Longitudinal Assessment of Left Atrial Remodeling in Patients With Chronic Severe Aortic Regurgitation.

BACKGROUND: There are significant sex and age differences in left ventricular (LV) remodeling that may lead to disparity in outcomes when used to inform the timing of aortic regurgitation (AR) intervention. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to examine whether left atrial (LA) parameters might represent better criteria than LV parameters to inform the timing of AR intervention. METHODS: Using data on patients with moderate to severe or severe AR with serial echocardiography (2010-2016), the longitudinal trends in left atrial volume index (LAVI) and left atrial reservoir strain (LAr) were evaluated by sex and age. The incremental utility of these parameters in predicting adverse events over LV parameters was also determined. RESULTS: In 525 patients (25.7% women) with 1,687 echocardiograms over a median follow-up period of 2.0 years (Q1-Q3: 1.0-3.6 years), there was significant increase in LAVI (1.0 mL/m2 per year [95% CI: 0.76-1.2 mL/m2 per year]) and decrease in LAr (-1.3% per year [95% CI: -1.6% to -0.92%]), without a significant interaction by sex or age category (P for interaction ≥ 0.17). In addition, both LAVI and LAr were significant predictors of adverse events independent of LV parameters. The optimal discriminatory thresholds were 37 mL/m2 for LAVI and 35% for LAr. These thresholds were similar across categories of sex and age. Within the relatively short-term follow-up, surgery was associated with survival benefit among patients with LAVI ≥37 mL/m2 (HR: 0.33 [95% CI: 0.15-0.72]; P = 0.006) but was not statistically significant among patients with LAVI <37 mL/m2 (HR: 0.46 [95% CI: 0.18-1.17]; P = 0.09). Similarly, surgery was associated with survival for the subgroup with LAr ≤35% but not among those with LAr >35%. CONCLUSIONS: Unlike LV remodeling, LA remodeling demonstrates a similar rate of progression between categories of sex and age among patients with AR. In addition, LA parameters provide incremental prognostic value over LV parameters.

Carotid Duplex Ultrasonography to Assess Severity of Low-Flow Low-Gradient Aortic Stenosis.

BACKGROUND: Patients with low-flow, low-gradient aortic valve stenosis constitute a substantial subset of all severe aortic stenosis patients. However, assessment of true severity of these patients can be challenging. In this analysis, we study the utility of the common carotid artery waveforms to distinguish true from pseudo-severe low-flow low-gradient aortic stenosis. METHODS: This is an observational analysis that included patients who underwent a transthoracic echocardiogram (TTE) and duplex carotid ultrasonography (DCUS) and had low-flow, low-gradient aortic stenosis with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) on the index TTE (LVEF <50%, calculated aortic valve area [AVA] of ≤1.0 cm2, mean and peak gradient of <40 and <64 mm Hg, respectively, and stroke volume index <35 mL/m2). Patients were classified as pseudo-severe and true-severe aortic stenosis based on additional subsequent testing. Differences in various TTE and DCUS waveform parameters across the aortic valve and the common carotid artery were compared between the 2 groups. RESULTS: The study included 30 patients (60 carotid arteries). Fifteen patients were categorized as pseudo-severe and 15 as true severe aortic stenosis. There were no significant differences in calculated AVA, LVEF, stroke volume/stroke volume index, and Doppler Velocity Index in the 2 groups. Mean and peak gradient were higher in patients with true-severe aortic stenosis. Carotid acceleration time (cAT) was significantly prolonged in patients with true-severe compared with pseudo-severe aortic stenosis. A cAT ≥80 ms was 83.3% sensitive and 83.3% specific for true-severe aortic stenosis. CONCLUSION: cAT acceleration time may be used to distinguish true from pseudo-severe low-flow, low-gradient aortic valve stenosis.

Prognostic Utility of Left Atrial Strain to Predict Thrombotic Events and Mortality in Amyloid Cardiomyopathy.

