Time-Varying Use of Proton Pump Inhibitors and Cognitive Impairment and Dementia: A Real-World Analysis from Germany.

BACKGROUND: Cumulative evidence of dementia risk in patients taking proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) is still inconclusive, probably due to a variety of study designs. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to compare how the association between dementia risk and use of PPIs differs by different outcome and exposure definitions. METHODS: We conceptualized a target trial using claims data with 7,696,127 individuals aged 40 years or older without previous dementia or mild cognitive impairment (MCI) from the Association of Statutory Health Insurance Physicians in Bavaria. Dementia was defined as either including or excluding MCI to compare how the results alter by different outcome definitions. We used weighted Cox models to estimate the PPI initiation effect on dementia risk and weighted pooled logistic regression to assess the effect of time-varying use versus non-use during 9 years of study period, including 1 year of wash-out period (2009-2018). The median follow-up time of PPI initiators and non-initiators was 5.4 and 5.8 years, respectively. We also evaluated the association between each PPI agent (omeprazole, pantoprazole, lansoprazole, esomeprazole, and combined use) and dementia risk. RESULTS: A total of 105,220 (3.6%) PPI initiators and 74,697 (2.6%) non-initiators were diagnosed with dementia. Comparing PPI initiation with no initiation, the hazard ratio (HR) for dementia was 1.04 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.03-1.05]. The HR for time-varying PPI use versus non-use was 1.85 (1.80-1.90). When MCI was included in the outcome, the number of outcomes increased to 121,922 in PPI initiators and 86,954 in non-initiators, but HRs remained similar, showing 1.04 (1.03-1.05) and 1.82 (1.77-1.86), respectively. Pantoprazole was the most frequently used PPI agent. Although the estimated HRs for the time-varying use effect of each PPI showed different ranges, all agents were associated with an increased dementia risk. A total of 105,220 (3.6%) PPI initiators and 74,697 (2.6%) non-initiators were diagnosed with dementia. Comparing PPI initiation with no initiation, the hazard ratio (HR) for dementia was 1.04 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.03-1.05]. The HR for time-varying PPI use versus non-use was 1.85 (1.80-1.90). When MCI was included in the outcome, the number of outcomes increased to 121,922 in PPI initiators and 86,954 in non-initiators, but HRs remained similar, showing 1.04 (1.03-1.05) and 1.82 (1.77-1.86), respectively. Pantoprazole was the most frequently used PPI agent. Although the estimated HRs for the time-varying use effect of each PPI showed different ranges, all agents were associated with an increased dementia risk.A total of 105,220 (3.6%) PPI initiators and 74,697 (2.6%) non-initiators were diagnosed with dementia. Comparing PPI initiation with no initiation, the hazard ratio (HR) for dementia was 1.04 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.03-1.05]. The HR for time-varying PPI use versus non-use was 1.85 (1.80-1.90). When MCI was included in the outcome, the number of outcomes increased to 121,922 in PPI initiators and 86,954 in non-initiators, but HRs remained similar, showing 1.04 (1.03-1.05) and 1.82 (1.77-1.86), respectively. Pantoprazole was the most frequently used PPI agent. Although the estimated HRs for the time-varying use effect of each PPI showed different ranges, all agents were associated with an increased dementia risk.A total of 105,220 (3.6%) PPI initiators and 74,697 (2.6%) non-initiators were diagnosed with dementia. Comparing PPI initiation with no initiation, the hazard ratio (HR) for dementia was 1.04 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.03-1.05]. The HR for time-varying PPI use versus non-use was 1.85 (1.80-1.90). When MCI was included in the outcome, the number of outcomes increased to 121,922 in PPI initiators and 86,954 in non-initiators, but HRs remained similar, showing 1.04 (1.03-1.05) and 1.82 (1.77-1.86), respectively. Pantoprazole was the most frequently used PPI agent. Although the estimated HRs for the time-varying use effect of each PPI showed different ranges, all agents were associated with an increased dementia risk.A total of 105,220 (3.6%) PPI initiators and 74,697 (2.6%) non-initiators were diagnosed with dementia. Comparing PPI initiation with no initiation, the hazard ratio (HR) for dementia was 1.04 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.03-1.05]. The HR for time-varying PPI use versus non-use was 1.85 (1.80-1.90). When MCI was included in the outcome, the number of outcomes increased to 121,922 in PPI initiators and 86,954 in non-initiators, but HRs remained similar, showing 1.04 (1.03-1.05) and 1.82 (1.77-1.86), respectively. Pantoprazole was the most frequently used PPI agent. Although the estimated HRs for the time-varying use effect of each PPI showed different ranges, all agents were associated with an increased dementia risk.A total of 105,220 (3.6%) PPI initiators and 74,697 (2.6%) non-initiators were diagnosed with dementia. Comparing PPI initiation with no initiation, the hazard ratio (HR) for dementia was 1.04 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.03-1.05]. The HR for time-varying PPI use versus non-use was 1.85 (1.80-1.90). When MCI was included in the outcome, the number of outcomes increased to 121,922 in PPI initiators and 86,954 in non-initiators, but HRs remained similar, showing 1.04 (1.03-1.05) and 1.82 (1.77-1.86), respectively. Pantoprazole was the most frequently used PPI agent. Although the estimated HRs for the time-varying use effect of each PPI showed different ranges, all agents were associated with an increased dementia risk.A total of 105,220 (3.6%) PPI initiators and 74,697 (2.6%) non-initiators were diagnosed with dementia. Comparing PPI initiation with no initiation, the hazard ratio (HR) for dementia was 1.04 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.03-1.05]. The HR for time-varying PPI use versus non-use was 1.85 (1.80-1.90). When MCI was included in the outcome, the number of outcomes increased to 121,922 in PPI initiators and 86,954 in non-initiators, but HRs remained similar, showing 1.04 (1.03-1.05) and 1.82 (1.77-1.86), respectively. Pantoprazole was the most frequently used PPI agent. Although the estimated HRs for the time-varying use effect of each PPI showed different ranges, all agents were associated with an increased dementia risk.A total of 105,220 (3.6%) PPI initiators and 74,697 (2.6%) non-initiators were diagnosed with dementia. Comparing PPI initiation with no initiation, the hazard ratio (HR) for dementia was 1.04 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.03-1.05]. The HR for time-varying PPI use versus non-use was 1.85 (1.80-1.90). When MCI was included in the outcome, the number of outcomes increased to 121,922 in PPI initiators and 86,954 in non-initiators, but HRs remained similar, showing 1.04 (1.03-1.05) and 1.82 (1.77-1.86), respectively. Pantoprazole was the most frequently used PPI agent. Although the estimated HRs for the time-varying use effect of each PPI showed different ranges, all agents were associated with an increased dementia risk.A total of 105,220 (3.6%) PPI initiators and 74,697 (2.6%) non-initiators were diagnosed with dementia. Comparing PPI initiation with no initiation, the hazard ratio (HR) for dementia was 1.04 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.03-1.05]. The HR for time-varying PPI use versus non-use was 1.85 (1.80-1.90). When MCI was included in the outcome, the number of outcomes increased to 121,922 in PPI initiators and 86,954 in non-initiators, but HRs remained similar, showing 1.04 (1.03-1.05) and 1.82 (1.77-1.86), respectively. Pantoprazole was the most frequently used PPI agent. Although the estimated HRs for the time-varying use effect of each PPI showed different ranges, all agents were associated with an increased dementia risk. CONCLUSION: Our large study supports existing evidence that PPI use is related to an increased risk of dementia.

