Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Mais filtros








Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Diabet Med ; 37(4): 674-680, 2020 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31955458

RESUMO

AIMS: To determine whether the neonatal and delivery outcomes of gestational diabetes vary seasonally in the context of a relatively cool temperate climate. METHODS: A retrospect cohort of 23 735 women consecutively delivering singleton, live-born term infants in a single tertiary obstetrics centre in the UK (2004-2008) was identified. A total of 985 (4.1%) met the diagnostic criteria for gestational diabetes. Additive dynamic regression models, adjusted for maternal age, BMI, parity and ethnicity, were used to compare gestational diabetes incidence and outcomes over annual cycles. Outcomes included: random plasma glucose at booking; gestational diabetes diagnosis; birth weight centile; and delivery mode. RESULTS: The incidence of gestational diabetes varied by 30% from peak incidence (October births) to lowest incidence (March births; P=0.031). Ambient temperature at time of testing (28 weeks) was strongly positively associated with diagnosis (P<0.001). Significant seasonal variation was evident in birth weight in gestational diabetes-affected pregnancies (average 54th centile June to September; average 60th centile December to March; P=0.027). Emergency Caesarean rates also showed significant seasonal variation of up to 50% (P=0.038), which was closely temporally correlated with increased birth weights. CONCLUSIONS: There is substantial seasonal variation in gestational diabetes incidence and maternal-fetal outcomes, even in a relatively cool temperate climate. The highest average birth weight and greatest risk of emergency Caesarean delivery occurs in women delivering during the spring months. Recognizing seasonal variation in neonatal and delivery outcomes provides new opportunity for individualizing approaches to managing gestational diabetes.


Assuntos
Diabetes Gestacional/epidemiologia , Resultado da Gravidez/epidemiologia , Estações do Ano , Adulto , Peso ao Nascer/fisiologia , Cesárea/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos de Coortes , Feminino , Humanos , Incidência , Recém-Nascido , Doenças do Recém-Nascido/epidemiologia , Gravidez , Estudos Retrospectivos , Reino Unido/epidemiologia , Adulto Jovem
2.
J Perinatol ; 35(9): 695-9, 2015 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26067473

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To investigate risk factors predicting unplanned conversion to general anesthesia during elective cesarean section, and to examine maternal and fetal outcomes associated with unplanned conversion compared with other modes of anesthesia. STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective cohort at a UK center (2008 to 2013). Women (4337) underwent elective cesarean section. Delivery outcomes were compared according to anesthesia type using logistic regression. RESULT: Women (1.6%) underwent unplanned conversion to general anesthetic. Unplanned conversion was associated with higher parity (odds ratio (OR) 3.82, confidence interval (CI; (1.58 to 9.62)) and maternal age ⩾40 (OR 4.40, CI (1.08 to 29.88)). Compared with spinal anesthetic, unplanned conversion was associated with increased likelihood of maternal hemorrhage ⩾1.5 l (OR 5.74, CI (1.90 to 14.01)) and delayed neonatal respiration (OR 4.76, CI (1.76 to 11.05)). Adverse outcomes were not significantly more likely compared with planned general anesthetic. CONCLUSION: Higher parity and maternal age are risk factors for unplanned conversion to general anesthetic. There is no increase in the likelihood of adverse outcomes with unplanned versus planned general anesthetic.


Assuntos
Anestesia Geral , Perda Sanguínea Cirúrgica/estatística & dados numéricos , Cesárea , Complicações do Trabalho de Parto/epidemiologia , Planejamento de Assistência ao Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto , Anestesia Geral/métodos , Anestesia Geral/estatística & dados numéricos , Cesárea/efeitos adversos , Cesárea/métodos , Cesárea/estatística & dados numéricos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Eletivos/efeitos adversos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Eletivos/métodos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Eletivos/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Humanos , Incidência , Recém-Nascido , Idade Materna , Paridade , Gravidez , Resultado da Gravidez , Reino Unido/epidemiologia
4.
Int J STD AIDS ; 21(12): 823-5, 2010 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21297091

RESUMO

We surveyed the HIV-positive population attending a major teaching hospital sited outwith a major conurbation. Eighty-five percent of homosexually acquired infections were contracted within the UK and 91% of heterosexually acquired infections were contracted outside of the UK. A strikingly wide range of nationalities (45) and countries of origin of infection were represented within a relatively small patient population. Most patients were non-UK-born immigrants. A high proportion of illegal immigrants were identified within which there was a high proportion lost to follow-up. This degree of ethnic diversity and domiciliary instability is rarely a feature of non-HIV populations in this setting and imposes additional demands on delivery of care and health-care planning.


Assuntos
Etnicidade , Infecções por HIV/epidemiologia , Adolescente , Adulto , Emigrantes e Imigrantes , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Reino Unido/epidemiologia , Adulto Jovem
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA