Potentially inappropriate prescribing in older patients admitted to psychiatric hospital.

OBJECTIVES: The objectives of this study are to determine the prevalence of potentially inappropriate prescribing including potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) and potential prescription omissions (PPOs) and to assess related risk factors in older people with major psychiatric illness. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional study of older patients hospitalized in a psychiatric hospital (n = 164; mean age 74.9 ± 7.3 years; 62% female). The primary endpoint was the prevalence of participants receiving PIMs and PPOs, which was assessed by using the Beers criteria 2012 and the screening tool of older person's potentially inappropriate prescriptions (STOPP) and screening tool of alert doctors to the right treatment (START) criteria. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression was used to assess significant risk factors for PIMs in this population. RESULTS: A total of 1269 drugs were prescribed to included patients (range: 0-19 drugs/day). PIMs were identified in 47% and 79% of participants, based on the Beers 2012 and STOPP criteria, respectively. Most PIMs (70%) concerned psychotropic drugs. The STOPP criteria identified more PIMs (331) than the Beers criteria 2012 (199). According to the START criteria, 59% of participants had PPOs. The number of prescribed medications was significantly associated with the occurrence of PIMs according to the Beers 2012 [OR 1.2 (95% CI 1.1-1.3)] and STOPP [OR 1.5 (95% CI 1.3-1.8)] criteria. CONCLUSION: Potentially inappropriate prescribing, as identified by the Beers and STOPP/START criteria, is highly prevalent among older patients hospitalized with major psychiatric illness. However, the focus on psychotropic drugs prescription without taking into account the benefit of these drugs to individual patients may limit the application of the Beers and STOPP criteria in psychiatric hospitals.

Tetrahydrocannabinol in Behavioral Disturbances in Dementia: A Crossover Randomized Controlled Trial.

OBJECTIVES: Neuropsychiatric symptoms (NPS) are highly prevalent in dementia, but effective pharmacotherapy without important side effects is lacking. This study aims to assess the efficacy and safety of oral tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) in the treatment of NPS in dementia. DESIGN: Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, repeated crossover trial, consisting of six treatment blocks of 2 weeks each. SETTING: Two hospital sites in The Netherlands, September 2011 to December 2013. PARTICIPANTS: Patients with dementia and clinically relevant NPS. INTERVENTION: Within each block THC (0.75 mg twice daily in blocks 1-3 and 1.5 mg twice daily in blocks 4-6) and placebo were administered in random order for 3 consecutive days, followed by a 4-day washout. MEASUREMENTS: Primary outcome was change in Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI) score. Analyses were performed intention-to-treat. Data from all subjects were used without imputation. Sample size required for a power of 80% was 20 patients, because of repeated crossover. RESULTS: 22 patients (15 men, mean age 76.4 [5.3] years) were included, of whom 20 (91%) completed the trial. THC did not reduce NPI compared to placebo (blocks 1-3: 1.8, 97.5% CI: -2.1 to 5.8; blocks 4-6: -2.8, 97.5% CI: -7.4 to 1.8). THC was well tolerated, as assessed by adverse event monitoring, vital signs, and mobility. The incidence of adverse events was similar between treatment groups. Four non-related serious adverse events occurred. CONCLUSIONS: This is the largest randomized controlled trial studying the efficacy of THC for NPS, to date. Oral THC did not reduce NPS in dementia, but was well tolerated by these vulnerable patients, supporting future higher dosing studies.

Tetrahydrocannabinol for neuropsychiatric symptoms in dementia: A randomized controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: To study the efficacy and safety of low-dose oral tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) in the treatment of dementia-related neuropsychiatric symptoms (NPS). METHODS: This is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Patients with dementia and clinically relevant NPS were randomly assigned to receive THC 1.5 mg or matched placebo (1:1) 3 times daily for 3 weeks. Primary outcome was change in Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI), assessed at baseline and after 14 and 21 days. Analyses were based on intention-to-treat. RESULTS: Twenty-four patients received THC and 26 received placebo. NPS were reduced during both treatment conditions. The difference in reduction from baseline between THC and placebo was not significant (mean difference NPItotal: 3.2, 95% confidence interval [CI] -3.6 to 10.0), nor were changes in scores for agitation (Cohen-Mansfield Agitation Inventory 4.6, 95% CI -3.0 to 12.2), quality of life (Quality of Life-Alzheimer's Disease -0.5, 95% CI -2.6 to 1.6), or activities of daily living (Barthel Index 0.6, 95% CI -0.8 to 1.9). The number of patients experiencing mild or moderate adverse events was similar (THC, n = 16; placebo, n = 14, p = 0.36). No effects on vital signs, weight, or episodic memory were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Oral THC of 4.5 mg daily showed no benefit in NPS, but was well-tolerated, which adds valuable knowledge to the scarce evidence on THC in dementia. The benign adverse event profile of this dosage allows study of whether higher doses are efficacious and equally well-tolerated. CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE: This study provides Class I evidence that for patients with dementia-related NPS, low-dose THC does not significantly reduce NPS at 21 days, though it is well-tolerated.

