Teledermatology Platforms Usage and Barriers: A Cross-Sectional Analysis of United States-Based Dermatologists Pre- and Post-COVID-19.

BACKGROUND: During the global COVID-19 pandemic, dermatologists increasingly adopted teledermatology to facilitate patient care. OBJECTIVE: To identify differences in teledermatology platform usage and functionality among dermatologists as a means of understanding the potential effect on virtual healthcare access. METHODS: Results from a 2021 cross-sectional pre-validated survey distributed to actively practicing United States dermatologists were analyzed based on timepoint when teledermatology was adopted relative to COVID-19, previous/currently used platforms, self-reported platform functionality, and barriers to teledermatology implementation. Analysis was performed using chi-square and odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) for categorical data and single-factor analysis of variance (ANOVA) with post-hoc Tukey-Kramer for continuous data. P<.05 was considered significant. RESULTS: Early adopters (EAs) trialed significantly more (2.3 vs 1.9, P=0.02) platforms than (post) COVID adopters (CAs) before choosing their current platform. More EAs reported using platforms capable of uploading images (P=.002), required a mobile application (P=.006), and allowed staff to join patient encounters (P<.001). While poor image quality was the most cited barrier to implementation, CAs and non-adaptors (NAs) were materially more likely to cite it as their largest barrier to teledermatology. LIMITATIONS: The retrospective nature of the study and potential response bias. CONCLUSION: Dermatologists' use of teledermatology materially correlates with their teledermatology-adoption timepoint, and future usage may be materially impacted by the end of the COVID-19 public health emergency. Future studies should aim at how implementation and barriers to teledermatology usage may impact access to care. J Drugs Dermatol. 2024;23(2): doi:10.36849/JDD.7819e.

Telemedicine Versus Teledermatology Usage and Perception Among US-Based Physicians: A Survey Study.

The COVID-19 pandemic has sparked an increase in focus and use of telemedicine in several patient care settings. This survey study was distributed to actively practicing US-based physicians and examines telehealth use 2 years after the beginning of the COVID pandemic from a physician’s perspective. Notable findings include telehealth benefits which include increased patient access and the ability to work from home. A continued drawback in telehealth visits is the limitations on a complete physical examination, a drawback that was emphasized by the dermatology community. While this study sheds light on the developing nature of telehealth, it is limited by its retrospective nature and sample size. Future research with larger sample sizes focusing on economic incentives and telemedicine training may help to overcome barriers to using telehealth.  J Drugs Dermatol. 2023;22(11):e4-e8    doi:10.36849/JDD.7386e.

Learning dermatology in medical school: analysis of dermatology topics tested in popular question banks.

Given the lack of formal dermatology education in medical schools, dermatology principles covered in board exam preparatory resources remain the only standardized concepts that all medical students across the USA universally learn. The primary objective of this study was to quantify the dermatology topics represented in UWorld and AMBOSS Step 1 and Step 2CK question banks. Our study found that 49% of the 655 questions on dermatology assessed the top 10 most prevalent skin diseases encountered in clinical practice with a variety of rare conditions also tested. Step 2CK question banks had a higher proportion of questions that assessed management of dermatological conditions. Furthermore, there was a large variability in the proportion of questions that included images of the condition. This study highlights the need and opportunity for standardization of dermatology teaching in medical school curricula to optimally prepare graduating physicians for future practice.

Neurocognitive Outcomes in Deformational Plagiocephaly: Is There an Association between Morphologic Severity and Results?

