prevalence accounted for some of the observed between study heterogeneity. CONCLUSIONS: Bone scintigraphy imaging is highly accurate for identifying patients with ATTR-CM, with between study heterogeneity in part explained by differences in disease prevalence. We identified small differences in specificity, which may have important clinical implications when applied to low-risk screening populations.


Assuntos
Neuropatias Amiloides Familiares , Cardiomiopatias , Humanos , Pré-Albumina , Neuropatias Amiloides Familiares/diagnóstico por imagem , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X , Cintilografia , Cardiomiopatias/diagnóstico por imagem
2.
Ann Hematol ; 102(2): 439-445, 2023 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36542101

RESUMO

Patients with hematological malignancies (HM) are at risk of acute respiratory failure (ARF). Malnutrition, a common association with HM, has the potential to influence ICU outcomes. Geriatric nutritional risk index (G-NRI) is a score derived from albumin and weight, which reflects risk of protein-energy malnutrition. We evaluated the association between G-NRI at ICU admission and ICU mortality in HM patients with ARF. We conducted a single center retrospective study of ventilated HM patients between 2014 and 2018. We calculated G-NRI for all patients using their ICU admission albumin and weight. Our primary outcome was ICU mortality. Secondary outcomes included duration of mechanical ventilation and ICU length of stay. Two hundred eighty patients were admitted to the ICU requiring ventilation. Median age was 62 years (IQR 51-68), 42% (n = 118) were females, and median SOFA score was 11 (IQR 9-14). The most common type of HM was acute leukemia (54%) and 40% underwent hematopoietic cell transplant. Median G-NRI was 87 (IQR 79-99). ICU mortality was 51% (n = 143) with a median duration of ventilation of 4 days (IQR 2-7). Mortality across those at severe malnutrition (NRI < 83.5) was 59% (65/111) compared to 46% (76/164) across those with moderate-no risk (p = 0.047). On multivariable analysis, severe NRI (OR 2.34, 95% CI 1.04-5.27, p = 0.04) was significantly associated with ICU mortality. In this single center, exploratory study, severe G-NRI was prognostic of ICU mortality in HM patients admitted with respiratory failure.


Assuntos
Neoplasias Hematológicas , Transplante de Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas , Leucemia Mieloide Aguda , Desnutrição , Síndrome do Desconforto Respiratório , Insuficiência Respiratória , Feminino , Humanos , Idoso , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Masculino , Estudos Retrospectivos , Desnutrição/complicações , Insuficiência Respiratória/etiologia , Insuficiência Respiratória/terapia , Leucemia Mieloide Aguda/complicações , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva
3.
Ann Hematol ; 101(11): 2515-2524, 2022 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36107204

RESUMO

Catheter-related bloodstream infection (CRBSI) can lead to ICU admission in patients with hematologic malignancy (HM). Variability exists in the management of catheters given the need for long-term access and co-existing thrombocytopenia or coagulopathy. We conducted a systematic review to evaluate catheter management in patients with CRBSI. Literature searches were conducted up to December 20, 2021 across MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL, CINAHL, and PubMed. Observational studies and RCTs of adults (> 16) with HM were included. Our primary outcome was mortality and secondary outcomes included infection recurrence and ICU admission. We identified 23 studies (N = 2026 patients), of which 22 were observational. Across the 12 studies (N = 801) that reported on bacterial organisms, 528 (65.9%) were gram positive, and 273 (34.1%) were gram negative. Catheters were removed in 1266 (62%) and retained in 760 (38%) patients. Removal was associated with a mean 30-day mortality of 13.14% (SD 9.12; 90/685) and reinfection rate of 5.49% (SD 2.88; 22/401) compared to 39.23% (SD 14.58; 122/311) and 10.75% (SD 21.07; 10/93), respectively, if retained. Catheter retention may be associated with a higher risk of mortality and infection recurrence. Further prospective research should assess catheter management in this population, including potential harms associated with retention.


Assuntos
Bacteriemia , Infecções Relacionadas a Cateter , Cateterismo Venoso Central , Cateteres Venosos Centrais , Neoplasias Hematológicas , Adulto , Bacteriemia/complicações , Infecções Relacionadas a Cateter/epidemiologia , Infecções Relacionadas a Cateter/etiologia , Cateterismo Venoso Central/efeitos adversos , Catéteres , Neoplasias Hematológicas/complicações , Neoplasias Hematológicas/terapia , Humanos
4.
Crit Care Med ; 50(4): 535-542, 2022 04 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34473658

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: Diverse perspectives improve the quality of scholarly initiatives. The demographic and professional diversity of scientists who contribute to critical care research and publications has not been described for the Canadian Critical Care Trials Group. Our objective was to describe the diversity of authors of publications from the Canadian Critical Care Trials Group. DESIGN: We conducted a quantitative content analysis of peer-reviewed articles published on behalf of the Canadian Critical Care Trials Group. SETTING: All peer-reviewed articles that were published on behalf of the Canadian Critical Care Trials Group between 1994 and October 2020. SUBJECTS: For each publication, we recorded the study design, the number of authors, and national or international collaboration. For the lead author, the senior author, and each coauthor, we recorded the following facets of diversity: gender, professional role, medical discipline, geographic location, academic stage, and visible minority status. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: We identified 354 eligible publications; 74% (263/354) reported observational cohort studies, randomized trials, and surveys. Of 4,246 authors, 1,205 were unique individuals. The mean (sd) number of authors per publication was 12 (7.1). Of all 4,246 authors, 37% were women, and 13.7% were members of a visible minority group. Of all lead or senior authors, 40% and 34% respectively were women; 15% of lead and 10% of senior authors were members of a visible minority group. Three-quarters (73%) of publications listed authors from more than one profession, and more than half (54%) listed authors from more than one medical discipline. Nearly half of publications (45%) listed authors who were early career faculty, 33% listed authors who were trainees, and 67% listed authors who were from visible minority groups. Authors from different provinces and from different countries were listed in 67% and 40% of publications, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Authors of Canadian Critical Care Trials Group publications are diverse with regard to demographic and professional characteristics.


Assuntos
Autoria , Cuidados Críticos , Canadá , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Papel Profissional , Publicações , Projetos de Pesquisa
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA