Tumor type M2 pyruvate kinase expression in advanced breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: Recently, a high validity correlation of the tumor M2 pyruvate kinase (Tu M2-PK) isoenzyme in comparison to standard tumor markers has been demonstrated in solid tumors. We investigated this marker in 67 patients with advanced breast cancer (ABC) in comparison to healthy controls. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Plasma Tu M2-PK was measured using an ELISA assay (ScheBo Tech, Giessen, Germany) while serum CA27.29 was determined using a chemiluminescent immunoassay (Bayer Diagnostics, Tarrytown, USA). RESULTS: In a ROC analysis, the cut-off to discriminate patients from controls was established at 15 U/ml for Tu M2-PK (specificity 85%; positive predictive value 81%) and 30 U/ml for CA27.29 (specificity 91%; positive predictive value 92%). Median ABC baseline levels (ranges) in patients with ABC for Tu M2-PK and CA27.29 were 12.8 U/ml (4.8-252,495) and 130 U/ml (13.3-8130), respectively. Response assessment was done in 45 chemotherapy courses of 38 pts. In 13 out of 19 blocks (68.4%) with PD (progressive disease), an elevated level of Tu M2-PK at baseline or in the follow-up was found. In 17 out of 20 blocks (85%) with SD (stable disease), the Tu M2-PK level was normal at baseline or normalised within 4 weeks of treatment. All 6 patients with disease remission had a normal baseline Tu M2-PK level or the levels decreased promptly. CONCLUSION: Tu M2-PK gives additional information about ABC, indicating disease activity and sensitivity to chemotherapy while CA27.29 reflects tumor burden.

A comparison of bone-related biomarkers and CA27.29 to assess response to treatment of osseous metastatic breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: The assessment of bone metastases by clinical examination or imaging techniques is still considered unreliable. We compared a specific marker of bone resorption, urinary deoxypyridinoline (DPD)-crosslinks, with serum calcium (Ca), alkaline phosphatase (AP) and CA27.29, to evaluate the status of bone metastases in patients with breast cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Second morning voided urine was collected from 2 groups of patient (pts), those without evidence of disease (n = 118), and those with bone metastases (n = 85) under specific therapy plus pamidronate. DPD and CA27.29 were measured on the automated ACS180 system (Bayer Diagnostics, Tarrytown, NY, USA). Receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curves were established for each of the 4 biomarkers to determine whether they could distinguish the 2 subsets of pts with clinically sufficient validity, and to establish the corresponding cut-off values. RESULTS: Neither Ca nor AP was useful in discriminating the 2 subgroups. At a DPD cut-off of 13 nmol/mmol, we found a specificity of 69% and a sensitivity of 53% for diagnosing bone metastases. Best results, however, were seen for CA27.29. A cut-off value of 30 U/ml resulted in a specificity of 62% and a sensitivity of 81%. CONCLUSIONS: CA27.29 was the best parameter for the discrimination of stage IV breast cancer with bone metastases. The primary advantage of DPD lies in the monitoring of bone metastases under specific therapy.

Gemcitabine plus dose-escalated epirubicin in advanced breast cancer: results of a phase I study.

Gemcitabine has shown single-agent activity in metastatic breast cancer. Epirubicin is also widely used for the adjuvant and treatment of metastatic breast cancer. The toxicity profiles and modes of action are different which provides a good rationale for studying both drugs in combination. In a phase I study gemcitabine at a fixed dose of 1000 mg/m2 on days 1, 8, 15 of a 28 day cycle was combined with escalated weekly doses of epirubicin starting with an initial dose of 10 mg/m2. Patients had stage IV metastatic disease without previous chemotherapy except as adjuvant treatment. Nineteen patients were included in the study which defined the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of epirubicin at 20 mg/m2. Myelosuppression was the dose limiting toxicity with leucopenia WHO grade 3 and 4 in 40.0% and 20.0%, neutropenia WHO grade 3 and 4 without neutropenic fever in 20.0% and 40.0% and thrombocytopenia WHO grade 4 in 20.0%. At the epirubicin 15 mg/m2 dose level, leucopenia (11.1% WHO grade 3) and neutropenia (12.5 and 37.5% WHO grade 3 and 4) were reported. Symptomatic toxicity was generally mild: nausea/vomiting in about 20% of patients (WHO grade 3 or 4) on both 15 and 20 mg/m2 epirubicin dose levels. Alopecia WHO grade 3 and 4 was seen in 2 patients at MTD. Four of 19 evaluable patients had a partial response. We conclude that the combination of gemcitabine and epirubicin is well tolerated and has promising activity. A phase II study is underway with gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 and epirubicin 15 mg/m2 on days 1, 8 and 15 of a 28 day cycle.

Gemcitabine for palliative treatment in metastatic breast cancer.

Gemcitabine is one of the recently developed drugs with a high efficacy in various malignant tumours and a mild toxicity profile. As monochemotherapy in metastatic breast cancer, gemcitabine yielded response rates up to 46% as first- and second-line treatment. Neutropenia is the clinically most relevant unwanted effect. Haematological and nonhaematological toxicities are mild, making dose reductions, delays of treatment or withdrawal from treatment very rare. The first phase I and phase II studies of gemcitabine in combination with anthracyclines have shown a good toxicity profile and promising remission rates. Phase I experiences with long-time infusion schedules reveal good feasibility and high patient acceptance.

Quality monitoring, standardized documentation and management with a computerized system in oncology.

Within the last years the prerequisite was prepared to develop a computerized tumor--patient documentation system including quality monitoring and oncological therapy recommendations for every day use. In medicine today, there is an increasing need for quality oriented low cost and transparent management--what is especially true in the field of oncology. The German Federal Authority of Health demands the documentation of all tumor disorders for the establishment of an cancer registry. For these reasons our study group established the program "OncoDoc" in cooperation with the laboratory for Artificial Intelligence of the University Bremen.