Do proton pump inhibitors increase the risk of dementia? A systematic review, meta-analysis and bias analysis.

AIM: Previous studies on the association between proton pump inhibitor (PPI) intake and the increased risk of dementia has shown discrepancies in their conclusions. We aimed to provide updated evidence based on extensive bias assessments and quantitative sensitivity analyses. METHODS: We searched the databases PubMed, EMBASE, SCOPUS, CENTRAL and clinicaltrials.gov for prospective studies that examined an association between PPI use and dementia, up to February 2022. Each study was assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias assessment tools for non-randomized studies of interventions (ROBINS-I) or randomized trials (RoB2). Pooled risk ratios (RRs) and 95% prediction intervals were computed using random-effects models. Sensitivity analyses were adjusted for small-study bias. RESULTS: We included nine observational studies with 204 108 dementia cases in the primary analysis on the association between PPI use vs. non-use and dementia, and the RR was 1.16 (95% CI = 1.00; 1.35). After adjusting for small-study bias by Copas selection model and Rücker's shrinkage procedure, the RR was 1.16 (1.02; 1.32) and 1.15 (1.13; 1.17), respectively. A subgroup analysis of PPI use vs. non-use regarding Alzheimer's disease risk yielded an RR of 1.15 (0.89; 1.50). The secondary analysis on the risk of dementia by use of PPI vs. histamine-2 receptor antagonist showed an RR of 1.03 (0.66; 1.62). CONCLUSION: This meta-analysis provided no clear evidence for an association between PPI intake and the risk of dementia. Due to discrepancies in sensitivity analyses, however, some risk of dementia by PPI use cannot be ruled out. Since an unequivocal conclusion is still pending, further research is warranted.

