Differences in the MRI Signature and ADC Values of Diffuse Midline Gliomas with H3 K27M Mutation Compared to Midline Glioblastomas.

We conducted a two-center retrospective survey on standard MRI features including apparent diffusion coefficient mapping (ADC) of diffuse midline gliomas H3 K27M-mutant (DMG) compared to midline glioblastomas H3 K27M-wildtype (midGBM-H3wt). We identified 39 intracranial DMG and 18 midGBM-H3wt tumors. Samples were microscopically re-evaluated for microvascular proliferations and necrosis. Image analysis focused on location, peritumoral edema, degree of contrast enhancement and DWI features. Within DMG, MRI features between tumors with or without histomorphological GBM features were compared. DMG occurred in 15/39 samples from the thalamus (38%), in 23/39 samples from the brainstem (59%) and in 1/39 tumors involving primarily the cerebellum (2%). Edema was present in 3/39 DMG cases (8%) versus 78% in the control (midGBM-H3wt) group (p < 0.001). Contrast enhancement at the tumor rim was detected in 17/39 DMG (44%) versus 67% in control (p = 0.155), and necrosis in 24/39 (62%) versus 89% in control (p = 0.060). Strong contrast enhancement was observed in 15/39 DMG (38%) versus 56% in control (p = 0.262). Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) histogram analysis showed significantly higher skewness and kurtosis values in the DMG group compared to the controls (p = 0.0016/p = 0.002). Minimum relative ADC (rADC) values, as well as the 10th and 25th rADC-percentiles, were lower in DMGs with GBM features within the DMG group (p < 0.001/p = 0.012/p = 0.027). In conclusion, DMG cases exhibited markedly less edema than midGBM-H3wt, even if histomorphological malignancy was present. Histologically malignant DMGs and midGBM-H3wt more often displayed strong enhancement, as well as rim enhancement, than DMGs without histomorphological malignancy. DMGs showed higher skewness and kurtosis values on ADC-histogram analysis compared to midGBM-H3wt. Lower minimum rADC values in DMGs indicated malignant histomorphological features, likely representing a more complex tissue microstructure.

Diffuse midline gliomas, H3 K27M-mutant are associated with less peritumoral edema and contrast enhancement in comparison to glioblastomas, H3 K27M-wildtype of midline structures.

PURPOSE: The entity 'diffuse midline glioma, H3 K27M-mutant (DMG)' was introduced in the revised 4th edition of the 2016 WHO classification of brain tumors. However, there are only a few reports on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of these tumors. Thus, we conducted a retrospective survey focused on MRI features of DMG compared to midline glioblastomas H3 K27M-wildtype (mGBM-H3wt). METHODS: We identified 24 DMG cases and 19 mGBM-H3wt patients as controls. After being retrospectively evaluated for microscopic evidence of microvascular proliferations (MVP) and tumor necrosis by two experienced neuropathologists to identify the defining histological criteria of mGBM-H3wt, the samples were further analyzed by two experienced readers regarding imaging features such as shape, peritumoral edema and contrast enhancement. RESULTS: The DMG were found in the thalamus in 37.5% of cases (controls 63%), in the brainstem in 50% (vs. 32%) and spinal cord in 12.5% (vs. 5%). In MRI and considering MVP, DMG were found to be by far less likely to develop peritumoral edema (OR: 0.13; 95%-CL: 0.02-0.62) (p = 0.010). They, similarly, were associated with a significantly lower probability of developing strong contrast enhancement compared to mGBM-H3wt (OR: 0.10; 95%-CL: 0.02-0.47) (P = 0.003). CONCLUSION: Despite having highly variable imaging features, DMG exhibited markedly less edema and lower contrast enhancement in MRI compared to mGBM-H3wt. Of these features, the enhancement level was associated with evidence of MVP.

Demagnetization of cochlear implants and temperature changes in 3.0T MRI environment.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the level of demagnetization of the magnets and temperature changes in cochlear implants (Cis) in a 3.0 tesla (3.0T) MRI. STUDY DESIGN: Experimental. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Demagnetization and remagnetization measurements were done on magnets for different types of CIs. Temperature of different body and electrode sides was measured in the MRI environment. RESULTS: Demagnetization of the magnets of the CI is dependent on the angle between the magnetic field of the CI magnet and the MRI. When this angle was greater than 80 degrees, relevant demagnetization occurred and sufficient remagnetization was not possible with the 3.0T MRI magnet. Maximum temperature rise was 0.5 degrees C. CONCLUSIONS: Patients carrying CIs with non-removable magnets should not enter a 3.0T MRI device in a routine clinical setup. Under special conditions (angle between the two magnets less than 80 degrees) imaging in a 3.0T MRI may be possible without harming the patient or the implant.