Big data analytics in medical engineering and healthcare: methods, advances and challenges.

Big data analytics are gaining popularity in medical engineering and healthcare use cases. Stakeholders are finding big data analytics reduce medical costs and personalise medical services for each individual patient. Big data analytics can be used in large-scale genetics studies, public health, personalised and precision medicine, new drug development, etc. The introduction of the types, sources, and features of big data in healthcare as well as the applications and benefits of big data and big data analytics in healthcare is key to understanding healthcare big data and will be discussed in this article. Major methods, platforms and tools of big data analytics in medical engineering and healthcare are also presented. Advances and technology progress of big data analytics in healthcare are introduced, which includes artificial intelligence (AI) with big data, infrastructure and cloud computing, advanced computation and data processing, privacy and cybersecurity, health economic outcomes and technology management, and smart healthcare with sensing, wearable devices and Internet of things (IoT). Current challenges of dealing with big data and big data analytics in medical engineering and healthcare as well as future work are also presented.

Effect of Referral Patterns and Treatment Type on Oncologic Outcomes for Women with Ductal Carcinoma In Situ.

OBJECTIVE: Management of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) remains controversial. This study examined long-term outcomes in a population-based cohort of patients with pure DCIS treated with breast-conserving surgery (BCS) alone, BCS + radiotherapy (RT), and mastectomy. Outcomes were compared between patients referred versus not referred for oncologic assessment after definitive surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Subjects were 2575 women diagnosed between 1985 and 1999. Data from several electronic databases were linked and analyzed. Outcomes were invasive local recurrence-free survival (ILRFS), mastectomy-free survival (MFS), breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS), and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: Median follow-up time was 9.8 years. Overall, 56% (n = 1448) of subjects were referred to a cancer centre. Factors associated with non-referral were older age, comorbidities, and travel distance. Ten-year MFS, BCSS, and OS were higher among referred patients (all p ≤ 0.001). In cohorts treated with BCS alone (n = 1314) vs. BCS + RT (n = 510) vs. mastectomy (n = 751), 10-year ILRFS were 93.7% vs. 96.6% vs. 97.7%, (p < 0.001) and BCSS were 97.6% vs. 99.8% vs. 98.6%, (p = 0.01). Corresponding rates of ipsilateral invasive breast relapse at 10 years were 6.3% after BCS alone, 3.4% after BCS + RT, and 2.3% after mastectomy (p < 0.001). On multivariable analysis, factors associated with improved ILRFS were older age at diagnosis, low comorbidity score, absence of comedo histology, mastectomy, and post-BCS RT. CONCLUSION: Patients with DCIS referred for oncologic assessment were more likely to undergo post-BCS RT, resulting in lower mastectomy and higher survival rates compared to non-referred patients. Patients with significant comorbidities were less likely to be referred and experienced lower ILRFS and BCSS. Referral for multidisciplinary oncologic assessment after surgery is warranted to individualize management and optimize outcomes for patients with DCIS.

Locally Advanced Malignant Myoepithelioma of the Parotid Gland Treated With Radiotherapy: A Case Study and Review of the BC Cancer Agency Experience.

OBJECTIVES: Malignant myoepithelioma of salivary glands is a rare neoplasm; most arise in the parotid gland and minor salivary glands of the palate. Surgery has been the mainstay of treatment. METHODS: This is case report of a patient treated with primary radical radiotherapy and retrospective review of institutional experience. RESULTS: An 87-year-old man with locoregionally advanced malignant myoepithelioma of the parotid gland received radiotherapy alone with complete clinical response and sustained 39 months of posttreatment. Between 1981 and 2012, 15 cases of malignant myoepithelioma of the parotid were seen. Thirteen patients received surgical excision and adjuvant radiotherapy. At a median follow-up of 47 months, 12 patients were alive without recurrence, 2 died without recurrence, and 1 died with metastatic myoepithelioma. CONCLUSIONS: Durable locoregional disease control and disease-free-survival was achieved in the majority of patients. The case reported suggests radiation therapy may be an effective treatment option for inoperable cases.

Stage IIIC Endometrial Cancer: Relapse and Survival Outcomes in Women Treated With Pelvic or Extended Field Para-Aortic Nodal Radiation Therapy.

