Comparison of efficacy and usability of custom mandibular advancement devices fabricated with the conventional method and digital workflow: A pilot clinical study.

PURPOSE: To compare the effects of fabricating methods of custom monoblock mandibular advancement devices (MADs) on usability and efficacy in patients with mild and moderate obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Digitally fabricated custom MADs (dMADs) were produced for 11 OSA participants who had previously used conventionally fabricated custom MADs (cMADs). The participants answered a modified usability questionnaire for both MADs, and the average scores that were given to the questionnaire were evaluated by age, sex, and body mass index (BMI), and the scores of cMADs and dMADs were compared. After 6 months of usage of each MAD, the apnea-hypopnea index (AHI), mean and lowest oxygen saturations, and total sleep time were measured for efficacy assessment. Data were analyzed with Cronbach's alpha, Mann-Whitney U, Kruskal-Wallis, Wilcoxon signed-rank, one-way repeated measures analyses of variance, and Bonferroni tests (α = 0.05). RESULTS: Cronbach's alpha was found at 0.834 and 0.722 for the conventional and digital questionnaires, respectively. The usability scores of the dMADs were significantly higher than those of cMADs (p = 0.013). There was no difference in usability scores in terms of sex or BMI (p > 0.05). No statistically significant difference was found for cMAD (p = 0.113) among age groups; however, there was a significant difference for dMAD (p = 0.046). The AHI, mean, and lowest oxygen saturation values were significantly affected by MAD usage (p < 0.001). However, total sleep time values did not differ after the MAD treatments (p > 0.05). Significantly lower AHI and significantly higher lowest oxygen saturation values were observed with dMAD, while both appliances led to similar results for mean oxygen saturation and total sleep time values (p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Participant usability scores were higher for digitally manufactured MADs than conventionally manufactured MADs. However, both conventional and digital MADs were found effective in decreasing the AHI levels and increasing the mean and lowest oxygen saturation values of the participants.

Perception of color mismatch or conspicuous marginal adaptation in extraoral prostheses with eye-tracking.

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: Color matching and marginal integrity are major challenges when providing extraoral maxillofacial prostheses. Which of the color and marginal harmony features are more important for the extraoral prostheses to be inconspicuous is unclear. Studies on the perception of these prostheses with objective evaluation criteria are lacking. PURPOSE: The purpose of this observational study was to investigate the significance of color mismatch and conspicuous marginal adaptation in the perception of extraoral maxillofacial prostheses using eye-tracking technology. The secondary aim was to evaluate the perception of extraoral maxillofacial prostheses with regard to the observers' sex. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Twenty-seven face images, in 3 groups, representing well-fitting orbital prostheses with a color mismatch (IC), prostheses with a good color match but distinct marginal adaptation (IM), and symmetrical face images, were viewed for 5 seconds by 52 laypeople. Time to first fixation (TFF), fixation duration (FD), and fixation count (FC) at defined areas of interest were recorded and analyzed by an eye-tracking device. Because of the nested structure of data, a sex- and age-adjusted random intercept linear mixed effects model was used to assess the difference between IC, IM, and SI. Bonferroni corrected P values were used for pairwise comparisons. The difference between observers' sex was evaluated with random intercept mixed model by adjusting for age for each image. For repeated measurement analysis, the lm4, lmerTest, and emmeans libraries in R version 4.3.1 (R Foundation for Statistical Computing) were used (α=.05 for all tests). RESULTS: Significant differences were found between the symmetrical image group and other study groups at the facial prosthesis region in all parameters (each P<.001). Observers first focused on the facial prostheses in IC (0.72 seconds) and in IM (0.789 seconds). Longer fixation durations, 1.909, 1.989 seconds for IC and IM (PIC<.001, PIM<.001), respectively, and a higher fixation count for IC (5.28) (P<.001) and for IM (5.45) (P<.001) were recorded on facial prostheses compared with other areas of interest. Women were more focused on the prosthesis than men in the IC and IM groups considering FD (PIC=.003, PIM<.001) and FC values (PIC=.016, PIM<.001, PSI<.001). Fixation duration for women and men was 2.097 seconds and 1.739 seconds in the IC group, 2.219 seconds and 1.78 seconds in the IM group, and 1.364 seconds and 1.222 seconds in the SI group, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Since the color mismatch and distinct marginal adaptation of maxillofacial prostheses were recognized using eye-tracking technology, both features appeared to be equally significant to be considered in fabrication procedures.

Perception of orbital epitheses evaluated with eye tracker.

PURPOSE: Orbital epitheses replace a missing eyeball and surrounding soft tissue. Perception of epithesis in public gaze and the attention areas on the face are of interest. This study aimed to examine the differences in perception of orbital epitheses by prosthodontists, dentistry students, and laypeople with an objective evaluation tool that utilized eye-tracking technology. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-four frontal facial images of 12 patients who had orbital epitheses were viewed by 81 observers (prosthodontists, dentistry students, laypeople) in random order for 5 seconds each. Gaze data were analyzed. Kruskal-Wallis H test with Bonferroni correction was used to compare parameters in groups and areas of interest. RESULTS: First fixation duration at the mouth for symmetrical images were 0.30, 0.28, and 0.25 seconds for prosthodontists, students, and laypeople, respectively. Fixation duration at the mouth for the laypeople (0.27 second) was shorter than students (0.29 second) and prosthodontists (0.31 second) at symmetrical images. Time to the first fixation to epithesis, nose, and eye was significantly lower than the forehead and mouth for all groups. Fixation count at epithesis was 6.36 for prosthodontists, 5.64 for students, and 5.34 for laypeople. CONCLUSION: Eyes were of most significant interest for all observer groups in symmetrical images. Individuals dealing with dentistry, especially prosthodontists, paid more attention to the mouth region along with the eyes in symmetrical images, considering fixation duration and fixation count. Attention directed to epithesis by all groups was verified with objective and measurable criteria. Prosthodontists' attention to epithesis and mouth was evident considering the four parameters measured.

Design and fabrication of an interim fixed restoration with an open-source nondental CAD software program and additive manufacturing: A technical report.

This technique aimed to identify the potential of an open-source software program and to present the design and fabrication procedures of a single interim crown with a nondental CAD software program. The steps included defining the margins, establishing the cement interval value, completing the virtual modeling of the crown, and checking the proximal and occlusal contacts by using color mapping.