Surgical Anatomy of the Mesopancreas in Obese Patients: A Retrospective Study.

Introduction The mesopancreas is described as a triangle formed by the superior mesenteric vein, celiac axis (CA), and superior mesenteric artery (SMA). It is the most likely site of residual cancer and local recurrence after surgical resection, making it the key site of the current radical resection of pancreatic head cancer. The surgical anatomy of the mesopancreas triangle has not been studied in detail. Furthermore, to the best of our knowledge, no information is available on the impact of obesity on the anatomy of the mesopancreas triangle. Methods Between January 2016 and August 2016, 200 consecutive triple-phase computed tomography scans of the abdomen were performed and included in this retrospective study aiming to define the anatomical relation of the left renal vein (LRV) to the root of the SMA and focusing on the relevance of the LRV as a landmark to guidance for the dissection of the mesopancreas. Furthermore, by studying six surgically relevant anatomical parameters namely the thickness of the areolar tissue separating the LRV from the root of the SMA, IVC from the root of the SMA, the left adrenal vein (LAV) from the root of the SMA, splenic vein from the aorta, and CA from the SMA at two levels, we investigated the impact of obesity on the mesopancreas anatomy. Results The mean distance from the upper border of the LRV to the root of the SMA (LRV-SMA distance) was 2.3 ± 5.4 mm. There was no correlation between this distance and patient's age (r = -0.02), height (r = -0.07), BMI (r = -0.01), visceral fat area (r = -0.04), or abdominal circumference (r = -0.02). There was no correlation between the distance from the IVC to the root of the SMA, and patient's age (r = 0.01), height (r = 0.11), BMI (r = 0.15), or abdominal circumference (r = 0.00). However, there was a negligible correlation between the IVC-SMA distance and patient's visceral fat area (r = 0.15, p = 0.036). Conclusion In the current study, the LRV was reliably identified in more than 99% of the studied patients, and in 96% of patients, the LRV crosses anterior to the aorta at the level of the second lumbar vertebra, making it easily accessible following mobilization of the duodenum and the head of the pancreas. The relationship between the LRV and SMA remains unchanged following Kocherization. Most importantly, we demonstrated that the LRV-SMA distance does not correlate with patient's age, height, BMI, visceral fat area, or abdominal circumference. This makes the LRV a reliable landmark in both obese and non-obese patients.

Non-Functioning Adrenocortical Carcinoma Presenting as Retroperitoneal Hemorrhage With Early Metastasis.

Adrenocortical cancer is a rare neoplasm with varied clinical presentation and overall poor outcome. This should be managed with timely intervention at highly specialized centers. Our aim is to report this rare case presentation of large non-functional adrenocortical cancer, complicated by spontaneous rupture while awaiting workup leading to life-threatening hemorrhage. Despite successful emergency radical surgical management and achieving negative margins, the patient developed early recurrence as intra-abdominal metastasis within two months. This can likely be attributed to the aggressive nature of the tumor as indicated by the high Ki-67 index or spillage of the tumor cells following spontaneous rupture. We recommend managing these non-functioning adrenocortical cancers as early as possible at highly specialized centers with reference to published standard guidelines.

Navigating the Root of the Mesentery: A Guided Approach to an Artery-First Pancreatoduodenectomy.

In the standard technique of pancreatoduodenectomy (PD), the superior mesenteric artery (SMA) is approached following Kocher maneuver of the duodenum. Alternative approaches include SMA first with no touch approaches. The aim of this article is to report the preoperative planning for and operative techniques of a combined artery first with no touch technique (CTPD) for the performance of PD. The CTPD technique is described with a detailed discussion of the operative anatomy, and of the importance of preoperative mapping using computed tomography to aid dissection of the mesenteric root and identification of the SMA. The use of careful preoperative mapping of arterial anatomy on cross-sectional imaging helps to facilitate identification of the SMA and simplifies the operative approach to PD. By incorporating detailed preoperative planning and a careful anatomical dissection, the CTPD technique provides an earlier assessment of the superior mesenteric vessels and determination of resectability.

