Invasiveness of decompression surgery affects modeled lumbar spine kinetics in patients with degenerative spondylolisthesis.

Introduction: The surgical treatment of degenerative spondylolisthesis with accompanying spinal stenosis focuses mainly on decompression of the spinal canal with or without additional fusion by means of a dorsal spondylodesis. Currently, one main decision criterion for additional fusion is the presence of instability in flexion and extension X-rays. In cases of mild and stable spondylolisthesis, the optimal treatment remains a subject of ongoing debate. There exist different opinions on whether performing a fusion directly together with decompression has a potential benefit for patients or constitutes overtreatment. As X-ray images do not provide any information about internal biomechanical forces, computer simulation of individual patients might be a tool to gain a set of new decision criteria for those cases. Methods: To evaluate the biomechanical effects resulting from different decompression techniques, we developed a lumbar spine model using forward dynamic-based multibody simulation (FD_MBS). Preoperative CT data of 15 patients with degenerative spondylolisthesis at the level L4/L5 who underwent spinal decompression were identified retrospectively. Based on the segmented vertebrae, 15 individualized models were built. To establish a reference for comparison, we simulated a standardized flexion movement (intact) for each model. Subsequently, we performed virtual unilateral and bilateral interlaminar fenestration (uILF, bILF) and laminectomy (LAM) by removing the respective ligaments in each model. Afterward, the standardized flexion movement was simulated again for each case and decompression method, allowing us to compare the outcomes with the reference. This comprehensive approach enables us to assess the biomechanical implications of different surgical approaches and gain valuable insights into their effects on lumbar spine functionality. Results: Our findings reveal significant changes in the biomechanics of vertebrae and intervertebral discs (IVDs) as a result of different decompression techniques. As the invasiveness of decompression increases, the moment transmitted on the vertebrae significantly rises, following the sequence intact ➝ uILF ➝ bILF ➝ LAM. Conversely, we observed a reduction in anterior-posterior shear forces within the IVDs at the levels L3/L4 and L4/L5 following LAM. Conclusion: Our findings showed that it was feasible to forecast lumbar spine kinematics after three distinct decompression methods, which might be helpful in future clinical applications.

Determination of the translational and rotational stiffnesses of an L4-L5 functional spinal unit using a specimen-specific finite element model.

The knowledge of spinal kinematics is of paramount importance for many aspects of clinical application (i.e. diagnosis, treatment and surgical intervention) and for the development of new spinal implants. The aim of this study was to determine the translational and rotational stiffnesses of a functional spinal unit (FSU) L4-L5 using a specimen-specific finite element model. The results are needed as input data for three-dimensional (3D) multi-body musculoskeletal models in order to simulate vertebral motions and loading in the lumbar spine during daily activities. Within the modelling process, a technique to partition the constitutive members and to calibrate their mechanical properties for the complex model is presented. The material and geometrical non-linearities originating from the disc, the ligaments and the load transfer through the zygapophysial joints were considered. The FSU was subjected to pure moments and forces in the three anatomical planes. For each of the loading scenarios, with and without vertical and follower preload, the presented technique provides results in fair agreement with the literature. The novel representation of the nonlinear behaviour of the translational and rotational stiffness of the disc as a function of the displacement can be used directly as input data for multi-body models.

Replicating interbody device subsidence with lumbar vertebraesurrogates.

Bone surrogates are proposed alternatives to human cadaveric vertebrae for assessing interbody device subsidence. A synthetic vertebra with representations of cortices, endplates and cancellous bone was recently developed as an alternative surrogate to polyurethane foam blocks. The ability of the two surrogates to replicate subsidence has not been fully assessed, and was evaluated by indenting them with ring-shaped indenters and comparing their performance with human cadaveric vertebrae using qualitative characteristics and indentation metrics. The sensitivity of each surrogate to a centrally or peripherally placed indenter was of particular interest. Many indentation characteristics of the foam blocks were similar to those of human cadaveric vertebrae, except their insensitivity to centrally and peripherally placed indenters, owing to their homogeneous mechanical properties. This is distinctly different from the cadaveric vertebrae, where a peripherally placed indenter indented significantly less than a centrally placed indenter, because of endplates. By contrast, the synthetic vertebra was sensitive to peripherally placed indenters owing to its bi-material composition, including a thickened peripheral endplate. However, an overly strong synthetic endplate resulted in unrepresentative indentation shape and depth. Both surrogates produced similar results to human cadaveric vertebrae in certain respects, but neither is accurate enough in terms of material property distribution to model subsidence completely in human cadaveric vertebrae.