Association of Prospective Falls in Older People With Ubiquitous Step-Based Fall Risk Parameters Calculated From Ambulatory Inertial Signals: Secondary Data Analysis.

Background: In recent years, researchers have been advocating for the integration of ambulatory gait monitoring as a complementary approach to traditional fall risk assessments. However, current research relies on dedicated inertial sensors that are fixed on a specific body part. This limitation impacts the acceptance and adoption of such devices. Objective: Our study objective is twofold: (1) to propose a set of step-based fall risk parameters that can be obtained independently of the sensor placement by using a ubiquitous step detection method and (2) to evaluate their association with prospective falls. Methods: A reanalysis was conducted on the 1-week ambulatory inertial data from the StandingTall study, which was originally described by Delbaere et al. The data were from 301 community-dwelling older people and contained fall occurrences over a 12-month follow-up period. Using the ubiquitous and robust step detection method Smartstep, which is agnostic to sensor placement, a range of step-based fall risk parameters can be calculated based on walking bouts of 200 steps. These parameters are known to describe different dimensions of gait (ie, variability, complexity, intensity, and quantity). First, the correlation between parameters was studied. Then, the number of parameters was reduced through stepwise backward elimination. Finally, the association of parameters with prospective falls was assessed through a negative binomial regression model using the area under the curve metric. Results: The built model had an area under the curve of 0.69, which is comparable to models exclusively built on fixed sensor placement. A higher fall risk was noted with higher gait variability (coefficient of variance of stride time), intensity (cadence), and quantity (number of steps) and lower gait complexity (sample entropy and fractal exponent). Conclusions: These findings highlight the potential of our method for comprehensive and accurate fall risk assessments, independent of sensor placement. This approach has promising implications for ambulatory gait monitoring and fall risk monitoring using consumer-grade devices.

Early Intensive Bimanual Stimulation Program (BB-Bim) for Infants at Risk of Unilateral Cerebral Palsy: A Randomized, Multiple-Baseline, Single-Case Study.

IMPORTANCE: Clinical practice guidelines for infants at high risk of cerebral palsy (CP) emphasize the importance of very early and intensive intervention. OBJECTIVE: To determine the feasibility of a new, home-based, early intensive bimanual stimulation program (BB-Bim) and its impact on hand function in infants at risk of unilateral CP. DESIGN: Single case experimental design, multiple baseline across subjects, lasting from 12 to 15 wk, including a 4- to 7-wk randomized baseline, followed by 8 wk of BB-Bim. SETTING: Home. PARTICIPANTS: Infants (ages 3-12 mo) with suspected unilateral CP, whose parents agreed to participate in the stimulation program. INTERVENTION: Parent-provided bimanual stimulation 20 min/day, 6×/wk, with weekly occupational therapist coaching visits. MEASURES: Weekly repeated measures were the Hand Assessment in Infants (HAI) and Goal Attainment Scaling (GAS). Feasibility and relevance were assessed with a logbook and a parental report, including 10 continuous 0-10 scaled questions. RESULTS: Six infants were included (2 with left and 4 with right brain lesions). Parents provided a mean 3.4 to 6.2 stimulation sessions/wk. Feasibility and relevance were highly rated (Ms = 8.2-9.6, SDs = 0.2-1.3). Stimulation significantly improved HAI bimanual and total scores for all infants, with no impact on HAI unilateral scores. GAS scores improved with stimulation (significant for 3 infants). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: BB-Bim was feasible and tended to improve bimanual function in infants at risk of unilateral CP. What This Article Adds: Parent-provided daily bimanual stimulation at home is feasible when parents are coached weekly by an occupational therapist. Bimanual stimulation seems to improve functional interactions between the hands among infants at high risk of unilateral CP.

Does accelerometry reflect hand function in infants at risk of unilateral cerebral palsy? A secondary analysis of BB-Bim results.

BACKGROUND: Infants at high-risk of unilateral Cerebral Palsy (UCP) may have asymmetry in upper extremity movement and function, which should be identified as soon as possible for management. AIMS: To explore the feasibility of using two AX3 Axivity monitors in wrist-worn bracelets to quantify movements, and to identify whether accelerometry parameters are consistent with hand function. METHODS AND PROCEDURES: 6 infants at high risk of UCP (aged 3 to -12 months) were included in a Single-Case Experimental Design to explore the impact of an 8-week bimanual stimulation home program. OUTCOMES: Each week of the baseline (randomized duration 4-7 weeks) and 8-week program, the Hand Assessment for Infants (HAI) was performed and accelerometry parameters were collected during HAI and also during spontaneous activity, several times a week. RESULTS: Actimetry was analyzed during HAI and 238 spontaneous activity sessions (mean 42 ± 21 min). Actimetry ratios distribution and evolution show a high variability, especially for spontaneous activity. No strong correlation was found between HAI scores and accelerometry parameters, either collected during HAI, or during spontaneous activity times. CONCLUSION AND IMPLICATIONS: Despite its feasibility, using accelerometry bracelets looks unreliable for detecting and monitoring hand function in infants under one year.