BACKGROUND: There is currently no thromboembolic risk stratification tool for amyloid cardiomyopathy (ACM) and the current survival staging systems for ACM have only modest discriminatory ability. OBJECTIVES: This study aims to evaluate the prognostic value of left atrial (LA) strain to predict incident thrombotic event (TE) and improve survival staging systems in ACM. METHODS: The authors identified patients with light chain (AL) or transthyretin (ATTR) ACM and no history of atrial fibrillation (AF) at diagnosis. Three components of LA strain (reservoir, conduit, and contractile) were measured and their predictive value for TE and mortality was determined. In addition, the authors evaluated the incremental utility of adding LA strain to current prognostic staging systems. RESULTS: The authors included 448 patients (50.2% AL; 49.8% ATTR) with median follow-up of 3.8 years. There were 64 (14.3%) TE cases, 103 (23%) AF cases, and 234 (52.2%) deaths. Notably, 75% of TEs occurred without preceding AF documented. LA strain reservoir and LA contractile strain significantly predicted both events: HRs for TE were 2.22 (95% CI: 1.27-3.85; P = 0.006) and 2.63 (95% CI: 1.25-5.00; P = 0.01) per SD decrease in LA strain reservoir and LA contractile strain, respectively. The respective HRs for mortality were 1.32 (95% CI: 1.09-1.59; P < 0.001) and 1.49 (95% CI: 1.22-1.75; P < 0.001). Also, LA strain reservoir and LA contractile strain significantly improved the C-statistics of the Mayo AL staging from 0.65 to 0.68 and 0.70, respectively (P ≤ 0.02); Mayo ATTR staging (0.73 to 0.79 and 0.80, respectively; P < 0.001); and Gillmore ATTR staging (0.70 to 0.79 and 0.80, respectively; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: LA strain identifies ACM patients with high thrombotic risk (independent of AF) and improves current ACM-specific survival staging.

Impact of Age and Sex on Left Ventricular Remodeling in Patients With Aortic Regurgitation.

BACKGROUND: Current guidelines for aortic regurgitation (AR) recommend the same linear left ventricular (LV) dimension for intervention regardless of age and sex. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of age and sex on the degree of LV remodeling and outcomes. METHODS: We included consecutive patients with severe AR who were serially monitored by echocardiogram between 2010 and 2016. The 2 main endpoints were as follows: 1) LV end-systolic volume indexed to body surface area (LVESVi) and LV end-diastolic volume indexed to body surface area; and 2) adverse events (AE). We evaluated the longitudinal rate of LV remodeling and determined the association between LV volume and AE by age and sex. RESULTS: A total of 525 adult patients (26% women) with a median echocardiogram follow-up of 2.0 years (IQR: 1.0-3.6 years) were included. At baseline, older patients (age ≥60 years) had smaller LV volumes compared with younger patients (age <60 years), eg, the mean LVESVi was 27.3 mL/m2 vs 32.3 mL/m2, respectively. Similarly, women had smaller LV volumes compared with men (mean LVESVi was 23.3 mL/m2 vs 32.4 mL/m2). On serial evaluation, older patients and women maintained smaller LV volumes compared with younger patients and men, respectively. There were 210 (40%) AE during follow-up. The optimal discriminatory threshold for AE varies by age and sex, eg, the LVESVi threshold was highest for young men (50 mL/m2), intermediate for older men (35 mL/m2), and lowest for women (27 mL/m2). CONCLUSIONS: On serial evaluation, older patients and women with chronic AR maintained smaller LV volumes than younger patients and men, respectively, and develop AE at lower LV volumes.

Echo Doppler Parameters of Diastolic Function.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The purpose of this review is to highlight the echo Doppler parameters that form the cornerstone for the evaluation of diastolic function as per the guideline documents of the American Society of Echocardiography (ASE) and the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging (EACVI). In addition, the individual Doppler-based parameters will be explored, with commentary on the rationale behind their use and the multi-parametric approach to the assessment of diastolic dysfunction (DD) using echocardiography. RECENT FINDINGS: Previous guidelines for assessment of diastolic function are complex with modest diagnostic performance and significant inter-observer variability. The most recent guidelines have made the evaluation of DD more streamlined with excellent correlation with invasive measures of LV filling pressures. This is a review of the echo-derived Doppler parameters that are integral in the diagnosis and gradation of DD. A brief description of the physiological principles that govern changes in echocardiographic parameters during normal and abnormal diastolic function is also discussed for the appropriate diagnosis of DD using non-invasive Doppler echocardiography techniques.

