Mapping potentially inappropriate medications in older adults using the Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (ATC) classification system.

BACKGROUND: Potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) in older adults are medications in which risks often outweigh benefits and are suggested to be avoided. Worldwide, many distinct guidelines and tools classify PIMs in older adults. Collating these guidelines and tools, mapping them to a medication classification system, and creating a crosswalk will enhance the utility of PIM guidance for research and clinical practice. METHODS: We used the Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (ATC) Classification System, a hierarchical classification system, to map PIMs from eight distinct guidelines and tools (2019 Beers Criteria, Screening Tool for Older Person's Appropriate Prescriptions [STOPP], STOPP-Japan, German PRISCUS, European Union-7 Potentially Inappropriate Medication [PIM] list, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services [CMS] High-Risk Medication, Anticholinergic Burden Scale, and Drug Burden Index). Each PIM was mapped to ATC Level 5 (drug) and to ATC Level 4 (drug class). We then used the crosswalk (1) to compare PIMs and PIM drug classes across guidelines and tools to determine the number of PIMs that were index (drug-induced adverse event) or marker (treatment of drug-induced adverse event) drug of prescribing cascades, and (2) estimate the prevalence of PIM use in older adults continuously enrolled with fee-for-service Medicare in 2018 as use cases. Data visualization and descriptive statistics were used to assess guidelines and tools for both use cases. RESULTS: Out of 480 unique PIMs identified, only three medications-amitriptyline, clomipramine, and imipramine and two drug classes-N06AA (tricyclic antidepressants) and N06AB (selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors), were noted in all eight guidelines and tools. Using the crosswalk, 50% of classes of index drugs and 47% of classes of marker drugs of known prescribing cascades were PIMs. Additionally, 88% of Medicare beneficiaries were dispensed ≥1 PIM across the eight guidelines and tools. CONCLUSION: We created a crosswalk of eight PIM guidelines and tools to the ATC classification system and created two use cases. Our findings could be used to expand the ease of PIM identification and harmonization for research and clinical practice purposes.

Changes in overactive bladder medication following bariatric surgery: segmented regression analysis.

PURPOSE: Bariatric surgery has shown reductions in overactive bladder (OAB) symptoms; however, the impacts on OAB treatment is unknown. The goal of our study is to evaluate the impact of bariatric surgery on OAB medication utilization. METHODS: We used IBM® MarketScan® commercial databases from 2005 to 2018. We included patients aged ≥ 18 years with 360 days of continuous enrollment before and after bariatric surgery (Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass and Sleeve Gastrectomy) with at least one fill of an OAB medication in the 360 days prior to bariatric surgery. We evaluated all included patients and stratified by surgery type and patient sex. Segmented regression analyses were used to assess the proportion of patients on OAB medications before and after bariatric surgery. We replicated our findings using hip or knee replacement surgery as a negative control. RESULTS: Among the included patients (n = 3069), 92.2% were females, 58.6% underwent Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass. Immediately following bariatric surgery, the proportion of patients treated with an OAB medication reduced from 34.8 to 14.1% (p < 0.001) resulting in a 59.5% relative reduction. Patients who underwent Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass vs. Sleeve Gastrectomy (63.8% vs. 55.1%) relative reduction (p = 0.009)) and females versus males [62.3% vs. 52.9% relative reduction (p < 0.001)] had a more pronounced reduction in OAB medication use. There was slight decrease in OAB medication use in the negative control analysis. CONCLUSIONS: A reduction in OAB medication use following bariatric surgery may be associated with a reduction in OAB symptoms suggesting an additional benefit of bariatric surgery.

Changes in utilization of immediate-release, extended-release, and liquid formulation medications relative to bariatric surgery: a segmented regression analysis.

BACKGROUND: Changes in gut anatomy following bariatric surgery impacts medication absorption, often requiring changes in medication formulations. OBJECTIVES: To assess changes in utilization of extended-release (ER), immediate-release (IR), and liquid formulations 360 days before and after bariatric surgery. SETTING: Large U.S. administrative claims database of privately insured beneficiaries, January 2005 through December 2018. METHODS: We included patients aged ≥18 years with 360 days of continuous enrollment before and after date of bariatric surgery (Roux-en-Y gastric bypass [RYGB] or sleeve gastrectomy [SG]). The proportion of each formulation (ER, IR, or liquid) of oral prescription medications filled during the study period were assessed in twelve 30-day windows before and after bariatric surgery and stratified by bariatric surgery type. Segmented regression analysis was used to assess filled medication categorized by formulation before and after bariatric surgery overall and RYGB relative to SG. RESULTS: Among 122,866 included patients, there were increases in the proportion of patients on each formulation before and after surgery attributed to proton pump inhibitors, opioids, antiemetics, and ursodiol. After removing these acutely used medications, we found a 40% immediate reduction in patients on ER medications (P < .0001), 15% immediate reduction in patients on IR medications (P < .0001), and a nonsignificant increase in patients on liquid formulations (P = .1340). CONCLUSION: Despite reductions in ER formulations, many patients continued on this formulation which may potentially contribute to poor outcomes.