Proton pump inhibitors and the risk of cardiovascular events and cardiovascular mortality: A systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Observational research has indicated that proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) might increase the long-term risk of cardiovascular events. This study evaluated the evidence from observational studies for an effect of PPI monotherapy on the risk of incident cardiovascular events and cardiovascular mortality. METHODS: The databases MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Scopus were systematically searched up to September 2021. The primary outcome was first cardiovascular event, i.e. first myocardial infarction or first ischaemic stroke. The secondary outcome was cardiovascular mortality. Studies were included following a detailed risk of bias assessment with the ROBINS-I tool. Sensitivity and bias analyses adjusted for potential publication bias, immortal time bias, and unmeasured confounding. RESULTS: We included ten studies with 75,371 first cardiovascular events, as well as seven studies on cardiovascular mortality with 50,329 cardiovascular deaths in total. The pooled hazard ratios (HRs) for PPI use and cardiovascular events were 1.05 with a 95% confidence interval of (0.96; 1.15) before and 0.99 (0.93; 1.04) after adjusting for observational study design bias. The pooled HRs for PPI use and cardiovascular mortality were 1.27 (1.11; 1.44) before and 1.06 (0.96; 1.16) after adjusting for publication bias and observational study design bias. CONCLUSION: It is questionable, whether PPI monotherapy constitutes a cardiovascular risk factor.

Emulating a target trial of proton pump inhibitors and dementia risk using claims data.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Understanding the adverse effects of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) is important due to their widespread use, but the available evidence for an increased dementia risk amongst patients taking PPIs is inconclusive. The present study aimed to estimate the causal effect of PPIs on the risk of dementia by target trial emulation and time-varying exposure modeling. METHODS: Using claims data of 2,698,176 insured people of a large German statutory health insurer, a target trial was conceptualized in which individuals aged 40 years and older were classified as PPI initiators or non-initiators between 2008 and 2018, and were followed until diagnosis of dementia, death, loss to follow-up or end of study. Incidence of dementia (International Classification of Diseases 10 codes F00, F01, F03, F05.1, G30, G31.0, G31.1, G31.9 and F02.8+G31.82) was defined applying a 1-year lag window. Weighted Cox models were used to estimate the effect of PPI initiation versus non-initiation on dementia risk and weighted pooled logistic regression was used to estimate the effect of time-varying use versus non-use. RESULTS: In all, 29,746 PPI initiators (4.4%) and 26,830 non-initiators (1.3%) were diagnosed with dementia. Comparing PPI initiation with no initiation, the hazard ratio for dementia was 1.54 (95% confidence interval 1.51-1.58). The hazard ratio for time-dependent PPI use versus non-use was 1.56 (95% confidence interval 1.50-1.63). Differentiated subtypes, including unspecified dementia, Alzheimer's disease and vascular dementia, showed increased risk by PPI initiation and time-varying PPI use. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that PPI initiation and time-varying PPI use may increase overall dementia risk.

Who gets prescriptions for proton pump inhibitors and why? A drug-utilization study with claims data in Bavaria, Germany, 2010-2018.