Outcome of long interval radiological surveillance of side branch pancreatic duct-involved intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm in selected patients.

INTRODUCTION: Side branch IPMN (SB-IPMN) of the pancreas has a malignancy rate between 10 and 20%. We hypothesized that surveillance at longer intervals on selected patients with SB-IPMN might be indicated. METHODS: This is a retrospective study of prospectively collected data of 276 patients presenting from 2000 to 2010. After 2007, we opted to screen our patients with longer intervals, initially at 12 months then 24 months using MR if no "worrisome features" were present. RESULTS: Complete data sets for 261 patients were analysed and patients were aged 78 (40-91) years. 232 patients had sole SB-IPMN while 92% were incidental (n = 209) and 8% were symptomatic (n = 24). Single SB-IPMN accounted for 84% (n = 195) of all cases; maximum diameter of 15.5 (5-60) mm. The median follow up duration was 46 (32-53) months. Short interval radiological surveillance (3-9 months) was 39% (n = 90), while long interval surveillance (12-36 months) was performed in 61% (n = 142). The rate of pancreatic resection, due to concern for the development of pancreatic cancer, in the short and long interval surveillance groups was 4.4% (n = 4) and 3.5% (n = 5) respectively; p = 0.78. CONCLUSION: Our data suggests no difference in outcome between long and short interval MR surveillance of SB-IPMN patients.

A matched-pair analysis of laparoscopic versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy: oncological outcomes using Leeds Pathology Protocol.

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy (LPD) is a safe procedure. Oncological safety of LPD is still a matter for debate. This study aimed to compare the oncological outcomes, in terms of adequacy of resection and recurrence rate following LPD and open pancreaticoduodenectomy (OPD). METHODS: Between November 2005 and April 2009, 12 LPDs (9 ampullary and 3 distal common bile duct tumors) were performed. A cohort of 12 OPDs were matched for age, gender, body mass index (BMI) and American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score and tumor site. RESULTS: Mean tumor size LPD vs OPD (19.8 vs 19.2 mm, P=0.870). R0 resection was achieved in 9 LPD vs 8 OPD (P=1.000). The mean number of metastatic lymph nodes and total number resected for LPD vs OPD were 1.1 vs 2.1 (P=0.140) and 20.7 vs 18.5 (P=0.534) respectively. Clavien complications grade I/II (5 vs 8), III/IV (2 vs 6) and pancreatic leak (2 vs 1) were statistically not significant (LPD vs OPD). The mean high dependency unit (HDU) stay was longer in OPD (3.7 vs 1.4 days, P<0.001). There were 2 recurrences each in LPD and OPD (log-rank, P=0.983). Overall mortality for LPD vs OPD was 3 vs 6 (log-rank, P=0.283) and recurrence-related mortality was 2 vs 1. There was one death within 30 days in the OPD group secondary to severe sepsis and none in the LPD group. CONCLUSIONS: Compared to open procedure, LPD achieved a similar rate of R0 resection, lymph node harvest and long-term recurrence for tumors less than 2 cm. Though technically challenging, LPD is safe and does not compromise oncological outcome.

Results of pancreatic surgery in the elderly: is age a barrier?

BACKGROUND: By 2033, the number of people aged 85 years and over in the UK is projected to double, accounting for 5% of the total population. It is important to understand the surgical outcome after a pancreatic resection in the elderly to assist decision making. METHODS: Over a 9-year period (from January 2000 to August 2009), 428 consecutive patients who underwent a pancreatic resection were reviewed. Data were collected on mortality, complications, length of stay and survival. Patients were divided into two groups (younger than 70 and older than 70 years old) and outcomes were analysed. RESULTS: In all, 119 (27.8%) patients were ≥ 70 years and 309 (72.2%) patients were < 70 years. The median length of stay for the older and younger group was 15 days (range 3-91) and 14 days (range 3-144), respectively. The overall mortality was 3.4% in the older group and 2.6% in the younger group (P = 0.75). The older cohort had a cumulative median survival of 57.3 months (range 0-119), compared with 78.7 months (range 0-126) in the younger cohort (P < 0.0001). In patients undergoing a pancreatic resection for ductal adenocarcinoma and cholangiocarcinoma there was a significant difference in survival with P-values of 0.043 and 0.003, respectively. For ampullary adenocarcinoma, the older group had a median survival of 47.1 months compared with 68.3 months (P = 0.194). CONCLUSION: Results from this study suggest that while elderly patients can safely undergo a pancreatic resection and that age alone should not preclude a pancreatic resection, there is still significant morbidity and mortality in the octogenarian subgroup with poor long-term survival with the need for quality-of-life assessment.

