Pulmonary Alveolar Microlithiasis: a Case Report in King Hussein Medical Center (KHMC), Amman, Jordan.

INTRODUCTION: Pulmonary Alveolar Microlithiasis (PAM) is a rare disorder that can affect patients at any age, although it is more common to present in the third and fourth decades of life. Most patients are asymptomatic at the time of diagnosis. However, some may present with symptoms of dyspnea or cough. PAM can be sporadic, or it can be hereditary. AIM: To focus on the importance of using chest CT scans along with bone scintigraphy to aid in the diagnosis of PAM. The importance of screening all family members is also addressed. CASE REPORT: In our case, the patient was a 21-year-old male, coming for routine check-up to be recruited in the army. He was referred to our clinic after the examining doctor noticed that his chest X-Ray was not normal. Upon revising his chest X-ray, he was found to have bilateral fine reticular infiltrates. His physical examination was unremarkable. His spirometry and DLCO were normal. A high-resolution chest CT scan was done, and showed diffuse bilateral microcalcifications with bilateral interstitial and septal thickening. To confirm the diagnosis of PAM, a Technetium-99m methylene diphosphonate (Tc-99m MDP) whole body bone scintigraphy was done, and it showed diffusely increased radiotracer uptake in both lungs. His family members were screened for PAM. His father and sister, who were completely asymptomatic and with normal pulmonary function tests, were found to have PAM as well. CONCLUSION: The use of bone scintigraphy plays an integral role in diagnosing patients with radiological findings consistent with PAM, and it can diagnose PAM without the need for invasive procedures. Once diagnosed, screening of all family members for PAM should be done, even when they are asymptomatic, as more than one-third of the cases have a familial pattern.

The Alvarado score versus computed tomography in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis: A prospective study.

BACKGROUND: To assess and compare performance of the Alvarado score and computed tomography scan in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis at King Hussein Medical Center. METHODS: A total of 320 patients with suspected acute appendicitis were included in this study over a period of 2 years. The Alvarado score was calculated for all of these patients and 112 CT scans were requested selectively by surgeons caring for the patients. The histopathology diagnosis was used as the gold standard against which diagnostic performance of Alvarado score and CT scan were compared. RESULTS: The complete data of 196 males and 124 females were analyzed at the end of the study period. The mean age was 26.1 ± 11.3 years. Appendectomy was performed in 263 patients with a negative appendectomy rate of 14.83% overall (12.28 in males and 19.56 in females). The remaining 57 patients were assumed to have no appendicitis. The diagnostic performance of CT scan was superior to that of Alvarado score with sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, and negative likelihood ratio of 94.2 versus 85.4%, 90 versus 65%, 9.42 versus 2.44, and 0.065 versus 0.224, respectively (p-value < 0.05). The overall diagnostic accuracy of CT scan was 92.6% compared to 77.5% for Alvarado score. CONCLUSION: The Alvarado score was far from good and CT scan is more accurate in diagnosis of acute appendicitis in our patient population.