More evidence, greater generalization? The relation between the prevalence of observed action and the strength of generalization depends on action properties.

Although group members may be diverse and have their own reasons for actions, people tend to generalize the actions of known members to unknown cases from the observer's perspective. Nevertheless, it is unclear whether action generalization is entirely determined by statistical evidence or is additionally constrained by prior knowledge or beliefs toward group members' actions. Given that people specifically believe that group members pursue common action goals, we hypothesized that action generalization is constrained by this belief. Accordingly, the extent of generalizing a goal underlying action does not always increase as the prevalence of the goal increases; instead, a strict monotonicity effect is observed for the action's movement. We found that the common goal is generalized to a new group member only when all sampled group members have this target property, revealing that the relation between the prevalence of goals and the strength of their generalization violates strict monotonicity (Studies 1a and 1b). In contrast, the more group members perform the same movement, the more likely this movement is to be generalized to an unknown group member, showing monotonic generalization of movements (Studies 3a, 3b, and 3c). Importantly, these dissociative generalizations are specific to entitative social groups (Studies 2, 4, and 6) and not due to differences in experimental tasks between studies. In shared experimental paradigms, when the goal status is available, the monotonic generalization of actions is not found; however, when the goal status is unavailable and the movement is still accessed, the monotonic generalization of actions is observed (Study 5). Thus, our findings highlight that the belief that group members pursue a common goal constrains action generalization to a greater extent than statistical evidence. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).

Event-related potential and behavioural evidence of goal-based expectations for consistent actions among group members.

PLACEHOLDER TEXT: ABSTRACT: People expect group members to act consistently. However, because actions are organized hierarchically, incorporating deep-level goals and shallow-level movements, it remains unclear what level of action is expected to be consistent among group members. We determined that these two levels of action representations can be dissociated in object-directed actions and measured the late positive potential (LPP), which indicates expectation. We found that participants identified a new agent's actions more quickly when this agent pursued a consistent goal while moving in a manner inconsistent with group members than when this agent pursued an inconsistent goal while moving in the same manner as group members. Moreover, this facilitation effect disappeared when the new agent was from a different group, revealing goal-based expectations for consistent actions among group members. The LPP amplitude during the action-expectation phase was greater for agents from the same group than for agents from a different group, suggesting that people implicitly generate clearer action expectations for group members than for other individuals. Additionally, the behavioural facilitation effect was observed when the goal of actions was clearly identifiable (i.e. performing rational actions to reach an external target) rather than when there was no clear association between actions and external targets (i.e. performing irrational actions). The LPP amplitude during the action-expectation phase was greater after observing rational actions than after observing irrational actions performed by two agents from the same group, and the expectation-related increase in LPP predicted the behavioural measurements of the facilitation effect. Hence, the behavioural and event-related potential evidence suggest that people implicitly expect group members to behave consistently according to goals rather than movements per se.

The Severity of Cyberbullying Affects Bystander Intervention Among College Students: The Roles of Feelings of Responsibility and Empathy.

Background: Bystander intervention can protect victims from harm in cyberbullying. Previous studies have found that the severity of cyberbullying incidents is one of the important factors affecting decisions to intervene. However, little is known about the mediating and moderating mechanisms underlying this effect. Purpose: The current study explored the effect of the severity of cyberbullying incidents on bystander intention to intervene on social network sites (SNSs) among college students (Experiment 1), the mediating role of feelings of responsibility (Experiment 2) and the moderating role of empathy (Experiment 3). Patients and Methods: We presented cyberbullying incidents with different levels of severity through scenarios including fictive Weibo news reports and comments. Participants were exposed to a fictive cyberbullying incident and asked to complete a questionnaire including measures of the variables of interest. Results: Our results showed that the severity of incidents positively affected bystander intention to intervene through the mediation of feelings of responsibility. Empathy moderated the effect of incident severity on bystander intention to intervene. Conclusion: The results of the current study help to understand the behavior of bystanders in cyberbullying and they provide a practical reference for intervention in cyberbullying incidents.