BACKGROUND: The neurodevelopmental effects of skull asymmetry and orthotic helmet therapy for deformational plagiocephaly (DP) have had limited investigation. This study assessed the long-term neurocognitive outcomes in patients with DP and their association with orthotic helmet therapy and head shape abnormality. METHODS: A total of 138 school-age children with a history of DP, 108 of whom received helmet therapy, were tested with a neurocognitive battery assessing academic achievement, intelligence quotient, and visual-motor function. Severity of presenting plagiocephaly was calculated using anthropometric and photometric measurements. Analysis of covariance was used to compare outcomes between helmeted and nonhelmeted cohorts, unilateral plagiocephaly and concomitant brachycephaly, and left-sided and right-sided plagiocephaly. The association between severity of plagiocephaly and neurocognitive outcome was assessed through a residualized change approach. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in neurocognitive outcomes between the helmeted and nonhelmeted DP cohorts or the unilateral plagiocephaly and brachycephaly cohorts. Participants with left-sided DP had significantly lower motor coordination scores than participants with right-sided DP (84.8 versus 92.7; effect size = -0.50; P = 0.03). There was a significant laterality by cephalic index interaction, with a negative association between cephalic index and reading comprehension and spelling for participants with left-sided DP. No significant associations were found between severity of presenting or posttreatment deformity and neurocognitive outcome. CONCLUSIONS: Pretreatment and posttreatment severity of plagiocephaly were not correlated with neurocognitive function at school age. Helmet therapy was not associated with better or worse long-term neurocognitive function. However, participants with left-sided DP demonstrated worse neurocognitive outcomes than participants with right-sided DP in the domains of motor coordination and some types of academic achievement. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, III.

Dermatologic toxicities of chemotherapy: an educational intervention for skin of color women with breast cancer.

Minority patients are more likely to require dose adjustments for chemotherapy, with cultural barriers and access to medical care cited as contributory factors. Objective: We sought to pilot an educational intervention, in the form of a pamphlet, to evaluate the effectiveness of this tool in teaching skin of color (SoC) patients about potential dermatologic toxicities of chemotherapy that are relevant to their skin type. Methods: At a chemotherapy infusion center, SoC patients (n = 26) who were receiving chemotherapy for breast cancer voluntarily consented to read an educational pamphlet and complete a series of survey questions before and after this educational intervention. Results: Most participants identified as female (96%), African American/Black (81%), and non-Hispanic (85%); all respondents had obtained at least a high school degree. Survey responses revealed a significant increase in knowledge about the potential dermatologic effects of cancer treatment after this intervention. Notably, 100% of participants either agreed or strongly agreed that they would like to see other doctors use this educational tool as a form of patient education, that they would recommend this pamphlet to other patients who are starting cancer treatment, and that the pamphlet was easy to understand. Limitations: Limitations of this study include small sample size and single-institution recruitment, which may limit generalizability. Furthermore, this study only included patients who are proficient in English. Conclusion: This study pilots an effective educational tool that addresses dermatologic toxicities of chemotherapy that are relevant to SoC patients. Further multi-institutional studies with larger sample sizes and translation to other languages can overcome the limitations of this pilot study.

Characteristic Distinctions Between Pre-/Post-COVID-19 Teledermatology Adoptees: A Cross-Sectional United States-based Analysis and the Implications for Dermatologic Healthcare Equity.