PURPOSE: The German annual drug prescription-report has indicated overuse of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) for many years; however, little was known about the characteristics of people using PPIs. This study aimed to provide comprehensive utilization data and describe frequencies of potential on- and off-label PPI-indications in Bavaria, Germany. METHODS: Claims data of statutorily insured people from 2010 to 2018 were used. Defined daily doses (DDDs) of PPIs by type of drug, prevalence of PPI-use and DDDs prescribed per 1000 insured people/day were analyzed. For 2018, proportions of users and DDDs per 1000 insured people were calculated by age and sex. To elucidate changes in prescribing practices due to a suspected drug-drug interaction, we examined co-prescribing of clopidogrel and PPIs between 2010 and 2018. For PPI new users, sums of DDDs and frequencies of potential indications were examined. RESULTS: PPI prescribing increased linearly from 2010 to 2016 and gradually decreased from 2016 to 2018. In 2018, 14.7% of women and 12.2% of men received at least one prescription, and 64.8 DDDs (WHO-def.) per 1000 insured people/day were prescribed. Overall, omeprazole use decreased over the observation period and was steadily replaced by pantoprazole, especially when co-prescibed with clopidogrel. An on-label PPI-indication was not reported at first intake in 52.0% of new users. CONCLUSIONS: The utilization of prescribed PPIs has decreased since 2016. However, a large proportion of new PPI-users had no documentation of a potential indication, and the sums of DDDs prescribed often seemed not to comply with guidelines.

The long-term risk for myocardial infarction or stroke after proton pump inhibitor therapy (2008-2018).

BACKGROUND: Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are well tolerated in the short term but have recently been associated with increased long-term cardiovascular risk in observational studies. AIMS: To evaluate long-term risks of myocardial infarction (MI) and ischaemic stroke (IS) associated with PPI vs H2 -receptor antagonist (H2 RA) therapy in adults without pre-existing cardiovascular or cerebrovascular disease METHODS: Using administrative claims data (2008-2018), we emulated a target trial comparing MI and IS risks in new users of PPIs vs H2 RAs. Treatment was identified using dispensed prescriptions. MI and IS were defined using hospital discharge codes. Inverse probability weighting was used to adjust for confounding, and Cox models to estimate hazard ratios (HRs). Survival curves were estimated using weighted Kaplan-Meier estimators. RESULTS: We identified 1 143 948 new users of PPIs and 36 229 new users of H2 RAs who were free of prevalent cardiovascular or cerebrovascular disease. The mean follow-up time was 6.2 years for PPI initiators and 5.3 years for H2 RA initiators. After 10 years, the HRs for MI and IS were 0.96 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.80-1.16) and 0.98 (95% CI: 0.89-1.08), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: This analysis of claims data of a large German health insurer did not provide evidence that PPI therapy increased the risk of MI or IS in the first decade after treatment initiation.

Association of proton pump inhibitor use with endothelial function and metabolites of the nitric oxide pathway: A cross-sectional study.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: Long-term intake of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) might increase the risk of cardiovascular events. One suggested mechanism is that PPIs inhibit the enzyme dimethylarginine dimethylaminohydrolase (DDAH) and thereby block the degradation of endothelial asymmetrical dimethylarginine (ADMA). Excess ADMA in turn leads to impaired endothelial nitric oxide (NO) generation. So far, this mechanism has only been established in human cell cultures. Previous studies that examined this pathway in human populations measured circulating ADMA and found no association with PPI use and excess plasma ADMA. But in a recent study, plasma ADMA was not correlated with intracellular ADMA. We therefore focused on changes in plasma citrulline as an indicator for potential DDAH inhibition. DESIGN: We analyzed the association between regular daily PPI intake and flow-mediated dilation (FMD) of the brachial artery as well as plasma concentrations of citrulline, arginine, ADMA, and symmetric dimethylarginine using inverse probability weighting to adjust for confounding and censoring. DATA SOURCE: Data of 1298 participants from two independent cohorts of the population-based Study of Health in Pomerania were used. PATIENTS: Participants of the population-based Study of Health in Pomerania are a stratified random sample of the study region. INTERVENTION: Regular daily intake of PPIs. MEASUREMENTS: FMD of the brachial artery and plasma concentrations of citrulline, arginine, ADMA, and symmetric dimethylarginine. MAIN RESULTS: Eighty-seven participants (57.5% female) were regular daily users of PPIs. In the fully adjusted models, associations were identified for FMD and plasma citrulline concentrations. PPI users revealed a 0.99% (95% CI: -1.96 to -0.02) lower FMD and 3.03 µmol/L (95% CI: -4.96 to -1.10) lower plasma citrulline levels as compared to non-users. CONCLUSION: Our data provide evidence that long-term intake of PPIs might inhibit human DDAH activity, resulting in impaired endothelial NO production and reduced vascular function. In the long run, this might explain an increased risk for cardiovascular diseases associated with long-term PPI use.

Lack of association between proton pump inhibitor use and brain aging: a cross-sectional study.