Safety, pharmacodynamics, and pharmacokinetics of multiple oral doses of delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol in older persons with dementia.

RATIONALE: Data on safety, pharmacodynamics, and pharmacokinetics of tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) are lacking in dementia patients. METHODS: In this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover trial, we evaluated the safety, pharmacodynamics, and pharmacokinetics of THC in ten patients with dementia (mean age 77.3 ± 5.6). For 12 weeks, participants randomly received oral THC (weeks 1-6, 0.75 mg; weeks 7-12, 1.5 mg) or placebo twice daily for 3 days, separated by a 4-day washout period. RESULTS: Only 6 of the 98 reported adverse events were related to THC. Visual analog scale (VAS) feeling high, VAS external perception, body sway-eyes-open, and diastolic blood pressure were not significantly different with THC. After the 0.75-mg dose, VAS internal perception (0.025 units; 95% CI 0.010-0.040) and heart rate (2 beats/min; 95% CI 0.4-3.8) increased significantly. Body sway-eyes-closed increased only after 1.5 mg (0.59°/s; 95% CI 0.13-1.06). Systolic blood pressure changed significantly after both doses of THC (0.75 mg, -7 mmHg, 95% CI -11.4, -3.0; 1.5 mg, 5 mmHg, 95% CI 1.0-9.2). The median T max was 1-2 h, with THC pharmacokinetics increasing linearly with increasing dose, with wide interindividual variability (CV% up to 140%). The mean C max (ng/mL) after the first dose (0-6 h) was 0.41 (0.18-0.90) for the 0.75-mg dose and 1.01 (0.53-1.92) for the 1.5-mg dose. After the second dose (6-24 h), the C max was 0.50 (0.27-0.92) and 0.98 (0.46-2.06), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: THC was rapidly absorbed and had dose-linear pharmacokinetics with considerable interindividual variation. Pharmacodynamic effects, including adverse events, were minor. Further studies are warranted to evaluate the pharmacodynamics and efficacy of higher THC doses in older persons with dementia.

Safety and pharmacokinetics of oral delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol in healthy older subjects: a randomized controlled trial.

There is a great concern about the safety of THC-based drugs in older people (≥65 years), as most of THC-trials did not include such group. In this phase 1, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, placebo-controlled, cross-over trial, we evaluated the safety and pharmacokinetics of three oral doses of Namisol(®), a novel THC in tablet form, in older subjects. Twelve healthy older subjects (6 male; mean age 72±5 years) randomly received a single oral dose of 3mg, 5mg, or 6.5mg of THC or matching placebo, in a crossover manner, on each intervention day. The data for 11 subjects were included in the analysis. The data of 1 subject were excluded due to non-compliance to study medication. THC was safe and well tolerated. The most frequently reported adverse events (AEs) were drowsiness (27%) and dry mouth (11%). Subjects reported more AEs with THC 6.5mg than with 3mg (p=0.048), 5mg (p=0.034) and placebo (p=0.013). There was a wide inter-individual variability in plasma concentrations of THC. Subjects for whom the Cmax fell within the sampling period (over 2h), Cmax was 1.42-4.57ng/mL and Tmax was 67-92min. The AUC0-2h (n=11) was 1.67-3.51ng/mL. Overall, the pharmacodynamic effects of THC were smaller than effects previously reported in young adults. In conclusion, THC appeared to be safe and well tolerated by healthy older individuals. Data on safety and effectiveness of THC in frail older persons are urgently required, as this population could benefit from the therapeutic applications of THC.

Neuropsychiatric adverse events of varenicline: a systematic review of published reports.

INTRODUCTION: Over the past years, the impact of varenicline in patients with mental illness has been debated as serious neuropsychiatric adverse events (AEs) have been reported with varenicline use. AIM: To identify and summarize published case reports of neuropsychiatric AEs ascribed to varenicline and to determine potential risk factors for these AEs. METHODS: A literature search of MEDLINE, the Cochrane Library, EMBASE, and PsychInfo database was conducted for case reports concerning the neuropsychiatric AEs of varenicline published in English from 2006 (approval year by the US Food and Drug Administration and the Dutch Medicines Evaluation Board) to January 1, 2012. RESULTS: We identified 25 published cases. In most reports, patients had been admitted to psychiatric hospitals with serious neuropsychiatric AEs due to varenicline. The average patient age was 46.4 years, and 56% were men; 68% of patients had a psychiatric history. The onset of symptoms started 2 days to 3 months after the initiation of varenicline. One report described completed suicide in a man with no psychiatric history. In most cases (84%), the neuropsychiatric symptoms resolved after the discontinuation of varenicline. Analysis of all reports using the Naranjo causality scale, a method for estimating the probability of adverse drug reactions, indicated probable causality in 76% of the cases and definite causality in 12% of cases. CONCLUSION: Varenicline is associated with an increased risk of serious neuropsychiatric AEs, especially in patients with a psychiatric illness. It is strongly recommended that varenicline be administered only to mentally stable patients and under close monitoring.