Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 6 de 6
Filtrar
1.
Curr Rheumatol Rev ; 2024 Apr 30.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38693734

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To provide evidence-based clinical practice recommendations for managing Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) in Saudi Arabia. METHODS: This EULAR-adapted national guideline in which a multidisciplinary task force utilized the modified Delphi method to develop 31 clinical key questions. A systematic literature review was conducted to update the evidence since the EULAR publication. After reaching a consensus agreement, two rounds of voting and group discussion were conducted to generate consolidated recommendations/statements. RESULTS: A significant number of patients in Saudi Arabia experience delays in accessing rheumatologists, highlighting the significance of timely referral to SLE specialists or rheumatologists to ensure accurate diagnosis and prompt treatment. The primary goal of Glucocorticoid (GC) therapy in SLE patients is to establish disease control with a minimum dose and duration. Steroid-sparing agent utilization facilitates steroid-sparing goals. Hydroxychloroquine is recommended for all SLE patients, though physicians must carefully monitor toxicity and prioritize regular medication adherence assessment. SLE management during pregnancy starts from preconception time by assessing disease activity, major organ involvement, hypercoagulability status, and concomitant diseases that may negatively impact maternal and fetal outcomes. Multidisciplinary care with close monitoring may optimize both maternal and fetal outcomes. For patients with antiphospholipid antibodies, low-dose aspirin prophylaxis is recommended. Also, Long-term anticoagulant medications are fundamental to prevent secondary antiphospholipid syndrome due to high thrombosis recurrence. CONCLUSION: This Saudi National Clinical Practice guidelines for SLE management provide evidence-based recommendations and guidance for healthcare providers in Saudi Arabia who are managing patients with SLE. These guidelines will help to standardize healthcare service, improve provider education, and perhaps lead to better treatment outcomes for SLE patients.

2.
Clin Rheumatol ; 43(3): 879-894, 2024 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38217738

RESUMO

Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is a complex inflammatory disease characterized by musculoskeletal and non-musculoskeletal manifestations. It is a distinct disease entity at the interface between rheumatology and dermatology, making it challenging to manage. The diverse clinical presentation and severity of PsA require a multidisciplinary approach for optimal care. Early diagnosis and management are necessary to improving quality of life for patients. In Saudi Arabia, there is currently no unified national consensus on the best practices for managing PsA. This lack of consensus leads to debate and uncertainty in the treatment of the disease, resulting in over or under prescribing of biological agents. To address this issue, a multidisciplinary work group was formed by the Saudi Ministry of Health. This group, consisting of dermatologists, rheumatologists, and pharmacists, aimed to develop evidence-based consensus recommendations for he use and monitoring of biological therapy in PsA management. The work group conducted five consensus workshops between December 2021 to March 2022. Using the nominal group technique, they discussed various aspects of PsA management, including eligibility criteria for biological treatment, monitoring of disease activity, treatment goals, screening, precautions, and management of PsA with biologic therapies. The group also considered special considerations for patients with comorbidities, pregnant and lactating women, as well as pediatric and adolescent populations. The resulting consensus document provides recommendations that are applicable to the Saudi setting, taking into account international guidelines and the specific needs of PsA patients in the country. The consensus document will be regularly updated to incorporate new data and therapeutic agents as they become available. Key Points • In Saudi Arabia, there is a lack of unified national consensus on the optimal management of PsA, therefore, this article aims to provide up-to-date evidence-based consensus recommendations for the optimal use and monitoring of biologic therapy in the management of PsA in Saudi Arabia. • The consensus development process was undertaken by a multidisciplinary work group of 13 experts, including two dermatologists, six rheumatologists, and five pharmacists. • There is more than one disease activity tool used in PsA disease, depending on the disease domain - peripheral arthritis Disease Activity Index in Psoriatic Arthritis (DAPSA) or Minimal Disease Activity (MDA), axial PsA Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score (ASDAS), and dactylitis and enthesitis MDA. • The main goal of therapy in all patients with PsA is to achieve the target of remission, or alternatively, low disease activity in all disease domains and improve quality of life (QoL).


Assuntos
Artrite Psoriásica , Masculino , Humanos , Feminino , Criança , Adolescente , Artrite Psoriásica/diagnóstico , Artrite Psoriásica/tratamento farmacológico , Consenso , Qualidade de Vida , Lactação , Arábia Saudita
3.
Cureus ; 13(10): e18858, 2021 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34804711

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: This study sought to evaluate the main causes of hospitalization of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) in a tertiary health center in Saudi Arabia. METHODS: A retrospective observational study was performed for all the SLE patients admitted to King Saud Medical City between 2016 and 2019. The primary reason for hospitalization was determined by the primary physician caring for the patient at the time of admission. RESULTS: Of the 98 hospitalizations for SLE, 49% of patients were admitted from the emergency department (ED) and 51% from the rheumatology clinic. The most common reason for hospitalization was lupus flare (68.4%) followed by infection (20.4%). The lupus flare patients commonly presented with musculoskeletal (MSK)symptoms (34.6%), renal manifestations (25.5%), and skin rash (24.5%), whereas patients admitted with infection were commonly diagnosed with community-acquired pneumonia (12.2%). Other hospitalization causes were obstetric complications, adverse drug reactions, and thrombosis. Intensive care unit (ICU) admission was necessary for 7% of patients due to acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) and pulmonary hemorrhage (28.6%) or other reasons (14.1%), such as pleural effusion, cardiac tamponade, and thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP). Conclusions: The two most common reasons for SLE hospitalization were lupus flare and infection. Lupus flare was mainly due to MSK, renal, and dermatologic manifestations. The most common infection leading to hospitalization was community-acquired pneumonia, and ICU admission was mainly due to ARDS and pulmonary hemorrhage.