BACKGROUND: Studies suggest potential heterogeneity in telemedicine adoption with potential to exacerbate healthcare access inequity. METHODS: A pre-validated survey was electronically sent to a proprietary listserv of practicing US-based dermatologists. Results were stratified by when teledermatology was adopted. Chi-square and odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (95%CI) were used to analyze categorical data while single-factor ANOVA with posthoc Tukey-Kramer was used for continuous data. RESULTS: 338 practicing US-based dermatologists completed the questionnaire. Academic/Government dermatologists were 4-times more likely (OR 4.08, 95%CI 2.37-7.03) to adopt teledermatology pre-COVID than private-practice dermatologists. Dermatologists with ≤10 years of experience were 1.8-times (OR 1.8, 95%CI 1.01-3.18) and 2.82-times more likely (OR 2.82, 95%CI 0.78-10.25) to adopt teledermatology pre-COVID-19 or at all, respectively, compared to dermatologists with ≥20 years of experience. Teledermatology adopters practiced more medical-dermatology (P<.0001) than non-adopters, who reported practicing more dermatologic surgery (P=.003; Tukey-Kramer α<.05) and dermatopathology (P<.0001; Tukey-Kramer α<.05). Pre-COVID-19 adopters were 4-times more likely (OR 4.69, 95%CI 1.46-15.07) to switch/incorporate live-interactive-only teledermatology (LI) post-COVID-19. Post-COVID-19 adopters were 6-times more likely (OR 6.09, 95%CI 3.36-11.06) to utilize LI than Pre-COVID-19 adopters. Pre-COVID-19 adopters use teledermatology for a larger proportion of patient visits than Post-COVID-19 adopters (19.6% v 10.4%, P<.0001), but also are 3.43-times more likely (OR 3.43, 95%CI 1.82-6.46) to report future decreases in usage. LIMITATIONS: Cross-sectional retrospective survey and potential response bias. CONCLUSION: Current teledermatology usage may be a suitable tool for medical-dermatology-focused practices. Material hurdles still exist for procedurally-oriented practices and future studies should investigate these barriers to maximize equitable access to dermatological care. J Drugs Dermatol. 2023;21(1):101-104. doi:10.36849/JDD.7169.

Malnutrition and Postoperative Outcomes Following Transcervical Zenker Diverticulectomy.

OBJECTIVES: Hypoalbuminemia has been used as a proxy for poor nutrition, and has been associated with poor postoperative outcomes in varying surgical procedures. This study investigates the association between albumin status and complications following transcervical Zenker diverticulectomy. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective database review. METHODS: The National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database was queried for patients who underwent transcervical Zenker diverticulectomy between 2005 and 2018. Univariate and multivariable analyses were conducted to determine associations between albumin status and postoperative complications. RESULTS: 318 patients undergoing transcervical Zenker diverticulectomy with available albumin values were queried. The mean serum albumin was 3.90 g/dL (SD = 0.56). Univariate analysis showed that hypoalbuminemia was associated with increased age (77.68 vs. 70.03 years) and female gender (54.4% vs. 45.6%), as well as sepsis (p = 0.045), reintubation (p = 0.040), urinary tract infection (p = 0.017), any medical complication (p < 0.001), any life-threatening complication (p = 0.017), and mortality (p = 0.012). Multivariable analyses found no associations between hypoalbuminemia and mortality (OR 33.136, 95% CI N/A, p = 1.000), any medical complication (OR 1.154, 95% CI 0.326-4.079, p = 0.824), any life-threatening complication (OR 0.604, 95% CI 0.079-4.586, p = 0.604), and length of stay (p = 0.249). CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests no association between hypoalbuminemia and postoperative complications in transcervical Zenker diverticulectomy. Hypoalbuminemia and malnutrition may not be a contraindication for surgery correcting Zenker diverticulectomy. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4 Laryngoscope, 133:1402-1408, 2023.

Antibody markup language (AbML) - a notation language for antibody-based drug formats and software for creating and rendering AbML (abYdraw).

As interest in antibody-based drug development continues to increase, the biopharmaceutical industry has begun to focus on complex multi-specific antibodies (MsAbs) as an up-and-coming class of biologic that differ from natural monoclonal antibodies through their ability to bind to more than one type of antigen. As techniques to generate such molecules have diversified, so have their formats and the need for standard notation. Previous efforts to develop a notation language for macromolecule drugs have been insufficient, or too complex, for MsAbs. Here, we present Antibody Markup Language (AbML), a new notation language specifically for antibody formats that overcomes the limitations of existing languages and can annotate all current antibody formats, including fusions, fragments, standard antibodies and MsAbs, as well as all currently conceivable future formats. AbML V1.1 also provides explicit support for T-cell receptor domains. To assist users of this language we have also developed a tool, abYdraw, that can draw antibody schematics from AbML strings or generate an AbML string from a drawn antibody schematic. AbML has the potential to become a standardized notation for describing new MsAb formats entering clinical trials.Abbreviations: AbML: Antibody Markup Language; ADC: Antibody-drug conjugate; CAS: Chemical Abstracts Service; CH: Constant heavy; CL: Constant light; Fv: Variable fragment; HELM: Hierarchical Editing Language for Macromolecules; HSA: Human serum albumin; INN: International Nonproprietary Names; KIH: Knobs-into-holes; mAbs: Monoclonal antibodies; MsAb: Multi-specific antibody; WHO: World Health Organization; PEG: Poly-ethylene glycol; scFv: Single-chain variable fragment; SMILES: Simplified Molecular-Input Line-Entry System; VH: Variable heavy; VHH: Single-domain (Camelid) variable heavy; VL: Variable light.