PURPOSE: The optimal radiation (RT) volume for node-positive endometrial cancer is controversial. This study evaluates clinical outcomes in patients with stage IIIC, N1 endometrial cancer who received RT to the pelvis (PV RT) or pelvis plus para-aortic nodes (PV-PAN RT). METHODS: Overall, there were 89 women with stage IIIC endometrial cancer. Of these, 57 women had N1-only disease, forming the study cohort. Clinicopathologic characteristics, recurrence rates, endometrial cancer-specific survival (ECSS), and overall survival (OS) were examined among patients treated with pelvic RT (n=23) compared with pelvic plus para-aortic RT (n=34). Multivariable analysis of ECSS and OS was performed using Cox regression modeling. RESULTS: Median follow-up was 5.1 years. Adjuvant chemotherapy was used in 51/57 (89%) of N1 cases. Women with N1 disease who received PV-PAN RT compared with PV RT experienced lower recurrence (26% vs. 52%, P=0.06) and higher survival rates (5 y ECSS 81.5% vs. 47.0%, P=0.04 and OS 79.1% vs. 47.0%, P=0.01). On multivariable analysis, RT volume was not significantly associated with OS, whereas chemotherapy was associated with improved ECSS and OS. CONCLUSIONS: RT conferred excellent local control, whereas chemotherapy was associated with improved survival in women with N1 endometrial cancer. Distant relapse remains the most common site of recurrence despite chemotherapy.

Population-based Analysis of Treatment and Survival in Women Presenting With Brain Metastasis at Initial Breast Cancer Diagnosis.

PURPOSE: Brain metastasis at initial breast cancer diagnosis is rare. This study aims to evaluate the clinical characteristics of these patients and identify prognostic and treatment factors associated with improved survival. METHODS: Subjects were 35 women referred from 1996 to 2005 with newly diagnosed breast cancer with synchronous brain metastasis. Overall survival (OS) and brain progression-free survival were examined using Kaplan-Meier methods and compared between subgroups with different clinicopathologic and treatment characteristics using log-rank tests. RESULTS: Median age was 65 years. Whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) alone was used in 25 patients, surgical resection and postoperative WBRT in 5 patients, and no or unknown treatment in 5 patients. Patients who underwent cranial resection were more likely to have solitary brain metastasis (P=0.003) and no visceral involvement (P=0.006). Overall, median OS was 6.8 months and median brain progression-free survival was 6.5 months (range, 0.7 to 54 mo). Median OS were 15 months with surgery and postoperative WBRT, 5 months with WBRT alone, and 3 months with no brain treatment. Longer OS was observed with age below 65 years versus 65 years and above (11 vs. 5 mo, P=0.046), 0 to 1 versus ≥2 sites of extracranial metastasis (10 vs. 3 mo, P=0.047), and diagnosis from 2001 to 2005 versus 1996 to 2000 (10 vs. 3 mo, P=0.018). A trend toward improved OS was observed in patients with no visceral involvement (11 vs. 4 mo, P=0.09). CONCLUSIONS: In this unique cohort presenting with breast cancer and synchronous brain metastasis, longer survival were observed with young age, limited extracranial metastasis, and no visceral disease. These characteristics may be used to select candidates for more aggressive treatment.