Clinical outcomes and 30-day readmissions associated with high-output heart failure.

BACKGROUND: High-output heart failure (HOHF) is an underdiagnosed type of heart failure (HF) characterized by low systemic vascular resistance and high cardiac output. OBJECTIVE: This study sought to characterize the causes, mortality, and readmissions related to HOHF within the United States. METHODS: Data were collected from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality's Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP) National Readmissions Database (NRD) from January 1, 2017, to November 30, 2019. We used the International Classification of Diseases, 10th revision (ICD-10), diagnostic codes to identify encounters with HOHF and heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). RESULTS: Of the total 5,080,985 encounters with HF, 3,897 hospitalizations (mean age 62.5 ± 17.9 years, 56.5% females) with HOHF and 5,077,088 hospitalizations with HFrEF were recorded. The most commonly associated putative etiologies of HOHF included pulmonary disease (19.8%), morbid obesity (9.9%), sepsis (9.6%), cirrhosis (8.9%), myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) (7.9%), hyperthyroidism (5.5%), and sickle cell disease (3.3%). There was no significant difference in mortality rates [4.3% vs. 5.2%; odds ratio (OR) 0.9, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.7-1.2] between HOHF and HFrEF. However, the 30-day readmission rate for HOHF was significantly lower than that for HFrEF (5.7% vs. 21.2%; OR 0.39, 95% CI 0.30-0.51). Cardiovascular (39.9%) followed by hematological (20.6%) complications accounted for the majority of 30-day readmissions in the HOHF group. CONCLUSIONS: HOHF is an infrequently reported cardiovascular complication associated with noncardiovascular disorders and is encountered in 0.07% of all encounters with HF. Although comparable in-hospital mortality between studied cohorts was observed, raising awareness and timely recognition of this entity are warranted.

Quantitative Echocardiographic Assessment and Optimal Criteria for Early Intervention in Asymptomatic Tricuspid Regurgitation.

BACKGROUND: Significant tricuspid regurgitation (TR) is associated with poor outcome and high operative mortality resulting from late presentation. Yet, the optimal timing for intervention is unknown. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the prognostic value of echocardiographic parameters to inform early intervention in asymptomatic TR. METHODS: Using the Cleveland Clinic echocardiography database 2004 to 2018, the authors identified a consecutive cohort of asymptomatic patients with moderate to severe (3+) or severe (4+) TR. Quantitative TR and right heart parameters were retrospectively determined, and their prognostic utility for all-cause mortality was assessed. RESULTS: In 325 asymptomatic patients (mean age: 67.9 years; 79.4% female) with at least 3+ TR, there were 132 deaths (40.6%), with a median survival time of 9.9 years (95% CI: 7.9-12.7 years). By contrast, the median survival time in an age- and sex-matched cohort of symptomatic TR patients was 4.4 years (95% CI: 2.8-5.9 years). Among all the echocardiographic parameters evaluated, right ventricle free wall strain (RVFWS) and tricuspid regurgitant volume (RVol) were the strongest predictors of mortality in asymptomatic TR. The optimal discriminatory thresholds for these parameters were RVFWS <-19% and RVol >45 mL. The 5-year survival rates by number of risk factors (RF) were 93% (95% CI: 86%-96%), 65% (95% CI: 55%-74%), and 38% (95% CI: 26%-49%) for no RF, 1 RF, and both RFs, respectively. Compared with symptomatic TR, mortality was lower for asymptomatic TR with no RF (HR: 0.10; 95% CI: 0.04-0.29) or 1 RF (HR: 0.29; 95% CI: 0.14-0.58), but similar for asymptomatic TR with both RFs (HR: 1.11; 95% CI: 0.56-2.19). CONCLUSIONS: RVFWS and RVol are key prognostic markers that can be serially monitored to inform optimal timing of intervention for severe asymptomatic TR.

Impact of chronic kidney disease on in-hospital mortality and clinical outcomes of catheter ablation of ventricular tachycardia: Insights from the national readmission database.

BACKGROUND: Catheter ablation is an effective treatment for ventricular tachycardia (VT), albeit the decision to undergo this procedure is often influenced by underlying comorbidities. The present study aims at evaluating the effects of chronic kidney disease (CKD) on clinical outcomes of VT ablation. METHODS: We identified 7212 patients who presented between 2016 and 2018 and underwent catheter ablation for VT. Their clinical data were retrospectively accrued from the national readmission database (NRD) using the corresponding diagnosis codes. We compared clinical outcomes between patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD group) and patients without. Odds ratios (OR) for the primary and secondary outcomes were calculated, and multivariable regression analysis was utilized to adjust for confounding variables. RESULTS: Compared with patients without CKD, patients in CKD group were older (mean age 67.9 vs. 60.5 years, P < 0.01), had a longer mean length of stay (8.73 vs. 5.69 days, P < 0.01), and higher in-hospital mortality 113 (6.7%) vs. 119 (2.2%) (OR 2.24, 95% confidence interval (CI) (1.29-3.88), P < 0.01). CKD group patients had increased risk of developing acute kidney injury 726 (43%) vs. 623 (11.3%) (3.69 95% CI (2.87-4.74), P < 0.01). CONCLUSION: In patients with CKD, VT ablation is associated with worse clinical outcomes in-hospital mortality, acute kidney injury, mean length of stay, and total hospital charge. This significantly influences the decision-making prior to performing this procedure.

Incremental Utility of 3D Printing to Guide the Surgical Management of Apical Aneurysm.

A 24-year-old man presented with a nonischemic cardiomyopathy of unknown etiology, apical aneurysm, and a secondary mitral regurgitation. Computer tomography-derived 3-dimensional model of the patient's heart was an essential step in guiding the surgical management for an optimal outcome. (Level of Difficulty: Advanced.).

Trends and Outcomes of Patients With Amyloid Cardiomyopathy Listed for Heart Transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Heart transplantation in patients with amyloid cardiomyopathy (ACM) has been historically underused owing to the risk of amyloid recurrence. METHODS: Using data from the United Network for Organ Sharing database on patients listed for single-organ heart transplant between 2010 and 2019, we evaluated trend in heart transplant and compared waitlist mortality and graft survival between patients with ACM and dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM). Also, we evaluated for independent predictors of outcomes. RESULTS: Over the study period, 411 adult patients with ACM were added to the heart transplant waitlist. In the propensity-matched cohorts, the rates of waitlist mortality were significantly higher for ACM compared with DCM (hazard ratio [HR], 1.75; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.16-2.65). Over the study period, 330 patients with ACM underwent heart transplant. The number of transplants increased from 22 in 2010 to 59 in 2019 (168% increase). The 5-year graft survival rate was, however, significantly worse for ACM (78%) compared with DCM (82%) (HR,1.46, 1.03-2.08). We identified 2 predictors of graft failure among patients with ACM: namely, renal failure requiring dialysis (HR, 5.4, 1.6-17) and previous history of malignancy (HR, 1.6, 1.0-28). Patients with ACM with neither risk factor had 5-year graft survivals of 82%, which is comparable with DCM (HR, 1.28, 0.90-1.91). On the other hand, patients with ACM and either risk factor had worse 5-year graft survivals of 62% (HR, 2.44, 1.39-4.28). CONCLUSIONS: Increasing numbers of patients with ACM are undergoing heart transplants. Although patients with ACM experience higher waitlist mortality and worse graft survival compared with DCM, selecting carefully screened ACM patients may result in improved outcomes following heart transplant.