Diagnostic accuracy of quick SOFA score and inflammatory biomarkers for predicting community-onset bacteremia.

The potential use of quick SOFA (qSOFA) score and inflammatory biomarkers as bacteremia predictors is unelucidated. Herein the aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of the qSOFA score and biomarkers for predicting community-onset bacteremia. We enrolled adult outpatients with blood culture samples drawn between 2018 and 2020. Contamination, intensive care unit admission, and hemodialysis were excluded. We performed a case-control study, and analyzed 115 patients (58 with bacteremia and 57 without bacteremia). The positive likelihood ratio (LR) for bacteremia was 2.46 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.76-9.05) for a qSOFA score ≥ 2, and 4.07 (95% CI 1.92-9.58) for tachypnea (≥ 22/min). The highest performing biomarkers were procalcitonin (area under the curve [AUC] 0.80; 95% CI 0.72-0.88), followed by presepsin (AUC 0.69; 95% CI 0.60-0.79), and C-reactive protein (AUC 0.60; 95% CI 0.49-0.70). The estimated optimal cut-off value of procalcitonin was 0.377 ng/mL, with a sensitivity of 74.1%, a specificity of 73.7%, and a positive LR of 2.82. Presepsin was 407 pg/mL, with a sensitivity of 60.3%, a specificity of 75.4%, and a positive LR of 2.46. Procalcitonin was found to be a modestly useful biomarker for predicting non-severe community-onset bacteremia. Tachypnea (≥ 22/min) itself, rather than the qSOFA score, can be a diagnostic predictor. These predictors may aid decision-making regarding the collection of blood culture samples in the emergency department and outpatient clinics.

Quality Improvement of Blood Drawing Through Targeted Training Using an Operation Support System.

In order to reduce the rate of needle re-insertion (hereafter, retaking) during a blood drawing operation, we proposed a method for training blood drawing staff, based on data analysis. The method is composed of three steps: (1) analysis of collected data for selecting staff to be trained intensively, (2) training, and (3) assessment of training results. We obtained the result that the retaking rate was reduced for the trained staff.

Preoperative diagnosis of gastrointestinal stromal tumor by endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration.

AIM: To evaluate the role of endoscopic ultrasonography-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) in the preoperative diagnosis of gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST). METHODS: From September 2002 to June 2006, Fifty-three consecutive EUS-FNAs of GI tract subepithelial hypoechoic tumors with continuity to proper muscle layer suspected as GIST by standard EUS were evaluated prospectively. The reference standards for the final diagnosis were surgery (n = 31), or clinical follow-up (n=22). Additionally, immunophenotyping of specimens obtained by EUS-FNA and surgical resection specimens were compared. RESULTS: In 2 cases puncture was not performed because of anatomical problems. The collection rate of adequate specimens from the GI tract subepithelial hypoechoic tumor with continuity to proper muscle layer was 82% (42/51). The diagnostic rate for the tumor less than 2 cm, 2 to 4 cm, and 4 cm or more were 71% (15/21), 86% (18/21), and 100% (9/9), respectively. In 29 surgically resected cases, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and diagnostic accuracy of EUS-FNA using immunohistochemical analysis of GIST were 100% (24/24), 80% (4/5), 96% (24/25), 100% (4/4), and 97% (28/29), respectively. No major complications were encountered. CONCLUSION: EUS-FNA with immunohistochemical analysis is a safe and accurate method in the pretherapeutic diagnosis of GIST. It should be taken into consideration in decision making, especially in early diagnosis following minimal invasive surgery for GIST.