Locoregional recurrence and survival outcomes by type of local therapy and trastuzumab use among women with node-negative, HER2-positive breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: While human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) overexpression is an adverse breast cancer prognostic factor, it is unclear whether there are differences in outcomes between types of local treatment in this population. This retrospective study examined locoregional recurrence and survival in women with node-negative, HER2+ breast cancer treated with breast-conserving therapy (BCT) versus mastectomy. METHODS: Subjects were 748 patients with pT1-2, N0, M0 HER2+ breast cancer, treated with BCT (n = 422) or mastectomy (n = 326). Trastuzumab was used in 54 % of subjects. The 5-year Kaplan-Meier locoregional recurrence free survival (LRRFS), breast cancer specific survival (BCSS), and overall survival (OS) were compared between cohorts treated with BCT versus mastectomy. Subgroup analyses of LRR and survival were performed separately among patients treated with BCT or mastectomy to examine the effect of trastuzumab on outcomes in each group. RESULTS: Median follow-up was 4.4 years. Patients treated with mastectomy had higher proportions of grade 3 histology (69 vs 60 %, p = 0.004) and lower rates of hormone therapy (51 vs 64 %, p < 0.001) and trastuzumab therapy (50 vs 57 %, p = 0.04). The 5-year outcomes in women treated with BCT compared with mastectomy were: LRRFS 98.0 versus 98.3 % (p = 0.88), BCSS 97.2 versus 96.1 % (p = 0.70), and OS 95.5 versus 93.4 % (p = 0.19). Trastuzumab was associated with similar LRRFS and improved OS in both local treatment groups. CONCLUSIONS: BCT is safe in the population of women with pT1-2, N0, HER2+ breast cancer, providing high rates of locoregional control and survival equivalent to mastectomy. Trastuzumab was associated with improved survival in both groups.

Is biological subtype prognostic of locoregional recurrence risk in women with pT1-2N0 breast cancer treated with mastectomy?

PURPOSE: To examine locoregional and distant recurrence (LRR and DR) in women with pT1-2N0 breast cancer according to approximated subtype and clinicopathologic characteristics. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Two independent datasets were pooled and analyzed. The study participants were 1994 patients with pT1-2N0M0 breast cancer, treated with mastectomy without radiation therapy. The patients were classified into 1 of 5 subtypes: luminal A (ER+ or PR+/HER 2-/grade 1-2, n=1202); luminal B (ER+ or PR+/HER 2-/grade 3, n=294); luminal HER 2 (ER+ or PR+/HER 2+, n=221); HER 2 (ER-/PR-/HER 2+, n=105) and triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) (ER-/PR-/HER 2-, n=172). RESULTS: The median follow-up time was 4.3 years. The 5-year Kaplan-Meier (KM) LRR were 1.8% in luminal A, 3.1% in luminal B, 1.7% in luminal HER 2, 1.9% in HER 2, and 1.9% in TNBC cohorts (P=.81). The 5-year KM DR was highest among women with TNBC: 1.8% in luminal A, 5.0% in luminal B, 2.4% in luminal HER 2, 1.1% in HER 2, and 9.6% in TNBC cohorts (P<.001). Among 172 women with TNBC, the 5-year KM LRR were 1.3% with clear margins versus 12.5% with close or positive margins (P=.04). On multivariable analysis, factors that conferred higher LRR risk were tumors>2 cm, lobular histology, and close/positive surgical margins. CONCLUSIONS: The 5-year risk of LRR in our pT1-2N0 cohort treated with mastectomy was generally low, with no significant differences observed between approximated subtypes. Among the subtypes, TNBC conferred the highest risk of DR and an elevated risk of LRR in the presence of positive or close margins. Our data suggest that although subtype alone cannot be used as the sole criterion to offer postmastectomy radiation therapy, it may reasonably be considered in conjunction with other clinicopathologic factors including tumor size, histology, and margin status. Larger cohorts and longer follow-up times are needed to define which women with node-negative disease have high postmastectomy LRR risks in contemporary practice.

Treatment and outcomes in patients with primary cutaneous B-cell lymphoma: the BC Cancer Agency experience.

PURPOSE: To review the treatment and outcomes of patients with primary cutaneous B-cell lymphoma (CBCL). METHODS AND MATERIALS: Clinical characteristics, treatment, and outcomes were analyzed for all patients referred to our institution from 1981 through 2011 with primary CBCL without extracutaneous or distant nodal spread at diagnosis (n=136). Hematopathologists classified 99% of cases using the World Health Organization-European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (WHO-EORTC) guidelines. RESULTS: Median age at diagnosis was 62 years. Classification was 18% diffuse large B-cell leg-type (DLBCL-leg), 32% follicle center (FCCL), 45% marginal zone (MZL), and 6% nonclassifiable (OTHER). Of the 111 subjects with indolent lymphoma (FCCL, MZL, OTHER), 79% received radiation alone (RT), 11% surgery alone, 3% chemotherapy alone, 4% chemotherapy followed by RT, and 3% observation. Following treatment, 29% of subjects relapsed. In-field recurrence occurred in 2% treated with RT and in 33% treated with surgery alone. Of the 25 subjects with DLBCL-leg, 52% received chemotherapy followed by RT, 24% chemotherapy, 20% RT, and 4% surgery alone. Seventy-nine percent received CHOP-type chemotherapy (cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin or epirubicin, vincristine, prednisone), 47% with rituximab added. Overall and disease-specific survival and time to progression at 5 years were 81%, 92%, and 69% for indolent and 26%, 61%, and 54% for DLBCL-leg, respectively. On Cox regression analysis of indolent subjects, RT was associated with better time to progression (P=.05). RT dose, chemo, age>60 y, and >1 lesion were not significantly associated with time to progression. For DLBCL-leg, disease-specific survival at 5 years was 100% for those receiving rituximab versus 67% for no rituximab (P=.13). CONCLUSIONS: This review demonstrates better outcomes for indolent histology compared with DLBCL-leg, validating the prognostic utility of the WHO-EORTC classification. In the indolent group, RT was associated with 98% local control. DLBCL-leg is a more aggressive disease; the excellent results in the rituximab group suggest it has an important role in management.

Outcomes in patients treated with mastectomy for ductal carcinoma in situ.

PURPOSE: To examine, in a large, population-based cohort of women, the risk factors for recurrence after mastectomy for pure ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) and to identify which patients may benefit from postmastectomy radiation therapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Data were analyzed for 637 subjects with pure DCIS, diagnosed between January 1990 and December 1999, treated initially with mastectomy. Locoregional relapse (LRR), breast cancer-specific survival, and overall survival were described using the Kaplan-Meier method. Reported risk factors for LRR (age, margins, size, Van Nuys Prognostic Index, grade, necrosis, and histologic subtype) were analyzed by univariate (log-rank) and multivariate (Cox modeling) methods. RESULTS: Median follow-up was 12.0 years. Characteristics of the cohort were median age 55 years, 8.6% aged ≤ 40 years, 30.5% tumors >4 cm, 42.5% grade 3 histology, 37.7% multifocal disease, and 4.9% positive margins. At 10 years, LRR was 1.0%, breast cancer-specific survival was 98.0%, and overall survival was 90.3%. All recurrences (n=12) involved ipsilateral chest wall disease, with the majority being invasive disease (11 of 12). None of the 12 patients with recurrence died of breast cancer; all were successfully salvaged (median follow-up of 4.4 years). Ten-year LRR was higher with age ≤ 40 years (7.5% vs 1.5%; P=.003). CONCLUSION: Mastectomy provides excellent locoregional control for DCIS. Routine use of postmastectomy radiation therapy is not justified. Young age (≤40 years) predicts slightly higher LRR, but possibly owing to the small number of cases with multiple risk factors for relapse, a subgroup with a high risk of LRR (ie, approximately 15%) was not identified.

Treatment and outcomes of primary breast lymphoma.

PURPOSE: To evaluate treatment and outcomes in a population-based cohort of patients diagnosed with primary breast lymphoma. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Prognostic factors, management, and outcomes (local control, lymphoma-specific survival, and overall survival) were analyzed for all patients diagnosed with limited-stage, primary breast non-Hodgkin lymphoma (n = 50) diagnosed in British Columbia between 1981 and 2009. RESULTS: The median follow-up was 3.5 years; 64% presented with a breast mass. Histologic subtypes were indolent (n = 16 [32%]) or aggressive (n = 34 [68%]). Of those with indolent lymphoma, 81% had stage I, and 19% had stage II disease; 13% received no initial treatment; 75% received radiotherapy (RT) alone. One (6%) patient received surgical resection alone, and 1 (6%) patient received surgical resection in addition to RT. Of those with aggressive lymphoma, 62% had stage I and 38% had stage II disease; 3% received no initial treatment; 6%, RT alone; 38%, chemotherapy only; 41%, chemotherapy and RT; 9%, surgical resection alone; and 3%, surgical resection in addition to chemotherapy and RT. In patients with indolent and aggressive disease, 5-year local control estimates were 92% and 96%, lymphoma-specific survivals were 91% and 71%, and overall survivals were 75% and 54%, respectively. On univariate analysis, stage (I vs. II) (P = .006) and RT use (P = .032) were statistically significant predictors of improved overall survival in patients with indolent breast lymphoma. Combined chemoradiation was associated with a trend for improved overall survival (P = .061) in patients with aggressive disease. There were 4 cases of central nervous system relapse, all occurred in subjects with aggressive primary breast lymphoma. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with indolent breast lymphoma were most frequently treated with RT alone and achieved high rates of local control and survival. Patients with aggressive histology most often treated with chemotherapy, alone or combined with RT, had excellent local control but lower survival compared with indolent disease. Improved systemic therapies are needed to improve outcomes for patients with aggressive breast lymphoma.

