The obesity paradox in younger adult patients with sepsis: analysis of the MIMIC-IV database.

BACKGROUND: The obesity paradox suggests that individuals with obesity may have a survival advantage against specific critical illnesses, including sepsis. However, whether this paradox occurs at younger ages remains unclear. Therefore, we aimed to investigate whether obesity could improve survival in younger adult patients with sepsis. METHODS: We used clinical data sourced from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care IV (MIMIC-IV) database. Patients with Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score ≥2 and suspected infection at the time of ICU admission were identified as having sepsis, following the Sepsis-3 definition. Individuals were classified into the obesity (BMI ≥30 kg/m²) and non-obesity (BMI <30 kg/m²) groups. Patients aged <50 and ≥50 years were categorized as younger adult patients and older patients, respectively. RESULTS: Of 73,181 patients in the MIMIC-IV ICU database, 18,120 satisfied the inclusion criteria: 2642 aged <50 years and 15,478 aged ≥50 years. The Kaplan-Meier curve showed that obesity was not associated with an improved mortality rate among younger adult patients with sepsis (log-rank test: P = 0.197), while obesity exhibited a survival benefit in older patients with sepsis (log-rank test: P < 0.001). After propensity score matching, in-hospital mortality did not differ significantly between the obesity and non-obesity groups (13.3% vs. 12.2%; P = 0.457) in the younger adult patients with sepsis. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that BMI was not an independent risk factor for in-hospital mortality in younger adult patients with sepsis (underweight: adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.72, P = 0.076; overweight: aOR 0.88, P = 0.437; obesity: aOR 0.93, P = 0.677; and severe obesity: aOR 1.22, P = 0.580, with normal weight as the reference). CONCLUSION: Contrary to findings regarding older patients with sepsis, our findings suggest that the obesity paradox does not apply to younger adult patients with sepsis.

DECIPHERING GUT MICROBIOTA IN PATIENTS WITH SEVERE SEPSIS AND SEPTIC SHOCK.

ABSTRACT: Introduction: Gut microbiota dysbiosis is associated with susceptibility to sepsis and poor outcomes. However, changes to the intestinal microbiota during sepsis and their value as biomarkers are unclear. In this study, we compared the intestinal microbiota of patients with sepsis and healthy controls. Methods: Stool was collected from patients with sepsis (subdivided according to mortality) and controls. Microbiome diversity and composition were analyzed by 16S rRNA gene pyrosequencing. The α-diversity of the intestinal microbiome was determined using operational taxonomic unit counts and the Chao1, Shannon, and ACE indices. Adjusted Cox regression analyses assessed 6-month mortality risk factors. Results: Fifty-nine patients (14 in-hospital deaths) and 29 healthy controls were enrolled. Operational taxonomic unit counts and Chao1 and ACE indices were lower in the nonsurvivor than in the other groups. The controls showed a higher Shannon and lower Simpson index than did the sepsis group. The genus Blautia was more abundant in controls than in the sepsis group, and Faecalibacterium less abundant in the nonsurvivor than in the other groups. Regression analysis associated low Shannon index with 6-month mortality. Conclusions: Survivors of sepsis, nonsurvivors, and healthy controls have different gut microbiomes, and a low Shannon index is a risk factor for 6-month mortality.

Cumulative Incidence and Factors Associated With Subsequent Vertebral Compression Fractures: A Nationwide Population-based Study.

OBJECTIVE: Patients who experience vertebral compression fractures are vulnerable to subsequent vertebral compression fractures (SVCFs). The purpose of this nationwide population-based study was to determine the age-specific cumulative incidence and factors associated with SVCFs in South Korea. METHODS: Diagnostic codes, medical costs, and comorbid diseases in patients who had a vertebral compression fracture in 2011 and 2012 were collected from the National Health Insurance Service database of South Korea from 2007 to 2018. Demographic data, mortality rate, medical cost, and frequency of vertebroplasty or kyphoplasty were compared between patients with an initial fracture (IF) and those with a subsequent fracture (SF). RESULTS: The cumulative incidence of SVCFs over 4 years was 24.4% and increased rapidly within a few months after the IF. In 2011, SVCFs occurred in 17,004 patients, and the incidence rate per 100,000 people was 113.6 (84.9 in men vs. 138.5 in women). The odds ratio (OR) of SVCFs in units of 10 years was the highest in women in their 60s, at 2.89. However, in men in their 70s, the OR was the highest, at 2.51. The rates of vertebroplasty or kyphoplasty, medical expenses, and mortality rate were significantly higher in the SF group than in the IF group (P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The age-specific cumulative incidence of SVCFs per 100,000 people was 113.6. SVCFs were more frequent among women, the elderly, and patients who underwent vertebroplasty or kyphoplasty. Women in their 60s or above and men in their 70s or above were at highest risk.

