Point-of-care ultrasonography for the management of shoulder dislocation in ED.

OBJECTIVE: Point-of-care ultrasonography (POCUS) is an easily available and noninvasive tool without radiation exposure that is also gaining a broad range of use in emergency departments. The aim of this study is to evaluate the value of POCUS in the diagnosis of shoulder dislocation by comparing with plain radiography. METHODS: This prospective observational study with a convenience sampling was conducted in emergency departments of 2 hospitals. Patients older than 15 years with possible shoulder dislocation during the physical examination composed the study population. All the study patients underwent POCUS evaluation to detect a shoulder dislocation or fracture before radiography, and the POCUS procedure was also achieved after the reduction attempt. RESULTS: A total of 103 patients were enrolled in the study. The mean age of study subjects was 33.9±15 years, and 80.6% (n=83) of them were male. The sensitivity and specificity of POCUS in identifying dislocation were 100% (95% confidence interval [CI], 96%-100%) and 100% (95% CI, 48%-100%), respectively. POCUS also confirmed reduction in 93 of 94 patients with a specificity of 100% (95% CI, 96%-100%). POCUS has a sensitivity of 100% (95% CI, 63%-100%) for excluding a shoulder fracture but a specificity of 84.2% (95% CI, 75%-91%). CONCLUSION: Point-of-care ultrasonography is an effective tool to either rule in or rule out shoulder dislocation in the emergency setting. Furthermore, it is a robust sensitive tool for excluding fractures but with false-positive results.

Anterior Shoulder Dislocations in Busy Emergency Departments: The External Rotation Without Sedation and Analgesia (ERWOSA) Method May Be the First Choice for Reduction.

Shoulder joint is the most common joint requiring reduction by emergency physicians. Successful reduction is based on the overcoming of resistance of the shoulder muscles. Pain is the most important factor in resistance increase and sedation; analgesia and, in certain cases, intra-articular anesthesia are preferred for reduction. The external rotation (ER) method can provide successful reduction without causing an increase in muscle resistance if applied slowly and gently. The aim of this study was, therefore, to determine the usefulness of the ERWOSA method in the reduction of acute anterior shoulder dislocations (AASDs).This was a retrospective descriptive study. The records of patients admitted to the emergency department with anterior shoulder dislocation between 2009 and 2011 were reviewed for demographic data, sedation, analgesia, and discharge times. Patients were then divided into ERWOSA (n = 80) and external rotation and sedation-analgesia (ERASA, n = 59) groups, with regard to the application of SA (sedation-analgesia). The study data were analyzed using SPSS version 22.0 software for Windows. Numerical data were presented as mean ± standard deviation and categorical data as rates.A total of 139 patients were included in the study. The patients' average age was 35 ± 14 years, 108 (77.7%) were male. Successful reduction rates for 59 male and 21 female patients in the ERWOSA group were 83% and 66.7% (78.7% total success), respectively. Successful reduction rates for 49 male and 10 female patients in the ERASA group were 87.7% and 90% (88.1% total success), respectively. The length of stay of the ERWOSA and ERASA groups in emergency services were found to be significantly different, with 55 ± 17 and 118 ± 23 minutes for each group, respectively. There were no complications.The ER method can be used in reduction of anterior shoulder dislocations without sedation and analgesia, if applied slowly enough to overcome the resistance of shoulder muscles. The ERWOSA method causes both a significant decrease in the length of stay of patients in the emergency department results in negating the possibility of adverse drug effects. In busy emergency departments, male patients with anterior shoulder dislocation are particularly suitable candidates for ERWOSA.

Inflight Emergencies During Eurasian Flights.

BACKGROUND: This study evaluated the incidence and status of urgent medical conditions, the attitudes of health professionals who encounter such conditions, the adequacy of medical kits and training of cabin crew in data-received-company aircrafts suggested by Aerospace Medical Association, and the demographic data of patients. METHODS: Data were collected from medical records of a major flight company from 2011 through 2013. All patients with complete records were included in the study. Numerical variables were defined as median and interquartiles (IQR) for median, while categorical variables were defined as numbers and percentage. RESULTS: During the study period, 10,100,000 passengers were carried by the company flights, with 1,312 (0.013%) demands for urgent medical support (UMS). The median age of the passengers who requested UMS was 45 years (IQR: 29-62). Females constituted 698 (53.2%) among the patients, and 721 (55%) patients were evaluated by medical professionals found among passengers. The most common nontraumatic complaints resulting in requests for UMS were flight anxiety (311 patients, 23.7%) and dyspnea (145 patients, 11%). The most common traumatic complaint was burns (221 patients, 16.8%) resulting from trauma during flight. A total of 22 (1.67%) emergency landings occurred for which the most frequent reasons were epilepsy (22.7%) and death (18.2%). Deaths during flights were recorded in 13 patients, whose median age was 77 years (IQR: 69-82), which was significantly higher compared to the age of patients requiring UMS (p < 0.0001). A total of 592 (45%) patients did not require any treatment for UMS. Medical kits and training were found to be sufficient according to the symptomatic treatments. CONCLUSION: Most of the urgent cases encountered during flights can be facilitated with basic medical support. "Traumatic emergency procedures inflight medical care" would be useful for additional training. Medical professionals as passengers are significantly involved in encountered emergency situations. Adding automated external defibrillator and pulse oximetry to recommended kits and training can help facilitate staff decisions such as emergency landings and tele-assistance.