PURPOSE: Due to conflicting scientific evidence for an increased risk of dementia by intake of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs), this study investigates associations between PPI use and brain volumes, estimated brain age, and cognitive function in the general population. METHODS: Two surveys of the population-based Study of Health in Pomerania (SHIP) conducted in Northeast Germany were used. In total, 2653 participants underwent brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and were included in the primary analysis. They were divided into two groups according to their PPI intake and compared with regard to their brain volumes (gray matter, white matter, total brain, and hippocampus) and estimated brain age. Multiple regression was used to adjust for confounding factors. Cognitive function was evaluated by the Verbal Learning and Memory Test (VLMT) and the Nuremberg Age Inventory (NAI) and put in relation to PPI use. RESULTS: No association was found between PPI use and brain volumes or the estimated brain age. The VLMT score was 1.11 lower (95% confidence interval: - 2.06 to - 0.16) in immediate recall, and 0.72 lower (95% CI: - 1.22 to - 0.22) in delayed recall in PPI users than in non-users. PPI use was unrelated to the NAI score. CONCLUSIONS: The present study does not support a relationship between PPI use and brain aging.

Visceral adiposity index (VAI), lipid accumulation product (LAP), and product of triglycerides and glucose (TyG) to discriminate prediabetes and diabetes.

The present study evaluated the ability of the visceral adiposity index (VAI), the lipid accumulation product (LAP), and product of triglycerides and glucose (TyG), three novel, insulin resistance-related markers, to discriminate prediabetes/diabetes in the general German population. Altogether 2,045 Germans (31-72 years, 53.3% women) without known diabetes and a history of Myocardial Infarction (MI)/stroke from the Cooperative Health Research in the Region of Augsburg (KORA) F4 Study were eligible. The discriminatory accuracy of the markers for oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT)-defined prediabetes/diabetes according to the American Diabetes Association (ADA) criteria was assessed by the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC). The Youden Index (YI) was used to determine optimal cut-off values, and a non-parametric ROC regression was used to examine whether the discriminatory accuracy varied by sex and age. 365 men (38.2%) and 257 women (23.6%) were newly diagnosed with prediabetes/diabetes. AUCs for TyG, LAP and VAI were 0.762 (95% CI 0.740-0.784), 0.743 (95% CI 0.720-0.765), and 0.687 (95% CI 0.662-0.712), respectively. The optimal cut-off values for the LAP and TyG were 56.70 and 8.75 in men, and 30.40 and 8.53 in women. In conclusion, TyG and LAP provide good discrimination of persons with prediabetes/diabetes.

Impact of Targeted Interventions on Trends in Central Line-Associated Bloodstream Infection: A Single-Center Experience From the Republic of Korea.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the impact of targeted interventions on trends in central line-associated bloodstream infection. DESIGN: A before-and-after study between January 2013 and September 2014. SETTING: Tertiary hospital in the Republic of Korea. PATIENTS: All patients with central-line catheters in the hospital. INTERVENTIONS: In September 2013, interventions that targeted central line insertion practices were implemented in 10 ICUs, including compliance monitoring with a central line insertion practices bundle and use of an all-inclusive catheter kit. The impact of targeted interventions on trends in central line-associated bloodstream infection was evaluated by segmented autoregression analysis of an interrupted time series. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The average hospital-wide central line-associated bloodstream infection rates in the baseline and intervention periods were 1.84 and 1.56 per 1,000 catheter-days, respectively. During the baseline period, there was an increase of central line-associated bloodstream infection rate of 0.12 per 1,000 catheter-days per month. In the intervention period, there was a decrease of central line-associated bloodstream infection rate of 0.16 per 1,000 catheter-days per month (change in slope, -0.28; 95% CI, -0.37 to -0.19; p < 0.0001). In ICUs, the average central line-associated bloodstream infection rates in the baseline and intervention periods were 1.92 and 1.64 per 1,000 catheter-days, respectively. During the baseline period, there was an increase of central line-associated bloodstream infection rate of 0.18 per 1,000 catheter-days per month in ICUs. After sequential-targeted interventions, there was a decrease of central line-associated bloodstream infection rate of 0.16 per 1,000 catheter-days per month (change in slope, -0.34; 95% CI, -0.50 to -0.18; p = 0.0007). CONCLUSIONS: Targeted interventions were associated with significant changes in trends in the occurrence rate of central line-associated bloodstream infection in ICUs and the entire hospital.