Stage III non-small-cell lung cancer: population-based patterns of treatment in British Columbia, Canada.

INTRODUCTION: Management of Stage III non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) involves surgery, radiotherapy (RT), chemotherapy, and best supportive care. The aims were to describe the patterns of treatment in a population-based cohort of patients, and compare utilization of RT and chemotherapy to model estimates of need. METHODS: Patients diagnosed with Stage III NSCLC between January 1, 2000, to December 31, 2007, were identified from the British Columbia Cancer Agency database. Patients who had prior or concomitant malignancy were excluded. Patient demographics, tumor characteristics, and initial treatment were extracted. Survival data were derived from the British Columbia Vital Statistics Death Listings. RESULTS: 2365 patients with Stage III NSCLC were referred, of which 212 patients were excluded, leaving 2153 patients in the study population. Median age was 69 years. Disease stage was IIIA in 49% and IIIB in 51%. Histologies were squamous-cell carcinoma (31%), adenocarcinoma (27%), NSCLC not otherwise specified (31%), and other pathology (11%). Initial treatment included surgery in 12%, RT in 78%, and chemotherapy in 31%. Predicted RT utilization was 77% to 87% and chemotherapy 78%. From 2000 to 2007, curative-intent treatment increased from 21% to 35%, chemoradiotherapy from 8% to 18.6%, and concurrent chemoradiotherapy from 5.1% to 17.6%. Median survival was 30 months for patients who had curative surgery, 21 months for curative RT, 8 months for palliative treatment, and 5 months for best supportive care (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: RT utilization was similar to that predicted by models whereas chemotherapy utilization was less. During the study period, the proportion of patients receiving curative chemoradiotherapy doubled and of those receiving concurrent chemoradiotherapy trebled.

Limited M1 disease: a significant prognostic factor for stage IV breast cancer.

PURPOSE: The prognosis of patients with breast cancer presenting with distant metastasis can vary depending on disease extent. This study evaluates a definition of limited M1 disease in association with survival in a cohort of women presenting with metastatic breast cancer. METHODS: The study cohort comprised 692 women referred to the BC Cancer Agency between 1996 and 2005 with M1 breast cancer at presentation. Limited M1 disease was defined as <5 metastatic lesions confined to one anatomic subsite. Extensive M1 disease was defined as ≥ 5 lesions or disease in more than one subsite. Clinicopathologic and treatment characteristics and overall survival (OS) were compared between subjects with limited (n = 233) versus extensive (n = 459) M1 disease. Multivariable analysis was performed by Cox regression modeling. RESULTS: Median follow-up time was 1.9 years. Five-year Kaplan-Meier OS was significantly higher in patients with limited compared to extensive M1 disease (29.7 vs. 13.1 %, p < 0.001). In the multivariable Cox regression analysis, limited M1 disease was significantly associated with OS (hazard ratio 0.51, 95 % confidence interval 0.40-0.66, p < 0.001). The only patient subsets with limited M1 disease with poor 5-year OS <15 % were patients with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of ≥ 2 or estrogen receptor-negative status. CONCLUSIONS: Limited M1 disease, defined as <5 metastatic lesions confined to one anatomic subsite, is a relevant favorable prognostic factor in patients with stage IV breast cancer. This definition may be used in conjunction with other clinicopathologic factors to select patients for more aggressive systemic and locoregional treatments.

Absolute lymphocyte count is associated with survival in ovarian cancer independent of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes.

BACKGROUND: The immune system strongly influences outcome in patients with ovarian cancer. In particular, the absolute lymphocyte count in peripheral blood (ALC) and the presence of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL) have each been associated with favourable prognosis. However, the mechanistic relationships between ALC, TIL and prognosis are poorly understood. We hypothesized that high ALC values might be associated with stronger tumor immunity as manifested by increased TIL, decreased tumor burden and longer survival. METHODS: ALC values were collected from patient records ≥ 2 years before, during or after primary treatment for high-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSC). Lymphocyte subsets were assessed in peripheral blood by flow cytometry. CD8+ and CD20+ TIL were assessed by immunohistochemistry. RESULTS: Overall, patients had normal ALC values two or more years prior to diagnosis of HGSC. These values were not predictive of disease severity or survival upon subsequent development of HGSC. Rather, ALC declined upon development of HGSC in proportion to disease burden. This decline involved all lymphocyte subsets. ALC increased following surgery, remained stable during chemotherapy, but rarely recovered to pre-diagnostic levels. ALC values recorded at diagnosis did not correlate with CD8+ or CD20+ TIL but were associated with progression-free survival. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with high intrinsic ALC values show no clinical or survival advantage upon subsequent development of HGSC. ALC values at diagnosis are prognostic due to an association with disease burden rather than TIL. Therapeutic enhancement of ALC may be necessary but not sufficient to improve survival in HGSC.

Can locoregional treatment of the primary tumor improve outcomes for women with stage IV breast cancer at diagnosis?

PURPOSE: To examine the effect of locoregional treatment (LRT) of the primary tumor on survival in patients with Stage IV breast cancer at diagnosis. METHODS AND MATERIALS: The study cohort comprised 733 women referred to the British Columbia Cancer Agency between 1996 and 2005 with newly diagnosed clinical or pathologic M1 breast cancer. Tumor and treatment characteristics, overall survival (OS), and locoregional progression-free survival were compared between patients treated with (n = 378) and without (n = 355) LRT of the primary disease. Multivariable analysis was performed with Cox regression modeling. RESULTS: The median follow-up time was 1.9 years. LRT consisted of surgery alone in 67% of patients, radiotherapy alone in 22%, and both in 11%. LRT was used more commonly in women with age <50 years, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status 0-1, Stage T1-2 tumors, N0-1 disease, limited M1 burden, and asymptomatic M1 disease (all p < 0.05). Systemic therapy was used in 92% of patients who underwent LRT and 85% of patients who did not. In patients treated with LRT compared with those without LRT, the 5-year OS rates were 21% vs. 14% (p < 0.001), and the rates of locoregional progression-free survival were 72% vs. 46% (p < 0.001). Among 378 patients treated with LRT, the rates of 5-year OS were higher in patients with age <50, ECOG performance status 0-1, estrogen receptor-positive disease, clear surgical margins, single subsite, bone-only metastasis, and one to four metastatic lesions (all p < 0.003). On multivariable analysis, LRT was associated with improved OS (hazard ratio, 0.78; 95% confidence interval, 0.64-0.94, p = 0.009). CONCLUSION: Locoregional treatment of the primary disease is associated with improved survival in some women with Stage IV breast cancer at diagnosis. Among those treated with LRT, the most favorable rates of survival were observed in subsets with young age, good performance status, estrogen receptor-positive disease, clear margins, and distant disease limited to one subsite, bone-only involvement, or fewer than five metastatic lesions.

Intratumoral Immune Responses Can Distinguish New Primary and True Recurrence Types of Ipsilateral Breast Tumor Recurrences (IBTR).

Ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR) is an increasingly common clinical challenge. IBTRs include True Recurrences (TR; persistent disease) and New Primaries (NP; de novo tumors), but discrimination between these is difficult. We assessed tumor infiltrating leukocytes (TIL) as biomarkers for distinguishing these types of IBTR using primary tumors and matched IBTRs from 24 breast cancer patients, half of which were identified as putative TRs and half as NPs using a previously reported clinical algorithm. Intratumoral lymphocyte populations (CD3, CD8, CD4, CD25, FOXP3, TIA1, CD20) and macrophages (CD68) were quantified by immunohistochemistry in each tumor. Compared to matched primaries, TRs showed significant trends towards increased CD3(+) and CD8(+) TIL, while these populations were often diminished in NPs. Comparison of IBTRs showed that TRs had significantly higher levels of CD3(+) (P = 0.0136), CD8(+) (P = 0.0092), and CD25(+) (P = 0.0159) TIL than NPs. We conclude that TIL may be a novel diagnostic biomarker to distinguish NP from TR IBTRs.