Virtual Neurocognitive Testing in Craniofacial Surgery.

SUMMARY: Digital communication platforms have had an impact on plastic surgery research. Although neurocognitive testing is an important tool for understanding the long-term developmental outcomes of congenital craniofacial conditions, testing has been geographically limited because of its interactive nature. Virtual neurocognitive testing is a facsimile version of in-person testing that allows researchers to overcome this limitation with high fidelity. Ten school-age subjects completed a neurocognitive assessment battery measuring intelligence quotient, academic achievement, and visuomotor skills at an average age of 7.8 ± 1.4 years. The subjects then retook the same battery through an identical virtual testing method approximately 1 year after the initial test. There were no significant differences in verbal intelligence quotient (p = 0.878), performance intelligence quotient (p = 0.813), and full-scale intelligence quotient (p = 0.982) scores obtained through in-person and virtual tests. There were no significant differences between academic achievement letter and word recognition (p = 0.999), math computation (p = 0.619), reading comprehension (p = 0.963), and spelling (p = 0.344) scores. There were no significant differences in visuomotor integration (p = 0.158), visual perception (p = 0.798), and motor coordination (p = 0.796) scores obtained through the two methods. The median at-home time to set up study equipment for the virtual testing was 5.0 minutes (interquartile range, 2.3 minutes). Seventy percent of participants reported that they preferred participating in research from home. All participants stated that the virtual research study was an overall positive experience. Virtual neurocognitive testing is an effective method of performing high-fidelity neurocognitive assessments while overcoming geographic barriers.

Trends in industry-sponsored research in plastic surgery since implementation of the Sunshine Act.

Financial contributions from industry for physician-led research have been historically challenging to study in plastic surgery. However, as mandated by the Physician Payments Sunshine Act of 2013, the Open Payments Database (OPD) has increased transparency in payments from industry to physicians. This study aimed to analyze trends in industry-sponsored research funding for plastic surgeons. Using the OPD, research payments from industry made to plastic surgeons from 2014 to 2018 were examined. Total payments and number of payments were recorded by recipient's census region (e.g., Northeast, Midwest, South, West) and therapeutic area (e.g., breast prosthetics/reconstruction, wound healing/tissue engineering, software/instrumentation, biologics, cosmetics/injectables). Payments totaled across 5 years in each therapeutic area for each region were also analyzed. Location of company U.S. headquarters and therapeutic area were recorded. Statistical analyses were performed using SAS 9.4. Brown-Mood test, t test, Kruskal-Wallis, Mann-Whitney, and linear regression tests were used. Aggregated over 5 years, the greatest payment value was allocated to wound healing/tissue engineering, whereas the number of payments was highest in breast prosthetics/reconstruction. Private plastic surgeons receive significantly higher payments compared to academic plastic surgeons. With such findings, greater transparency and additional years of OPD data may provide further insight into industry influence on physician-led research in plastic surgery.

Distinguishing Craniomorphometric Characteristics of Unilateral Lambdoid Craniosynostosis.