Trends of age-related non-communicable diseases in people living with HIV and comparison with uninfected controls: A nationwide population-based study in South Korea.

OBJECTIVES: We aim to compare the trends of non-communicable diseases (NCDs) and death among people living with HIV (PLWH) and uninfected controls in South Korea. METHODS: We identified PLWH from a nationwide database of all Korean citizens enrolled from 1 January 2004 to 31 December 2016. A control cohort was randomly selected for PLWH by frequency matching for age and sex in a 20:1 ratio. To compare NCD trends between the groups, adjusted incidence rate ratios for outcomes across ages, calendar years and times after HIV diagnosis were calculated. RESULTS: We included 14 134 PLWH and 282 039 controls in this study; 58.5% of PLWH and 36.4% of the controls were diagnosed with at least one NCD. The incidence rates of cancers, chronic kidney disease, depression, osteoporosis, diabetes and dyslipidaemia were higher in PLWH than in the controls, whereas those of cardiovascular disease, heart failure, ischaemic stroke and hypertension were lower in PLWH. Relative risks (RRs) for NCDs in PLWH were higher than controls in younger age groups. Trends in the RRs of NCDs tended to increase with the calendar year for PLWH vs. controls and either stabilized or decreased with time after HIV diagnosis. The RR of death from PLWH has decreased with the calendar year, but showed a tendency to rise again after 2014 and was significant at the early stage of HIV diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS: Although the RR of each NCD in PLWH showed variable trends compared with that in controls, NCDs in PLWH have been increasingly prevalent.

Needle echogenicity in ultrasound-guided lumbar spine injections: a cadaveric study.

BACKGROUND: Echogenicity of regional anesthesia needles has been tested on different preclinical models; however, previous studies were done in an ideal experimental setting utilizing high-frequency insonation and superficially located targets. Because steep-angle deep injections are typically required for spinal and other chronic pain procedures, and low-frequency transducers are used, further feasibility study is warranted. OBJECTIVES: To determine effectiveness of steep-angle deep injections, typically required for spinal and other chronic pain procedures. STUDY DESIGN: Experimental laboratory study. SETTING: Willed Body Program, University of Washington. METHODS: In-plane lumbar spine procedures with 50° and 70° angles were performed on a human cadaver. The images and video clips of a non-echogenic (Quincke-type) and echogenic (SonoPlex, StimuQuick, and EchoStim) needle placements were presented to 3 blinded assessors who rated the needle visibility on a 4-point scale. The data was statistically analyzed to determine the differences in visibility between the needles with and without the digital image enhancement, and to compare the video clips to captured images. RESULTS: ANOVA analysis demonstrated that overall SonoPlex was significantly better (P = 0.02) than other needles. SonoPlex maintained its superiority in the subset of facet joint injections (P = 0.02), followed by Quincke-type, then the StimuQuik, and EchoStim needles. In deep procedures, EchoStim was comparable with SonoPlex (P = 0.03), and they both were better than the other 2 needles. The enhanced images received higher rates, with a 0.6 point mean improved rating (P = 0). LIMITATIONS: This study is limited by choice of needles, number of experiments performed, and potential postmortem changes of echogenicity. CONCLUSIONS: The SonoPlex needle appeared to have better echogenicity in this study. While non-echogenic Quincke-type needle visibility was adequate in superficial placements, it was limited in deep injections. An imaging enhancement is effective in improving needle visibility and should be used whenever possible.

Neuropathic pain.

Neuropathic pain is a clinical entity that presents unique diagnostic and therapeutic challenges. This chapter addresses the classification, epidemiology, pathophysiology, diagnosis, and treatment of neuropathic pain syndrome. Neuropathic pain can be distinguished from nociceptive pain based on clinical signs and symptoms. Although neuropathic pain presents a significant burden to individuals and society, a more accurate assessment of resource utilization, costs, and impairments associated with neuropathic pain would facilitate appropriate planning of healthcare policies. The underlying pathophysiology of neuropathic pain is not well defined. Several theories regarding the mechanism of neuropathic pain have been proposed, including central and peripheral nervous system sensitization, deafferentation, neurogenic inflammation, and the wind up theory. Neuropathic pain is a clinical diagnosis and requires a systematic approach to assessment, including a detailed history, physical examination, and appropriate diagnostic testing. The mainstay of treatment for neuropathic pain is pharmacological, including the use of antidepressants, antiepileptics, topical anesthetics, and opioids. Nonpharmacological treatments include psychological approaches, physical therapy, interventional therapy, spinal cord stimulation, and surgical procedures. Neuropathic pain is difficult to treat, but a combination of therapies may be more effective than monotherapy. Clinical practice guidelines provide an evidence-based approach to the treatment of neuropathic pain.