Cell carriage, delivery, and selective replication of an oncolytic virus in tumor in patients.

Oncolytic viruses, which preferentially lyse cancer cells and stimulate an antitumor immune response, represent a promising approach to the treatment of cancer. However, how they evade the antiviral immune response and their selective delivery to, and replication in, tumor over normal tissue has not been investigated in humans. Here, we treated patients with a single cycle of intravenous reovirus before planned surgery to resect colorectal cancer metastases in the liver. Tracking the viral genome in the circulation showed that reovirus could be detected in plasma and blood mononuclear, granulocyte, and platelet cell compartments after infusion. Despite the presence of neutralizing antibodies before viral infusion in all patients, replication-competent reovirus that retained cytotoxicity was recovered from blood cells but not plasma, suggesting that transport by cells could protect virus for potential delivery to tumors. Analysis of surgical specimens demonstrated greater, preferential expression of reovirus protein in malignant cells compared to either tumor stroma or surrounding normal liver tissue. There was evidence of viral factories within tumor, and recovery of replicating virus from tumor (but not normal liver) was achieved in all four patients from whom fresh tissue was available. Hence, reovirus could be protected from neutralizing antibodies after systemic administration by immune cell carriage, which delivered reovirus to tumor. These findings suggest new preclinical and clinical scheduling and treatment combination strategies to enhance in vivo immune evasion and effective intravenous delivery of oncolytic viruses to patients in vivo.

Acceptable outcome after kidney transplantation using "expanded criteria donor" grafts.

INTRODUCTION: With the worldwide shortage of donors, extra lengths are ongoing to enlarge the donor pool. One means has been a greater use of "expanded criteria donor" (ECD) grafts. A major concern regarding ECD kidneys is poor long-term graft survival. The aims of this study were to determine whether ECD grafts, as defined by the United Network for Organ Sharing, had a negative impact on graft survival and to identify the principle donor and recipient factors that influenced graft survival in our patient cohort. METHODS: We analyzed all deceased donor renal transplants in our unit from January 1995 to October 2005, in total 1,053 transplants. RESULTS: ECD grafts (United Network for Organ Sharing criteria) demonstrated higher rates of delayed graft function and higher early mean creatinine levels. However, there was no significant difference in 5-year graft survival. Multivariate analysis of our patient group identified donor hypertension and ischemic heart disease (IHD) as independent predictors of poor graft survival. Recipient age was significant on univariate but not on multivariate analysis. However, although younger recipients maintained acceptable 5-year graft survival despite donor hypertension, IHD, or a combination of both, these factors significantly reduced graft survival in older recipients. CONCLUSION: Although ECD grafts had slightly worse function, 5-year survival was comparable with standard grafts in all recipients. Donor hypertension, IHD, or a combination of both significantly reduced graft survival in older recipients, not evident in younger patients. We discuss the possible factors for improved outcome with ECD grafts in our patients and the implications of our patient analysis.

Correlation between postoperative infective complications and long-term outcomes after hepatic resection for colorectal liver metastasis.

