RESUMO
Transoral endoscopic thyroidectomy via the vestibular approach (TOETVA) represents a minimally invasive alternative to traditional open thyroidectomy (OT). The objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to comprehensively analyze and compare postoperative pain outcomes between conventional open thyroidectomy (COT) and TOETVA. We conducted a systematic search across multiple databases, including PubMed, Medline, Elton B. Stephens Company (EBSCO), and Google Scholar, to identify cohorts and randomized trials comparing postoperative pain outcomes between patients undergoing transoral endoscopic thyroidectomy via the vestibular approach (TOETVA) and those undergoing conventional thyroidectomy. The search period spanned from the earliest available article up to January 15, 2022. Keywords such as "scarless thyroidectomy," "endoscopic transoral via vestibular thyroidectomy," "conventional thyroidectomy," "transcervical thyroidectomy," "postoperative pain," and "visual analog pain score" were utilized to retrieve relevant studies. A total of 1,291 patients from 11 studies were included in our analysis, with 10 studies originating from Asia and one from Europe. Among these studies, seven were prospective, while four were retrospective. The primary outcome measure was postoperative pain. Various statistical tests were also performed for data analysis, including the Chi-square and random effects model. The Newcastle Ottawa Scale was used to assess the quality of studies. There was no significant statistical difference observed between the endoscopic transoral vestibular route and the conventional cervical approach in terms of visual analog scale (VAS) score, with an odds ratio of -0.37 and a 95% confidence interval ranging from -0.9 to 0.17. The overall effect had a P-value of 0.18. However, substantial heterogeneity was noted, with an I2 value for heterogeneity of 98% and a P-value for heterogeneity of less than 0.001. The Chi-square value was calculated as 364.02, and the main difference was 9. In comparison, TOETVA exhibited lower pain levels on the first day post-operation compared to conventional thyroidectomy, with an odds ratio of -1.36 and a 95% confidence interval ranging from -2.65 to -0.06. Transoral endoscopic thyroidectomy via the vestibular approach demonstrated superior outcomes compared to conventional thyroidectomy in terms of postoperative pain management on the first day following surgery. However, when considering overall pain management throughout the recovery period, no significant difference was observed between the two approaches. More extensive studies evaluating pain levels on the day of surgery and controlling for analgesic interventions are warranted.
RESUMO
The global adoption of remote thyroidectomy is increasing, with the transoral endoscopic thyroidectomy vestibular approach (TOETVA) and transareolar approach (TAA) emerging as predominant methods. However, existing meta-analyses comparing these approaches to operative surgeries and short-term postoperative complications have significant limitations. To address this gap, our meta-analysis provides a comprehensive comparison between the TOETVA and TAA, focusing on operation time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative drainage, and hospital stay duration. It aims to offer robust insights into their relative efficacy and safety profiles. We searched SCOPUS, PubMed, Web of Science, MEDLINE, and Cochrane Library from June 2015 to January 2024 for studies comparing transoral endoscopic thyroidectomy with the vestibular approach and areolar thyroidectomy using keywords, including "transoral thyroidectomy" and "scarless thyroidectomy." Studies were included if they were randomized controlled trials, case-control studies, or prospective/retrospective cohort studies comparing the TOETVA and TAA. Exclusion criteria removed case series, cross-sectional studies, editorials, non-English language, animal studies, and irrelevant articles. Data on operative time, postoperative drainage, intraoperative blood loss, and hospital stay were extracted. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was used to assess study quality (all studies scored 7-8). The findings revealed that the operative time was longer among the TOETVA group, with less intraoperative blood loss (odds ratio (OR) = 13.31, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 4.44-22.19); OR = -1.61, 95% CI = -2.82 to -0.39, respectively). Regarding hospitalization duration and postoperative drainage, no discernible difference was observed between the endoscopic TAA (ETAA) and TOETVA (OR = -0.04, 95% CI = -0.24 to 0.16; OR = -6.74, 95% CI = -20.08 to 6.60, respectively). The TOETVA has advantages over the TAA in terms of intraoperative blood loss and shorter operation times. However, both approaches exhibited comparable outcomes in terms of hospital stay duration and postoperative drainage. Furthermore, extensive randomized trials are warranted.
