Rationalising pre-operative trauma bloods can lead to significant cost savings.

BACKGROUND: A full set of pre-operative bloods is being done on nearly all trauma patients who are admitted to our institute for surgery-regardless of variables such as patient age, injury sustained, or co-morbidities. This leads to unnecessary bloods being taken. AIMS: The primary aims are (1) to calculate the costs associated with routine pre-operative bloods and (2) to examine how much money could be saved by retrospectively applying a more pragmatic pre-operative bloods policy. METHODS: Trauma theatre cases over a 5-week period were identified with their pre-operative bloods and post-operative transfusions. Labour, material, and processing costs were estimated for each test. An updated pre-operative blood schedule was proposed and applied retrospectively to see if cost savings could be found. RESULTS: Of the 173 orthopaedic procedures performed, 109 (63%) had a group and screen or crossmatch pre-operatively. Fifteen (8.6%) required a post-operative blood transfusion. One hundred and twenty-eight (74%) patients had a full blood count, and renal profile taken pre-operatively. A full set of bloods costs approximately €51.23 to take and process. When the updated pre-operative blood guidelines were retrospectively applied, it would have led to cost savings of €2496 over the 5-week period of this audit, and if extrapolated up to 1 year, could lead to potential annual savings of €25,960. CONCLUSIONS: We have demonstrated that an excessive amount of unnecessary pre-operative bloods have been taken using the current blood schedule. A pragmatic pre-operative blood schedule can lead to significant actual cost savings.

Assessing outcomes in hip fracture patients under the age of 60.

BACKGROUND: Hip fractures are a common and serious orthopaedic injury. The principle of treatment for hip fractures in the "non-elderly" patient is to preserve the native hip. There is limited published literature in this area. AIM: The aim of this research is to review all of the "non-elderly" hip fracture patients to report on the demographics, fracture patterns, fixation types, and revisions. METHODS: This was a retrospective single-site review of all of the "non-elderly" patients who underwent operative management for hip fractures between 1999 and 2019. A manual review was done of all of the x-rays for the identified patients to confirm the fracture type and identify further surgeries. RESULTS: Three hundred and eighty-one patients were identified. The average age was 48.4 years old. Two hundred and thirty nine of them were intra-capsular, and 142 of them were extra-capsular fractures. Dynamic hip screw (DHS) was the most popular fixation method. In the recent decade of data, the number of hemi-arthroplasties remained consistent, but the number of total hip arthroplasties (THAs) performed increased sevenfold. Mean follow-up was 35 months. Forty-three (11%) patients required follow-up surgery. Non-union accounted for 56% of all revisions and avascular necrosis for 19%. THA was performed in 70% of all revisions. CONCLUSION: DHS remains the most widely used fixation technique in an effort to preserve the native hip. The use of THA has increased and surpassed the usage of hemi-arthroplasty in recent times. A high proportion of these patients will go on to develop complications requiring secondary surgery; therefore, they all need long-term follow-up.