BACKGROUND: The impact of postoperative morbidity, and in particular infective complications on long-term outcomes, following hepatic resection for colorectal liver metastasis (CRLM) is not widely published. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of postoperative complications on disease recurrence and overall survival in patients undergoing hepatic resection for CRLM. METHODS: All patients undergoing hepatic resection for CRLM from January 1993 and March 2007 were identified, and postoperative complications analyzed. Patients who died of postoperative complications within 30 days of surgery were excluded form the study. Postoperative complications were graded using a validated system of classification. Complications were further classified into infective and noninfective complication groups and the primary end points of the study were disease free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) at 5 years. RESULT: A total of 705 patients underwent hepatic resection in the study period. Median follow-up was 38 months. Operative morbidity and mortality were 28% and 3.6%, respectively. The total number of patients was 197 (28%) with complications, and 508 (72%) without complications. The 5 year DFS and OS for those with and without complications were: 13% versus 26% (P < 0.001) and 24% versus 37% (P < 0.001), respectively. Multivariate analysis showed inflammatory response to tumor score, blood transfusion, tumor number >8, and postoperative sepsis to be independent factors associated with DFS, and inflammatory response to tumor, tumor number >8, and postoperative sepsis to be independent predictors for OS. Intra-abdominal and respiratory infection but not wound infections were associated with poorer long-term outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Postoperative complications influence long-term outcomes in hepatic resection for CRLM. Specifically, postoperative sepsis is an independent predictor of disease free and overall survival. Thorough preoperative optimization, meticulous surgical technique and careful management in the postoperative period may reduce the incidence of these complications and influence long-term outcomes.

Liver transplantation following donation after cardiac death: an analysis using matched pairs.

Grafts from donation after cardiac death (DCD) donors are used to increase the number of organs available for liver transplantation. There is concern that warm ischemia may impair graft function. We compared our DCD recipients with a case-matched group of donation after brain death (DBD) recipients. Between January 2002 and April 2008, 39 DCD grafts were transplanted. These were matched with 39 DBD recipients on the basis of identified variables that had a significant impact on mortality. These were used to individually match DCD and DBD patients with similar predictive mortality. We compared patient/graft survival, primary non-function (PNF), and rates of complications. Of all liver transplants, 6.1% were DCD grafts. PNF occurred twice in the DCD group. The incidence of nonanastomotic biliary strictures (NABS; 20.5% versus 0%, P = 0.005) and hepatic artery stenosis (HAS; 12.8% versus 0%, P = 0.027) in the DCD group was higher. One-year (79.5% versus 97.4%, P = 0.029) and 3-year (63.6% versus 97.4%, P = 0.001) graft survival was lower in the DCD group. Three-year patient survival was also lower (68.2% versus 100%, P < 0.0001). Our study is the first to use case-matched patients and compare groups with similar predictive mortality. There was a higher incidence of NABS and HAS in the DCD group. NABS were likely a result of warm ischemia. HAS may have been due to ischemia or arterial injury during retrieval. The DCD group had significantly poorer outcomes, but DCD grafts remain a valuable resource. With careful donor/recipient selection, minimization of ischemia, and good postoperative care, acceptable results can be achieved.

Outcomes in right liver lobe transplantation: a matched pair analysis.

Split liver transplantation (SLT) has proven to be an effective technique of increasing the donor pool and thereby reducing adult and paediatric waiting list mortality. There remains concern regarding complications in adult recipients. Here, we compare SLT with matched whole liver grafts. Adult recipients of primary extended right lobe grafts (ERL) were matched to recipients of whole liver transplantations (WLTs) according to the following criteria: model of end-stage liver disease (MELD) score, recipient age, indication for liver transplantation and year of transplantation. Twenty-seven pairs of recipients were transplanted for chronic liver disease. The overall 30-day patient survival rates after ERL and WLT were 88.9% and 92.5% and 3-year survival rates after SLT and WLT were 77.8% and 85.2% respectively (log-rank = 0.38). Two patients with SLTs had hepatic artery thromboses and were retransplanted with none from the WLT group. The prevalence of a biliary leak was higher among the SLT group (n = 4) compared with none in the WLT group (P = 0.05). Patients with preoperative hyponatraemia showed a trend towards poorer survival after SLT compared with WLT. Our data suggest that SLT with extended right liver lobes, although not significantly different, shows a trend towards a poorer outcome.

Presentation and management of perirectal sepsis.

Perirectal sepsis is a potentially severe complication which may follow minor anorectal intervention and be slow to be diagnosed and treated. We report the presentation and outcome of three patients with perirectal sepsis of differing aetiologies. Awareness of the possible diagnosis, urgent investigation with cross-sectional imaging and immediate treatment with broad-spectrum antibiotics is vital. However, radical surgical intervention may be necessary. This report highlights the importance of investigating patients with persistent pelvic pain after minor anorectal procedures or trauma and maintaining a high index of suspicion for this important complication.

Right hepatic trisectionectomy for hepatobiliary diseases: results and an appraisal of its current role.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the results of 275 patients undergoing right hepatic trisectionectomy and to clarify its current role. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Right hepatic trisectionectomy is considered one of the most extensive liver resections, and few reports have described the long-term results of the procedure. METHODS: Short- and long-term outcomes of 275 consecutive patients who underwent right hepatic trisectionectomy from January 1993 to January 2006 were analyzed. RESULTS: Of the 275 patients, 160 had colorectal metastases, 49 had biliary tract cancers, 20 had hepatocellular carcinomas, 20 had other metastatic tumors, and 12 had benign diseases. Fourteen of the 275 patients underwent right hepatic trisectionectomy as part of auxiliary liver transplantation for acute liver failure and were excluded. Concomitant procedures were carried out in 192 patients: caudate lobectomy in 45 patients, resection of tumors from the liver remnant in 57 patients, resection of the extrahepatic biliary tree in 45 patients, and lymphadenectomy in 45 patients. One-, 3-, 5-, and 10-year survivals were 74%, 54%, 43%, and 36%, respectively. Overall hospital morbidity and 30-day and in-hospital mortalities were 41%, 7%, and 8%, respectively. Survivals for individual tumor types were acceptable, with 5-year survivals for colorectal metastasis and cholangiocarcinoma being 38% and 32%, respectively. Multivariate analysis disclosed the amount of intraoperative blood transfusion to be the sole independent predictor for the development of hospital morbidity. Age over 70 years, preoperative bilirubin levels, and the development of postoperative renal failure were found to be independent predictors of long-term survival. CONCLUSION: Right hepatic trisectionectomy remains a challenging procedure. The outcome is not influenced by additional concomitant resection of tumors from the planned liver remnant. Caution must be taken when considering patients older than 70 years for such resections.

Outcomes after major hepatectomy in elderly patients.

BACKGROUND: We aimed to study the early and longterm outcomes of patients 70 years and older undergoing major liver resections, and compare the results with patients below the age of 70 years. STUDY DESIGN: All patients undergoing major liver resection (defined as three segments or more) from January 1993 to June 2004 were included. Patients were studied in two groups: 70 years of age and older (group E, elderly) and less than 70 years old (group Y, young). Early outcomes and longterm survival were analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 517 patients underwent major liver resection: group E, n=127; group Y, n=390 patients. There was no difference in operative mortality (group E, 7.9%; group Y, 5.4%; p=0.32) or postoperative morbidity (p=0.22) between the groups. Overall and disease-free survivals were not notably different for all patients (59% versus 57%, p=0.89; 60% versus 55%, p=0.28, respectively) or for a subgroup of patients with colorectal liver metastases (61% versus 55%, p=0.76; 60% versus 47%, p=0.07) in groups E versus Y, respectively. In multivariable analysis, American Society of Anesthesiologists grade 3 (p=0.024, hazard ratio [HR]=1.59, versus grade 1, 95% CI=1.06 to 2.39) and intraoperative transfusion>3 U (p<0.0005, HR=2.56, 95% CI=1.84 to 3.56) were predictors for overall survival. More than three tumors (p=0.025, HR=1.41, 95% CI=1.04 to 1.90) and redo resection (p=0.001, HR=2.80, 95% CI=1.51 to 5.19) were predictors of disease-free survival. CONCLUSIONS: Major liver resections can be safely performed in patients 70 years of age or older, with early results and survival similar to those in the younger than 70 age group. American Society of Anesthesiologists grade 3 and intraoperative transfusions>3 U were predictors for overall survival, and more than three tumors and redo resection were predictors for disease-free survival.