RESUMO
This study aimed to evaluate the clinical, radiological and functional outcome of early (within 24 h) surgical intervention of displaced orbital roof fractures. This is a prospective observational study for patients with displaced orbital roof fractures. Six patients underwent early surgical management within hours of admission. The primary outcome variables were functional and aesthetic (evaluated through clinical and radiological assessments). The rate of immediate and delayed complications over a 6-months minimum follow-up period was recorded. All patients were males. The median age at the time of presentation was 23.5 years ranging from 4 to 40 years. The etiology was a high impact traffic accident in all patients. In three patients, the orbital roof fractures were unilateral, and in the other three patients, the fractures were bilateral. All patients were treated via transcranial approach at the same time as the neurosurgery. The median follow-up period was 10 months ranging from 6 to 15 months. During the follow-up period, there were no signs of meningitis, cerebrospinal fluid leakage, facial asymmetry, enophthalmos, exophthalmos, restriction of ocular motility, or blindness. Traumatic optic neuropathy was present in two patients (one unilateral and the other bilateral), of whom, one patient achieved full visual acuity recovery, while the other patient showed a mild decrease in visual acuity which improved within 6 months (OD;20/30, OS;20/25). One patient had mild ptosis and recovered spontaneously within 3 months after surgery. Postoperative CT scans showed a good anatomical reconstruction of orbital roof fracture in all cases. Early definite management of displaced orbital roof fractures secures reliable functional and cosmetic results and reduces the incidences of intracranial and ocular complications. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12070-023-04056-x.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Reconstruction of mandibular defects following ablative surgery remains a challenge even for experienced surgeons. Virtual planning and guided surgery, including computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM), afford optimized ways by which to plan complex surgery. This study aimed to evaluate and compare aesthetic outcome and surgical efficiency of free fibular flap (FFF) with and without CAD/CAM customized osteotomy guide (COG) for reconstruction of onco-surgical mandibular defects. METHODS: Twenty-two patients indicated for segmental mandibulectomy were randomly assigned to either CAD/CAM with COG group or that without COG- Model based reconstruction (MB group) at a 1:1 ratio. Aesthetic outcomes were evaluated by means of morphometric assessment and comparison for each differential area (DAr) and angle (DAn) in the affected side to the contralateral side of the mandible using computerized digital imaging analysis (CDIA) based on the post-operative 3D CT-scan. Subjective evaluation was performed using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and Patient's Satisfaction Score (PSS). Surgical efficiency was a secondary outcome and evaluated as total operative time and ischemia time. RESULTS: The mean sagittal DAr was significantly lower in the COG group (277.28 ± 127.05 vs. 398.67 ± 139.10 mm2, P = 0.045). Although there was an improvement in the axial DAr (147.61 ± 55.42 vs. 183.68 ± 72.85 mm2), the difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.206). The mean differences (Δ) in both sagittal and coronal DAn were significantly lower in the COG group than in the MB group (6.11 ± 3.46 and 1.77 ± 1.12° vs. 9.53 ± 4.17 and 3.44 ± 2.34°), respectively. There were no statistically significant differences in the axial DAn between the two groups (P = 0.386). The PSS was significantly higher in the COG group, reflecting better aesthetic satisfaction than in the MB group (P = 0.041). The total operation and ischemia time were significantly shorter in favor of the COG group with a mean of (562.91 ± 51.22, 97.55 ± 16.80 min vs. 663.55 ± 53.43, 172.45 ± 21.87 min), respectively. CONCLUSION: The CAD/CAM with COG is more reliable and highly valuable in enhancing aesthetic outcomes and surgical efficiency of mandibular reconstruction by FFF compared to that without COG (MB reconstruction). TRIAL REGISTRATION: This trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov . REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03757273. Registration date: 28/11/2018.