4.
BMJ Case Rep ; 14(1)2021 Jan 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33431530

RESUMO

Granulomatosis with polyangiitis (GPA) is a necrotising vasculitis of unknown cause that has several systemic manifestations. The disease is characterised by the classical triad involving acute inflammation of the upper and lower respiratory tracts with renal involvement. However, the disease pathology can involve the central nervous system. This case report presents a case of GPA with facial nerve palsy as the first manifestation of the disease, which has been rarely reported in the medical literature.


Assuntos
Paralisia Facial/etiologia , Granulomatose com Poliangiite/diagnóstico , Perfuração do Septo Nasal/etiologia , Convulsões/etiologia , Adolescente , Anticorpos Anticitoplasma de Neutrófilos/sangue , Encéfalo/diagnóstico por imagem , Ciclofosfamida/administração & dosagem , Paralisia Facial/sangue , Paralisia Facial/diagnóstico , Paralisia Facial/terapia , Feminino , Granulomatose com Poliangiite/sangue , Granulomatose com Poliangiite/complicações , Granulomatose com Poliangiite/terapia , Humanos , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética , Metilprednisolona/administração & dosagem , Perfuração do Septo Nasal/diagnóstico , Septo Nasal/diagnóstico por imagem , Seios Paranasais/diagnóstico por imagem , Plasmaferese , Pulsoterapia , Convulsões/sangue , Convulsões/diagnóstico , Convulsões/terapia , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X
5.
Can J Infect Dis Med Microbiol ; 2016: 7270413, 2016.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27366177

RESUMO

Rat bite fever is rare in Western countries. It can be very difficult to diagnose as blood cultures are typically negative and a history of rodent exposure is often missed. Unless a high index of suspicion is maintained, the associated polyarthritis can be mistaken for rheumatoid arthritis. We report a case of culture-positive rat bite fever in a 46-year-old female presenting with fever and polyarthritis. The clinical presentation mimicked rheumatoid arthritis. Infection was complicated by discitis, a rare manifestation. We discuss the diagnosis and management of this rare zoonotic infection. We also review nine reported cases of rat bite fever, all of which had an initial presumptive diagnosis of a rheumatological disorder. Rat bite fever is a potentially curable infection but can have a lethal course if left untreated.

6.
Semin Arthritis Rheum ; 44(2): 155-61, 2014 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24909809

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: Ankylosing spondylitis (AS) is a chronic inflammatory disease associated with an increased risk of osteoporosis and fractures. TNF inhibitors have been used to treat AS, but their effect on bone is unclear. Thus, we conducted a meta-analysis to study the effect of TNF inhibitors on spine and hip BMD in patients with AS. METHODS: Two authors independently searched MEDLINE and PubMed for longitudinal studies that had assessed the effect of TNF inhibitors on BMD in patients with AS. Studies with a minimum follow-up period of 1 year were included. RESULTS: Seven longitudinal studies and one randomized control trial were included, with a total of 568 AS patients (mean age range of 36-48 years and disease duration of 9-17 years). Lumbar spine BMD increased by 5.1% (95% CI: 4.0-6.1%, p = 0.00000) after 1 year of treatment with TNF inhibitors and by 8.6% (95% CI: 6.8-10.3%, p < 0.00001) after 2 years. Significant improvements in total hip BMD were also noted after 1 [1.8% (1.0-2.5%)] and 2 years [2.5% (1.9-3.0%)]. Compared to baseline, femoral neck BMD remained stable after 1 year [0.7% (-0.8% to 2.2%), p = 0.34]. No significant heterogeneity was noted amongst the included studies. CONCLUSIONS: TNF inhibitors can increase lumbar spine and total hip BMD and maintain femoral neck BMD for up to 2 years in patients with AS. More research is needed to assess the effect of TNF inhibitors on bone quality and fracture risk.


Assuntos
Antirreumáticos/farmacologia , Antirreumáticos/uso terapêutico , Densidade Óssea/efeitos dos fármacos , Espondilite Anquilosante/tratamento farmacológico , Fator de Necrose Tumoral alfa/antagonistas & inibidores , Adulto , Idoso , Densidade Óssea/fisiologia , Colo do Fêmur/fisiopatologia , Fraturas Ósseas/epidemiologia , Fraturas Ósseas/fisiopatologia , Articulação do Quadril/fisiopatologia , Humanos , Vértebras Lombares/fisiopatologia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Fatores de Risco , Espondilite Anquilosante/fisiopatologia , Resultado do Tratamento
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA