Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros








Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med ; 32(22): 3703-3707, 2019 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29742942

RESUMO

Purpose: To compare between low dose vaginal misoprostol with and without Foley catheter for late second trimester pregnancy termination in women with previous multiple cesarean sections. Materials and methods: A prospective randomized controlled clinical trial, patients were randomly allocated to either low dose vaginal misoprostol group (n = 40) or combined low dose vaginal misoprostol plus Foley catheter group (n = 38). The primary outcome was complete abortion. Secondary outcomes were induction-to-abortion interval, the number of misoprostol doses and occurrence of complications. Results: Incomplete abortion rate was significantly lower in combined group than misoprostol only group (2.6%versus 15% respectively, p = .03). Induction-to-expulsion interval with the combined vaginal misoprostol plus Foley catheter was significantly shorter (p = .01) and the number of misoprostol doses in the combined group was significantly lower (p = .04). No statistically significant difference in the frequency of complications between both groups. Conclusions: The combination of low dose vaginal misoprostol and Foley catheter is an effective and safe method for termination of second trimester pregnancy in women with previous multiple cesarean sections.


Assuntos
Abortivos não Esteroides/administração & dosagem , Aborto Induzido/métodos , Cesárea , Doenças Fetais/terapia , Misoprostol/administração & dosagem , Segundo Trimestre da Gravidez , Cateterismo Urinário , Abortivos não Esteroides/efeitos adversos , Aborto Induzido/efeitos adversos , Administração Intravaginal , Adulto , Cesárea/efeitos adversos , Relação Dose-Resposta a Droga , Esquema de Medicação , Feminino , Idade Gestacional , Humanos , Trabalho de Parto Induzido/métodos , Misoprostol/efeitos adversos , Paridade , Gravidez , Cateterismo Urinário/efeitos adversos , Cateterismo Urinário/métodos , Nascimento Vaginal Após Cesárea/efeitos adversos , Nascimento Vaginal Após Cesárea/métodos , Adulto Jovem
2.
J Obstet Gynaecol India ; 67(5): 356-362, 2017 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28867887

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of unilateral laparoscopic ovarian drilling versus bilateral laparoscopic ovarian drilling with thermal dose adjusted according to ovarian volume in clomiphene citrate (CC)-resistant PCOS patients in terms of endocrine changes, menstrual cycle resumption, ovulation and pregnancy rates. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This study was conducted in the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Zagazig university hospitals. One hundred CC-resistant PCOS patients were divided into two groups. Group (I) (50 patients) underwent unilateral laparoscopic ovarian drilling with thermal dose adjusted according to ovarian volume (60 J/cm3 of ovarian tissue), and group (II) (50 patients) underwent bilateral laparoscopic ovarian drilling using the same previously mentioned thermal dose. Endocrinal changes and menstrual cycle resumption were assessed within 8 weeks postoperatively, but the ovulation and pregnancy rates were estimated after 6-month follow-up period. RESULTS: There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups as regards demographic data (p > 0.05). As regards menstruation cycle resumption (62.5 vs. 81%) (p = 0.047), total ovulation rate (54.2 vs. 78.7%) (p = 0.011) and cumulative pregnancy rate (33.3 vs. 55.3%) (p = 0.031), there was statistically significant difference between both groups. After drilling, there were highly statistically significant decrease in the mean serum levels of luteinizing hormone (LH) and significant decrease in the mean serum levels of testosterone in both groups. Mean serum level of follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) did not change significantly in both groups after drilling. CONCLUSION: Bilateral laparoscopic ovarian drilling with thermal dose adjusted according to ovarian volume is more effective than the right-sided unilateral technique with thermal dose adjusted according to ovarian volume in terms of menstrual cycle resumption, ovulation and cumulative pregnancy rates in CC-resistant PCOS patients.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA