Association of Body Dysmorphic-Induced Anabolic-Androgenic Steroid Use With Mental Health Outcomes: A Systematic Review.

Objective: To explore the relationship between body dysmorphic disorder (BDD), anabolic-androgenic steroid use (AAS) use, and mental health outcomes and to identify potential interventions and treatments that may help mitigate these detrimental effects.Data Sources: PubMed, Scopus, CINAHL, Embase, and PsycINFO were searched from 1992 to 2022 with no language limits. Search terms included "AAS" AND "mental health outcomes" AND "body dysmorphia" and were expanded in PubMed to include "anabolic steroids induced depression," "anabolic steroids induced depression in athletes," "steroids," "mental health," and "performance-enhancing drugs."Study Selection: Forty-one articles were identified, and 37 remained after duplicates were removed. After full-text appraisal, 33 articles were included in the final review.Data Extraction: Two reviewers independently screened studies for inclusion criteria, extracted pertinent data, and assessed the quality of evidence.Results: Bodybuilders and fitness athletes may be more susceptible to developing muscle dysmorphia, having disordered eating habits, and using performance-enhancing drugs like AAS. The COVID-19 pandemic increased reliance on social media and online interactions, which was previously associated with disordered eating patterns and negative body image. Being a member of a sexual minority may increase one's risk of developing muscle dysmorphia and other types of BDD, as these individuals may experience additional stressors and difficulties due to stigma and discrimination, which may worsen one's sense of self and body image.Conclusion: The development and evaluation of interventions such as cognitive-behavioral therapy, mindfulness-based interventions, and peer support programs, should be prioritized to deter AAS use in people at risk.Prim Care Companion CNS Disord 2023;25(5):23r03532. Author affiliations are listed at the end of this article.

Efficacy of platelet-rich plasma for sacroiliac joint dysfunction: a qualitative systematic review with pooled analysis.

Aim: We aimed to expound upon previous research examining the effect of platelet rich plasma in the treatment of sacroiliac joint (SIJ) dysfunction and pain. Materials & methods: A systematic review was employed in conjunction with a pooled analysis of the efficacy of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) in SIJ dysfunction and pain. Results: A total of 259 articles were retrieved following database systematic review. As a result, four clinical trials and two case studies were subjected to full text appraisal. The dates of publication ranged from 2015 to 2022. Conclusion: Although a unique modality, there is not enough evidence to support the employment of PRP injections over current steroid standard of care. Further double-blinded, randomized control trials are required to elucidate PRP role in SIJ dysfunction.

Platelet rich plasma is an injection derived from separating blood components in a centrifuge. Injection of platelet rich plasma into the sacroiliac joint has often been touted as highly beneficial for pain and disability, and superior to other modalities. Our systematic review and pooled analysis show that platelet rich plasma injections are beneficial, albeit not to the degree previously reported.