BACKGROUND: Unilateral lambdoid synostosis (ULS) represents the rarest form of single suture nonsyndromic craniosynostosis. Differentiating between posterior deformational plagiocephaly (DP) and ULS has been difficult due to overlapping clinical findings. Past analyses have been limited by sample size. This study was undertaken to clarify anatomical features of ULS. METHODS: A multiinstitution study was undertaken, analyzing CT imaging from patients with documented ULS to determine clinical and pathological characteristics. Similar analyses were performed on DP patients to differentiate the 2 conditions. RESULTS: Twenty-seven ULS patient scans and 10 DP scans were included. For ULS patients mean age was 6.6 months, majority male (75%), and majority left-sided ULS (71%). The synostosed side ear was anteriorly displaced in 100% of ULS patients, mean difference of 9.6° (P < 0.001), and inferiorly in 96.3% of patients, mean difference of 4.4 mm, relative to the nonsynostosed side. The posterior fossa deflection (PFD) was deviated 5.9° toward the synostosed side relative to the anterior midline. In DP, there was no significant difference between sides in EAC measurements. The PFD and EAC displacements were significantly smaller in DP relative to ULS (P < 0.001 for each). An ipsilateral mastoid bulge was found in 100% of ULS and 0% of DP on CT imaging. CONCLUSION: Contrary to some previously published findings, the ear is more anteriorly displaced ipsilateral to the fused lambdoid suture in 100% of ULS patients. Ear position alone is not a reliable indicator to differentiate between DP and ULS. A mastoid bulge is a more reliable indicator of ULS.

Vascularized Composite Parietal Bone Flap for Immediate Reconstruction of a Hemi-Maxillectomy Defect in an Infant.

BACKGROUND: Surgical resection of maxillary tumors can result in defects that can be difficult to reconstruct by conventional means due to the complex functional and anatomic nature of the midface and lack of regional bone flap options in the head and neck. Many reconstructive methods have been used to repair maxillary defects, but the ideal technique for the reconstruction of hemi-maxillectomy defects in growing pediatric patients has yet to be determined. METHODS: The authors present a rare pediatric patient with melanotic neuroectodermal tumor of infancy resulting in a hemi-maxillectomy defect after resection that was reconstructed using a pedicled vascularized composite flap consisting of temporalis muscle, pericranium, and parietal bone. RESULTS: The patient achieved successful long-term bony reconstruction of his right maxilla with this flap. Stable skeletal fixation with adequate orbital support was maintained over a >3-year follow-up period. CONCLUSION: A vascularized composite parietal bone flap is a reliable reconstructive option for reconstruction of large maxillectomy defects providing low donor-site morbidity, adequate globe support, excellent long-term skeletal stability, and malar symmetry in rapidly growing pediatric patients. Successful reconstruction for a rare patient with maxillary melanotic neuroectodermal tumor of infancy requiring hemi-maxillectomy was demonstrated with >3-year follow-up.

The impact of radiation on lymphedema: a review of the literature.

Radiation therapy (RT) is a common adjunct therapy in oncology. However, it carries a significant risk of lymphedema when utilized in some anatomic locations. Recent studies have provided insight into lymphedema pathophysiology, diagnostic techniques, and RT. This review will examine the role of RT in upper and lower extremity lymphedema. Radiation's role in increasing the risk of lymphedema through decreased lymphatic proliferation potential, interstitial fibrosis compressing lymphatic vessels, and mechanical insufficiency of the lymphatic system will be reviewed.

Engineered Expression of Broadly Neutralizing Antibodies Against Human Immunodeficiency Virus.

This review discusses recent progress made in developing a vaccine and novel treatments for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). It highlights the shortcomings of the RV144 vaccination trial [ALVAC-HIV (vCP1521) and AIDSVAX B/E] and the current standard of care and proposes that engineered expression of broadly neutralizing antibodies (bNAbs) against HIV-1 could overcome these shortcomings. Current developments in three major lines of research on HIV prevention and treatment using bNAbs are reviewed: firstly, the use of sequential immunogens to activate B cells to express bNAbs; secondly, the delivery of novel and extremely potent bNAbs through passive administration; and finally, the use of gene transfer using adeno-associated viral vectors to deliver bNAbs.