Clinicopathologic factors of the recurrent tumor predict outcome in patients with ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence.

BACKGROUND: The role of clinicopathologic characteristics of the recurrent tumor in determining survival in a cohort of patients with ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR) was investigated. METHODS: Among 6020 women with pT1-T2, pN0-1, M0 treated with breast-conserving surgery from 1989 to 1999, 269 developed isolated IBTR. Ten-year Kaplan-Meier breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) and overall survival (OS), calculated from date of IBTR, were analyzed according to clinicopathologic characteristics. RESULTS: Factors that were associated with diminished OS and BCSS on univariate analysis were: time to IBTR ≤48 months, lymphovascular invasion positive status, estrogen receptor (ER) negative status, high grade, clinical IBTR detection, biopsy alone, and close/positive margins (all P < .05). On multivariate analysis, time to IBTR ≤48 months (hazard ratio [HR], 1.87, P = .012), lymphovascular invasion positive status (HR, 2.46; P < .001), ER negative status (HR, 2.08; P = .013), high-grade recurrent disease (HR, 1.88; P = .013), and close/positive margins after surgery for IBTR (HR, 1.94; P = .013) retained significance for prediction of diminished OS. When stratified according to number of adverse prognostic features, 10-year OS was 70.4% in patients with 1 factor, 35.8% with 2 factors, and 19.9% with 3 or more factors (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Time to recurrence ≤48 months, lymphovascular invasion positive status, ER negative status, high-grade histology, and close/positive margins in association with the recurrent tumor are independent prognostic factors for survival after IBTR. The presence of 2 or more of these features at recurrence is significantly associated with poor OS. These criteria can be used to prognosticate and guide clinical decisions after recurrence.

Subsets of women with close or positive margins after breast-conserving surgery with high local recurrence risk despite breast plus boost radiotherapy.

PURPOSE: (1) To examine the effect of surgical margin status on local recurrence (LR) and survival following breast-conserving therapy; (2) To identify subsets with close or positive margins with high LR risk despite whole breast radiotherapy (RT) plus boost. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Subjects were 2,264 women with pT1-3, any N, M0 invasive breast cancer, treated with breast-conserving surgery and whole breast ± boost RT. Five-year Kaplan-Meier (KM) LR, breast cancer-specific and overall survival (BCSS and OS) were compared between cohorts with negative (n = 1,980), close (n = 222), and positive (n = 62) margins. LR rates were analyzed according to clinicopathologic characteristics. Multivariable Cox regression modeling and matched analysis of close/positive margin cases and negative margin controls were performed. RESULTS: Median follow-up was 5.2 years. Boost RT was used in 92% of patients with close or positive margins. Five-year KM LR rates in the negative, close and positive margin cohorts were 1.3%, 4.0%, and 5.2%, respectively (p = 0.001). BCSS and OS were similar in the three margin subgroups. In the close/positive margin cohort, LR rates were 10.2% with age <45 years, 11.8% with Grade III, 11.3% with lymphovascular invasion (LVI), and 26.3% with ≥4 positive nodes. Corresponding rates in the negative margin cohort were 2.3%, 2.4%, 1.0%, and 2.4%, respectively. On Cox regression analysis of the entire cohort, close or positive margin, Grade III histology, ≥4 positive nodes, and lack of systemic therapy were significantly associated with higher LR risk. When close/positive margin cases were matched to negative margin controls, the difference in 5-year LR remained significant (4.25% vs. 0.7%, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: On univariable analysis, subsets with close or positive margins, in combination with age <45 years, Grade III, LVI, and ≥4 positive nodes, have 5-year LR >10% despite whole breast plus boost RT. These patients should be considered for more definitive surgery.

Ten-year locoregional recurrence risks in women with nodal micrometastatic breast cancer staged with axillary dissection.

PURPOSE: To compare the locoregional recurrence (LRR) rates in patients with nodal mirometastases (pNmic) with those in patients with node-negative (pN0) and macroscopic node-positive (pNmac) breast cancer; and to evaluate the LRR rates according to locoregional treatment of pNmic disease. METHODS AND MATERIALS: The subjects were 9,616 women diagnosed between 1989 and 1999 with Stage pT1-T2, pN0, pNmic, or pNmac, M0 breast cancer. All women had undergone axillary dissection. The Kaplan-Meier local recurrence, regional recurrence, and LRR rates were compared among those with pN0 (n=7,977), pNmic (n=490) and pNmac (n=1,149) and according to locoregional treatment. Multivariate analysis was performed to identify the significant factors associated with LRR. RESULTS: The median follow-up was 11 years. The 10-year Kaplan-Meier recurrence rate in the pN0, pNmic, and pNmac cohorts was 6.1%, 6.8%, and 8.7% for local recurrence; 3.1%, 6.2%, and 10.3% for regional recurrence; and 8.0%, 11.6%, and 15.2% for LRR, respectively (all p<.001). In the pNmic patients, the 10-year regional recurrence rate was 6.4% with breast-conserving surgery plus breast radiotherapy (RT), 5.4% with breast-conserving surgery plus locoregional RT, 4.6% with mastectomy alone, 11.1% with mastectomy plus chest wall RT, and 10.7% with mastectomy plus locoregional RT. In patients with pNmic disease and age<45 years, Grade 3 histologic features, lymphovascular invasion, nodal ratio>0.25, and estrogen receptor-negative disease, the 10-year LRR rates were 15-20%. On multivariate analysis of the entire cohort, pNmic was associated with greater LRR than Stage pN0 (hazard ratio [HR], 1.6; p=.002). On multivariate analysis of pNmic patients only, age<45 years was associated with significantly greater LRR (HR, 1.9; p=.03), and trends for greater LRR were observed with a nodal ratio>0.25 (HR, 2.0; p=.07) and lymphovascular invasion (HR, 1.7; p=.07). CONCLUSION: Women with pNmic had a greater risk of LRR than those with pN0 disease. Patients with pNmic in association with young age, Grade 3 histologic features, lymphovascular invasion, nodal ratio>0.25, and estrogen receptor-negative disease experienced 10-year LRR rates of ∼15-20%, warranting consideration of locoregional RT.

True recurrence versus new primary: an analysis of ipsilateral breast tumor recurrences after breast-conserving therapy.

PURPOSE: Ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR) can occur in 5-20% of women with early-stage breast cancer treated with breast-conserving therapy. Two entities of IBTR have been described: true recurrence (TR), suggested to be regrowth of disease at the tumor bed, and new primary (NP), distinct from the index lesion in histology and location. This study compared survival outcomes between two patient cohorts classified clinically as having either TR or NP. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Between 1989 and 1999, 6,020 women were referred to the BC Cancer Agency with newly diagnosed pT1-2, N0-1, M0 invasive breast cancer, treated with breast-conserving surgery. Of these, 289 patients had pathologically confirmed IBTR. Retrospective analysis was performed, and a set of decision rules was applied to classify cases as TR or NP based on change in histology, grade, hormone receptor status, and tumor location. Of 289 patients, 129 (45%) were classified as having TR and 139 (48%) as having NP; 21 (7%) were unclassified. RESULTS: The distributions of age at diagnosis, age at recurrence, and histopathologic factors were similar in the TR and NP cohorts (all p > 0.05). The mean time to recurrence was shorter in TR patients than in NP patients (4.8 years vs. 6.3 years, p = 0.001). Treatment of the IBTR did not differ between the two groups. In the TR and NP cohorts, breast cancer-specific survival was 55.7% vs. 61.3% (p = 0.93), and overall survival was 43.7% vs. 54.8% (p = 0.53). CONCLUSIONS: Time to recurrence is significantly shorter in patients with IBTR classified as true recurrence compared to new primary. Non-statistically significant trends for less favorable survival were observed for patients with TR. Further investigation of the hypothesis that TR and NP tumors are distinct entities with different survival prognoses will require standardized pathology review and molecular analyses.