Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros








Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open ; 3(6): e12859, 2022 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36474706

RESUMO

Introduction: Pediatric organophosphate insecticide poisonings are rare in the United States, and life-threatening toxicity is rarely seen. We report 2 accidental ingestions of the organophosphate insecticide coumaphos that resulted in life-threatening symptoms. Case Reports: A 7-year-old boy and 10-year-old girl both presented from home after accidental ingestion of 1 "spoonful" of coumaphos 20% liquid (Asuntol; Bayer de Mexico, S.A. de C.V., Mexico D.F., Mexico). There were no other known ingestions. Both became rapidly symptomatic, with the boy developing dyspnea, vomiting, and depressed mental status and the girl developing headache and nausea. Soon afterward, the boy had witnessed cardiopulmonary arrest and the girl developed altered mental status and flaccid paralysis. Both were treated initially with atropine, but required no additional doses. On arrival to the pediatric intensive care unit (ICU), both patients received pralidoxime with subsequent plasma exchange and continuous venovenous hemodiafiltration (CVVHDF). Transient anemia, coagulopathy, transaminitis, and hyperglycemia developed in both patients. The girl was extubated on hospital day 6 and the boy on hospital day 11. The girl's course was complicated by aspiration pneumonia and an isolated seizure. The boy's course was complicated mainly by anoxic brain injury, associated seizures, neuroagitation, spasticity, and autonomic instability. The girl was discharged on hospital day 16 and remains asymptomatic 32 days after ingestion. As of 90 days after ingestion, the boy remains admitted to inpatient rehabilitation. Discussion: The clinical benefit of pralidoxime, plasma exchange, and CVVHDF is uncertain in these cases. The optimal treatment regimen for organophosphate insecticide toxicity remains poorly defined.

2.
Int J Crit Illn Inj Sci ; 12(2): 70-76, 2022.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35845124

RESUMO

Background: Delirium in critically ill patients is independently associated with poor clinical outcomes. There is a scarcity of published data on the prevalence of delirium among critically ill patients in Saudi Arabia. Therefore, we sought to determine, in a multicenter fashion, the prevalence of delirium in critically ill patients in Saudi Arabia and explore associated risk factors. Methods: A cross-sectional point prevalence study was conducted on January 28, 2020, at 14 intensive care units (ICUs) across 3 universities and 11 other tertiary care hospitals in Saudi Arabia. Delirium was screened once using the Intensive Care Delirium Screening Checklist. We excluded patients who were unable to participate in a valid delirium assessment, patients admitted with traumatic brain injury, and patients with documented dementia in their medical charts. Results: Of the 407 screened ICU patients, 233 patients were enrolled and 45.9% were diagnosed with delirium. The prevalence was higher in mechanically ventilated patients compared to patients not mechanically ventilated (57.5% vs. 33.6%; P < 0.001). In a multivariate model, risk factors independently associated with delirium included age (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 1.021; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.01-1.04; P = 0.008), mechanical ventilation (AOR, 2.39; 95% CI, 1.34-4.28; P = 0.003), and higher severity of illness (AOR, 1.01; 95% CI, 1.001-1.021; P = 0.026). Conclusion: In our study, delirium remains a prevalent complication, with distinct risk factors. Further studies are necessary to investigate long-term outcomes of delirium in critically ill patients in Saudi Arabia.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA